Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 12-2008 Calculations of Diffusion in FCC Binary Alloys Using On-the-fly Kinetic Monte Carlo Erdi Bleda Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at:https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Part of theCondensed Matter Physics Commons Recommended Citation Bleda, Erdi, "Calculations of Diffusion in FCC Binary Alloys Using On-the-fly Kinetic Monte Carlo" (2008).All Dissertations. 306. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/306 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please [email protected]. Calculations of diffusion in FCC binary alloys using on-the-fly kinetic Monte Carlo A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Physics and Astronomy by Erdi Ata Bleda December 2008 Accepted by: Dr. Murray S. Daw, Committee Chair Dr. Joseph R. Manson Dr. Chad E. Sosolik Dr. Sean Brittain Abstract Withtherecentadvancementsincomputertechnologiesandtheimprovements in simulation algorithms, along with the theories, has allowed scientists to carry out diffusion calculations more efficiently, especially for the cases where either the diffusion itself takes longer, or there is no available isotope to carry out the diffusion experiments such as tracer diffusion. In this work, we present a systematic approach to diffusion in intermetallic alloys such as weakly clustered Cu − Ni and weakly ordered Au − Ag. We use AcceleratedMolecularDynamics(AMD)combinedwiththeEmbeddedAtomMethod (EAM) to find the necessary saddlepoint energies. With this technique, we calculate the tracer diffusivity coefficients for Cu−Ni (temperature range 700−1300K) and for Au − Ag (temperature range 800 − 1300K) as a function of composition and temperature. We assume that the vacancy-assisted diffusion mechanism is governing the whole process. In our calculations we keep the vacancy concentration fixed. We observe that the results are in agreement with Arrhenius behavior as discussed in detail in Chapter 4: Results. However closer to critical temperature, the results are overwhelmed by statistical fluctuations. During the simulations at low temperatures, we sometimes find that the va- cancyspendsalargenumberofstepsmovinglocallywithoutaccomplishingsignificant displacements or accumulating much simulated time. To overcome this “sandtrap” ii problem, we develop a systematic approach which is discussed in Chapter 5: Sandtrap Limitation and How to Overcome it in detail. We also analyze the motion and the “width” of the Anti-Phase Boundary (APB) perpendicular to its slip plane for Ni Al using the same approach mentioned 3 above for various temperatures (1000,1200 and 1500K) under no driving force. We create the APB in the center of the sample and observe its motion. In addition, we create the APB farther away from the center and fix the atoms at the end of each side. This puts a bias on the motion of the APB by limiting the number of possible escapes in a certain direction, thus “forcing” it to move towards the center. We observe the motion of the APB and the results are discussed in detail in Chapter 4: Results. iii Dedication This work is dedicated to my mother for her tremendous support and in loving memory of my grandfather. iv Acknowledgments First, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my adviser, Dr. Daw for his advices and support on my studies towards ph.D. I also would like to thank each one of my committee members for accepting being in my committee. And finally, I would like to thank Xing Gao for her help in the calculations of Au − Ag, and her patience in our countless discussions. This project is carried out with the support from NSF-ITR. v Table of Contents Title Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Dedication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3 Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.1 Embedded Atom Method (EAM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2 Saddlepoint Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3.3 On-the-fly kinetic Monte Carlo Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 4.1 Bulk Tracer Diffusivity for Cu−Ni . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 4.2 Bulk Tracer Diffusivity for Au−Ag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.3 Mobility of Anti-Phase Boundary in Ni Al . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3 5 Sandtrap Limitation and How to Overcome it . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 6 Conclusions and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 6.1 Diffusion in Binary Alloys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 6.2 Translation of an APB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 7 Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 vi References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 vii List of Tables 4.1 Parameters obtained by a global fit to all of the presented kMC results for scaled tracer diffusivity in Cu−Ni . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 4.2 Parameters obtained by a global fit to all of the presented kMC results for scaled tracer diffusivity in Au−Ag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.3 Histogram of sites Al atoms occupy per layer for the initial configura- tion. There are total 32 Al atoms per layer. Due to phase shift (remember, APB) after the fifth layer, Al atoms now reside on site three. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.4 The averaged histogram of sites Al atoms occupy per layer over inter- mediate configurations after the third run at T = 1000 K. Initially the APB was positioned in the middle (between the fifth and the sixth layer). The histogram for the first two and the last two layers are not allowed to change due to the non-movable region. . . . . . 75 4.5 The averaged histogram of sites Al atoms occupy per layer over inter- mediate configurations for the final configuration at T = 1000 K. Initially the APB was positioned in the middle (between the fifth and the sixth layer). The histogram for the first two and the last two layers are not allowed to change due to the non-movable region. 76 4.6 The averaged histogram of sites Al atoms occupy per layer over inter- mediate configurations for the final configuration at T = 1200 K. Initially the APB was positioned in the middle (between the fifth and the sixth layer). The histogram for the first two and the last two layers are not allowed to change due to the non-movable region. 77 viii 4.7 The averaged histogram of sites Al atoms occupy per layer over inter- mediate configurations for the final configuration at T = 1500 K. Initially the APB was positioned in the middle (between the fifth and the sixth layer). The histogram for the first two and the last two layers are not allowed to change due to the non-movable region. 78 4.8 Histogram of sites Al atoms occupy per layer for the initial configura- tion. There are total 32 Al atoms per layer. Due to phase shift (remember– APB) after the seventh layer, Al atoms now reside on site three. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.9 The averaged histogram of sites Al atoms occupy per layer over interme- diate configurations for the third run at T = 1000 K. The histro- gram for the first two and the last two layers are not allowed to change due to the non-movable region. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 4.10 An early snapshot of the configuration of the simulation running at T=1000K under no driving force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 4.11 AlatersnapshotoftheconfigurationofthesimulationrunningatT=1000K under no driving force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 ix
Description: