Causatives in Minimalism Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (LA) Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (LA) provides a platform for original monograph studies into synchronic and diachronic linguistics. Studies in LA confront empirical and theoretical problems as these are currently discussed in syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, and systematic pragmatics with the aim to establish robust empirical generalizations within a universalistic perspective. For an overview of all books published in this series, please see http://benjamins.com/catalog/la General Editors Werner Abraham Elly van Gelderen University of Vienna / Arizona State University Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Advisory Editorial Board Josef Bayer Christer Platzack University of Konstanz University of Lund Cedric Boeckx Ian Roberts ICREA/Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Cambridge University Guglielmo Cinque Lisa deMena Travis University of Venice McGill University Liliane Haegeman Sten Vikner University of Ghent University of Aarhus Hubert Haider C. Jan-Wouter Zwart University of Salzburg University of Groningen Terje Lohndal University of Maryland Volume 179 Causatives in Minimalism by Mercedes Tubino Blanco Causatives in Minimalism Mercedes Tubino Blanco University of Sonora, México John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam / Philadelphia TM The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of 8 American National Standard for Information Sciences – Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Tubino Blanco, Mercedes. Causatives in Minimalism / Mercedes Tubino Blanco. p. cm. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, issn 0166-0829 ; v. 179) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Causative (Linguistics) 2. Minimalist theory (Linguistics) I. Title. P292.B53 2011 415’.6--dc22 2011014033 isbn 978 90 272 5562 4 (Hb ; alk. paper) isbn 978 90 272 8659 8 (Eb) © 2011 – John Benjamins B.V. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. John Benjamins Publishing Co. · P.O. Box 36224 · 1020 me Amsterdam · The Netherlands John Benjamins North America · P.O. Box 27519 · Philadelphia pa 19118-0519 · usa To Kip (twice) Table of contents Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and symbols xv Introduction xvii chapter 1 Contrasts in causatives 1 1. Contrasts in causatives 1 2. Variation in lexical causatives: The causative-inchoative alternation 1 3. Variation in productive causatives 5 chapter 2 Theoretical framework 11 1. Introduction 11 2. Introducing Pylkkänen (2002, 2008) 11 2.1 The data 11 2.2 The lexical vs. productive distinction 12 2.3 Causation and the causer 13 2.3.1 Causation: An argument increasing phenomenon? 14 2.3.2 The interpretation of the causer-less causatives 15 2.3.2.1 The adversity interpretation: Japanese 15 2.3.2.2 The desiderative interpretation: Finnish 16 2.3.3 Concluding, causers are not intrinsic to causation 21 3. Pylkkänen’s pieces of causation 21 3.1 The syntax and semantics of Cause 21 3.1.1 Pylkkänen’s Cause 22 3.1.2 Cause: A little history 23 3.1.2.1 Larson’s VP-shells 23 3.1.2.2 Light verbs and complex predication 24 3.1.2.3 Light verbs with null phonological content 25 3.1.2.4 Different ‘flavors’ of v 26 3.1.3 Summary 28 3.2 Kratzer’s (1994, 1996) Voice 29 viii Causatives in Minimalism 4. Pylkkänen’s Voice-bundling parameter 33 4.1 Voice and Cause: Two different functional heads 33 4.2 The Voice-bundling parameter 34 5. Selection 36 5.1 Cause is parameterized for selection 36 5.1.1 Marantz (1997): Acategorial roots 37 5.1.2 The Selection parameter 39 5.2 Summary 44 6. Voice-bundling and selection working in tandem 44 6.1 Voice-bundling + Root selecting 45 6.2 Non-Voice-bundling Cause and embedded agents 47 6.3 Summary 48 6.4 Pylkkänen’s predictions 49 7. Discussion and conclusion 50 chapter 3 Exploring Root causatives 53 1. Introduction 53 2. Hiaki lexical causatives 54 2.1 Causatives in Hiaki 54 2.2 Japanese 55 2.3 Hiaki lexical causatives 57 2.3.1 Hiaki lexical v : Root selecting 58 CAUSE 2.3.2 Hiaki is non-Voice-bundling 65 2.3.3 Summary 67 2.4 Hiaki and Japanese lexical causatives contrasted 67 2.4.1 Unergatives do not root-causativize in Hiaki 67 2.4.2 The adversity interpretation of transitive die 72 2.5 Other suppletive forms in Hiaki 78 2.5.1 A case study: die crosslinguistically 79 2.5.2 Suppletion in lexical causatives 80 2.5.3 Kill as a suppletive lexical causative 82 2.6 Summary 84 3. Root causativization of unaccusatives and Voice-bundling 85 3.1 Suppletion cannot explain all cases 87 3.2 Testing unaccusativity 88 3.2.1 break 92 3.2.2 arrive and appear 93 3.2.3 break vs {arrive/appear} 94 3.3 The locative element 94 3.4 Word order and pro-loc in Romance 96 Table of contents ix 3.5 The deictic component and Voice-bundling 99 3.6 There-construction and locative inversion 103 3.7 Potential problems 105 3.7.1 Leave vs arrive 105 3.7.2 Japanese 109 3.8 Summary 111 4. Conclusion 112 chapter 4 English causatives with make: The role of agreement in causatives 115 1. Introduction 115 2. English productive causatives: Make 116 2.1 English v has different flavors 116 CAUSE 2.2 English make: Phase-selecting v 117 CAUSE 2.2.1 The concept of phase for Pylkkänen 117 2.2.2 On phases 118 2.2.3 VoiceP as a phase: Introductory ideas 119 2.3 Diagnostics 121 2.3.1 Internal VP modification 122 2.3.2 Intervening verbal morphology 123 2.3.3 Agentive modification under make 124 2.3.4 Intervening high applicative morphology 125 2.3.5 Causatives of unergatives and transitives 126 2.3.6 Unaccusative causatives 127 2.4 Summary 129 3. VoiceP is a phase 129 3.1 Passives contain VoiceP 129 3.2 Actives contain VoiceP: Evidence from ellipsis 132 3.3 The complement of make 136 3.5 Summary 143 4. Passive causatives with make 143 4.1 Passive make 144 4.2 A preliminary analysis 147 4.3 The nature of to in passive causatives 148 4.3.1 Hornstein et al. (2006) 148 4.3.2 Santorini & Heycock (1988) and Higginbotham (1983) 150 4.4 The role of T(ense) features in Agree relations: Pesetsky & Torrego 154 4.4.1 The auxiliary do is an instance of T in C 154 4.4.2 That is an instance of T in C 155 4.4.3 Two types of T 156
Description: