Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2016 Caregivers' Perceptions of an Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease in African Americans Stanita Jackson Walden University Follow this and additional works at:https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of theAfrican American Studies Commons, and thePublic Health Education and Promotion Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please [email protected]. Walden University College of Health Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Stanita Jackson has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. JaMuir Robinson, Committee Chairperson, Public Health Faculty Dr. Eboni Green, Committee Member, Public Health Faculty Dr. Raymond Thron, University Reviewer, Public Health Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2016 Abstract Caregivers’ Perceptions of an Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease in African Americans by Stanita Jackson MS, Delta State University, 2007 BS, Delta State University, 2005 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Public Health Walden University May 2016 Abstract Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is significantly more prevalent among African Americans than within the general population, but rates of early detection are lower in the African American community. Researchers have demonstrated that both pessimistic Alzheimer’s- directed health beliefs, and negative perceptions of the effectiveness and the accessibility of medical care act as barriers to care seeking by African American family members of individuals with the disease. Recent research into causal judgments made by potential caregivers about individuals with undiagnosed AD suggests that gender bias and errors in attribution may constitute covert barriers to both lay and professional interpretations regarding the need for cognitive assessment. This study used grounded theory to investigate whether African American family caregivers hold integrated, gender-distinct beliefs about causal attributions of their family member’s cognitive decline which may contribute to a delay in care-seeking behaviors. The health belief model was used in conjunction with the attribution theory as the conceptual framework for understanding the data. Purposive sampling of geriatric and memory clinics, and a church was used to recruit eight family caregivers who participated in in-depth interviews. The results indicated that there is a significant lack of caregivers’ knowledge and understanding of AD regardless of gender, and that this lack is linked to delays in diagnosis. These results may be used to support the development of a new theory of family caregivers’ knowledge and understanding of AD. The social change implications include decreasing delayed diagnosis through increased educational awareness, community outreach programs, and universal mandatory cognitive testing of AD for at-risk individuals. Caregivers’ Perceptions of an Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease in African Americans by Stanita Jackson MS, Delta State University, 2007 BS, Delta State University, 2005 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Public Health Walden University May 2016 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my beloved grandmother Minnie L. Harris who was diagnosed with Dementia in 2005 and made her heavenly entrance in 2013. She has always been my role model and hero because she experienced so many health issues and challenges in her life and God always kept her safe in his hands. With my grandmother diagnosis, I noticed a disease that changed the person I have known for 30 years of my life at that time and transformed her into someone who was very vulnerable and unable to live alone and maintain her independence. After battling with this chronic illness for 8 years, she still stood strong at 82 years of age without an intense progression as some individuals have experienced. She still possessed her charismatic personality, yet sometimes was unable to remember things that just happened. I am thankful that she still recognized her children and grandchildren and was able to communicate with us on a regular basis. On July 6, 2013 my granny went on to continue her life in heaven and she no longer has to suffer from Alzheimer’s disease or any other chronic illness. I miss her so much and will always love her. She always told me the importance of education. Since this research will not directly impact my grandmother’s life, hopefully it will help others to come that are susceptible to developing Alzheimer’s disease. I love you grandmother. Also, I would like to dedicate this research study to my grandfather Theodore Dowdy who passed away in 1997 from prostate cancer, he is now my angel in the sky and I know he is very proud of his granddaughter. He will always hold a special place in my heart. I love you both forever and always. Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank God who is my savior and the reason that I have been able to fulfill this dream. He has given me the desires of my heart to complete such a task that will not only be a great accomplishment for myself but will allow me to help others. Secondly, I would like to thank my mother who has always inspired and encouraged me to be the best that I can be and to never give up and always trust God to see me through any challenging situation. She is my rock and support throughout my entire educational journey. To my grandparents, I love and miss each of you dearly and I thank you all for always loving and supporting me in all my endeavors. To Dr. Robinson, thank you for being my heaven sent angel to see me through to the end of this journey. I thank Dr. Green for serving on my committee and assisting me throughout this journey too. Thanks to Dr. Thron and the research team for their valuable feedback and support. I truly express thanks to every mentor that inspired my interest in science and my previous chair Dr. Mary for assisting me with portions of my dissertation. I would like to thank my participants for their time and information that built this study. Thanks to my partner Eric for always supporting me and giving advice countless times during this process. I thank my brother, family, and friends that have supported me through words, advice, laughter, and prayer. I am very grateful for all of your time, commitment, love, and diligence. I have obtained a lot of knowledge and experiences throughout this time that will continue to direct me into more awesome endeavors. Once again thank you all very much. I sincerely love you all. Table of Contents List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ................................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study ....................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 Background ....................................................................................................................2 Problem Statement .........................................................................................................3 Purpose of the study .......................................................................................................8 Research Questions ........................................................................................................9 Theoretical Framework ................................................................................................10 Health Belief Model (HBM) and Attribution Theory ........................................... 10 Nature of the Study ......................................................................................................12 Definitions....................................................................................................................13 Assumptions .................................................................................................................14 Scope and Delimitations ..............................................................................................14 Limitations ...................................................................................................................15 Significance of the Study .............................................................................................15 Summary ......................................................................................................................17 Chapter 2: Literature Review .............................................................................................18 Introduction ..................................................................................................................18 Literature Search Strategy............................................................................................18 Conceptual Framework ................................................................................................19 i Attribution Theory ................................................................................................ 19 Dominant Attribution Theories ............................................................................. 20 Applied Research of Attribution Theory .....................................................................37 Theoretical Foundation ................................................................................................42 Health Belief Model (HBM) ................................................................................. 42 Subsequent Additions to the Model ...................................................................... 46 Frameworks and Summary ..........................................................................................52 Rationale for Using the HBM ......................................................................................56 Rationale for Using HBM in Conjunction with Attribution Theories .........................57 Key Literature ..............................................................................................................59 Clinical Manifestations of Alzheimer’s Disease..........................................................59 Epidemiologic Information on Alzheimer’s Disease ...................................................69 Prevalence and Incidence of Alzheimer’s Disease ............................................... 69 Prevalence of Alzheimer’s Disease by Race ........................................................ 71 Prevalence of Alzheimer’s Disease by Gender ..................................................... 72 Risks factors of Alzheimer’s Disease ................................................................... 72 Risks factors by Race ............................................................................................ 73 Mortality and Morbidity of Alzheimer’s Disease ................................................. 73 Healthcare Burden of Alzheimer’s Disease .......................................................... 74 Delayed Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease .................................................................75 General Information on Delayed Diagnosis ................................................................75 Delayed Diagnosis by Race .........................................................................................76 ii Delayed Diagnosis by Race and Gender ......................................................................78 Contribution of the Family Caregiver to Delayed Diagnosis ......................................78 Contribution of Primary Health Care Provider to Delayed Diagnosis ........................82 Summary ......................................................................................................................84 Chapter 3: Research Method ..............................................................................................86 Introduction ..................................................................................................................86 Research Design and Rationale ...................................................................................87 Role of the Researcher .................................................................................................90 Methodology ................................................................................................................91 Participant Selection Logic ................................................................................... 91 Sample…............................................................................................................... 92 Instrumentation ............................................................................................................93 Semi-Structured Interview .................................................................................... 93 Procedures for Recruitment .........................................................................................93 Data Collection and Analysis.......................................................................................95 Data Collection ..................................................................................................... 95 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................ 96 Issues of Trustworthiness .............................................................................................97 Ethical Procedures .......................................................................................................99 Summary ....................................................................................................................100 Chapter 4: Results ............................................................................................................102 Introduction ................................................................................................................102 iii
Description: