CATHOLIC PENTECOSTALISM Anybody with the gift of tongues speaks to God, but not to other people; because nobody understands him (St. Paul, i Co. 14:2) CATHOLIC PENTECOSTALISM René Laurentin TRANSLATED BY MATTHEW J. O’CONNELL Doubleday & Company, Inc. Garden City, New York ^77 Original edition: Pentecotisme chez les Catholiques: Risques et Avenir, © Editions Beauchesne, 1974. Excerpts from The Jerusalem Bible, copyright © 1966 by Darton, Longman & Todd, Ltd. and Doubleday & Company, Inc. Used by permission of the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Laurentin, Rene. Catholic Pentecostalism. Translation Pentecotisme chez les catholiques. Bibliography: p. 204 1. Pentecostalism—Catholic Church. I. Title. BX2350.57.L3613 282 ISBN: 0-385-12129-6 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 76-18358 Translation Copyright © 1977 by Doubleday & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America First Edition GiFT -HP*! c.^ Contents INTRODUCTION 7 Chapter 1 The Birth of Catholic Pentecostalism 11 Chapter 2 From Pentecostalism to Neo-Pentecostalism 18 Chapter 3 “Baptism in the Spirit” and “Charisms” 2Ö Chapter 4 Speaking in Tongues 58 Chapter 5 Healings IOO Chapter 6 The Charismatic Movement in Church History 132 Chapter 7 Sources and Meaning: An Explanation M7 Chapter 8 Dangers 163 Chapter 9 Importance and Future of the Charismatic Renewal 178 Chapter 10 Mary, Model of the Charismatic 192 CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE 201 BIBLIOGRAPHY ON CATHOLIC NEO-PENTECOSTALISM 204 NOTES 223 4 6 2 2 4 O Holy Spirit . . . who art present in the Church and dost infallibly guide it, pour forth, we pray, the fullness of Thy gifts upon the Ecumenical Council. . . . Renew Thy wonders in this our day as by a new Pentecost.1 Pope John xxm Jesus is preparing for his Church great things that we cannot even imagine. Perhaps you will see the beginnings of it all. The Holy Spirit is invisibly at work. We must have unconditional confidence in the work of the Holy Spirit.2 Jacques Maritain The fresh breath of the Spirit. . . has come to awaken latent energies within the Church, to stir up dormant charisms, and to infuse a sense of vitality and joy . . . which makes the Church youthful. . . in every age.3 Pope Paul vi Introduction “They speak in other tongues.”1 They go in for “healing.” They are followers, more or less, of the “pentecostal sects.” Such are some of the most common impressions abroad of the Catholic Neo-Pen- tecostal movement, which is called “The Charismatic Renewal” in the United States and “Renewal in the Spirit” or “Spiritual Re newal” in France. The most accurate names for the movement have come in for criticism and therefore been more or less abandoned. The result? A confusion that is all the greater, since “charismatic group” today can refer to people of quite varying allegiances. We must try to dissipate the confusion and focus clearly on one important point: After less than ten years, Catholic pentecostalists number a half million in about a hundred countries. You hear of the gathering near where you live—in the Montparnasse chapel, in the crypt of Saint-Sulpice, or in a neighbor’s house in Paris or else where in the country. Somewhat uneasy about approaching a group of initiates and wondering whether you may be getting involved in unusual rites, you go to observe them. You find no reticence, a warm welcome, no prejudice shown, no questions asked. Chairs are set up in concentric circles, the innermost having about a dozen chairs and stools. After the greeting, the meeting gets under way, not following a preconceived plan or externally imposed di rection, but depending for its course on what the members contrib ute. Scripture readings, brief exhortations or teachings, and witness- ings alternate with singing and spontaneous prayer. All express themselves freely, whether individually or in groups, in words or in 4 6 224 8 Introduction song, and yet no one ever interrupts anyone else—not even in. France! At times all speak or sing at once, each with his own rhythm and in his own tongue, but this happens by common con sent. The harmony that marks these improvisations is surprising. Is it a grace flowing from the receptiveness of each person to the others? Or from the presence of the Spirit to whom each member of the group is attending? At times, the group you visit may be one that has established a community in which everything is shared: money, housing, projects. The more penetrating studies conducted by psychologists, theolo gians, pastors of various confessions, and bishops (especially by sev eral national episcopal conferences) have concluded with positive judgments on the movement, even though those conducting the studies may often have begun with a strong bias against it. I was struck by the favorable, even enthusiastic reaction of a physician psychoanalyst who asked if he might accompany me to a meeting. And yet those who look at the movement from outside feel appre hensive and even fearful about it. Theirs is the reaction people often have to novelties that promise to be permanent and threaten to cause changes in their Eves. At the same time, these negative judgments can be quite contrary to one another. The traditionalists fear destructive innovations, the establishment of a charismatic hierarchy, new “ecumenical confu sions,” and the manipulation of these naive groups by political leftists. The progressives, on the contrary, fear that the mysticism of the charismatics may lead to a dispersal of forces, or enable con servative clerics to gain control again, or even become the Trojan horse of traditionalism. Integrists see the movement as the means of Anglo-Saxon Protes tant infiltration. But American Protestant circles see it rather as a marginal manifestation of the counterculture: “Just another ‘revival’ in a long series, all of them ephemeral because based on collective emotion. Another example of sentimental womanish mysticism.”2 In such a judgment we can see the usual armory of epithets being brought to bear: fundamentalism, illuminism, emotionalism, elitism, etc. Does the movement with its impressive growth have a purely psychological explanation? Is it from God? From the devil? All three hypotheses have been defended. Introduction 9 Is it a new delusion, or the new Pentecost that John XXIII antici pated at the beginning of the Council? This book has been written to answer these questions. But why still another book? The writer must admit right off that it satisfies a long-frustrated urge of his. After the Council, when I was looking about for “signs of the times,” I became interested in Catholic Pentecostalism as early as 1967, the very year of its birth. On August 8 of that year, I spoke with Father Edward O’Connor of Notre Dame, one of the founders of the movement, at the Mari- ological Congress in Lisbon, and he told me: “I see in this move ment the future of the Church.” He had me believing him. But then he became so discreet as to say nothing more about the movement. I asked for further informa tion, but he simply sent me his article on the subject, published in the fall of 1967, with a covering note: “I let you have this provided you do not say anything about it in print.” The reason for his reserve was that if news about the movement spread too soon, it might militate against the slow germination of an experience that is so difficult for the outsider to appreciate. The result was that I remained quiet and kept my eye on what was happening. I came into direct contact with the movement again and took part in charismatic gatherings on my journeys to the United States (1970) and England (1971) as well as in France itself. Once the whole business became public knowledge, I published two articles on it in Le Figaro (January 21 and February 18, 1974). Letters to me raised a lot of questions, especially since a third article was not published and the first two had appeared only in abridged form. In June 1974, I felt I had to return to the fountainhead of the move ment and so I attended the international conference at Notre Dame, at which thirty thousand charismatics gathered (June 14-16). From there I went to visit charismatic communities at Ann Arbor, New Orleans, Houston, and in Canada. As I went about seeking information, I was also engaged in theo logical reflection on the Holy Spirit in preparation for an (un published) course at Quebec (July 1974). In the course I tried to show the convergence of three approaches to the Spirit: that of dogma, that of symbolism (especially biblical symbolism), and that of practice (from the Pauline Church of Corinth down to contem porary movements). The theme was a new one, and quite fascinat ing, since with few exceptions (and even these were less serene than io Introduction they appeared on the surface) the movements centering on the Spirit had never been placid affairs. They have always found it dif ficult to strike a balance between radicalism and dullness, rebellion and the status quo. I intend this book as a contribution from a theologian and histo rian who is also a professional religious journalist. I want to bring together the many scattered items of information and to deal with them historically and doctrinally, while also being open to the in terdisciplinary contributions of the human sciences (sociology, psy chology, linguistics). My aim is to discover the meaning and direc tion of the movement. Previous studies have usually been written inside and for the movement itself. The present book presents the viewpoint of a par ticipating observer (in this matter, participation is a prerequisite for understanding), while keeping the distance needed for objective in vestigation. Where did the Catholic Neo-Pentecostal movement come from? What do Church authorities think of it? (Chapters i and 2). Which is more fundamental: baptism in the Spirit or experience of the charisms? (Chapter 3). What of the two most striking charisms: speaking in tongues (Chapter 4) and healings (Chapter 5)? What are the historical antecedents of the new movement? (Chapter 6). How explain the movement? (Chapter 7). What are the risks it runs? (Chapter 8). In what direction is it moving? (Chapter 9). These are the questions that need answering.