Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 2001: Vol 57 Index

5 Pages·2001·2.3 MB·English

Continued from page 21 parties would have to call for a sixth tion had questioned the mandate his
reasons for failure to the Review review. personal “ray of hope.”
Conference. In the end, it was the This kind of uncertainty is in ¢ The 300-page rolling text and
issue of naming the United States in nobody’s interest. State parties will the 200-page chairman’s text should
the final report—Cuba and Iran need to try to separate discussions be carried forward, a point that was
pressed the point and provoked on the protocol from the proceed- already agreed to before the talks
open conflict—that provided the ings of the Review Conference. One collapsed.
formal trigger for failure. But the way would be to schedule a separate Charting the political course for-
underlying reason for implosion meeting, perhaps soon after the ward will probably be more difficult
was insufficient political support for Review Conference, to discuss the than reaching agreement on proce-
the protocol in the face of a long- continuing purpose, scope, and dural issues. The Europeans and a
expected U.S. onslaught. schedule of the Ad Hoc Group. number of non-aligned delegations
Agreeing to hold a separate meeting will need to keep the talks alive and
to kick-start new talks on a protocol press for an agreement. To put the
Finishing up would take many contentious issues talks into “hibernation,” as some
The group’s inability to agree on a off the Review Conference agenda. have suggested, will not strengthen
final report does not bode well for The delegations should also try to international security. Reviving talks
the Review Conference. Everything remember that despite the absence of after a prolonged intermission often
is up in the air and delegations will a formal report, the group did reach means starting from scratch. There
have little guidance on how to move a broad consensus on a number of was sufficient agreement on the
forward. issues. They agreed that: main elements of a protocol that it
In the worst case, disagreement ¢ Negotiations on verification should be possible to set a target
over the protocol could spill over should continue. Although many del- date in the foreseeable future—but
onto the treaty itself. Unlike most egations stated that “business as only if governments show the deter-
multilateral agreements, the BWC usual was not possible,” none called mination to finish the job. *
does not call for automatic five-year the negotiating process into question.
review conferences. If disagreement ¢ The mandate of the talks is still Oliver Meier is Senior Arms Control
over the protocol prevents the con- valid. In his closing statement (at and Disarmament Researcher at the
ference from adopting a “Final 3:30 a.m., Saturday, August 18), Verification Research, Training, and
Declaration,” a majority of state Toth called the fact that no delega- Information Centre (Vertic) in London.
INDEX FOR 2001
Authors Auer, Catherine, “Jumping Jehosabots!” Chuen, Cristina, “Russia’s Blue Water Blues,”
Jan./Feb., 8; “The 50-kiloton Test That No Jan/Feb., 65-69
Ackland, Len, “Rocky Flats: Closing in on One Noticed,” Mar./Apr., 6-7; review of Clemens, Walter C., Jr., “Who Terminates a
Closure,” Nov./Dec., 52-56 Hamza, Saddam’s Bombmaker, Mar./Apr., Treaty?” Nov./Dec., 38-39, 42-43
Aftergood, Steven, review of Gup, The Book 69-70; “Behind the Bits,” May/June, 6-7; Cranston, Alan, “Commit to Abolition,”
of Honor, Mar./Apr., 71-73 “Four Clicks is a Crater,” May/June, 11-12; Jan/Feb., 39-41
Albright, David, “Algeria: Big Deal in the “Yes, in My Backyard,” July/Aug., 6-7; “EU Cumings, Bruce, “Stay the Course on Asia,”
Desert?” May/June, 45-52 Knocks Echelon, Wants Own Super Spy,” Jan/Feb., 29-30; review of Kagan, While
Alvarez, Robert, “A Long Season of Dis- Sept/Oct., 11; “There’s Something in the America Sleeps, Mar./Apr., 70-71
content,” Jan./Feb., 52-57; “Mass Balance,” Air,” Nov./Dec., 9 Dragsdahl, Jorgen, “The Danish Dilemma,”
July/Aug., 57-56; “Making It Work,” Averre, Derek, “Chemical Weapons Disposal: Sept/Oct., 45-50
July/Aug., 55-60 Russia Tries Again,” Sept./Oct., 57-66 Estrella, Hugo, “Argentina: Menem’s Star
Amber, Dave, “Blocking the Way,” May/June, Barker, Fred, “Meanwhile, In Britain,” May/ Falls,” Sept/Oct., 13-15
18-19 June, 56-57 Findlay, Trevor, “In Verification We Trust,”
Arkin, William M., “National Security on the Benn, Aluf, “The Russian-lranian Connec- Jan./Feb., 13-15; review of Reynolds,
Web,” Jan./Feb., 74-75; “The Silver Lining,” tion,” Jan/Feb., 16-18; “Israel's Decision Australia’s Bid for the Bomb, July/Aug.,
Jan/Feb., 76; “U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2001,” Time,” Mar./Apr., 22-24; “Censoring the 67-69
Mar./Apr., 77-79; “The Praetorian Guards,” Past,” July/Aug., 17-19; “Quiet Coopera- Flynn, Matthew, “Brazil: Nuclear to the
Mar /Apr., 80; “Russian Nuclear Forces, tion,” Nov./Dec., 15-17 Rescue?” Sept./Oct., 15-17
2001,” May/June, 78-79; “Nuclear Postur- Bergeron, Kenneth, “While No One Was Flynn, Michael, “An Offer He Can’t Refuse?”
ing,” May/June, 80; “French Nuclear Forces, Looking,” Mar./Apr., 42-49 Mar./Apr., 15; “Guilty Until Proven Inno-
2001,” July/Aug., 70-71; “Targeting China,” Burnie, Shaun, “Japan’s Nuclear Twilight cent,” Mar./Apr., 14-17; “Precisely Off Tar-
July/Aug., 72; “Chinese Nuclear Forces, Zone,” May/June, 58-62 get,” May/June, 7; “Self-Fulfilling Proph-
2001,” Sept./Oct., 71-72; “Theater Defense,” Cameron, Gavin, “Planting Fear,” Sept./Oct., ecy,” May/June, 10-11; “Science on Center
Sept./Oct., 73; “British Nuclear Forces, 38-44 Stage,” July/Aug., 9-10; “A Debt Long
2001,” Nov/Dec., 78-79; “Some Things Choffnes, Eileen, “Germs on the Loose,” Overdue,” July/Aug., 38-48; “In Short
Never Change,” Nov./Dec., 80 Mar./Apr., 57-62 Supply?” Sept/Oct., 7-8
November/December 2001 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 73
Ford, Eugene, “Holy UAVs, Batman,” Sept./ nut,” May/June, 8; “Radiation on the Tom,” Got X-ray Vision, Too,” July/Aug., 8-9;
Oct., 9 May/June, 19-21; “Bioterror: The Game,” “The Purloined Plutonium,” Sept./Oct., 2;
Gabelnick, Tamar, “Small Arms: U.S., Rogues July/Aug., 7-8; “A Do-It-Yourself SIOP,” “Tokai ‘Downwinders’ Speak Out,” Sept./
Hold Out,” Sept/Oct., 18-20 July/Aug., 22-29 Oct., 11-12; “Humor Amid the Rubble,”
Ge6er7h art, Bill, “Watch Out Below,” Jan/Feb., Macfarlane, Allison, “Plutonium Disposal: A Nov./Dec., 2; “Stop That Face!” Nov./Dec.,
Third Way,” May/June, 53-57 6-8; “Best Buddies,” Nov/Dec., 8; “The Ulti-
Gusterson, Hugh, “Tall Tales and Deceptive Maerli, Morten Bremer, “The Navy Says: mate Symbol of Victory,” Nov/Dec., 10-11;
Discourses,” Nov/Dec., 65-68 Hands Off My Stash,” Sept/Oct., 24-25 “After September 11,” Nov./Dec., 44-49
Handler, Joshua, “U.S. Nuclear Forces, Maguen, Joel, “The Sexiest Geek Alive,” Sadnicki, Mike, “Meanwhile, In Britain,”
2001,” Mar/Apr., 77-79; “Russian Nuclear Sept/Oct., 10 May/June, 56-57
Forces, 2001,” May/June, 78-79; “French Makhijani, Annie, “Magical Thinking,” Sauer, Tom, “Wrong in Too Many Ways,”
Nuclear Forces, 2001,” July/Aug., 70-71; Mar/Apr., 3441 Nov./Dec., 36-38
“Chinese Nuclear Forces, 2001,” Sept./Oct., Makhijani, Arjun, “Magical Thinking,” Schwartz, Stephen L, “Defining Reliable,”
71-72; “British Nuclear Forces, 2001,” Mar./Apr., 34-41; “The Burden of Proof,” Mar./Apr., 55-56; “Don’t Know Much
Nov/Dec., 78-79 July/Aug., 49-54 About History,” July/Aug., 11-12; “The
Hansen, Chuck, “Beware the Old Story,” Mazurana, Dyan, “Child Soldiers: What New-Nuke Chorus Tunes Up,” July/Aug.,
Mar./Apr., 52-55 About the Girls?” Sept/Oct., 30-37 30-37; “This Is Not A Test,” Nov/Dec.,
Hartung, William D., “Stop Arming the McKay, Susan, “Child Soldiers: What About 50-51
World,” Jan/Feb., 34-36 the Girls?” Sept/Oct., 30-37 Sea, Geoffery , review of Tierney, Darkness in
Hibbs, Mark, “Plutonium: Can Germany Meier, Oliver, “In Verification We Trust,” El Dorado, Jan./Feb., 71-73
Swear Off?” May/June, 63-66 Jan/Feb., 13-15; “Neither Trust Nor Verify, Sigal, Leon V., “North Korea: On Hold . . .
Hinderstein, Corey Gay, “Algeria: Big Deal in Says U.S.,” Nov/Dec., 19-21, 73; “On the Again,” May/June, 32-39
the Desert?” May/June, 45-52 Wrong Side of the Line?” Nov/Dec., 21 Smith, Aileen Mioko, “Japan’s Nuclear
Hitchens, Theresa, “Get a Policy, Please,” Moore, Mike, “Whose Einstein?” Jan./Feb., Twilight,” May/June, 58-62
Jan/Feb., 21-23 10; “Watch Our for Space Command,” Jan./ Sokolski, Henry D., “Mission Impossible,”
Holl, Jack M., review of Arnold and Pyne, Feb., 24-25; “Non-aggressive Weapons?” Mar./Apr., 62-68
Britain and the H-Bomb, Nov/Dec., 71-72 Mar/Apr., 17-19; “Lovable Leftie,” May/ Stern, Jessica, “The Players: Who's Who in the
Horowitz, Sarah, “Consider Yourself June, 12-13; review of Lambakis, On the
Warned,” Nov/Dec., 40-41 Edge of Earth, May/June, 68-70; “A Waste
Isaacs, John, “Trim Pentagon Fat,” Jan./Feb., of Space?” Sept./Oct., 6-7; review of
26-28; “The Ones to Watch,” Mar./Apr., Williams, ed., Holding the Line, Sept/Oct.,
25-27; “Bush Il or Reagan Ill?” May/June, 68-70
30-31; “Two Steps Forward, Two Steps Moore, Richard, “Where Her Majesty's
Back,” July/Aug., 20-21, 68; “Pebbles and Weapons Were,” Jan./Feb., 58-64; review
All,” Sept/Oct., 22-23; “Costing out the of Paul, Nuclear Rivals, and Twigge and
New Agenda,” Nov/Dec., 17-19 Scott, Planning Armaggedon, May/June,
Isenberg, David, review of Evans, Gassed, 67-68
May/June, 72-73 Mueller, Harald, “Germany Hopes It Will Go
Jasinski, Michael, “Russia’s Blue Water Away,” Nov/Dec., 31-33
Blues,” Jan/Feb., 65-69 Mushtaq, Najum, “Khan Forced Out,”
Johnson, Rebecca, “Downing Street Says Yes; July/Aug., 13-15
Britons, No,” Nov./Dec., 28-30 Nelson, Robert, “Plutonium Disposal: A
Kang, Jungmin, “Plutonium Disposal: A Third Third Way,” May/June, 53-57
Way,” May/June, 53-57 Norris, Robert $., “National Security on the
Khripunov, Igor, “Chemical Weapons Dis- Web,” Jan/Feb., 74-75; “U.S. Nuclear
posal: Russia Tries Again,” Sept./Oct., 57-66 Forces, 2001,” Mar./Apr., 77-79; “Russian
Kibaroglu, Mustafa, “The Generals’ Dis- Nuclear Forces, 2001,” May/June, 78-79;
content,” Mar./Apr., 28-30 “French Nuclear Forces, 2001,” July/Aug.,
Kimball, Daryl, “End the Test Ban Limbo,” 70-71; “Chinese Nuclear Forces, 2001,”
Jan/Feb., 30-31 Sept/Oct., 71-72; “British Nuclear Forces,
Koslofsky, Dan, “Trim Pentagon Fat,” Jan/ 2001,” Nov/Dec., 78-79
Feb., 26-28 O'Hanlon, Michael, “Play Nice with
Kourous, George, review of Andreas, Border NATO,” Jan/Feb., 37-38
Games, Mar./Apr., 73-74 Pala, Christopher, “And Now for the Really
Kristensen, Hans M., “U.S. Nuclear Forces, Big One,” Mar/Apr., 20-22
2001,” Mar/Apr., 77-79; “Russian Nuclear Pate, Jason, “Planting Fear,” Sept./Oct.,
Forces, 2001,” May/June, 78-79; “French 38-44
Nuclear Forces, 2001,” July/Aug., 70-71; Podvig, Pavel, “For Russia, Little Loss, Little
“Chinese Nuclear Forces, 2001,” Sept/Oct., Gain,” Nov/Dec., 22-25
71-72; “British Nuclear Forces, 2001,” Polmar, Norman, review of Sontag and Drew,
Nov/Dec., 78-79 Blind Man’s Bluff and Craven, The Silent
Langeland, Terje, “Here, There, Everywhere,” Battle, Sept./Oct., 66-68
Nov/Dec., 57-64 Powaski, Ronald E., “An Army of Its Own,”
Li Bin, “China Will Have to Respond,” Nov./ May/June, 25-27
Dec., 25-28 Reidy, Michael, review of Jacobsen,
Libicki, Martin C., “Defending the ‘Revolu- Technical Fouls, Mar./Apr., 75-76
tion,” Mar/Apr., 31-33 Richelson, Jeffrey T., review of Lindgren,
Liu Zhiwei, “China Will Have to Respond,” Trust but Verify, Jjan/Feb., 70-71; “Back to
Nov./Dec., 25-28 Black,” May/June, 22-24, 74
Lortie, Bret, “The Art of Impending Doom,” Rothstein, Linda, “Predictions,” Jan./Feb., 2;
Jan/Feb., 7; “The Fungus Among Us,” Jan./ “Greening the Red Planet,” Jan/Feb., 8;
Feb., 9; “Could the Kursk Happen Here?” “Creative Writing,” Mar./Apr., 2; “A Little
Jan/Feb., 68; “It Came From Ohio,” Mar./ Sleight of Hand,” Mar/Apr., 47; “Things
A“pTrh.e, R8e;s t“aAu raLnota daet d theD eEcnkd, ” of Mtahre. /SAupbru.r,b ,”9 ; CPhroadn?g”e ,”M ay/MJauyn/eJ,u ne9,; “P2l; ut“oHnii-uTme,c ht he CaCtotnl-e e|eeS TNe ee eALae e Nt aweeAt n eeee a t| Ser cemeeS aOt S e e ehee— w ea eN Tn eSe—TE e M8e aee S LeeAe mese Atr ee
Mar/Apr., 10; “Setting the Scene,” Mar/ test,” May/June, 28-29; “Powering Up,” —= e eeaee he cee he ame © ot he NT CSOF oen ee
Apr., 50-52; “Unidentified Flying Dough- July/Aug., 2; “Move over, Superman, I've
74 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists November/December 2001
World of Jihad,” Jan/Feb., 46-49; “Meeting Paul, Septimus H., Nuclear Rivals, reviewed weapons program, Mar./Apr., 57-61; plu-
with the Muj,” Jan./Feb., 42-50 by Richard Moore, May/June, 67-68 tonium disposal, May/June, 56-57; view of
Suter, Keith, “Independence for West Papua?” Reynolds, Wayne, Awstralia’s Bid for the U.S. missile defense, Nov./Dec., 28-30;
May/June, 16-18 Bomb, reviewed by Trevor Findlay, July/ BNFL, Nov./Dec., 57-64; nuclear forces
Tucker, Jonathan, “Chemical Weapons: Aug., 67-69 2001, Nov./Dec., 78-79
Buried in the Backyard,” Sept./Oct., 51-56 Sigal, Leon V., Hang Separately, reviewed by British Nuclear Fuels, Ltd.: and plutonium
Uhler, Walter C., review of Sigal, Hang Walter C. Uhler, May/June, 70-72 disposal, May/June, 56-57 falsification of
Separately, May/June, 70-72; review of Sontag, Sherry, and Christopher Drew, Blind data, May/June, 58-62; German contracts,
McNamara and Blight, Wilson’s Ghost, Man’s Bluff, reviewed by Norman Polmar, May/June, 63-66; Nov./Dec., 57-64
Nov/Dec., 70-71 Sept/Oct., 66-68 Bulletin: redesign, Jan./Feb., 2; former editor
Urayama, Kori, “Japan’s Wait-and-See Ap- Tierney, Patrick, Darkness in El Dorado, Sam Day, May/June, 12-13
proach,” Nov./Dec., 33-35 reviewed by Geoffery Sea, Jan./Feb., 71-73 Bush administration: national security policy,
Vogel, Kathleen, “Planting Fear,” Sept/Oct., Twigge, Stephen and Len Scott, Planning May/June, 30-31; energy plan, July/Aug., 2;
38-44 Armageddon, reviewed by Richard Moore, treaty habits, July/Aug., 5; missile defense
von Hippel, Frank N., “Plutonium Disposal: A May/June, 67-68 plans, Sept./Oct., 22-23; new nuclear dis-
Third Way,” May/June, 53-57; “Eyes in the Williams, Cindy, ed., Holding the Line, course, Nov./Dec., 65-68; breaking treaties,
Sky,” July/Aug., 61-66; “Where Fermi reviewed by Mike Moore, Sept/Oct., 68-70 Nov./Dec., 38-39, 42-43
Stood,” Sept/Oct., 26-29 BWC: See Biological Weapons Convention
Wesolowsky, Tony, “Risky Business,” Censorship: in Israel, July/Aug., 17-19; and
May/June, 40-44 U.S. government, Sept./Oct., 5
Withington, Thomas, “Israel and India Partner Subjects Central Europe: reactor safety, May/June,
Up,” Jan/Feb., 18-19; “The Early Anti- 40-44
Taliban Team,” Nov/Dec., 13-15; review of ABM Treaty: see Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty Chemical weapons: Israel and treaty ratifica-
Griffin, Reaping the Whirlwind, Nov/Dec., Afghanistan: and mujahideen, Jan./Feb., tion, Mar./Apr., 22-24; buried in Wash-
69-70 42-50; anti-Taliban coalition, Nov/Dec., ington, D.C., Sept./Oct., 51-56; disposal in
Wolfsthal, Jon Brook, “Surveying the Nuclear 13-15 Russia, Sept./Oct., 57-66
Cities,” July/Aug., 15-17 Africa: girl soldiers, Sept./Oct., 30-37 Chernobyl: May/June, 40-44
Woodard, Colin, “Remember the Maine Yan- Agro-terrorism: Sept./Oct., 38-44 Child soldiers: girls, Sept./Oct., 30-37
kee,” Jan/Feb., 11-13; “Stuck in Orbit,” Ain Oussera: Algerian nuclear site, May/ China: U.S. relations, Jan./Feb., 29-30; North
Mar/Apr., 11-13; “Called to Account,” June, 45-52 Korea relationship, May/June, 32-39; tar-
May/June, 14-16; review of Kaplan, East- Aircraft: flying disc , Mar./Apr., 8; doughnut- geting of, July/Aug., 72; U.S. censorship on
ward to Tartary and The Coming Anarchy, shaped, May/June, 8; air traffic after terror- Chinese nuclear weapons, Sept./Oct., 5;
Sept./Oct., 64-66 ist attacks, Nov./Dec., 50-51 nuclear forces 2001, Sept./Oct., 71-72; view
Zerriffi, Hisham, “Magical Thinking,” Mar./ Albright, Madeleine: May/June, 32-39 of U.S. missile defense, Nov./Dec., 25-28
Apr., 34-41 Algeria: May/June, 45-52 Clinton, Bill: and North Korea, May/June,
Zhang, Hui, “Eyes in the Sky,” July/Aug., Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty: and Bush admin- 32-39
61-66 istration, Sept./Oct., 22-23; and Russia-U.S. Cohen, Avner: July/Aug., 17-19
Zhou Baogen, “China Will Have to Re- relations, Nov./Dec., 25-27; and Thule Air Cold War: Britain’s overseas nuclear deploy-
spond,” Nov./Dec., 25-28 Base, Sept./Oct., 45-50; and China, ments, Jan./Feb., 58-64; honoring sub-
Nov./Dec., 27-30; European views of, mariners, Mar./Apr., 5
Nov./Dec., 36-38; who can abrogate, Nov./ Collective security: and monsters, Jan./Feb., 5
Dec., 38-39, 42-43 Commercial satellites: July/Aug., 61-66
Books Argentina: corruption in, Sept./Oct., 13-15 Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty: verification
Armed conflict: girls in, Sept./Oct., 30-37 of, Jan/Feb., 13-15; need to ratify, Jan/
Andreas, Peter, Border Games, reviewed by Arms control: and Internet research, Jan./ Feb., 30-31; testing loophole, Mar./Apr.,
George Kourous, Mar./Apr., 73-74 Feb., 74-75; war plan simulation software, §2-55
Arnold, Lorna with Katherine Pyne, Britain July/Aug., 22-29; and new nuclear weap- Cooperative Threat Reduction: and Russian
and the H-Bomb, reviewed by Jack M. Holl, ons, July/Aug., 30-37; U.N. small arms con- chemical weapons disposal, Sept./Oct.,
Nov./Dec., 71-72 ference, Sept./Oct., 18-20; German perspec- 57-66
Craven, John Pita, The Silent War, reviewed tive, Nov./Dec., 31-33 Counterproliferation: Mar./Apr., 62-68
by Norman Polmar, Sept./Oct., 66-68 Arms sales: Russia to Iran, Jan/Feb., 16-18; CTBT: See Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
Evans, Rob, Gassed, reviewed by David Israel to india, Jan/Feb., 18-19; U.S. in- CWC: See chemical weapons
Isenberg, May/June, 72-73 volvement in, Jan./Feb., 34-36; Argentinean, Cyprus: British nuclear weapons in, Jan./Feb.,
Griffin, Michael, Reaping the Whirlwind, Sept./Oct., 13-15 58-64
reviewed by Thomas Withington, Nov./ Art: with nuclear motif, Jan./Feb., 7 Day, Sam: May/June, 12-13
Dec., 69-70 Asia: girl soldiers, Sept/Oct., 30-37; anti- Decommissioning: Maine Yankee, Jan./Feb.,
Gup, Ted, The Book of Honor, reviewed by Taliban coalition, Nov/Dec., 13-15 11-13; Russian submarines, Jan./Feb.,
Steven Aftergood, Mar/Apr., 71-73 Aspin, Les: Mar./Apr., 62-68 65-69
Hamza, Khidhir, Saddam's Bombmaker, Atomic veterans: July/Aug., 49-54 Defense conversion: Russian sub as transport
reviewed by Catherine Auer, Mar./Apr., Atmospheric tests: Mar./Apr., 6-7 vehicle, Mar./Apr., 20-22
69-70 Ballistic missile defense: See National missile Defense spending: need for cutbacks, Jan/
Jacobsen, John Kurt, Technical Fouls, defense Feb., 26-28; Sept./Oct., 36-37; after
reviewed by Michael Reidy, Mar./Apr., Ballistic Missile Defense Organization: and September 11 attacks, Nov./Dec., 17-19
7¢_9 secrecy, Mar./Apr., 5 Demobilization: of child soldiers, Sept./Oct.,
Kagan, Donald and Frederick W. Kagan, Bellona: Mar./Apr., 15 30-37
While America Sleeps, reviewed by Bruce Beryllium: July/Aug., 38-48 Denmark: and U.S. missile defense, Sept /
Cumings, Mar./Apr., 70-71 Biological Weapons Convention: verification Oct., 45-50
Kaplan, Robert, Eastward to Tartary and The protocol, Mar./Apr., 57-61; U.S. backs out Disarmament: movement in New Zealand,
Coming Anarchy, reviewed by Colin Wood- of protocol, July/Aug., 5; and agro-terror- May/June, 18-19; failure to address needs
ard, Sept./Oct., 64-66 ism, Sept/Oct., 38-44; stymied by U.S., of girls, Sept./Oct., 30-37; chemical weap-
Lambakis, Steven, On the Edge of Earth, Nov./Dec., 19-21, 73 ons in Russia, Sept./Oct., 57-66; new dis-
reviewed by Mike Moore, May/June, 68-70 BNFL: See British Nuclear Fuels, Ltd. course, Nov./Dec., 65-68
Lindgren, David T., Trust but Verify, reviewed Bomb shelter: honeymoon in, Jan./Feb., 6-7 Downwinders: at Tokai, Sept./Oct., 11-12
by Jeffrey T. Richelson, Jan/Feb., 70-71 Brazil: nuclear power, Sept./Oct., 15-17 Dugway Proving Ground: Mar./Apr., 57-61
McNamara, Robert S. and James G. Blight, Brilliant Pebbles: back, Sept./Oct., 22-23 Dystopias: Nov./Dec., 40-41
Wilson’s Ghost, reviewed by Walter C. Britain: nuclear attack subs, Jan./Feb., 5; East European reactors: May/June, 40-44
Uhler, Nov/Dec., 70-71 nuclear weapons, Jan./Feb., 58-64; bio- Echelon: Sept./Oct., 11
November/December 2001 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75
Einstein, Albert: and marketing, Jan./Feb., 10 International Atomic Energy Agency: inspec- Mar./Apr., 62-68; nuclear exercises, Mar./
Energy: crisis in Brazil, Sept./Oct., 15-17 tions in Algeria, May/June, 45-52; safe- Apr., 80; policy, May/June, 30-31; missile
Energy Department: and waste storage, Jan./ guards in Japan, May/June, 58-62; and defense, July/Aug., 20-21, 68
Feb., 11-13; Los Alamos problems, Jan./ naval fuel, Sept./Oct., 24-25 NATO: and U.S., Jan./Feb., 37-38; and Euro-
Feb., 52-57; transmutation, Mar./Apr., 34- International Court of Justice: Yugoslav war pean army, May/June, 25-27
41; tritium production, Mar./Apr., 42-49; crimes trial, May/June, 14-16 Natural Resources Defense Council: war
and nuclear dishonesty, Mar./Apr., 52-55; International Space Station: Mar./Apr., 11-13 planning software, July/Aug., 22-29
nuclear weapons complex, July/Aug., 30- Internet: national security research, Jan./Feb., New Zealand: nuclear-free policy, May/June,
37; compensation program, July/Aug., 38- 74-75; and terrorism, May/June, 6-7; Mars 18-19
48; worker compensation, July/Aug., 55- volunteer research, May/June, 11-12 Nikitin, Alexander: Mar./Apr., 14-17
60; recycled uranium, July/Aug., 56-57; Inuits: and Thule air base, Sept/Oct., 45-50 NMD: See National Missile Defense
sites covered by compensation, July/Aug., Iran: Russian arms sales to, Jan./Feb., 16-18 Non-lethal weapons: Vehicle-Mounted Active
58-60; conflicts of interest, Nov/Dec., 8; Iraq: defectors’ claims, May/June, 11; nuclear Denial System, May/June, 9; malodorants,
cooperation with Israel, Nov./Dec., 15-17; test claims refuted, July/Aug., 5 Nov./Dec., 9
cleanup, Nov./Dec., 52-64 Islam: religious schools, Jan./Feb., 42-50 Nonproliferation: tritium production, Mar./
Energy Employees Occupational Illness Israel: concern with Russian arms sales, Jan/ Apr., 42-49; challenges to, Mar./Apr., 62-
Compensation Act: July/Aug., 38-60 Feb., 16-18; arms sales to India, Jan./Feb., 68; German perspective, Nov./Dec., 31-33;
Entertainment: G-Fan, Jan./Feb., 5; Nuclear 18-19; non-ratification of chemical weapons see also NPT
War card game, Mar./Apr., 9; Mars restau- treaty, Mar/Apr., 22-24; nuclear policy, North Africa: May/June, 45-52
rant, Mar./Apr., 10; Pox video game, July/Aug., 17-19; nuclear cooperation with North American Aerospace Defense Com-
July/Aug., 7-8; plays with science themes, U.S., Nov./Dec., 15-17 mand (NORAD): Nov./Dec., 50-51
July/Aug., 9-10; sexiest geek, Sept./Oct., 10; Japan: plutonium disposal, May/June, 58- North Korea: May/June, 32-39
dystgpias, Nov./Dec., 40-41 62; downwinders at Tokai, Sept/Oct., 11- Northern Alliance: support for, Nov./Dec.,
Environment: Tomsk region radioactivity, 12; view of missile defense, Nov/Dec., 33-35 13-15
May/June, 19-21; and biological weapons, Jihad: groups, Jan./Feb., 42-50 NPT: Jan./Feb., 21-23; and Algeria, May/
Sept./Oct., 38-44; threat from buried chem- Joint Chiefs of Staff: Mar./Apr., 80 June, 45-52; and U.S. naval fuel, Sept./
ical munitions, Sept/Oct., 51-56; Rocky Joint Standoff Weapon: May/June, 7 Oct., 24-25
Flats, Nov./Dec., 52-56 Khan, A. Q.: July/Aug., 13-15 Nuclear abolition: U.S. should commit to,
Epstein, William: May/June, 12-13 Kursk: Jan./Feb., 65-69 Jan/Feb., 39-41
Espionage: at weapons labs, Jan./Feb., 76; Labor Department: and nuclear workers com- Nuclear cities: worker survey, July/Aug., 15-1 =
Sutyagin trial, Mar./Apr., 14-17; European pensation, July/Aug., 55-60, Nov./Dec., 5 Nuclear discourse: and Bush administration,
Union, Sept/Oct., 11 Labour Party: backing U.S. missile defense, Nov./Dec., 65-68
Europe: rapid reaction force, May/June, Nov./Dec., 28-30 Nuclear engineers: lack of, Sept./Oct., 7-8
25-27; reaction to U.S. missile defense Los Alamos: morale, Jan/Feb., 52-57 Nuclear Notebook: Internet research,
plans, Nov./Dec., 36-38 Madrisas: in Pakistan, Jan./Feb., 42-50 Jan./Feb., 74-75; U.S. nuclear forces 2001,
European Union: Turkey membership, Mar./ Maine Yankee: suing Energy Department, Mar./Apr., 77-79; Russian nuclear forces,
Apr., 28-30; European army, May/June, Jan/Feb., 11-13 2001, May/June, 78-79; French nuclear
25-27; and Echelon, Sept/Oct., 11; bio- Mars: terraforming, Jan./Feb., 8; online vol- forces, 2001, July/Aug., 70-71; Chinese
weapons treaty protocol, Nov/Dec., 19-21, unteer research, May/June, 11-12 nuclear forces, 2001, Sept/Oct., 71-72;
73; response to U.S. missile defense, Nov./ Mass Balance Study: July/Aug., 56-57 British nuclear forces, 2001, Nov/Dec.,
Dec., 36-38 Massoud, Ahmadshah: assassination of, 78-79
Fast breeder reactors: May/June, 58-62 Nov./Dec., 13-15 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: See NPT
Fermi, Enrico: Sept./Oct., 26-29 Media: coverage of nuclear workers, July/ Nuclear opacity: in Israel, July/Aug., 17-19
Fernald plant: July/Aug., 49-54 Aug., 38-48; interests before September 11, Nuclear Posture Review: May/June, 80
Fissile material: verifying production by satel- Nov./Dec., 2 Nuclear power: for tritium production, Mar./
lite, July/Aug., 61-66; as naval fuel, Sept./ Menem, Carlos: on trial, Sept./Oct., 13-15 Apr., 42-49; floating, in Russia, May/June,
Oct., 24-25 Middle East: and chemical weapons, Mar./ 5; safety, May/June, 40-44; revival, July/
Food irradiation: May/June, 5 Apr., 22-24 Aug., 2; lack of engineers, Sept./Oct., 7-8;
Foot-and-mouth disease: Sept/Oct., 38-44 Military: in space, Jan/Feb., 24-28; Mar./ in Brazil, Sept/Oct., 15-17; conflicts of
France: and transmutation, Mar/Apr., 34- Apr., 17-19; budget after September 11 interest, Nov./Dec., 8; British Nuclear Fuels
41; nuclear forces 2001, July/Aug., 70-71 attacks, Nov./Dec., 17-19 Ltd, Nov./Dec., 57-64
Germany: plutonium disposal, May/June, Missile defense: See National missile defense Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Mar./Apr.,
63-66; view of U.S. missile defense, Mixed oxide (MOX) fuel: May/June, 53-57; 42-49; conflicts of interest, Nov/Dec., 8
Nov/Dec., 31-33 in Britain, May/June, 56-57; in Japan, Nuclear submarines: Tireless at Gibraltar,
Gibraltar: British sub at, Jan./Feb., 5 May/June, 58-62; in Germany, May/June, Jan/Feb., 5; safety in Russia, Jan/Feb.,
Girl soldiers: Sept./Oct., 30-37 63-66 65-69; safety in U.S., Jan./Feb., 68; Mar./
Government Accountability Project: Tom MOxX: See mixed oxide fuel Apr., 20-22; U.S. fuel stockpile, Sept./Oct.,
River study, May/June, 19-21 NASA: fungus on spacecraft, Jan./Feb., 9; space 24-25
Greenland: and U.S.-Denmark relations, station v. exploration, Mar/Apr., 11-13; Nuclear testing: verification, Jan/Feb., 13-
Sept/Oct., 45-50 interactive astronomy, May/June, 11-12 15; purpose of, Jan./Feb., 30-31; misinfor-
Gruinard Island: Mar./Apr., 57-61 National missile defense: as a NATO issue, mation about, Mar./Apr., 6-7; Mar./Apr.,
Hanford: cleanup and BNFL, Nov./Dec., Jan/Feb., 37-38; proponents, Mar./Apr., 50-52; Mar./Apr., 52-56; Iraqi claims,
57-64 25-27; gaining momentum, May/June, 2; July/Aug., 5
Holy war: Jan./Feb., 46-49 misinformation about, July/Aug., 11-12; Nuclear transport: protests against, May/
Human rights: in Turkey, Mar./Apr., 28-30; slowed progress, July/Aug., 20-21, 68; June, 18-19, 63-66; BNFL, Nov./Dec.,
in Indonesia, May/June, 16-18; and girls in intercept of chem/bio warhead, Sept./Oct., 57-64
war, Sept/Oct., 30-37 6-7; and ABM Treaty, Sept./Oct., 22-23; Nuciear war planning: July/Aug., 22-29, 72
Hussein, Saddam: May/June, 11 costs, Sept./Oct., 36-37; and Thule, Green- Nuclear War: the card game, Mar./Apr., 9
Hydrogen bomb: and Enrico Fermi, Sept./ land, Sept./Oct., 45-50; arguments against, Nuclear waste: on-site storage problems,
Oct., 26-29 Sept./Oct., 73; international views on, Jan/Feb., 11-13; Mar./Apr., 34-41; Plu-
India: and Israeli weapons, Jan/Feb., 18-19; Nov./Dec., 22-39, 42-43 tonium Memorial Contest, May/June, 28-
anti-Taliban efforts, Nov./Dec., 13-15 National Reconnaissance Office: May/June, 29; plutonium disposal, May/June, 53-57;
Indonesia: West Papua independence move- 22-24, 74 British plutonium, May/June, 56-57; in
ment, May/June, 16-18 National security: on the Internet, Jan./Feb., Japan, May/June, 58-62; problems in Ger-
Intelligence: satellites, May/June, 22-24, 74; 74-75; exaggeration of threats, Mar./Apr., many, May/June, 63-66; Utah storage
use of commercial satellites, July/Aug., 2; team, Mar./Apr., 25-27; military theory, debate, July/Aug., 6-7; shooting into sun,
61-66; failure of, Nov/Dec. 44-49 Mar./Apr., 31-33; counterproliferation, Sept/Oct., 6-7; from Rocky Flats, Nov./
76 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists November/December 2001
Dec., 52-56; BNFL contracts, Nov./Dec., July/Aug., 15-17; chemical weapons dispos- 25-28; German view of, Nov./Dec., 31-33
57-64 al, Sept/Oct., 57-66; anti-Taliban efforts, United Nations: International Court of
Nuclear weapons: U.S. policy, Jan./Feb., Nov./Dec., 13-15; view of U.S. missile Justice, May/June, 14-16; and West Papua,
21-23; abolition, Jan./Feb., 39-41; mini- defense, Nov./Dec., 22-25; see also Soviet May/June, 16-18; small arms conference,
nukes, Jan./Feb., 52-57; British overseas Union Sept/Oct., 18-20
deployments, Jan./Feb., 58-64; and Internet Science: volunteer research, May/June, 11- United States: nuclear policy, Jan./Feb.,
research, Jan./Feb., 74-75; U.S. tritium pro- 12; and theater, July/Aug., 9-10 21-23, 39-41; in space, Jan./Feb., 24-25;
duction, Mar./Apr., 42-49; new designs and Secrecy: and Ballistic Missile Defense Organ- military spending, Jan./Feb., 26-28; foreign
reliability testing, Mar./Apr., 50-52; effects ization, Mar./Apr., 5; satellite imagery, policy on Asia, Jan./Feb., 29-30; arms deals,
tests, Mar/Apr., 52-55; Third World tar- May/June, 22-24, 74; U.S. censorship, Jan/Feb., 34-36; nuclear relations with
gets, Mar./Apr., 62-68; U.S. nuclear forces, Sept/Oct., 5 Britain, Jan./Feb., 58-64; congressional
2001, Mar./Apr., 77-79; North Korea, Sellafield: and BNFL, Nov./Dec., 57-64 logic, Mar./Apr., 2; funding for space pro-
May/June, 32-39; Algerian program, Siberia: radioactivity in, May/June, 19-21 grams, Mar./Apr., 11-13; national security
May/June, 45-52; Russian nuclear forces, Single Integrated Operational Plan: and nu- team, Mar./Apr., 25-27; revolution in mili-
2001, May/June, 78-79; Iraqi claims refut- clear reliability, Mar/Apr., 50-52; simu- tary affairs, Mar/Apr., 31-33; transmuta-
ed, July/Aug., 5; in Pakistan, July/Aug., lation software, July/Aug., 22-29; and tion of nuclear waste, Mar./Apr., 34-41; tri-
13-15; war simulation software, July/Aug., China, July/Aug., 72 tium production, Mar./Apr., 42-49; stock-
22-29; revival of, July/Aug., 30-35; threat SIOP: see Single Integrated Operational Plan pile reliability, Mar./Apr., 52-55; bioweap-
v. reality, July/Aug., 36-37; worker com- Skull Valley Goshute Indians: July/Aug., 6-7 ons program, Mar./Apr., 57-61; coun-
pensation, July/Aug., 38-48; recycled urani- Small arms: U.N. conference, Sept./Oct., 18- terproliferation, Mar./Apr., 62-68; nuclear
um, July/Aug., 56-57; sites where manufac- 20 forces 2001, Mar./Apr., 77-79; nuclear
tured, July/Aug., 58-60; satellite verifica- Smith, Alice Kimball: May/June, 12-13 preparation, Mar/Apr., 80; missile defense,
tion, July/Aug., 61-66; French nuclear South America: arms trade, Sept/Oct., 13- May/June, 2, July/Ang. 20-21, 68; Inter-
forces, 2001, July/Aug., 70-71; Chinese 15; girls in war, Sept./Oct., 30-37 national Criminal Court, May/June, 14-16;
programs, Sept./Oct., 5; and Enrico Fermi, South Asia: Jan./Feb., 42-50; terrorism, government secrecy, May/June, 22-24, 74;
Sept./Oct., 26-29; Chinese nuclear forces, Jan./Feb., 46-49; July/Aug., 13-15 foreign policy, May/June, 30-31; North
2001, Sept./Oct., 71-72; campaign against, Soviet Union: secret bioweapons program, Korea policy, May/June, 32-39; nuclear
Nov./Dec., 7; new discourse, Nov./Dec., Mar./Apr., 57-61; threat v. reality, July/ posture, May/June, 80; misinformed politi-
65-68; British nuclear forces, 2001, Nov./ Aug., 36-37; and chemical weapons dispos- cians, July/Aug., 11-12; Nuclear Cities
Dec., 78-79 al, Sept./Oct., 57-66; see also Russia Initiative, July/Aug., 15-17; nuclear war
Nuclear workers: in Russia, July/Aug., 15- Space: terraforming Mars, Jan./Feb., 8; fun- plan, July/Aug., 22-29; proponents of new
17; radiation exposure, July/Aug., 49-54; gus on spacecraft, Jan/Feb., 9; potential nukes, July/Aug., 30-37; defense predic-
compensation program, July/Aug., 55-57: arms race in, Jan./Feb., 24-25; International tions, July/Aug., 36-37; nuclear workers,
sites, July/Aug., 58-60 Space Station, Mar./Apr., 11-13; future July/Aug., 38-60; at arms control confer-
Oak Ridge: July/Aug., 38-48 weaponization, Mar /Apr., 17-19; military ence, Sept./Oct., 18-20; and ABM Treaty,
Paducah: July/Aug., 38-48 exercises, May/June, 10-11 Sept./Oct., 22-23; navy fuel-stockpiling pol-
Pakistan: religious schools, Jan./Feb., 42-50; Space Command: Jan./Feb., 24-25 icy, Sept/Oct., 24-25; defense spending com-
religious parties, Jan./Feb., 46-49; nuclear Spent fuel: storage, Jan./Feb., 11-13 parisons, Sept./Oct., 36-37; vulnerability to
establishment, July/Aug., 13-15: conflict, Spertus, Ellen: sexiest geek, Sept./Oct., 10 agricultural terrorism, Sept/Oct., 38-44;
with India, Nov./Dec., 13-15 Spring Valley: buried chemical weapons, debate over Thule Air Base, Sept./Oct., 45-
Plutonium: memorial design contest, May/ Sept/Oct., 51-56 50; chemical weapons, Sept/Oct., 51-56;
June 28-29; disposal, May/June, 53-66; Steganography: May/June, 6-7 and Russian chemical weapons disposal,
stolen, Sept/Oct., 2; at Rocky Flats, Nov./ Stink bomb: Nov./Dec., 9 Sept./Oct., 57-66; reaction to September 11
Dec., 52-56 Stockpile stewardship: Mar./Apr., 50-52 attacks, Nov/Dec., 17-19, 44-51; British
Political advice: for president-elect, Jan./Feb., Storage MOX: May/June, 53-57 support for missile defense, Nov./Dec.,
2, 22-39, 42-43 Strategic Command: July/Aug., 22-29; July/ 28-30; and treaty abrogation, Nov/Dec.,
Pollux cask: May/June, 53-57 Aug., 72; and September 11, Nov./Dec., 38-39, 42-43; cooperation with Israel,
Proliferation: and tritium production, March/ 50-51 Nov/Dec., 15-17; rejects bioweapons verifi-
April, 42-49; and transmutation, Mar./ Sutyagin, Igor: on trial, Mar./Apr., 14-17 cation protocol, Nov/Dec., 19-21, 73; and
Apr., 34-41; preventing, Mar./Apr., 62-68; Taiwan: view of U.S. missile defense, Nov/ China, Nov./Dec., 25-28; and Japan,
and storage MOX, May/June, 53-57; and Dec., 25-28 Nov/Dec., 33-35; cleanup, Nov/Dec., 52-64
Russian nuclear workers, July/Aug., 15-17 Taliban: opposition to, Nov./Dec., 13-15 Unmanned aerial vehicles: Sept./Oct., 9
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act: July/ Technology: hopping robots, Jan./Feb., 8; Uranium miners: July/Aug., 49-54
Aug., 49-54 sub-surface radar, July/Aug., 8-9; face- Verification: of nuclear tests, Jan./Feb., 13-
Radiation: worker exposures, July/Aug., 38- recognition, Nov./Dec., 6-8 15; May/June, 53-57
48; downwinders at Tokai, Sept/Oct., 11-12 Tennessee Valley Authority: and tritium pro- Vozrozhdeniye Island: Mar./Apr., 57-61
Radioactive materials: July/Aug., 38-60 duction, Mar./Apr., 42-49 War: girls in, Sept/Oct., 30-37
Reprocessing: and transmutation, Mar./Apr., Terrorism: roots of, Jan/Feb., 42-50; and Washington, D.C.: buried chemical muni-
34-41; Japan, May/June, 58-62; German electronic communication, May/June, 6-7; tions, Sept/Oct., 51-56
options, May/June, 63-66; Plutonium agricultural, Sept./Oct., 38-44; humor after Weapons labs: problems at Los Alamos,
Memorial Contest, May/June, 28-29; May/ September 11, Nov./Dec., 2; and budget, Jan/Feb., 52-57; security at, Jan./Feb., 76;
June, 53-57 Nov./Dec., 17-19; response to September nuclear workers, July/Aug., 38-48; recycled
Richardson, Bill: Mar/Apr., 42-49; July/ 11 attacks, Nov/Dec., 2, 44-51 uranium, July/Aug., 56-57; Rocky Flats
Aug., 38-48; Nov./Dec., 15-17 Theater missile defense: Sept/Oct., 73; Japan- cleanup, Nov./Dec., 8; Israeli-U.S. coopera-
Robots: that can hop, Jan./Feb., 8; miniature ese view, Nov/Dec., 33-35; see also Nation- tion, Nov./Dec., 15-17
aerial vehicles, Sept./Oct., 9 al missile defense Weapons of mass destruction: Counterpro-
Rocky Flats: cleanup, Nov./Dec., 52-56 Thermal imaging: July/Aug., 8-9 liferation Initiative, Mar/Apr., 62-68
Rokkasho: reprocessing at, May/June, 58-62 Thule Air Base: and native population, Sept./ Wen Ho Lee case: fallout, Jan./Feb., 52-57
Russia: arms sales to Iran, Jan/Feb., 16-18; Oct., 45-50 Weapons technology: precision-guided weap-
navy’s problems, Jan./Feb., 65-69; espi- Tokaimura: downwinders, Sept./Oct., 11-12 ons, May/June, 7; crowd control device,
onage trials, Mar./Apr., 14-17; Federal Tom River: radioactivity in, May/June, 19-21 May/June, 9; space-based laser, May/June,
Security Service, Mar./Apr., 15; nuclear sub- Transmutation: Mar./Apr., 34-41 10-11; mini-nukes, July/Aug., 30-37; threat
marines, Mar./Apr., 20-22; floating nuclear Tritium: Mar./Apr., 42-49 v. reality, July/Aug., 36-37; and missile
power plant, May/June, 5; nuclear pollu- Turkey: and EU, Mar./Apr., 28-30 defense advocates, Sept./Oct., 73; malodor-
tion, May/June, 19-21; reactor safety, UFOs: explanation of, Mar./Apr., 8; flying ants, Nov./Dec., 9
May/June, 40-44; nuclear forces, 2001, drones, May/June, 8 West Papua: separatist movement, May/June,
May/June, 78-79; nuclear workers survey, Unilateralism: China’s view of, Nov/Dec., 16-18
November/December 2001 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 77