ebook img

Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne PDF

172 Pages·2015·4.04 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne

ROYAL COMMISSION INTO INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSES TO CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE Public Hearing - Case Study 35 (Day C130) County Court of Victoria 250 William Street, Melbourne, VIC On Tuesday, 1 December 2015 at 10am Before The Presiding Member: Justice Peter McClellan AM (Chair) Commissioner: Justice Jennifer Ann Coate Mr Andrew Murray Counsel Assisting: Ms Gail Furness SC Mr Stephen Free .01/12/2015 (C130) C13698 Transcript produced by DTI 1 MS FURNESS: Thank you, Your Honour. 2 3 <ARCHBISHOP DENIS JAMES HART, on former oath: [10.05am] 4 5 <EXAMINATION BY MS FURNESS CONTINUING: 6 7 MS FURNESS: Q. Archbishop, do you still have your 8 statement with you. I do, yes. 9 10 Q. Yesterday I was asking you questions about the 1989 11 set of grievances, remember those questions, that were sent 12 by concerned staff to -- 13 A. Yes, yes, I remember that, yes. 14 15 Q. If you could continue down that page on your statement 16 to subparagraph (h), page 20, paragraph 136. 17 A. Thank you, yes, I have it. 18 19 Q. You refer there to further complaints in 1991, and you 20 set out those complaints and they include putting 21 children's heads on his knee, hitting an altar boy and 22 observing boys going through showers at camp and 23 misappropriating money. 24 25 Then, over the page, you report a further complaint, 26 this time in 1993, that Searson had started a fire and 27 encouraged children to throw material on the fire. 28 29 You go on, in paragraph 137 to say that most of the 30 complaints were known to the CEO, the Vicar-General or the 31 Archbishop. 32 33 In circumstances where the Auxiliary Bishop was 34 responsible for this area, you would expect also, wouldn't 35 you, that those complaints would have come to his attention 36 one way or another? 37 A. I don't have any knowledge. One would expect that, if 38 anything was going on, the Auxiliary Bishop would have 39 had - would have been brought up to speed with it, but 40 that's only a conjecture that I make. 41 42 Q. Well, it's more than conjecture, isn't it, it's based 43 on your understanding and practice that an Auxiliary Bishop 44 in a region -- 45 A. Yes, I would have understood that, yes. 46 47 Q. That he would know, as a matter of your practice and .01/12/2015 (C130) 13699 D J HART (Ms Furness) Transcript produced by DTI 1 experience, given the nature of these complaints, and that 2 they were known to the Vicar-General and Archbishop? 3 A. Well, that would certainly have happened - certainly 4 happen in my time. 5 6 Q. You then refer to a further serious incident in 1993, 7 when it was alleged that Searson had held a knife to a 8 girl's chest; do you see that? 9 A. That's right. 10 11 Q. And again, you note that the documents record that the 12 Vicar-General, Archbishop and the Curia were aware of the 13 matter; you see that in your paragraph? 14 A. That's right, yes. 15 16 Q. Therefore, each member of the Curia would have 17 knowledge of that incident if indeed the Curia -- 18 A. That was a very significant incident and I would have 19 imagined they would have been aware of it. 20 21 Q. I beg your pardon? 22 A. I would imagine they would have been aware of it. 23 24 Q. Well, you don't need to imagine if the documents 25 record that the Curia knew, do you? 26 A. Yes. 27 28 Q. Advice was then sought from a firm of solicitors after 29 the knife incident. Perhaps if we can have tab 113 of the 30 Searson bundle on the screen; that's the document you 31 referred to in your third line, Archbishop, of 32 paragraph 139. 33 A. That is correct. 34 35 Q. Perhaps if we can turn to the last page, which is 36 page 3. You understand that the various matters recorded 37 in the files have been considered by the lawyers. 38 A. Correct. 39 40 Q. Then, in the final paragraph, it begins: 41 42 None of these comments ... disclose any 43 evidence which would justify a charge ... 44 in relation to sexual offences. 45 46 As you would understand from having read this 47 document, the advice that was sought was in relation to .01/12/2015 (C130) 13700 D J HART (Ms Furness) Transcript produced by DTI 1 criminal charges? 2 A. That is correct. 3 4 Q. And the evidence is that this letter of advice 5 concerns criminal charges? 6 A. Correct. 7 8 Q. Whether or not a criminal charge could or couldn't be 9 made against Father Searson is not something that would be 10 determinative of any action the church could take? 11 A. No, it would not. 12 13 Q. A quite different standard of proof, quite different 14 rules and procedures? 15 A. That would be right. 16 17 Q. And maybe, if there was a conviction, the church could 18 take action following the conviction, but by no means was a 19 conviction or even a charge necessary for the church to 20 take action? 21 A. You've put that correctly, yes. 22 23 Q. Moving down that paragraph, the second sentence 24 begins: 25 26 However, the fact that over the years a 27 number of suggestions have been made from a 28 number of different people that there is 29 something untoward about Father Searson's 30 behaviour with children is, in my view, 31 sufficient to warrant some investigation of 32 his conduct in view of his position of 33 responsibility to the children in his 34 parish. 35 36 A. That is correct. 37 38 Q. You understand what the lawyers are advising in this 39 case is an investigation? 40 A. Yes. 41 42 Q. Into Searson's conduct in respect of sexual matters? 43 A. Yes. 44 45 Q. That never happened, did it? 46 A. No. 47 .01/12/2015 (C130) 13701 D J HART (Ms Furness) Transcript produced by DTI 1 Q. But there's no doubt that that was what was being 2 suggested? 3 A. Exactly. 4 5 Q. You refer, at paragraph 141, to a canonical warning 6 that was made in respect of Searson; do you see that at 7 paragraph 141? 8 A. I see that, yes. 9 10 Q. You understand, I think, that the canonical warning 11 was in respect of relatively minor conduct, given the 12 nature of the complaints against him? 13 A. I would have understood that, yes. 14 15 Q. In June 1994, it came to the attention of the Curia 16 another matter in respect of Father Searson, and that's at 17 tab 131 of the Searson bundle. 18 19 You see, this is the minutes of a Curia meeting on 20 3 June 1994? 21 A. Correct. 22 23 Q. There's reference, firstly, at topic 16 on page 3, see 24 under the heading, "Special Issues - meeting with Corrs"? 25 A. Yes. 26 27 Q. In those days "special issues", as you understand it, 28 was a euphemistic term to deal with child sexual abuse 29 allegations against the clergy? 30 A. That is correct. 31 32 Q. The reference there is that the recommendation from 33 the lawyers is: 34 35 an appropriate person review all clergy 36 files, and that the handling of special 37 issues be the responsibility of a senior 38 priest. 39 40 This is 1994, and that's before you had any specific 41 responsibility in this area, isn't it? 42 A. That is correct, yes. 43 44 Q. You weren't attending the Curia at this time? 45 A. No. 46 47 Q. Did it come to your attention, either when you began .01/12/2015 (C130) 13702 D J HART (Ms Furness) Transcript produced by DTI 1 as Vicar-General or before, that this happened? 2 A. I certainly have some memory - if I may say two 3 things: I certainly have some memory of a conduct document 4 sent out to all the clergy in 1995. In my preparation for 5 this appearance, I did find interim guidelines as to how 6 accusations of sexual abuse should be dealt with. 7 8 Q. You note at the end of that item: 9 10 It was agreed that Fathers Fleming and 11 Waters should review the ... files. 12 13 A. Yes. 14 15 Q. Who were Fathers Fleming and Waters in 1994? 16 A. Father Fleming was the former rector of Newman College 17 at the University of Melbourne, a Jesuit. When he ceased 18 that appointment, he came as personal assistant to 19 Archbishop Little, and he brought his wide experience and 20 so on. 21 22 Father Ian Waters was the judicial vicar of the 23 Regional Tribunal, and he had commenced working as 24 assistant to Monsignor Cudmore. Father Waters is a 25 canonist. 26 27 Q. Did you see the outcome of a review of clergy files 28 when you began? 29 A. No. 30 31 Q. Would you expect to have seen it, had it occurred, 32 given your role as Vicar-General a couple of years later? 33 A. I would have expected that there would have been some 34 record passed on, but there wasn't, and I haven't seen any 35 record subsequently. 36 37 Q. Turning over the page on these minutes to item 8, this 38 is a reference to Father Searson having sought permission 39 to conduct an exorcism. Do you see that? 40 A. Yes. 41 42 Q. Is that something that was common in the Archdiocese? 43 A. Normally exorcism is conferred for a person who is 44 burdened or under some spiritual influence, evil spiritual 45 influence; it's normally only given rarely and at the 46 direction of the Diocesan Bishop. 47 .01/12/2015 (C130) 13703 D J HART (Ms Furness) Transcript produced by DTI 1 Q. And it's given at the direction of the Diocesan Bishop 2 for the priest seeking it to carry it out in respect of the 3 person they wish to be exorcised? 4 A. I've always had the practice of having someone who has 5 knowledge of psychology and knowledge of - deep spiritual 6 knowledge and holiness; I've always chosen a priest that 7 I've appointed, rather than just a particular priest asking 8 might they do it. 9 10 Q. At the time that Searson's conduct was coming to the 11 attention of the Archdiocese, there were indeed a number of 12 canonical steps that could have been taken in respect of 13 his conduct, weren't there? 14 A. Yes. 15 16 Q. One of them was in relation to canon 1740, which you 17 will recall provides for the removal of any pastor when his 18 ministry becomes harmful or ineffective -- 19 A. Yes, I mentioned that yesterday, I think, without 20 naming the canon. 21 22 Q. Perhaps if I can read it in full: 23 24 The removal of any pastor when his ministry 25 becomes harmful or ineffective for any 26 cause even with no grave negligence and 27 there is no need to find fault. 28 29 Those circumstances, that is, a harmful or ineffective 30 ministry, clearly applied to Searson? 31 A. Yes. 32 33 Q. And it applied to him, no doubt, in 1994? 34 A. Yes. 35 36 Q. But also, when the first serious complaints were 37 coming through about his conduct with children? 38 A. Yes. 39 40 Q. Indeed, financial mismanagement may be sufficient to 41 give rise to the exercise of the rights under that canon? 42 A. Correct. 43 44 Q. That canon was never used in respect of Father 45 Searson; that's right? 46 A. Not that I know of. 47 .01/12/2015 (C130) 13704 D J HART (Ms Furness) Transcript produced by DTI 1 Q. If it were to be used, what would be the process that 2 would be followed? 3 A. Well, normally the Bishop would document what is - you 4 know, what is the accusation or what is the problem. He'd 5 then look at the effect on people. Because, this is all 6 geared to the care of souls, and that canon means that the 7 care of souls is being impeded, and therefore something has 8 to be done for the good of people. 9 10 The Bishop would then document what the problem is, 11 what the effect on people is. He's required to consult two 12 priests from a stable group - I have a stable group of six 13 selected from the Council of Priests, and he has to consult 14 two of them, and they have to read the Acts and they should 15 normally meet with the Bishop to present their 16 observations, and then he would issue, first, a notice of 17 intent, giving a certain number of days to reply, and then 18 after that he would issue his decree. 19 20 Q. Yesterday, you referred to the list of grievances and 21 particularly those in relation to children; you remember 22 that? 23 A. I do. 24 25 Q. It's the case, isn't it, that just that list alone in 26 relation to children could give rise to canon 1740? 27 A. I would have thought so. 28 29 Q. Those alone would satisfy canon 1740, wouldn't they? 30 A. Yes. 31 32 Q. There's also canon 1741, which provides examples in 33 respect of the removal of a priest, and they include: 34 35 Loss of good reputation among upright and 36 responsible parishioners or an aversion to 37 the pastor which it appears will not cease 38 in brief time. 39 40 Now, that applies in full measure to Searson, doesn't 41 it? 42 A. It does. 43 44 Q. And certainly did so by 1989, if not earlier? 45 A. Oh, yes. 46 47 Q. Can you help us, notwithstanding you weren't there at .01/12/2015 (C130) 13705 D J HART (Ms Furness) Transcript produced by DTI 1 the time, why you think, having read all the documents, 2 nothing was taken in that direction with Searson? 3 A. I would have to rever that matter or lay that matter 4 at the feet of the Archbishop; that he seemed to have an 5 aversion to using these procedures of removal; he tried to 6 work by consensus, and of course you wouldn't be getting 7 consensus in that situation and, therefore, nothing that I 8 know of was done and this had a tremendous impact on people 9 and endangered children. 10 11 Q. It's the case, isn't it, that the Curia were aware of, 12 according to your review of the documents, at least some of 13 the complaints that had been raised by the Catholic 14 Education Office through the Vicar-General and the 15 Archbishop? 16 A. From reading the documentation, that's very clear. 17 18 Q. It would be within the role of the Curia - in fact, 19 one might say a necessary part of the job of the Curia - to 20 raise such matters? 21 A. I would have thought so. 22 23 Q. You would expect, from your experience, that the use 24 or availability of these canons would be a matter of 25 discussion in the Curia? 26 A. I certainly would have thought so. 27 28 Q. There would be, among the Curia, those trained in 29 canon law? 30 A. At that stage Bishop O'Connell was an Auxiliary Bishop 31 and he had a doctorate in canon law. 32 33 Q. Even if there was no person trained in canon law, the 34 availability of this measure, I suggest, would have been 35 known to those among the Curia, at least some of them? 36 A. Well, I certainly would have thought so. I mean, when 37 problems arise - and I won't go on about this - but when 38 problems arise, you certainly look to see what are the 39 options that can be done for the good of people and for the 40 good of - not only for the good of people at large, but 41 also often for the welfare of a person themselves who can't 42 see how their way of acting is harmful. 43 44 Q. So a lack of insight? 45 A. Yes. 46 47 Q. In paragraph 148 of your statement, if I can take you .01/12/2015 (C130) 13706 D J HART (Ms Furness) Transcript produced by DTI 1 to that, you refer there to "until that time", that is, 2 when you took over as Vicar-General, I understand? 3 A. That's right. 4 5 Q. You: 6 7 ... had no knowledge of the problems with 8 Searson or the many complaints ... 9 10 You say there that you had been appointed 11 Vicar-General on 1 September 1996 and Archbishop Pell was 12 Archbishop some two and a half months before you became 13 Vicar-General. 14 A. Yes. 15 16 Q. He in fact appointed you as his Vicar-General, didn't 17 he? 18 A. He did. 19 20 Q. And that was a promotion, I take it, for you at the 21 time? 22 A. Well, I think that's the way it's regarded; it's a way 23 of serving the church and trying to lead as I could and 24 should. 25 26 Q. Well, you regarded it as such too, I suspect? 27 A. Yes. 28 29 Q. You say that he briefed you in broad terms concerning 30 the problems of sexual abuse by clergy. Can you help us 31 with that briefing? 32 A. He would have - by that time, of course, a number of 33 things would have been in the newspapers. He briefed me, 34 indicating that something needed to be done about this 35 problem, again in general terms, and that he was 36 contemplating and engaged in discussions to set up a system 37 which would deal independently with the investigation of 38 complaints, which would provide counselling and medical 39 help and which would also provide some financial redress. 40 It was in those general terms that what he was thinking of 41 doing because the problem was emerging quite strongly. He 42 didn't take me through a whole lot of cases or anything 43 like that. 44 45 Q. How did he describe the problem to you? 46 A. Well, that some priests were abusing children; I think 47 that's how - it was as simple as that. .01/12/2015 (C130) 13707 D J HART (Ms Furness) Transcript produced by DTI

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.