ebook img

Can AGN feedback break the self-similarity of galaxies, groups, and clusters? PDF

0.31 MB·
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Can AGN feedback break the self-similarity of galaxies, groups, and clusters?

Draftversion January22,2014 PreprinttypesetusingLATEXstyleemulateapjv.04/17/13 CAN AGN FEEDBACK BREAK THE SELF-SIMILARITY OF GALAXIES, GROUPS, AND CLUSTERS? M. Gaspari1,2,5, F. Brighenti2,3, P. Temi4, S. Ettori5,6 1MaxPlanckInstitute forAstrophysics,Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse1,85741Garching,Germany;[email protected] 2AstronomyDepartment, UniversityofBologna,ViaRanzani 1,40127Bologna,Italy 3UCO/LickObservatory,DepartmentofAstronomyandAstrophysics,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaCruz,CA95064, USA 4AstrophysicsBranch,NASA/AmesResearchCenter,MS245-6,MoffettField,CA94035 5INAF,OsservatorioAstronomicodiBologna,viaRanzani 1,40127Bologna,Italy 4 6INFN,SezionediBologna,vialeBertiPichat6/2,40127Bologna,Italy 1 Draft version January 22, 2014 0 2 ABSTRACT n It is commonly thought that AGN feedback can break the self-similar scaling relations of galaxies, a groups, and clusters. Using high-resolution 3D hydrodynamic simulations, we isolate the impact J of AGN feedback on the L − T relation, testing the two archetypal and common regimes, self- x x 0 regulated mechanical feedback and a quasar thermal blast. We find that AGN feedback has severe 2 difficulty in breaking the relation in a consistent way. The similarity breaking is directly linked to the gas evacuation within R , while the central cooling times are inversely proportionalto the core 500 ] density. Breaking self-similarity implies thus breaking the cool core, morphingallsystemstonon-cool- O core objects, which is in clear contradiction with the observed data populated by several cool-core C systems. Self-regulated feedback, which quenches cooling flows and preserves cool cores, prevents . the dramatic evacuationand similarity breakingat any scale; the relationscatter is also limited. The ph impulsivethermalblastcanbreakthecore-includedLx−TxatT500 <∼1keV,butsubstantiallyempties and overheats the halo, generating a perennial non-cool-core group, as experienced by cosmological - o simulations. Even with partial evacuation, massive systems remain overheated. We show the action r of purely AGN feedback is to lower the luminosity and heating the gas, perpendicular to the fit. t s Keywords: galaxies: active — galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium — galaxies: groups: general — a galaxies: jets — hydrodynamics — methods: numerical [ 1 1. INTRODUCTION ening in the group regime, ∼4-5 (Mulchaey et al. 2003; v Osmond & Ponman 2004; Helsdon & Ponman 2000a,b; 7 In the last decade, feedback due to active galactic nuclei Sun et al. 2009; Sun 2012; see Fig. 1). 6 (AGN) has allowed to solve crucial astrophysical prob- In recent years, different authors have studied the 0 lems. The supermassive black hole (SMBH) at the cen- scaling relations by means of large cosmological sim- 5 ter of galaxies,groups, and clusters can indeed release a . terrific amount of energy (>1061 erg), providing an effi- ulations with AGN feedback (e.g., Sijacki et al. 2007; 1 Fabjan et al. 2010; McCarthy et al. 2010; Short et al. cient source to quench cooling flows and star formation 0 2010). In general, they find that the implemented AGN 4 (McNamara & Nulsen 2007). In particular, mechanical feedback is able to break the self-similarity, lowering lu- 1 AGNfeedbackintheformofjets/outflowsisabletoreg- minosities by orders of magnitude and, surprisingly, de- : ulate for several Gyr the thermodynamical state of the v creasing the global temperature (Puchwein et al. 2008, systemcore(Gaspari et al.2013aforareview). However, i fig.2). Oftenoverlooked,thesimulatedsystemsarehow- X it is far from clear if AGN feedback is able to strongly ever non-cool-core objects (Planelles et al. 2013, fig. 7, modify the large-scale gas halo, as the total X-ray lu- r foracriticaldiscussion). Evenno-feedbackrunsproduce a minosity and temperature, in other words, breaking the negativetemperaturegradients,duetoextremeadiabatic self-similar scaling relations. heating,whicharenotpresentinhigh-resolutionsimula- If gravity were the single driver of the evolution tions(e.g.,Li & Bryan2012). Besidestheunder-resolved (Kaiser 1986; Kravtsov& Borgani 2012), all systems black hole/feedback physics and subgrid numerics (see would scale only with mass, M = (4π/3)∆ρ R3, ∆ c ∆ the analysis in Barai et al. 2014), it remains difficult to where ∆ is the chosen overdensity. The critical den- disentangleandisolatetheactionoffeedbackinthecom- sity of the universe evolves in redshift as ρ (z) ∝ c plex evolutionshaped by mergers,filaments, star forma- E2(z), where E2(z) ≃ Ω (1 + z)3 + Ω , giving a m Λ tion, sink particles, and other prescriptions. characteristic radius R∆ ∝ M∆1/3E−2/3(z). Via hy- The objective of this study is to critically examine drostatic equilibrium (M∆ ∝ T R∆), we can retrieve if AGN feedback itself can break the self-similarity of M ∝ T3/2E−1(z). Since the bolometric X-ray lumi- galaxies, groups, and clusters, in a way consistent with ∆ nosityscalesasL ∝n2T1/2R3 (inthe Bremsstrahlung observations. Via controlled high-resolution 3D (mesh) x x ∆ simulations, we study how the main scaling, L −T is regime), using gas number density n ∝ M /R3 ∝ x x ∆ ∆ shaped by the two archetypal and commonly adopted ρ (z) and the above relations, we find the well-known c feedback models, self-regulated kinetic feedback and a self-similar scaling L ∝ T2E(z). However, cluster x x quasarthermalblast. Inaforthcomingwork,weexplore observations show a slope steeper than 2 (∼3; e.g., othermodelsanddifferentrelations(Gasparietal. 2014, Pratt et al. 2009; Maughan et al. 2012), further sharp- 2 M. Gaspari et al. in prep.). The normalization of the density profile is set by the Acrucialconstraintdrivenbyobservationsisthepres- gas fraction at the virial radius, f ≃ 0.15. The gas,vir ence of a (strong or weak) cool core in the majority initial gas fraction is intentionally high, near the cosmic of observed systems (>∼ 65 per cent, Peres et al. 1998; value (Planck Collaboration et al. 2013), since we want Mittal et al. 2009; Sun et al. 2009; Hudson et al. 2010; to testif AGN feedbackis the originalcauseof gasevac- Zhao et al. 2013). Such systems show, in the core, uation and hence self-similarity breaking. Using lower cooling times < 7 Gyr, positive temperature gradients, values (e.g., 0.1) does not change the conclusions. and low gas entropy (<10s keV cm2). Moreover, cool cores appear to be long lived and in place since z > 1 2.2. Hydrodynamics, cooling and heating (McDonald et al. 2013). AGN feedback, or inside-out Using FLASH4 code, we integrate the 3D equations heating, intrinsically evacuates the central regions, be- of hydrodynamics in conservative form, including to- fore touching the periphery of the system. Although tal gravity, gas radiative cooling, and feedback heat- the AGN feedback energetics is in principle capable ing. The latter two source terms are implemented fol- to breaking the group self-similarity (Cavaliere & Lapi lowing the unified self-regulation model, as described in 2008;Giodini et al.2010),theenergydepositionandhy- Gaspari et al. (2012b). Transport mechanisms, as con- drodynamics is crucial. We show that breaking self- duction,arenotincludedsincedatasuggestastrongsup- similarity via AGN feedback implies disrupting the cool pression (e.g., Gaspari & Churazov 2013). The cubical core, morphing the system into perennial non-cool-core box fully coversthe virial radius, ∼1.2-4.6Mpc (groups objects;viceversa,self-regulationpreservesthecoreand to clusters). We use concentric grid levels with radius the large-scale structure. of ∼60 cells, centered on the BCG, where the maximum resolution reaches ≈ 290 pc. The system is integrated 2. PHYSICS&NUMERICS for at least 5 Gyr. Boundary conditions are set in diode 2.1. Initial conditions mode. Inordertofullyisolatetheroleoffeedbackinalteringthe 2.2.1. Self-regulated mechanical feedback scalingrelations,westartwithavirializedgroup/cluster In Gaspari et al. (2011a,b, 2012a,b, 2013a,b) was found havingaformedcoolcore,whichcharacterizesthemajor- ity of observed systems (§1). Groups and clusters share that the most consistent model able to solve the cool- ing flow problem is mechanical feedback, self-regulated many common properties, allowing to build an initial bycoldaccretion. Inturbulentregionswherethecooling ‘universal’ system defined only by its mass. Following Vikhlinin et al. (2006)1, the observed average tempera- time dropsbelow∼10×the free-falltime, thermalinsta- bilities become quickly nonlinear,leadingto the conden- ture profile can be modeled as sationofcoldgas outof the hot phase. Such coldclouds 0.45+(rˆ/0.045)1.9 1 andfilamentscollideinaninelasticandchaoticwaywhile T(r)=T0 1+(rˆ/0.045)1.9 (1+(rˆ/0.6)2)0.45, (1) rainingonto the blackhole, boostingthe accretionrate. Bipolar massive sub-relativistic outflows are then trig- where rˆ= r/R ; the normalization is T ≃ 1.4 T ≃ geredwithkineticpowerproportionaltothecentralcool- 500 0 500 3 keV(M500/1014M⊙)0.6 (cf., Sun et al. 2009). Eq. 1 ing rate, Pjet = ǫM˙coolc2 (Gaspari et al. 2012b for the models the positive gradient of the cool core and the numerical details), with optimal mechanical efficiencies gentle decrease at large r; the peak temperature (r ∼ ǫ ∼ 5 × 10−4 − 5 × 10−3. The self-regulated outflow 0.15R ) is ∼2× the central value, which is reached generates the cocoon shock, two buoyant bubbles, and 500 again at r ∼ R . Albeit some groups have slightly gas/metal uplift. The kinetic feedback rises the central 500 higher T peak and steeper decrease (Sun et al. 2009), gas entropy, quenching cooling and stifling the accretion such minor differences have no impact on the results. rate; the self-regulated loop starts then over again. The system is initially in hydrostatic equilibrium The gentle self-regulation with either kinetic or ther- within the gravitationalpotential φ, dominated by dark mal injection (the latter commonly used in cosmologi- matter,modeledviatheusualNFWprofileintheconcor- calsimulations2)producesanalogousimpactonthescal- dance ΛCDM universe. The halo concentrationis linked ing relations, although thermal feedback induces again to the virial mass as c ≃ 8.5(Mvir/1014 M⊙)−0.1 (e.g., excessive core overheating (Brighenti & Mathews 2003; Bullock et al. 2001). In addition, each group/cluster is Gaspari et al. 2011b). dominatedbyacentralmassiveellipticalgalaxy(‘BCG’), modeled with a de Vaucouleurs stellar density profile. 2.2.2. Quasar thermal blast The BCG K-band luminosity increases with the halo In the opposite spectrum of feedback models resides the mass as LK ≃ 4.7 ×1011(Mvir/1014 M⊙)0.39L⊙ (e.g., sudden and powerful release of thermal energy. This Lin & Mohr 2004). The stellar mass is then retrieved can be justified by a quasar event, emitting large ra- adoptingM∗/LK ∼1(e.g.,Mannucci et al.2005). Since diative power absorbed by highly dense clouds, or in BCGs are large ellipticals, we keep the effective radius alternative, by an Eddington wind fully thermalizing Reff ≃9kpc. AsdescribedinGaspari et al.(2012b),the in the inner core. Numerically, the thermal energy is BCG injects a low amount of energy and mass due to injected in the inner ∼4 kpc, with Eddington power SNIa and stellar winds; however, the energetics is domi- PEdd ≃1.5×1047(Mbh/109M⊙)ergs−1 lasting∼6Myr. nated by the AGN feedback. ThetotalreleasedenergyisE ≡ηM c2 ≃3×1061 AGN bh 1 Note a typo in the published version, missing the 0.45 expo- 2Insomecosmologicalworks,the‘quasarmode’issimplyquasi- nent;A.Vikhlinin,privatecommunication(seeastro-phversion). continuous thermalfeedback. Breaking galaxies, groups, and clusters with AGN feedback 3 Figure 1. X-ray bolometric luminosity versus X-ray temperature, including (top) or excising (middle) the core, r < 0.15R500. The bottom panels show the central coolingtime(∼15-20 kpc), withthecool-core thresholdtcool∼7Gyr. Left: self-regulatedkineticmodels (§2.2.1;ǫ=5×10−3). Right: quasarthermalblast(§2.2.2);theblackpointsshowthesimulated5Gyrevolutionevery500Myr(theinitial point has magenta contour). The observational data are from Maughanetal. (2012, Chandra; red), Prattetal. (2009, XMM; green), Sunetal. (2009,Chandra;blue),Mulchaeyetal.(2003)andOsmond&Ponman(2004;magenta),Helsdon&Ponman(2000a,b,ROSAT; cyan); wealways useh=0.7(e.g., forLx ∝h−2). Theself-regulatedAGN feedback prevents overheating, at thesametimeavoidingthe self-similaritybreaking. Conversely,thepowerfulthermalblastcanbreaktheLx−Txrelationatthegroupscale,butmorphingthesystem intoaperennialnon-cool-coreobject. 4 M. Gaspari et al. erg, i.e., the characteristic energy of a SMBH with typi- points towards lower luminosities and higher tempera- calMbh ∼109M⊙ andradiativeefficiencyη ≃1.5×10−2 tures. Similarly, radiative cooling moves the system to- (Novak 2013). The isotropic blast triggers once the nec- wards higher L and lower T (cf., Ettori & Brighenti x 500 essary mass of cold gas has been accreted; due to the 2008). In other words, the L −T secularly moves due x x powerful heating, no second event ever occurs. Conclu- to heating/cooling perpendicular to the fit, particularly sionsareunalteredwithdifferentE andcompactde- as the core is included. Works based on cosmological AGN position windows. simulations (§1) show instead a decrease of T , adding 500 Boosting ǫ above the optimal values (e.g., ∼ 0.1) subgrid AGN feedback. This could be linked to the re- transformsthe previousgentle self-regulatedfeedback in duction of the extreme adiabatic heating present in the the impulsive blast. Conversely, significantly lowering under-resolved pure cooling flow. A more serious prob- E morphs the feedback in the self-regulated regime. lem is that, although the similarity breaking occurs, no AGN The presented models constitute thus the two opposing object can be observationally described as a cool core archetypes of inside-out feedback. with the positive T gradient depicted in §2.1. Theself-regulatedmodelsshowthatavoidingthecom- 3. RESULTS pleteself-similaritybreakingimpliespreservingthe cool- Figure 1 presents the key results of the high-resolution core structure – at the same time reducing the cool- hydrodynamic simulations, testing kinetic or thermal ing rate below 10 per cent of that of the pure cooling AGN feedback in the range of systems with T ≃0.5- flow. In the bottom panel (left), the central cooling 500 6 keV (Mvir ∼ 1013-1015 M⊙). In the top and mid- timestaysinanyhalobelow∼7Gyr,thecommonupper dle panels, we show the X-ray luminosity versus X-ray limitusedtodefinecool-coresystems(e.g.,Hudson et al. temperature3 within R , including or excisingthe core 2010). These systems also preserve the positive tem- 500 (r < 0.15R ), respectively. The bottom panel depicts perature gradient and low central entropy. As found in 500 the gas central cooling time (in the shell ∼15-20 kpc, Gaspari et al. (2011b, 2012b), ǫ ≃ 5×10−3 is the best contained within <∼ 0.06R500). The Lx − Tx relation value for clusters; indeed, the two groups switch to a is shaped by the global amount of cooling and heating, weaker cool core after the initial heating. Overall, op- while t ∝T/nΛ assesses the core thermal state (Λ is timal self-regulation induces the system to oscillate be- cool the cooling function; see Gaspari et al. 2012b). tween a state of weak and strong cool core, preventing The self-similar relation is expected to be L ∝ T2, both the cooling and heating runaway. The duty cycle x x even shallower in the group regime due to line emission is very efficient with cold accretion, while much weaker (L ∝ T3/2Λ ∝ T ). Figure 1 (top) reveals that the ob- with hot Bondi regulation (Gaspari et al. 2011b). Since x x x most of the observed systems host a cool core (§1), self- servationaldatarelativetotheclusterregime(red,green) regulated mechanical heating represents the long-term are already deviating, with a slope α∼3. Below 2 keV, maintenance mode of AGN feedback, while avoiding the i.e., for small and massive groups, the relation steepens break of the scaling relations. further,reachingα∼ 4-5,with amuchmoresignificant Wetestnowthe otherextremeofAGNfeedbackmod- scatter. Excising the core in both quantities reduces the els, i.e., the impulsive thermal blast (Fig. 1, right). The scatter and the steepness (α ∼ 2.5), avoiding an abrupt suddenisotropicenergyrelease(∼3×1061 erg,compara- decline. The relation becomes nearly self-similar consid- bletothatofatypicalSMBH)candramaticallyevacuate ering only cool-coreclusters (Maughan et al.2012). Un- the atmosphere of the compactgroup,decreasing the X- fortunately, the excised relation for small groups is not ray luminosity by 2.5 orders of magnitude; T initially covered by observational data. 500 increases by ∼2× (the rightmost circle). The strong In the left column, the simulations (black; the ini- breakingoccursbecause the grouptotalbinding energy4 tial state has magenta contour) show that the impact of self-regulated jet feedback (ǫ = 5 × 10−3) on the is ≃ 1061 erg. After the initial blast, the BCG is slowly replenished by the stellar mass loss, mildly increasing L − T relation is limited. The remarkable aspect is x x the luminosity (<R ) to ∼ 1041 erg s−1, while restor- that no break – a deviation of orders of magnitude – 500 ing T near the initial value (this is not due to the ac- occurs, even at the scales of small halos. In the mas- 500 tionofAGNfeedback). Thesystemhascompletelymor- sivegroup(pentagons),the maximumdeviationinlumi- phed. The central t (bottom) is always >60 Gyr, in nosity/temperature is ∼30/10 per cent (0.1/0.05 dex), cool a perennial non-cool-core state. Excising the core (mid- strongly diminishing to ∼10/1 per cent in massive clus- dle), aggravates the breaking, since the compact group ters. In the compact group (circles), the luminosity de- is substantially devoid of gas outside the BCG, with an creases by ∼2.8×, while temperature increases by ∼80 unrealistic drop down to ∼1040 erg s−1 (cf., Sun 2012). per cent. T showsthe weakerscatter;the mainaction 500 Overall, the inside-out heating able to fully break self- of feedback, especially kinetic, is to evacuate gas and, similarity in the core-included L −T , violently alters secondarily, to heat the global atmosphere. x x the excised L −T relation, which is instead observed Excising the core within 0.15R (middle panel), sig- x x nificantly reduces the scatter to5<∼001/3 of the previous to have tighter scatter. In the massive group (pentagons), the total binding values. By removing the core separately for each vari- energy is ≃ 1062 erg (> E ). The thermal blast able, we see that internal heating can only move the AGN can thus only partially evacuate the gas from the core 3 Wecomputedboththeemission-weightedT500 withChandra (∼ 0.1R500), halted by the extended atmosphere before sensitivity(Tx>∼0.3keV;Gasparietal.2012b)andspectroscopic- reaching R500. The result is a decrease in luminosity by liketemperature(Vikhlinin2006);sinceourflowisnotmultiphase, tthheeydaiffreerveenrcyesiwmitihlart.heAsspinheorbicsaerlvvaatliuoensi,swmeinuoser.theprojectedT500; 4 Equaltothegravitational energyEb=R0RvirρgasφdV. Breaking galaxies, groups, and clusters with AGN feedback 5 maximum 0.9 dex and T oscillating within 0.1 dex. one order of magnitude at large radii implies decreas- 500 The extended evacuation is confirmed by the excised re- ing the core density n by at least 10× more, inducing 0 lation. Both simulated L −T are consistent with the t ≫ t . The problem is further aggravated by the x x cool H observed data. However, the similarity deviation occurs increaseoftemperature(t ∝T1/2). Thedirectaction cool againattheexpenseofthecoolcore. Infact,thecentral of AGN feedback is to lower the luminosity and heating cooling time stays above tens Gyr, signaling a strong thegas,notmovingthesystemparalleltotheL −T fit. x x non-cool-core group. Analyzing the poor and massive Overall,AGNfeedbackappearsnaturallysuitedtoregu- cluster simulations (squares, triangles), we see no sim- latethethermodynamicalstateofcosmicsystems,inthe ilarity breaking, due to the larger Eb. The maximum core, but not over large radii (r >∼0.2R500). We remark deviation in the core-included relation is highly limited, that any feedback mechanism, that is able to break the ∼0.17/0.08 dex in Lx and ∼0.03/0.015 in T500, for the self-similarity, needs to properly solve the cooling flow poorandmassivecluster,respectively. Excisingthe core problem. stifles the scatter by at least 1/3. The powerful AGN In a forthcoming work, we discuss other heating mod- heating has again the side effect of destroying the core els, parameters, and scaling relations. We found, nev- (tcool ≫ tH). Only the massive cluster can partially re- ertheless, that AGN feedback models fall in the two cover after several Gyr. Cool cores are common in the archetypalcategoriespresentedhere: self-regulatedheat- universe,hencethistypeofbreakingshouldberare. No- ing,preventingthebreaking,orstrongimpulsiveheating, ticethatcombiningthe twofeedbackmechanismsaggra- which breaks the scaling relations but destroys the core. vates the core overheating. For instance, using either thermal or kinetic feedback The global Lx−Tx property seems overallmore likely with self-regulation has the same minor impact on the linked to a primordial imprint that the group/cluster scaling relations (§2.2.1). Injecting energy in the center experienced, rather than an internal breaking after for- or at a distance of a few 10 kpc (<∼ 0.05R500) has also mation. However, we note that when the external ‘pre- thesameeffect,consideringthatthefeedbackmustaffect heating’athighredshift–whoseagencyisstillunclear– extremely large regions (R , several 100s kpc); a too 500 is high enough to bring Lx consistent with observations, distant injection allows instead central runaway cooling. thegasentropybecomesusuallytoohigh,inhibitingcool Further, boosting ǫ transforms the self-regulated feed- corestoformabinitio(e.g.,Brighenti & Mathews2001). back into the quasar-like blast; vice versa, diminishing the impulsive E slightly lowers t , but prevents 4. CONCLUSIONS AGN cool the similarity breaking. In other words, even with a dif- We showed that AGN feedback has severe difficulty in ferent parametrization of the archetypal AGN feedback breaking the self-similarity of galaxies,groups,and clus- models,breakingself-similarityimpliesbreakingthecool ters, in a consistentway. Via high-resolution3D simula- core. tions,weisolatedtheimpactofthetwocommonregimes ofAGNfeedbackontheprincipalscalingrelationLx−Tx. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS • Self-regulated kinetic feedback prevents the simi- The FLASH code was in part developed by the DOE larity breaking, inducing a limited scatter (<∼0.1 NNSA-ASC OASCR Flash center at the University dex). Self-regulation allows to properly quench of Chicago. MG is grateful for the financial sup- cooling flows preserving the cool-core structure; port provided by the Max Planck Fellowship. SE avoiding overheating translates thus in a modest and FB acknowledge financial contribution from ASI- central gas evacuation, maintaining low core INAF I/009/10/0, PRIN INAF 2012, PRIN MIUR cooling times (t < 7 Gyr) and avoiding the 2010LY5N2T. High-performance computing resources cool L − T breaking at any halo scale. Since the wereprovidedbytheNASA/AmesHECProgram(SMD- x x majority of observed systems display a cool core 13-3935, SMD-13-4373, SMD-13-4377; Pleiades). We (§1), this mode should represent the long-term thank M. Sun for providing the groups data, E. Chu- maintenance phase of AGN feedback. razovandtheanonymousrefereeforinterestinginsights. REFERENCES • An impulsive quasar thermal blast, injecting the totalenergyofatypicalSMBH,isabletobreakthe Barai,P.,Viel,M.,Murante,G.,Gaspari,M.,&Borgani,S.2014, core-includedLx−TxatscalesT500 <∼1keV(where MNRAS,437,1456 EAGN >∼ Eb). However, after full breaking, the B—r.ig2h0e0n3t,i,AFp.J,,&58M7,at5h8e0ws,W.G.2001,ApJ,553,103 systemisalmostdevoidofgas,alsoatlargeradii,in Bullock,J.S.,Kolatt,T.S.,Sigad,Y.,etal.2001,MNRAS,321, contradiction with the core-excised relation. Even 559 with partial evacuation (Mvir >∼5×1013 M⊙), the Cavaliere,A.,&Lapi,A.2008, ApJ,673,L5 central t is raised to several times the Hubble Ettori,S.,&Brighenti,F.2008,MNRAS,387,631 time. Inccoloulsters,thescatterisagainlimited,<∼0.2 Fa1b6j7a0n,D.,Borgani,S.,Tornatore,L.,etal.2010, MNRAS,401, dex. The imprint of the thermal blast is indelible, Gaspari,M.,Ruszkowski,M.,&Sharma,P.2012a, ApJ,746,94 morphingthesystemintoaperennialnon-cool-core Gaspari,M.,Brighenti,F.,&Temi,P.2012b,MNRAS,424,190 object. If existent, such a mechanism should be Gaspari,M.,Brighenti,F.,&Ruszkowski,M.2013a, rare or occurring at very high redshift. AstronomischeNachrichten, 334,394 Gaspari,M.,&Churazov,E.2013,A&A,559,A78 Breaking self-similarity via inside-out heating means Gaspari,M.,Ruszkowski,M.,&Oh,S.P.2013b, MNRAS,432, to evacuate most of the gas from the region <∼R500. Ga3s4p0a1ri,M.,Melioli,C.,Brighenti,F.,&D’Ercole,A.2011a, Since central tcool ∝ n−01, lowering the gas density by MNRAS,411,349 6 M. Gaspari et al. Gaspari,M.,Brighenti,F.,D’Ercole,A.,&Melioli,C.2011b, Mulchaey,J.S.,Davis,D.S.,Mushotzky,R.F.,&Burstein,D. MNRAS,415,1549 2003,ApJS,145,39 Giodini,S.,Smolˇci´c,V.,Finoguenov, A.,etal.2010, ApJ,714, Novak,G.S.2013,arXiv:1310.3833 218 Osmond,J.P.F.,&Ponman,T.J.2004,MNRAS,350,1511 Helsdon,S.F.,&Ponman,T.J.2000a, MNRAS,319,933 Peres,C.B.,Fabian,A.C.,Edge,A.C.,etal.1998,MNRAS, —.2000b,MNRAS,315,356 298,416 Hudson,D.S.,Mittal,R.,Reiprich,T.H.,etal.2010,A&A,513, PlanckCollaboration,Ade,P.A.R.,Aghanim,N.,etal.2013, A37 arXiv:1303.5076 Kaiser,N.1986, MNRAS,222,323 Planelles,S.,Borgani,S.,Fabjan,D.,etal.2013,MNRAS,2889P Kravtsov,A.V.,&Borgani,S.2012, ARA&A,50,353 Pratt,G.W.,Croston,J.H.,Arnaud,M.,&B¨ohringer,H.2009, Li,Y.,&Bryan,G.L.2012,ApJ,747,26 A&A,498,361 Lin,Y.-T.,&Mohr,J.J.2004, ApJ,617,879 Puchwein,E.,Sijacki,D.,&Springel,V.2008,ApJ,687,L53 Mannucci,F.,DellaValle,M.,Panagia,N.,etal.2005,A&A, Short,C.J.,Thomas,P.A.,Young,O.E.,etal.2010,MNRAS, 433,807 408,2213 Maughan,B.J.,Giles,P.A.,Randall,S.W.,Jones,C.,& Sijacki,D.,Springel,V.,DiMatteo,T.,&Hernquist,L.2007, Forman,W.R.2012, MNRAS,421,1583 MNRAS,380,877 McCarthy,I.G.,Schaye, J.,Ponman,T.J.,etal.2010, MNRAS, Sun,M.2012,NewJournalofPhysics,14,045004 406,822 Sun,M.,Voit,G.M.,Donahue, M.,etal.2009,ApJ,693,1142 McDonald,M.,Benson,B.A.,Vikhlinin,A.,etal.2013,ApJ, Vikhlinin,A.2006,ApJ,640,710 774,23 Vikhlinin,A.,Kravtsov,A.,Forman,W.,etal.2006,ApJ,640, McNamara,B.R.,&Nulsen,P.E.J.2007,ARA&A,45,117 691 Mittal,R.,Hudson,D.S.,Reiprich,T.H.,&Clarke,T.2009, Zhao,H.-H.,Jia,S.-M.,Chen,Y.,etal.2013,ApJ,778,124 A&A,501,835

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.