NEW OF SEDGE A SPECIES (CYPERACEAE). CYRTOSTACHYA CAREX CALIFORNIA NEVADA OF THE ENDEMIC TO SIERRA R Janeway Lawrence Zika Peter F. Herbarium The Chico State WTU Box 355325 Herbarium, Chico State University, California Washington of University 95929-0515, U.S.A. California Chico, Washington 98195-5325, U.S.A. Seattle, [email protected] Ranger Feather River District Plumas National Forest U.SA. 95965, California 875 Mitchell Avenue, Oroville, [email protected] Ahart Lowell Wilson Barbara L. Road Ahart 9771 Group Working Carex 95966, U.S.A. NW California Oroville, 377 Alta Vista Drive 1 [email protected] Oregon 97330, U.S.A. Corvallis, [email protected] Nevada of California. Detail •a been puzzled by a sedge resem- have Nevada California of northern Sierra workeK of the Several in ihe llora from on the basis of which Olney ex W. Boon, but differa it im bling Curex ntendurinensis & Atan Oswald Oaneway 1992; species and coast range habitats of that and from the coastal disjunct is we them here describe populations, studying the Sierran After Taylor 2010). Oswald CUfton 2003, 2005; 2002; 1968 by G. Ledyard Stebbins. was in new collected as a species. first It & 2A, 3A-B, 5) nov. (Fig?. Janeway Zika, sp. 1, Carex cyrtostacliya m, 5 Aug 2011, Zika 25715 6- Pinkard Creek drt mi SE Sugar Pine Point, 2 of Road 20N03 (Mooreville Ridge Road), air DM f,OSC,RSA). CHSC, WTU; BRU, CAS, isotypes; Janeway (HOLorYre: Ahart, Wilson, and longer widely spaced perigynia, CarexortosrnchyadiffersfromCarexmendocinensisinitsmorenexuousdistalla cul^ (stems) with root hairs Tertile rnT'ce^I, brown, not densely felted lort rhizomes; roots with Hapless, wtth mm sheaths scale-hke. smooth on the angles; basal trigonous, cm wide, 20-132 0.4-2.3 long, and green sheaths the red-brown, above red-purple, grading into dark purple, rale veins scabrouSHtillate, mm long 5-80(-142) culm; sheatte on lower of mostly half Letwes (2-)3-5, bearing blades. upper these of green to whitish, often blade) (opposite sheath faces green, the h^dy glabrous to scabrous, culm, clasping of Texas Journal of the Botanical Research Institute 7(1) “ l- U- V-shaped, dilate, fragile; ' apex (mouth) or scabrous, the glabrous or with red or purple, dotted cm 0.5-42 blades rounded cliate; acuminate, occasionally apex acute or "hau wide, longer long, on scabrous ad- strongly occasionally W-shaped in cross-section, S-4 5f-6')mmwide V- or flat loTna l-3paleprominentabaxialveir«,ttm,ginsscabrousd«^^^^^ with smooth, axWurfacenearligule,otherwi« see vegetative shoots, sheaths of pseudoculms (overlapping leaf shoots; shoots similar to fertile Vegetative mm J Ptoxtmal 2.5-5 wide. basal leaves 4-6 cm with 3-6 leaves, the larger Remtcek 1986) tall, mflorescence.5.5-^5cmong, exceeding than blades shorter to .be withsheaths(2.5-)6-42mm long, bracts im ^rescimees 5-47 much long, reduced, mm bracts gUbmus or slightly dilate, the distal wide, mm 0.9-2.5 on peduncles 17-171 spikes proximal lateml staminate; terminal spike .be the spikes pistillate, lateral Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 7(1) mm long, the portion exserted from the sheath 10-1 14 long (rarely the proximal spike branching once from the & basal Janeway 9080 CHSC, pistillate scale, Rubtzoff 7088 Howell CAS); lateral spikes solitary at the nodes, arching, often drooping at maturity on smooth flexible, or slightly scabrous peduncles, the two proximal 2-28 mm spikes separated by cm, the distal spikes overlapping, on peduncles 5-25 long, rarely termi- sessile; mm nal spike erect on peduncle 5-26 Spikes long. 3-6, the lateral spikes pistillate (very rarely androgynous) mm mm cylindrical, 18-93 long, 2-5.7 with mm thick, (10-)14-29 perigynia attached 0.7-3.5(-6) apart the mm mm terminal spike staminate, 10-64 & long, 1.1-2.3 thick, rarely gynecandrous 7088 Howell (Rubtzoff CAS)and the lower half staminate.PistiUate scales usuallyshorter than mature perigynia, obovate to oblong- mm obovate, (2.2-)3-4.8(-6.8) long including glabrous or awn, ciliate acute, rounded or notched apex at from (apart awn), glabrous with ciliate or erose margins distally, white-hyaline or faintly marked with red- brown, uncommonly mm awn red-spotted; (0-)0.5-2.2(-3.1) long; midrib broad, brown green, aging with 1-3 vems, ramly with sparse bristles Staminate distally. scales densely overlapping, clasping at base, oblan- mm ceolale to oHong-obUnceolate. 4-6.9(-8) bng, acme, roumled, or rrotched at apex, hyaline with green midvetn, ^abrous, the proximal mm with awn scales prominent mm 0.5-3(-5) Anthem long. 18-3 long 3, a^x s tg t y ctlmte at (40x1 Pengyma erect-ascending or oppressed when mm mature, (3.2-)3.8-5.8 mm long, 1-1.8 s1. y_,wide, bases gradually narrowed mm to darker stipes 0.3-0.6 long; body * flattened-trigonous ± mrop View, Cribbed and Bnely 12-15-vei„e4 ^ p s or purple membranous, dots, glabrous, gradually mm tapered to beak; beak (0.5-)0 7-1 4 Inno ^ (measured from mm inflection point); apical teeth obscure, 0.2-0.6 long on often ciliate nr h^t .u Ache^ mm (nutlets) 1.9-2.7 long (not including mm XT remnant style orstipeU.1-1.6 wide trigoZl 7 f ‘ by perigynium naniZ brown pale ® “ cvnZt ^0“ aTr'" fro" Cumx r.cessTons of """ waxycuticleandtheouterpericlinXXlhhr^f^^^^^^^ Z“" Cure., mcndociitensis (unZT "P“'“ Warent. tends to have many °7i papillae papillae often occupieda smaller percena^of*empZr''T7"''’'7' .ended robe narrowandwithout':n.meS t“*^^^^^^ 77 faces were simiUr for the two 7l “chene species 4C F sur- (Fig those of C. hirtissinta w. ' “..hene surfaces Boott (Waterway also resembled 1990a, Fig.V 7 7 Iro^fuM exposure. Imnges 7Zion *P™*ng on and elevation "P"^" terraces on more "“h ZwTn mesic samratedsoil, wel7' soils. a! Cur« cyr,mmcl.ya commonly grows in the shade wood of & & Am.) Torr. A. Gray, Corylus cornuta Marshall, Lithocarpus densiflorus (Hook. Rehder, Pinus contorta & Douglas ex Loudon, lambertiana Douglas, ponderosa Douglas ex Lawson C. Lawson, sabiniana Doug- P. P. P. & las ex D. Don, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, Quercus durata Rhododendron occidentak (Torr. A. Jeps., & Gray) A. Gray, Rulms armeniacus Focke, R. laciniatus Willd., and R. leucodermis Douglas ex Torr. A. Gray. Some Herbaceous associates are diverse, corresponding to variation in soil moisture. typical associates are Adenocaulon bicolor Hook., Agrostis palkns Trin., A. sccAra Willd., Aquikgiaformosa Fisch. ex DC., Carex ampli- C W. W. folia Boott, C. bolanderi Olney, C.feta L.H. Bailey, C. hirtissima Boott, laeviculmis Meinsh., C. lemmonii Boon, C. pachystachya Cham, ex Steud., C. stipata Muhl. ex Willd., Circaea alpina L., Equisetum arvense L., E. Geum hyemale Fragaria vesca Galium bolanderi A. Gray, macrophyllum Willd., Hieracium albiflorum L., L., & & & Hook., Juncus effusus L. subsp. pacificus (Feraald Wiegand) Piper Beattie, exiguus (Femald Wiegand) J. & Lint ex Snogerup Zika, laccatus Zika, trijormis Engelm., Linnaea borealis L., Luzula comosa E. Mey. var. J. J. laxa Buchenau, L. parviflora (Ehrh.) Desv., Mimulus moschatus Douglas ex Lindl, Pteridium aquilinum (L.) & Kuhn, Rhynchospora capitellata (Michx.) Vahl, and Scirpus microcarpus Presl C. Presl. J. — Etymology. Carex cyrtostachya, or arching sedge, is named for its a ving or pendulous (jcyrto-) pistillate spikes (-stachya). — The Distribution. range of Carex cyrtostachya limited the northern is to Sierra northern high Sierra Nevada geographic subdivisions (Baldwin from Do et 2012), El al. Yuba and Butte counties, California (Fig. 5). Populations of C. cyrtostachya are discontir on the western slopes of the Sierra Nevada, with one cluster of populatio Yuba adjacent County, and the other in El Dorado County. Only 13 populations have been documented, most them No of quite small, within an area of 120 x 30 km. populations have been found in the intervening Placer, Nevada, or Sierra counties. Arching sedge is thus a narrow endemic, restricted to just three counties in Califor- nia. There are 12 other endemic Carex species in California (Mastrogiuseppe 1993, Zika 2012, Zika et 2012), al. as well as additional endemic members of the Cyperaceae, such as the recently described Eleocharis torticulmis Sm., S.G. restricted to a small area in the northern high Nevada Sierra of Plumas County (Smith 2001). Conservation.—Most Carex cyrtostachya populations are small, difficult to locate, and potentially threat- ened by logging and The invasive Rubus. species should some receive conservation More attention. inventory is needed and systematic census data are lacking, but based on our initial field surveys and and observations, the her^num may records, there be fewer than 20 populations and A 2000 plants in few total. populations on are land managed by US the Forest Service, in the Plumas and Dorado El National Forests, but other locales are at low on elevations private land and susceptible development to or hydrological changes. an Creek bridge on Bean Creek Road, 609 m, 29 Jun 1988, Ahart 6108 m, Janeway J 2 Jul 1988 2955 (CHSC, WS); small lake mi S Brush 1 of 'of Lost Creek Reservoir, 1036 m, 6Jul 1993, Ahart 7052 (CHSC); mi 0.5 CHSC, DAV,HSC,JEPS,WTU); W same CHSC. site, 6Jul 2011, 2Sfea 25535 (CAS, OSC, WTU); side of Pinkard Crei road mi N .2 of Lost Creek Reservoir dam, 6 Aug Janeway 2006 8826 (CHSC WTU)- same site, 6 jul 2011, Zika 25536 CHSC, W (CAS, GH.JEPS, MICH, MO. OSC 1 -ipper branch of Know-Nothing Creek, Lumpkin ^ CHSC, NY ' JEPS, 'aEPS,CHSC);sa ^ miv 8868 (CHSC, WTU); Jane- S Fork Bacon S^onrarfelhicl™lRl^“^ ^006 ^ same & site, 19 Jul 1973, Rubtzpff 7187 Holell ((^); Rlckc™yoTcreek2TO “Pstream of Creek confluence with Special ^ Traverse Interest Area, Dorado Creek, Traverse El National Fn«>« fisn q i i 6-;a«cwa>(CHSC,OSC,WTl0. ^ay 2012, Zifea 25877 YubaCo.:HampshireCreekMealw^V“"r‘’pT’r‘^”^’.'^^^’ 2007,Jan<way9116&Ahart, Hanson (WTU); same ^ 7 Aug site, 2007 Ahart Aug Janeway ’ 5 (CHSC, 201 2iha25718& jEPS,OSC, WTU). 1, Wilson, Ahart. IZXx 'heirsy^ony^s (C. c. establish,!, differences ween be, ,hema„dCc>nosk.41ZJZed.Z^^ synonymy T .n might apply to C. cyrtostachya. The descriptions of IZ several of rhe " Whrch gathering was Wed “ the type, bu, whiA “"P'” to specify wt duplicate ^ type senes of ^®*°‘ype. In c.mendociticnsis was addition, part of a hybrid withe d tl vv and some neeWThTZofZZ^ lecmtypficariotrs were mkZZ consecutively by T W'e Bolander and numbere appear be froZargl to we (1951) belteve U Uke is masonable Howe assume to ) the ^pheates, ““ a, DS, has 1117^ the precise date of coUecion urn ' T hm sts; original material at Harvard is the siktw lectotype b^f^' d A Zika et al., r from type the and thus can be distinguished anthers The hybrid plants to exsert or dehisce their fail docinensis. anthers or immature, has dehiscent C on same which, although often mendocinensis the sheets, material of Bo- Waterway reported isotypes of and (1988) Howell were (1951) where the anthers shed. exserted filaments We inspected the we examine them. also NY were unable mix but were also a with the hybrid, lander 4701 at taxono- Howell discussed the cinnamomea Olney, a synonym of C. mendocinensis. (1951) available types of C. We Olney’s designate my GH, NY, UC, and US, but did not select a lectotype. and cited type specimens at gynody- Carex BRU, ex Olney). material Brown University as the lectotype (Bolander 6477 herb. S. T. original at which but not specifying nama was by Olney only one gathering, Bolander 4700, described citing also (1868), name by Bolander the citing of the many duplicates was the holotype. Howell (1951) effectively lectotypified none We and nine isotypes of C. gynodynama; ap- (BRU) were study the lectotype 4700 as the type. able to peared to include hybrid elements. swamps Carex mendocinensis Olney ex W. Boott, Bot. California 2:249. 1880. Type: U.S.A. Caufornu. Mendocino Co.; DISCUSSION Carex cyrtostachya is closely related to C. mendocinensis, and the two are compared in Table Most specimens 1. arc easily segregated by inflorescence The structure. lateral pistillate spikes of Carex cyrtostachya arch or droop, or dangle on flexuous peduncles, and the perigynia more are widely spaced Carex (Figs. 2A). mendocinensis 1, usually displays erect or ascending distal lateral spikes that are densely fruited (Fig. 2B). Occasional plants of C. mendocinensis show lax proximal spikes, but the distal pistillate spikes remain essentially addition erect. In to the obvious inflorescence differences, several other characters are useful in identification Although none are absolutely exclusive, in combination they allow reliable The identification. staminate scales of most plants o mmdocmensis C. are awnless, although mm the lower awn scales rarely have an 0.3-0.5 Peck 8792 (GH), (e.g.. Curry' Co., Oregon). Proximal staminate mm scales of C. cyrtostachya have prominent awns, often 1-5 In long. ^dition, the pistillate scales and awns their are longer in C. cyrtostachya, with some overlap measurements, in he^ngyma and scales of C. mendocinensis are green, strongly marked with red or purple or red-brown; T in comras, .he pis.lIU.e scale bodies ol cyHosc^kya C. are usually wh.n.-hyaline, cmly with rarely a red-brown lain, wash, whereas .he perigynia are placement within the perigynium differs so that .1^1.^^.^' slightly, the disunce bet^en C of ntendochtemis ate often m scabrous, while they tend be smooth fai«rscXusTn or . . . of Texas Research Institute 7(1) the Botanical Journal of ACKNOWLEDGMENTS POM, RSA, MICH, ORE, OSC, We BM, BRU, CAS, CHSC, DS, GH, HSC, ID, JEPS, NY, thank the curators of WTU Some unaccessioned additional SOC, UBC, UC, WILLU, WS, anti for access to their collections or loans. we applaud Lowell Ahart were examined CAS, CHSC, and JEPS. For assistance in the field, materials also at and Debra We Tony Reznicek, Philippe Seguin, and Nelson. extend our gratitude to Joy Mastrogiuseppe, Julie unmounted CAS Trock for their discussions and advice. Rebecca Peters at was especially helpful in locating maps assembled by by The drawings were prepared by Krista Anandakuttan, the collections Peter Rubtzoff. Tom Ruehli, Fig. 3 photographed by Steve Matson, and the SEM images made by Wai Pang Chan at the Biol- We we indebted ogy Imaging FaciUty the University of Washington; are grateful to all of them. are also at whose comments and Tony Leo and Ted Cochrane, to the three reviewers, Reznicek, Bruederle, especially much Comments strengthened the suggestions resulted in a improved manuscript. from Barbara Castro also Fund manuscript. Partial funding for herbarium study was provided by the Lawrence R. Heckard of the Jepson REFERENCES Bacdvwn, B.G, D.H. Goldman, DJ. Keil, R. Patterson, TJ. Rosath, and D.H. Wilkin (eds.). 201 2.The of California, 2nd ed. University of California Press, Berkeley. CuFTON, G. 2003. Plumas County and Plumas National Forest Published by the auth flora. cy.CA. CuFTON, G. 2005. Plumas County ai s National Forest flora. Published by the author ai s National Forest, Quincy, CA. Carex— Howell, J.T. 1951 Studies in llhThe identity of Carex mendocinensis. Leaf!. W. Bot. 6:1 57-1 62. . Janeway, LP. 1992. Cyperaceae of Butte County, California. Part 1; Carex. Studies from the Herbarium California State University, Chico, Publication No. 9. Masthoouseppe, J. 1993. Carex, sedge. In: J.C. Hickman, ed.The Jepson manual: higher plants of of California. Univ. Cali- fornia Press: Berkeley. Pp. 107-1 141 1 Olney, S.T. 868. Carices novae. Proc Amer. Acad. 7-393-396. 1 Arts Oswald, V.H. 2002. Selected plants of northern and California adjacent Nevada. Studies from the Herbarium California State University, Chico, Publication No. 1 1 L Oswald, V. and Ahart. 994. Manual of the 1 vascular plants of Butte County, California. N California Plant ScKiety, e Sacramento, CA. Hymenochlaenae (Cyperaceae) Mexico and in Central America. Syst. SMriH, S.G. 2001. Taxonomic innovations North American in Eleocharis (Cyperaceae). Novon 11-241-257 Taylor, D.W. 2010. Rora of the Yosemite Sierra. Published by the author, Aptos, CA. n Carex section Hymenochlaenae Drejer (Cyperaceae). Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. MJ. Vaterway, 1990a. Systematic ii ceae). Canad. Bot 68:630-639. J. C and manddc/nensd racea^) in Callfomla. MJ. 2002. Carex ^ Linnaeus sect Hymenochlaenae. In: f