Cattle Inspection. PDF
Preview Cattle Inspection.
es na i nal; liation origiublic e p e to thof this Cattle Inspection are truersion aks nt v Committee on Evaluation of USDA Streamlined Inspection System for Cattle (SIS-C) e brehe pri age t Ps ng files. Please u settied. Food And Nutrition Board peert ys Institute of Medicine ginal tally in National Academy of Sciences orient e d hci m tac on ot frbee ne k, av oh boy er ma papors original phic err he gra m tpo y d frome t eo eatd s es crd, an m XML file retaine d fronot b en sa oc mper, ov ce ew n rho eeg, bn as atti hm work c for al cifi ne origig-sp of the esettin n p ntatioher ty esed ot w digital reprng styles, anattribution. e: This neaks, headiersion for About this PDF filengths, word brehe authoritative v NWataisohnianlg Atocna,d Dem.Cy. 1P9r9e0ss lt es na ii nal; liation origiublic National Academy Press 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418 e p e to thof this NdcorOamwTmnICi ftEtreo:em T r hethsep epo crnoosjuiebnclcte it lhfso aort fti hsth eteh r eeN psaoutrbitoj enwcaetl r oAef cctahhdoises merenyp f ooorfrt Stwhcaeisier n ascppepesrc,o itvahlee dc No bmayt pitohenteea Gnl cAoevcse aardnnedimn wgy i Btohof arEerndgg aoirfnd et hfeoerri Nn agap,tp iaornondpa rlti haRetee Is nbesaatlriactunhtc eCe .oofu nMcield, iwcihnoes. eT mhee mmbeemrsb earrse of the are truersion memTbehriss oref pthoert Nhaasti obneeanl Arecvaideewmeyd obfy Sac giernocueps ,o tthheer N thaatino nthael Aauctahdoerms ayc ocfo rEdninggin teoe rpirnogc,e adnudr etsh ea pInpsrotivtuetde boyf Ma Redeipcoinrte R.eview Committee consisting of aks nt v sionsT inh et hIen setxitaumtei noaf tMioned oifc ipnoel iwcyas m cahtatretresr epde ritna i1n9in7g0 tboy t hthee h Neaalttiho noafl tAhec apduebmlicy. oIfn Sthciise,n tchees Itnos etintulitset adciststi nugnudiesrh beodt hm tehme bAercsa doef mthye' sa 1p8p6ro3p crioanteg rpersosfioesn-al e brehe pri cShaamrtueerl rOes.p Tohniseirb iilsi tpyr etosi bdee natn o af dtvhies eInr sttoi ttuhtee foefd Mereadl igcoinvee.rnment and its own initiative in identifying issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. age t This study was supported by contract no. 53-3A94-9-06 from the Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Ps etting files. d. Please u LICnoitbeprrynararigtyiho otn f©a Cl 1So9tna9gn0rd ebasrysd t ChBeao tNoaklao tNigo unCmaalbr Aedrc N0a-do3e.0 m990y--0 6o42f3 8S41c57i-eXnces ypesserte Tphhoet oco.ver photo was taken by Larry LeFever of Grant Heilman Photography, Inc., 506 West Lincoln Avenue, Lititz, PA 17543, which provided the ginal tally in Additional copies of this report are available from: National Academy Press 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418 orient S228 e d No part of this book may be reproduced by any mechanical, photographic, or electronic process, or in the form of a phonographic recording, nor hci m tac may it be stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, or otherwise copied for public or private use, without written permission from the publisher, except on for the purposes of official use by the U.S. Government. ot frbee Printed in the United States of America ne k, av oh boy er ma papors original phic err he gra m tpo y d frome t eo eatd s es crd, an m XML file retaine d fronot b en sa oc mper, ov ce ew n rho eeg, bn as atti hm work c for al cifi ne origig-sp of the esettin n p ntatioher ty esed ot w digital reprng styles, anattribution. e: This neaks, headiersion for About this PDF filengths, word brehe authoritative v lt es na iii nal; liation origiublic e p e to thof this Committee on Evaluation of USDA Streamlined Inspection System for Cattle are truersion Committee aks nt v ROBERT F. KAHRS (Chairman), Dean, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri e brehe pri HELEPNen nMsy. lAvaCnLiaAND, Associate Professor of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, age t ROGER G. BREEZE, Director, USDA-ARS Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, New York Ps GRAHAM C. CLARKE, Chief of National Programs, Meat and Poultry Products Division, Food Production and Inspection Branch, ng files. Please u DFAORNRAAEgLLrDic uRMl.t u. RrKeOI CNBaSInNMaSdAOaN,N O, ,P ttCraowhfieaes,f s Ooornf tE aTmriooex,r iiCctuoaslno, agDdyae pSaerrtmviecne,t oAf nAimniaml aDl Sisceiaesnec eD, Uianginvoesrtsiict yL oafb Coroantonreyc,t icSucth, oSotol rorsf, CVoentenreincatircyu tMedicine, ettid. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana se peert ys ginal tally in Consultants orient STANLEY M. MARTIN, Chief of Statistical Services Activity, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, he cid Georgia m tac J. GLENN MORRIS, JR., Associate Professor of Internal Medicine, Division of Geographic Medicine, University of Maryland School ot frobeen MORoRf IMS eEd.i PciOneT,T BEaRlt,i mEpoirdee, mMiaorlyolgainsdt, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia ne k, av oh boy Study Staff er ma papors FARID E. AHMED, Project Director, Food and Nutrition Board original phic err FRANCES M. PETER, Editor, Institute of Medicine he gra m tpo y d frome t eo eatd s es crd, an m XML file retaine d fronot b en sa oc mper, ov ce ew n rho eeg, bn as atti hm work c for al cifi ne origig-sp of the esettin n p ntatioher ty esed ot w digital reprng styles, anattribution. e: This neaks, headiersion for About this PDF filengths, word brehe authoritative v lt es na iv nal; liation origiublic e p e to thof this Food and Nutrition Board are truersion RICHCAaRlifDor nJ.i aHAVEL (Chairman), Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, aks nt v DEDOWNAINL DL. B B. IMERcCMOARNM, DICivKi s(iVoinc eo fC Mhaeitrambaonli)s,m D, eEpnadrtomcreinnto olof gByi,o acnhde mNiusttrryit,i oEnm, Uornyi vUenrsiviteyr soifty W Sacshhoionlg otof nM Secdhiocionl eo, fA Mtlaendtiac,i nGee, oSregaitatle, e brehe pri EDWWAaRsDhi nJg. toCnALABRESE, Environmental Health Program, Division of Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Pagse t Massachusetts ng files. Please u DDMOe.RWR.CIITS. TGH GR. CEOAEONLDLWMOOAWONAD, YI, nU, sUtniintvuievtere sroistfiy tH yo ufo mfC Caanlai lfNiofurontrriniati,ia oD, nBa, veCrisko,el uClemaylb,i fiCao arUnliinfaoivrneirasity, New York, New York ettid. JOAN D. GUSSOW, Department of Nutrition Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York peserte JOHN E. KINSELLA, Institute of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York ys LAURENCE N. KOLONEL, Cancer Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii ginal tally in RWEAYLNTAELRD MOE MRATRZ,T OHRumELanL ,N Fuotoridt iRone sReaersceha rIcnhs tiCtuetnet, eSr,t aAnfgorridc uUltnuirvael rsRiteys,e Sartacnhf oSredr,v Cicael,i fUor.nSi.a Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, orient Maryland he cid MALDEN C. NESHEIM, Office of the Provost, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York m tac JOHN LISTON (Ex Officio ), Division of Food Science, School of Fisheries, College of Ocean and Fishery Sciences, University of ot frobeen ARNWO aGsh. iMngOtoTnU, LSSeaKttYle ,( EWxa Oshffiincgioto),n Center for Inherited Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington ok, nhave ROYC Mal.i fPoIrTniKaIN (Ex Officio), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, boy er ma papors Staff original phic err CSHAITRHLEERYI NAES HE,. FWinOaTnEciKalI ,S Dpeirceiactloisrt he gra UTE HAYMAN, Administrative Assistant m tpo y d frome t eo eatd s es crd, an m XML file retaine d fronot b en sa oc mper, ov ce ew n rho eeg, bn as atti hm work c for al cifi ne origig-sp of the esettin n p ntatioher ty esed ot w digital reprng styles, anattribution. e: This neaks, headiersion for About this PDF filengths, word brehe authoritative v lt es na PREFACE v nal; liation origiublic e p e to thof this PREFACE are truersion aks nt v e brehe pri age t Ps Since the early 1900s, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been responsible for mandatory federal meat inspection ng files. Please u pFinrosoopgder caatminosdn, wNphruoitcgrihrta iromenms .Ba Tionhaeerdd Feososfoe dnth tieaan lNdly a Nutinuoctnrhaiatli noAgnec daB dioneamtrody 'ts h oerf e 1cS9oc8mi0emsn. ceIennsd 1a(9tNi8oA0n,Ss U )w SteoDr eAc o'rsne Fdleouaocstde dsS caiinfeen tttywif aiocn dree vIpnaoslruptase tciptoiuonbnsl iSoshef revidtis c ienm (eF1a9St8 IS5an) adan sdkp eo1du9 ltt8hry7e ettid. (NRC, 1985a, 1987a). se peert Meanwhile, FSIS worked to modernize inspection in high speed slaughter operations through streamlined inspection systems e original tydentally ins a(ppSnrrooIdSpp )tooo.ss Teeaddhs esrrisuuseltl e est ,hyi nseF t SetahmIgeSes nF awcesydek'resee rd ta irnlat hntRresoe idtgFiuiooscntoee ddrto ita noan dNem noNosvurueertme rp ibtmuieobornl ri 1ecB 9 eh8ofe8faai rcl(dtiFh eetn-odot .r uieResvneeat gleouidfsa tti.ien,n ss1Spp9Iee8Scc8 tti;ifo ooAnnr .pp cpTeaerhtnstelodeyni xn(i nSeAilIt,S) i.at- otCIe nh)d e rfeSlopsIr pS ion aindcnsuc eesp tpitrlotyoa tbqt oiupl ielbtasyent ictoasons ma sn aernd am ipsaoelutrdbee rl ainesbafhofteiiucvdtie ett nhhttoee, hci traditional slaughter inspection. om tn ac This six member committee was convened under the auspices of the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) Food and Nutrition Board not fre bee (inFcNluBd)e din ecxopnejrutns ctiino nb wioisttha ttihstei cNs, ateiopnidael mRieosloeagryc,h mCeoautn csicli'se n(cNeR, Cm) eBato airnds poenc tiAong,r icpuultbulrice . hTehael thc,o mvmeteitrtienea rayn dp aittsh otlhorgeye , covnetseurlitnaanrtys k, av microbiology, and veterinary toxicology. booy h The committee was charged with the following tasks: er ma papors (cid:127) Evaluate SIS-C as compared to the traditional cattle inspection system and its acceptability as an alternative to traditional original phic err (cid:127) Pcaeanrtdftl otewr msola opunlga hnstitetser o irpneesvpriaeetwcintsigo o naf.s tpwiolo th sigtuhd vieosl ufomre S cISat-tCle. slaughtering plants (establishments) operating under traditional inspection he gra (cid:127) Survey procedures for monitoring chemicals and pathogens in carcasses. m tpo (cid:127) Examine how this proposed system has integrated recommendations in the 1985 and 1987 reports, which called for FSIS to d frome ty panu risdueea ln mewea st ciinesnpteifcitci odni rpercotigornasm, .address contemporary public expectations for meat and poultry products, and work toward eated so (cid:127) Evaluate efficacy of SIS-C in protecting the public's health. es crd, an m XML file retaine d fronot b en sa oc mper, ov ce ew n rho eeg, bn as atti hm work c for al cifi ne origig-sp of the esettin n p ntatioher ty esed ot w digital reprng styles, anattribution. e: This neaks, headiersion for About this PDF filengths, word brehe authoritative v lt es na PREFACE vi nal; liation origiublic The committee received an overview of SIS-C from FSIS management, heard testimony from eight witnesses at a public hearing, e to the of this p acnodm mtDhieutntre ievn igas litstheoed ri ret hqprureeeess etSenIdtSa a-tCinod np r itelooc ett hipvele acdno tamsd admnitiditot etnwea,o lF dtSraaItSad ifstritooamnffa liFlnySd IiiScna s(tpAeedpc pttehedan tdp tilrxaa nBdtis)t..i oAnlatlo ginestpheecr,t iiotn m perto csiexd utirmese sw. eTrhe rsoeurgvhinogu ta tsh teh est ubdasye, lithnee are truersion fmoirc rmoobdiaelr noirz icnhge miniscpaelc ctioonnt aamndin aasn tas aspnrdi ntghbaot airtd i sf onro ft uatu Hrea izmarpdr oAvneamlyesnitss .C FrSitIiSca el mCpohnatrsoizle dP otihnatt (SHIAS-CCC iPs ) nporto ag rsaymst ebmu t,f orra tdheetre,c tiisn ga aks nt v spienrgsolen nsetel pi nt oqwuaalridty tchoonsetr oglo aanlsd. iFnS pIrSe sreengtaartdiosn SoIfS -cCar caass saens ainnndo pvaartitvs ef osry isntesmpe ctthioant ,i daenndt iifniecso rcpoonratrtoesl sptoaitnisttsi,c ainl csraemaspelse su asned o tfe sptsla tnot e brehe pri moniStoIrS p-Cro ddiufcfetsr sa nfrdo tmhe t rsaldauitgiohntearl pinrospceecssti.on in several ways. In traditional inspection programs, FSIS inspectors incise the bile ducts, Pagse t heart, cheek muscles, and numerous lymph nodes seeking visible lesions. Inspectors are responsible for condemnation and disposition ng files. Please u onrefos npdcoiosnnesfaiobsreimldit aycn afcorecrsa .ds srUeessns.d ienFrgS ISnSoI Sni-cnCos,np fepoclrtamonrtas n ecamelsspo la oniyddee ednset isfiiyng cnaiasnteed d t hstuerip mehrmevaiarsbte l eat nhcdeo nctdhriietmieokmn simn (gus esoec flCe sch,a arppcotaessris te3ios) n. w FpSitaIhrS ts vl eafaroidroe urissn hsdippre ecbstesoilrniseg,v eadsne dtfhe acatts sst huaemnsdee ettid. conditions can be recognized by personnel with limited experience, are susceptible to market pressures, and are the responsibility of peserte plant management. Under SIS-C, however, inspectors are still responsible for condemnation and disposition of diseased carcasses and ys still examine every head, viscera, and carcass. ginal tally in contrIonl (cPoQnjCun) cptiroong rwamit.h SSIISS--CC/P, QplCan ptsr okgirllaimngs mreoqruei rteh athne 2 p7l5a ncta ttotl ei dpeenrt ihfyo ucro mnturoslt phoavinet sa, efostrambalils hw rsittatnend,a rcduss,t oamndi zteadk,e p aacrttiioaln sq uwahlietyn orient FSIS-supervised monitoring reveals that standards are unmet. Plants unable to implement SIS-C/PQC successfully must operate at he cid chain speeds below 275 cattle per hour. m tac The SIS-C system is currently in effect in five pilot plants conducting high speed, high volume slaughter of fed steers and heifers ot frobeen —tha na 1cl,a3s0s0 o Uf SaDniAm-ailn swpiethct elodw c aptrtleev asllaeungceh toefr pcolanndtist iwonosu ldde bteec tealbigleib bley ftorra dSiItSio-nCa lw mereea tt hien sppreocptoiosned p rruolcee dimurpelse.m Aepnpterodx.imately 80 of more ok, nhave advocTahtees ,e itghhet m sepaeta kinedrsu swtryh,o foaoddd rienssspeedc ttohres , cfoomrmmeirt tUeeS DduAr isncgi etnhteis tpsu abnlidc inmsepeetcitnogr sh, ealndd onna tiJoannaula aryss o2c3i,a t1io9n9s0 ,( Arepppreensednixte Cd ).c oSnosmume oerf er bomay tuhnewiri lltiensgtnimesosn yto clriisttiecniz etod tFhSe ISsc ifeonrt ifpicr evcoiomums udneiftiyc,i efnocri erse luinc tainncsep etcot ioimn pprorovger aitms st,e cfhonr olfoagiliucr ec atpoa ceitmy,p hfaosri zfea ilpuureb litco ihnecaolrthp,o rfaoter papors recommendations original phic err he gra m tpo y d frome t eo eatd s es crd, an m XML file retaine d fronot b en sa oc mper, ov ce ew n rho eeg, bn as atti hm work c for al cifi ne origig-sp of the esettin n p ntatioher ty esed ot w digital reprng styles, anattribution. e: This neaks, headiersion for About this PDF filengths, word brehe authoritative v lt es na PREFACE vii nal; liation origiublic in previous Food and Nutrition Board reports, and for fundamental flaws in SIS-C. Several speakers criticized SIS-C because e to the of this p rapenrsodpf oiitsn csnoiobntis liifdteyea rsfaiobtril oeqn ubsa.e lcWitayui tcsneoe nsitstr eorsel qaiusls igorei vsste aindt eetdoa ltm hcaaotnn SadgIitSeimo-Cnes ni sti nof lfae wvmeeerday t bppellacananutt ssa.e n Tdhh eirased qa,u bvidrisieccsae tprialoa,n na,t n itde m wcaparslco sayaseisde s,i n ctsoopm epcpltaricooemn tiahsreees p atulhlbe cl iiocnm teipngrtreoirtmyes iost efa dFb SoanvISde are truersion tchoemrep oiusn dneod absys usrtaanffc er edthuactt iocnosm apnadn yin cpreerassoendn epla paerrew oprrko pfeorrl yt hetr iimnsmpeincgti ocno nfotarcmei.n Tatheed oaprienaios n fwroams ecxaprrceasssseeds . thTaht eSsIeS -pCr olbalcekms sc leaarer aks nt v rationMale satta tienmduesnttrsy orfe gporeasles natnadti vdeesf inqiutieosntiso nfoerd i tUs SsaDmAp-lFinSgI Sp'lsa nasb ialnitdy tthoa tr seogluidla tsec iepnlatinfti cq duaatlait ysu cpopnotrrtoinl gp trhoogsrea mplsa.n Ts haerey asbusgegnet.sted that e brehe pri clear Mguoisdte wlinitense asnseds a epmpepahla psrizoecde dcuornesc earrne anbeoeduet dm iifc trhoeb igaol vaenrndm cehnetm aiscsaul mceosn ttahmisi rnoalnet.s. The committee had to deal early with the real Pagse t distinction between safety and quality because FSIS contends SIS-C is not designed to detect and remove these contaminants. The FSIS ng files. Please u cphreevmeTinchta epl ucrboelsmiicdm ueiext tpemoeso uvnriiestio ttroeid nr getsh iprderuoee gSsr.aISm pwilohte tphlearn tisn (tirna dTietixoansa, lC oorl oSrIaSd-oC, apnladn Ntse ibsr adseksai)g naendd ttow op rtoravdiditei oinnaclildye nincsep eincfteodrm palatinotns (—in nToetx atos ettid. and Kansas). Its findings from these site visits are summarized in Appendix D. The committee interviewed 24 lay food inspectors, 6 peserte inspectors in charge, 5 veterinarians, 5 supervising veterinarians (including one area supervisor), 7 representatives of plant ys management, and 9 plant quality control personnel. ginal tally in commFirtoteme rtehcee iovuetdse stw, iotr nw aafsf iadpapvaitrse natn dth laett tpereso pfrloem w ienrsep eccotnocresr annedd vaebtoeuritn aforioadn ss awfhetoy ,w mereea dt iasinldlu spioounletdry w iinthsp SeIcSti-oCn ,( saened A SpIpSe-nCd.i xT hEe) orient and many letters from one veterinarian who was formerly an FSIS employee. The committee was also bombarded with testimony, he cid many other letters, information, undocumented anecdotes, newspaper clippings, and dogmatic statements assailing SIS and blaming it m tac for imperfections in meat and poultry inspection programs. Much of this input implied that the public expects the government to ensure ot frobeen zceornot armisikn aotifo mn eoaft -rbaowrn em edaist eiass ei ntehvriotuabglhe iannspde cntoio mn.e Tnthioe nc oomf mthiet tecer uhceiaalr dr olliett loe f efvoidoedn hcea ntdhlaitn gth, ep rpeupbalriact iiosn a, waanrde stehravt insogm mee bthaocdtesr iianl ok, nhave limitiTnhge f ocoodmbmorinttee de isweaasse sc.hosen for its diversity and scientific credibility. Because of its charge, it considered only commentary er bomay rperleesveanntitn tgo oSpIiSn-iCon. sI ta wnda sr eac ochmamlleenngdea ttioo nsso.r Bt tehcraouusgeh o tfh teh ee mlaoctkio onfs h, aprodl iqtiucaanl tmitaottiivvea tdioatnas,, hidden agendas, and vested interests of people papors original phic err he gra m tpo y d frome t eo eatd s es crd, an m XML file retaine d fronot b en sa oc mper, ov ce ew n rho eeg, bn as atti hm work c for al cifi ne origig-sp of the esettin n p ntatioher ty esed ot w digital reprng styles, anattribution. e: This neaks, headiersion for About this PDF filengths, word brehe authoritative v lt es na PREFACE viii nal; liation origiublic it was difficult to separate perception from fact. This complex controversial issue abounds with unsubstantiated accusations, subjective e to the of this p dospepeaincliiinfoignc s wc, haitanhrd gp edo.e uAelptlr tyeh moinuo gtoihon netha eol fir netvhpoeo lrvet aedrmeliaeelnrs t rsoe. npTloyhr etws ci(otNhm RbmCeie,tf t 1ece9a 8tdt7ildae) i stwlsa hubegenhs tt iettr o b alenilsditee vSneI dSca -tCrhe,ef uythl lhey a,c dot oma pbmpel iictctreaiettii coaandl dltyro e asbnseeaedlyf tssioclamaule,g ahrnetedcro tmaon madd edtnhrdeea sFtsi SothnISes are truersion missiConh.a pTtheer c1o (mthme itEtexee chuotpivees tShuem rempaorryt )i ss ufamirm aanrdiz wesi llt hsee rcvoem thmei btteeset' si ncthearergstes, ofifn tdhien gAsm, ceorinccalnu spieoonpsl, ea.nd recommendations. Chapter 2 aks nt v pexroavmidineess a tnh ein ptrroodpuocsteido nS aISnd-C a rhuilsitnogr,i ci tos vreartvioienwal eo,f amnde aitt si npsopteecnttiioanl aimndp apcutb olinc ccoonnscuemrnesr sa.b Touhte fsotoadti sstaicfeatly p. rIonc Cedhuarpetse ru 3se, dth ien cSoImS-mCi tateree e brehe pri danisacluyszsee dm iicnr oCbhiaoplotegri c4a.l Csahmapptleers 5is c pornetsaeinnste ad dinis cAupspsieonnd ioxf Fm. iCcrhoabpitoelro g6i cdaisl caunsds etso xhiocwol othgeic parl odpaotsae. dA SnI Sex raumlep lceo uolfd h hoawv et oi nccoolrlpecotr aatnedd Pagse t recommendations in the earlier Food and Nutrition Board reports. A Glossary of terms and acronyms can be found in Appendix G. The ng files. Please u aafdfmiliianTtihisoetnr acsto iamvnedm s miutptaepjeoo rcr tor eomsfem taherecn hdc osi nmtthemer eiatststessei s'ostf aw nccooermk, m,h Faitrrtdaen ewc meosre kPm,e batenerrd s f soaurnp depd osittraitn fofg fa trthhee ep rFreepNsoeBrnt t,se tadanf idfn: B DAarpr.bp Faearnardi diMx E aHt. o.As hfmore tdy,p fionrg tthhee odrogcaunmizeantito.nal and ettid. The committee expresses its appreciation to FSIS personnel for expediting facility visits and providing data, to all the plant peserte personnel who extended hospitality, and to all the witnesses who testified at the public hearing. The committee is also grateful to the ys anonymous USDA inspectors and veterinarians and many plant employees who volunteered time and shared their concerns. ginal tally in effortA tso cphroaidrumcaen a, nI oabljseoc ttihvaen akn dth tei mcoelmym reitptoeert mone ma bceornst raonvde rcsioanl ssuulbtajnectst tahnadt itsh eai rs memalpl lpoayret rosf; ath meya jvoor lnuanttieoenraeld i scsouuen —tle stsh eh osaufrest ya nodf orient the food supply. e d hci m tac on ot frbee ne k, av oh ROBERT F. KAHRS, CHAIRMAN boy er ma COMMITTEE ON EVALUATION OF USDA STREAMLINED INSPECTION SYSTEM FOR CATTLE papors original phic err he gra m tpo y d frome t eo eatd s es crd, an m XML file retaine d fronot b en sa oc mper, ov ce ew n rho eeg, bn as atti hm work c for al cifi ne origig-sp of the esettin n p ntatioher ty esed ot w digital reprng styles, anattribution. e: This neaks, headiersion for About this PDF filengths, word brehe authoritative v lt es na CONTENTS ix nal; liation origiublic e p e to thof this CONTENTS are truersion aks nt v e brehe pri age t Ps ng files. Please u 1 ExeCcoumtimvei tsteuem cmhaarrgye, its response, and its conclusions 13 ettid. Recommendations 6 se peert ys ginal tally in 2 IntArobdsutrcatciton and Historical Review of Meat Inspection 88 orient Historic food safety concerns and early meat inspection legislation 8 he cid Developments after the Meat Inspection Act of 1906 9 m tac Emergence of HACCP as a model inspection system 13 on ot frbee Contemporary public concerns about meat inspection 14 ne Conclusions 15 k, av oh er bomay 3 The Proposed SIS Rule 16 original papphic errors RASAIanbSt si-otoCrvna ecaprtlovesi etamwndo a rantsedsm uc moinmpstmpioeecnntsit oaornfy t hoen rSuIlSin-gC and the slaughter PQC program 11116679 he gra Streamlined inspection procedures 19 m typo Cervical/head inspection 19 d frome t Viscera and carcass inspection 22 eated so Uniform presentation standards 23 es crd, an CarScpaescs idfirce sesqiunigp rmeqenuti raenmde fnatcsilities 2233 d from XML filnot be retaine FAImSsspICSeaos cdsntia snotuagfm SitnehI rSess -uwCph pooonlre tcs ooofnm stheunem epesrsros op, foi ntshsepede crcautorlcirnasg sasn adn pdl apnrotsduct 22224677 sean Inspectors 28 oc mper, Plant managers and employees 29 coev Conclusions and recommendations 29 ew n rho eeg, 4 Statistical Considerations 34 bn as atti Abstract 34 hm work c for RUastei oonf aCleU sSuUppMo rftoinr gp rthoec ecshsa cnognet rforolm AQL to SIS 3345 al cifi The sampling basis for CUSUM 36 ne origig-sp Discussion 38 of the esettin n p ntatioher ty esed ot w digital reprng styles, anattribution. e: This neaks, headiersion for About this PDF filengths, word brehe authoritative v lt
The list of books you might like
