CAN 3:2012cv05998 opinion

0.03 MB·

by  PACER

Case3:12-cv-05998-JSC Document10 Filed12/20/12 Page1 of 2

1 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
2 ALEX G. TSE (CSBN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
3 REBECCA FALK (CSBN 226798)
Assistant United States Attorney
4
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
5 San Francisco, California 94102-3495
Telephone: [phone]
6 FAX: [phone]
[email protected]
7
Attorneys for Defendants
8
9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
FRIENDS OF OCEANO DUNES, INC., ) No. 12-05998 JSC
13 )
Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF
14 ) TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
v. ) COMPLAINT
15 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, )
16 the UNITED STATES FISH AND )
WILDLIFE SERVICE, KEN SALAZAR, in)
17 his official capacity as Secretary of the )
Interior, and DANIEL M. ASHE, in his
18 official capacity as Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service,
19
Defendants.
20
21 Defendants United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife
22 Service, Ken Salazar, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, and Daniel M. Ashe, in
23 his official capacity as the Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Defendants”) and
24 Plaintiff Friends of Oceano Dunes, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective counsel,
25 stipulate to extend the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Civil
26 Local Rule 6-1(a) of the Northern District of California, as follows:
27 1. On November 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed its Complaint re Failure to Produce
28 Records and Grant Fee Waiver in Violation of the Freedom of Information Act (“Complaint”);
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. C 12-05998 JCS
Case3:12-cv-05998-JSC Document10 Filed12/20/12 Page2 of 2

1 2. On November 30, 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office received a copy of Plaintiff’s
2 Complaint by personal service;
3 3. Pursuant to Rule 12(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants’
4 response to the Complaint is presently due to be filed and served on December 31, 2012;
5 4. The parties have agreed to an extension of time for Defendants to respond to the
6 Complaint from December 31, 2012 to January 7, 2013;
7 5. No prior extensions of time have been requested or granted; and
8 6. This change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by
9 Court order.
10 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants
11 that Defendants will have until January 7, 2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
12
13 DATED: December 18, 2012 Respectfully submitted,
14
15
16 ____/s/ Thomas D. Roth_______
Thomas D. Roth
17 Attorneys for Plaintiff
18
19 DATED: December 18, 2012 Respectfully submitted,
MELINDA HAAG
20 United States Attorney
21
22 ____/s/ Rebecca Falk____________
REBECCA FALK
23 Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants
24
25 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27 DATED: December 20, 2012 _______________________________________
HONORABLE JACQUELINE S. CORLEY
28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. C 12-05998 JCS