ebook img

BUFORA Bulletin2 No.06 Oct Nov 1998 PDF

28 Pages·1998·8 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview BUFORA Bulletin2 No.06 Oct Nov 1998

Di.llonfhlyJournal 0f Ifu Drilislr ufO flrsrentr lssoriation ln This lssue: Roswell Autopgy Movie; Latest! Sturrock Report'. The Holrden Moors '.fornado pilot.,. uevon-Fg_anormal/UFo ..Link.. C--a-s-e'. 1959 Papuan UFO Wave. 6 No: October/November {99g, Lntrrl-E--r UUI UI I 3ULtEEin Robert Moore On thc 29lh Junc. 1998 a repon by a Sroup of acadenrics lmnr a body callcd thc Sociefy for Ernlomtion rssE) crcatcJ nolablc cxcitcmcnt both rvithin Inrl $ithout Ujology. lhr' sSE hurj conductcLj rr\r(* ,'l th(' Ul-() phcnonrcnon anJ concluLlcd lhat tll'() rcpons werc $oflh) ol' sciljnclj s arlcnliun- rDd thc stud)'ofLll]Os oll'ered lhe prospecl ol real scicntilic breakthroughs. l-his has awokcn among many prubably lirr thc lirsl timc since lhe dcalh of Dr. J. A. Ilynck - hopcs thal our subjccl will lin.rlly *- i enti li c rcspcctab i I ity..... ll wc arc tonunatc. lhis so-called Sturrock Report will engender a ncw intercst in the " appn)ach $ilhin our subject, as opposed lo one dominarcd by thc concerns and desircs of thc r.'ct{)r. I_hroughoul thc 199{}'s our subiccl has had a prolracted llinalion with populism. Ahllough lhis our subject crrdlcss opportunities lo empowcr and strengthen ourselves. I pcnionally Ieel this chancc sr]uand('rcd. Many wilhin this subjecl seemed to work vigorously lo rcndcr Ufology inlo a rn:tloguc ol' X-.Filesl Asaresuh we hear ofpeople being dcsc(ibe'J as "the rcal lile Mul.lertt or as the ttred life ca!p/c". liunhcrmorc. is il a coincidcnce lhat the lopics strcssed by this programme (ahductions, covcr-ups and saucer crashes) are ones which have come to vinually dominate Ulblo8y in rccenl years......? It is. ofcourse. a matlcr of considerable debale whelhcr the X-Files aclually thrust thcsc conccpLs public don1lrin. or whether il merely reflects pre-cxistent (il'publicly unstatcd) undcrcurrcnts ol' L lo riliel: Whalcvcr lhc casc, it must be rare lbr a lvork oi'liction k) so markedly influcncc tho publ ol_a frcturl subiect. as this progritmme has in rcgards to Lltros. Don'l get me wrong, I cnioy the Files: but in it's proper contexl. as a work ol'fiction. cxprcssing ideas through thc mcdium ol' iul:undlL'urs.Butwhyhusoursuhj('clsccminglyallowedlhispmgramm€'wilhlilllcovcrlopposilion- inateJxrpularconceptionsofUf'ology?'fhereis vcryliulL'rnyof usccndi\lo h(rrhe media's j()nccminB this subjecr. tJfobgists havc long recogniscd thc media as a bcast ()1 [,ovccrutiirn proponi('ns. blindly stomps across our agcndas like a rampaging B-movic monstcr! llul could wc havc lried irl a collcclive unity) to kccp a serious and objectivc trcatment ol our subjcct in the public domain? Who reall) 1.11. alie. all this 1imc...... ,\lthouSh once decmcd the "royal road'k) lruc undcrstanding. nrany wilhin tJli)logy l()day suG(onsciously lcarlul ol lhlj scienlilic approrch. lhis mry bc duc 1o thc realisatiur lhal dpplyinS scicnce 1() t:FO rcpon\ lcads lo the vast majorily ol'thcm bcirrg explaincd as l|()sl lt also nlljalls that nrany luncilir] noliDns and luprovcn assunrplions - wlrich aro comnron ulblogical cuffcncy wi(hin our subicct loday - would no lon8cr bc acecplable. llut a scicnlilic approach should ncver cquale k) an ovc l! socplical rtliludr. only onc ol honcsty. An honesly thal must c 1bolh ways. nn honcsty thlr lccepls a sighliDg iLccount as erplicahle or us a;xrssiblc Senuineanomaly, bascd only an obi€clivc xsscssnrc[l ol'it's salicnt dctuils. Wh l. lhcn.oflhcothcr way'l lllind bclicl lcads lo 8 ghetlo ol sell delLrsion. in which "answcrs" ol a rrc lbund. hul only ones dcrived lronl suhicctivc id('nls. Such rl|s$crs" probahly bo r litrlc {il' Ir) obicclivc rculit!. lhc scicDlilic tlpproirch isnotanei|sy pnth loroursubicll lo t.rkc. Ilutilprovi unlirili|g bright lighl ol-rorson. crpuhle ol protecting nll vvho trul) fl:vcrc il lionl slonrhl'n8. bl;ndly ttnd he:rdlong. irtto thc dark. dcsp rbyss ol-lhc unknown. Ilut. rery soon. $c mry havc to drci{-lc s4rcthcr *c wish Lo nuster lhc IJlrO problenr. or lct thc various bclicl\ associatc'd with this subicct nrastcr usl BUFORA BULLETIN No. 6. OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 1998. Editorial Address: 83, Church Road, East Huntspill, Highbridge, Somerset, TA9 3NG. email: [email protected] _ . BUI'ORA BULLETIN is published by the Brirish UFO Research Association (BUFORA Ltd). Registered Oflice: 16 Southway, Burgess Hill, Sussex, RH15 9S.I. Registered in London 01234924. Membership ofBUFOR{ is open to all those who suppon the aims ofthe and who's application is approved by the executive committee. please forward any ueries to BUI'ORA's registered office. 'l'hc views expressed in submitted cortributions do not represent the views or policies BUFORA or rhc f,ditorial Board, excepr where specilically srared. BUFOIi,{ BULLETIN tight O BUFORA 1998 and may not bc duplicated without the express wntten consent ofrhe ishec lt is thc policy ofBUFoRA not to pubrish the names or addresses ofwitnesses. Contents page NEws UFO 4-5 STURROCK REPORT: It's Contents & Iml)lications 6_l.0 CASTING DOI'BTS ON TIIE AIIEN AIITOPSY FILM 11_15 DEVON UFO/PARANORIAI ',LINK" CASE 15_17 THE PAPUAN UFO IiA\/E OF 1959 - A RE-EXAMINATTON. L'T-22 Investigations Diary Special THE HOI{DEN MOORS INCIDENT ( PART 2) 23-27 DR,PARTED SOULS...... on the ground. Ilungy Williarns (watch Ufology has lost two notable figures manager at llclfast Coastguard) said the "Z" over the recent months.... shaped lights wetc in thc sky lbr 45 minutes. "l can soy I'te nelcr seen onylhittg like il Hector J. Quntinillia, Jr. Lt. Col before," he said. "Il nuts t lorger shopc (USAF ret.) died on the l8th May 1998, thon lhe,noon hut ds b'e N'crc unthle tu, aged 75. He was the last director of the nteosure lhc distancc il v,qs inqr.rssihle lt, USAF s Project "BL(JE BOOK", holding judge its acludl sae. " RAF l;ylingdalcs in this position from 1963 to 1969. North Yorkshire, noticed "no unduc activity" rcportcd on radrr. Phillip J. Corso (U.S. Arnly. ret.) Metcor spccialist Alastair Mcllcath died on the l6th July, 1998 aged 83' following a heart attack. Corso's book passed thc ftillorving comments legarding The Day Alter Roswell (published in this panicular holidc cvcnl: 1997), claimed hc uas involved in inlroducing into our cullure various ilcms "..1t seenrs .. a wry htighl firehall .... of alien technology allegedly recovered possledl over b,eslern Brilain, possihll'on o from the 1947 Roswell, Ne*' Mexico soulh-no h/north-soulh tock, with "UFO" crash. His claims rvere generally x,ilnesses spreod over from the soulh-A,csl greeted with scepticism bY the UFO .,f Englsnd lo lhe Glasgow orco. This lefl o troir, .. perhops visihle for lhree quorlers of community. on hour, which disto ed inlo a lypicul Z/S or Q shape (diffcrent obsen'ing angles) owt lime. lll's|,.. duration ond sPpedronce dre rorc, but nol une\pected.... The lrqin OYER TIIE U.K. consislle.ll of ionised gases exciled h! the meteor's Jlight (and still wovirg Jlags hnlf Hot on th€ heels of the June ll-l2th ur hour loler!)." 1998 events, another maior fireball meteor (or bolide) event manifested on the night of Friday l2th July, 1998. On this datc, coastguard stations and police from Scotland to Comwall were flooded with calls fronl concemed witnesses, many reporting lights in the shapes of the leiters "2", "Q" or the number "2". Many calls were centred around the Isle of Man where a large explosion in the sky was reported. A pilot said he watched as \r,inds formed the trail into shapes resembling letters which had becn repoded 4l F"s" NEW BUFORA BUFORA SKYhIATGH: DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH.; lgth-2oth t DECEMBER, John Spencer has replaced Stevcn nhecxlcl lsI IocLlrnjeF dOruhlReedA lS9ikst) ,hwc auttrcoehn 2etlvy0e tnohrr. glDahncisics ci\nm\-.uibll eitb,res aOrGcna_sf vnel {rapebrrslocecpha o arpcssha rB.los IH'j JclFebcO rtissR r Arinoe'strer .v rd eoedssfteifegicdtna iaaiintells dhB eoDIaJifFrri enOcgRt ooArf anv 1998. staning early Saturdal evcning and independenr research eflon. The resear.ch conli:'tuing into Sunday monring. ll'lou clcpanntc.nt is also looking for rrish to he involved plcase corrnct rhc rriliirr! ttr h'gularlv \{'rite up the osno-ngreooinnEel slhkrevcrl'a wtcehe kcso -boerdfoinraethoar,n dP.h pilihpi liWp arhvoilnl baet laebalscl rleltslFulOts RofA ir 'sII UrvLorLkf,: TbolNth faonr dp ufbblirc agteionne rainl to inlbrnr;,ou ofthe nearest skvwarch to you d isscnrination. rrncl rr ill be able to provide genelal cdr.ice. []quall), imponant are the services ol. Email: sHkyisr vcaotnctha@ct adsestaaipls. oarrge: ssotonlirsctoicnacl 'm"veitthho dao loggyo,o tdo k hnoewlpl epdrogdeu coef. I'hone:0181-313-t556 qurr erll tnd yearly statistical breakdor{rs (rl'lhc siBht;n-rrs reporred to BUFORA. Skyu,atches are generall-v-' held in open arcas rvith good views of thc skv. rt.herc Iror lurther details please contact slrr'ltcl and other l'acilities are luruulll; nnn- I}UFORA RESEARCH. cxistent. BUFORA or it,s oftlcers cannot lre cio 16, Southway, Burgess Hill, held responsible for any loss or injury ro an1, Sussex. RHl5 9ST. panv taking pan in these events. John SpenCer: TU;RROS;K REPO,RT: It's Contents & lmplications Robert Moore ln July 1998 newspapers from around to Rockefellels request by stating (among the worid reported the astonishing findings of other things) lhal "the problem is in a very an American scientific panel. A scientific panel unsatisfactory state of ignorance and which had seemingly concluded the confusion", a viewpoint with which Rockefeller unthinkable; that UFOS could well exist and concurred. Because of this, Stuffock felt that a that their study may result in the advancement true understanding of this problem would only of human knowledgel come about through an "extensiye and open p rofes si on a I s c ie nlif i c i nv esli g atio n". But were these startling newspaper headlines justified? ls it correct to herald the It was evident to Sturrock and others that so-called "Sturrock Report' as a scientists shy away from this subject for a breaKhrough? Will it really result in the variety of reasons. This is a great obstacle in regular unbiased study of UFOS by the reaching an understanding of UFOS, as a true mainstream scientific communlty? Or is it just comprehension of this phenomenon will only another false dawn, a transitory glint of forlorn be attained through subjecting it to balanced, hope along the dusty path of tears that is scientific enquiry. For this lo be possible (to Ufology? This article aims to examine the quote Prof. Sturrock) "an essertia, background to this report, it's findings and it's pterequisite,.,.. is that more scientisls implications for the subject. acquire an interest in this tgpic-" Establishment Of The Rockefeller, his associates and Proi Sturrock-Rockefeller Panel, Stunock himself felt that a good sound initial step towards this goal would be to hold a The establishment of this scientific review "workshop", where "prominent investigators of UFO evidence was masterminded by of UFO reporb would meet with a panet PETER A. STURROCK , professor of applied ot....scienaists with wide-ranging interests physics at Stanford University, and the main and expeftise". Sturrock agreed to serve as founder of the Society for Scientific director of this initiative, with the Society for Exploration (SSE). This body was Scientific Exploration giving administrative established in 1982 as an "intetdisciplinary support and the LSR fund supplying the otganisation of scholars formed to suppod necessary financial backing. unbiased investigation of claimed anomalous experiences". The SSE aims to THE WORKSHOP. "encourage and support" ohjective scientific research i,'rfo these subJ'ects", but After some organisational effort this at entertains no desires to either control or direct workshop was eventually held Pocantico it. To further this end it publishes it's quarterly Conference Centre, Taffytown, New York, peer-reviewed periodical lhe Journal of commencing on the 29th September 1997 and S c ientific Ex plo ration (J S E). ending on the 4th Oclober4, 1997. During the tenure of this workshop, the scientific panel ln December 1996, Mr. Laurance S. focused on incidents involving some form of Rockefeller (Chairman of the "LSR Fund") physical evidence. This included UFO approached Prof. Sturrock with a view to him photographs, radar traces, vehicle and aircraft undertaking a general assessment of current interference cases, apparent gravilational or knowledge concerning UFOS. Slunock replied inertial effects, ground traces, jnjuries to al lil,.r vegetation, physiological effects on witnesses 3. Studies should concentrate on cases and instances where supposed "UFO" debris thal include as much independent had been recovered. The "recurrent" UFO phyaical evidenco a6 possible. events ln the Hessdalen Valley in Norway were also discussed. lnterestinqly, the Roswell 4. Continuing contact between the UFO incident (and many other "classic" cases) were community and physical scientists not mentioned, either in the discussion of could be productive. "UFO debrjs" or elsewhere in the report. 5. lnstitutional support for research in This emphasis on UFo-related physical this area is desirable, evidence was due to the panel recognising the doafn gwerrlsn eosf s"eresl yainngd wohfo ltlyh eon i mthpeo tretasnficmeo noyf paneAl, si tto w thaes UfeFlOt tchaaste s'b p refseewnt erde ptoof ttehde physical measurements fot dislinguishing incidents may have involved rare... aremvieownegd hbyyp oththee speas.n" eTl h"ewsieth e vae nvtise wwe rteo phenomena such as electrical activity" assessirg whether the futther acquisition However the report also stated that and investigation of such evidence is likely some of the UFO cases presented to the panel to help solve the UFO problem, namety the were 'noa easy to explain in this fashion', determinalion of the cause or caarses of even through (in their view) "there was no these repods" convincing evidence pointing to unknown physica, processes or to the involvement ol This data was presented by various extraterrestrial intelligence. A few cases members of the UFO community, who were may have their origins in secret military asked to p.esent their strongest data to the activities". review panel. The ufologists who presented evidence to the panelwere: ln regards to the evidence presented at the workshop the panelstated " Richard Haines (photographic cases & a(riarcdraarf t einvtiedrefenrcenec),e )M, alllrokb rRaondde vgohnie rL u(vdewhiigcleer It appears that most current LtFO i(nbitoelorfgeicrael necffee ctcs)a, sEerlsin)g JSotrahnnd (SHcehsusdeaslselne)r risnitgvaoenrsd ttaihgraadtts ioi sno snf oastr ceci oecnnastriirsliiaeced n reot suwet iatahrt c Nah e l.ev..av..ei.lTiln hogef Michael Swords (gravitational/inertial effects), Jdaecbqruise sc aVsaellse)e, a(lunmd in-o sreityp reessteimntaintegs S &E pURFAO,/ peavnideel ncocnec lpurdeesde nthteaad fauttl htehre a wnaoly*ssish oofp t hies GEPAN - Jean-Jacques Vetasco (ground unlikely to elucidate the cause or causes of the reports. However, the panet considers traces & radar evidence). that new data, scienailically acquired and analysed (especially of welt documented, the StuOrnro chke-aRrioncgk eafnedll ear sspeasnseinl gc aamlleth itso tdhaeta, tecurrent events), could yield usefut intormation. following conclusions: 1. Fhail the UFO problem is not a simple The workshop committee also made the one, and it is unlikely that there is any following important observation: simple, universal answer. "The panel nevertheless concluded 2. Whenever there are unexplained tha, it would be valuabte to carefully observations, there is the possibility evaluate UFO reports since, whenever thete that scientists will learn something aproes usnibexilpitlyai ntetda aob ssecNieantitoinssts, thwerietl isle athrne new by studying them. something new by studying these obseryations. -..such evaluaaions must activities would receive the same take place with a spirit of objecaivity and a recognition and level of suppott as their willingness to evaluate rival hypotheses. more c o nve nlional re se a rch ". The besl prospect for achieving a meaningful evatuation of relevana ln regards to the UFO subiect, the hypotheses is likely ao come from lh@ lollowing statement is particularly telling; examination of physical evidence, The panel felt that a good model for such "Whenever there are unex|lained e scientific UFO initiative was France's obseryations, there is the possibility thal cEPANTSEPRA official UFO study sciertrsts will leam something new by programme, stating that there "is no doubt studying those obseryations. What is that ahe best ptospect for real advance in leaned may bear no relation to the our undersaanding ol the uFo Problem concepts that were entettained when lhe would be the creation of similar proiects in research was underTaken. We venture to othe r co u ntri es. -....... " hope that rnore scientists will take an inaeresa in this cutious subiect so that there An important aim lor such a study-effort will be more progress in the second half would be to qain total access to data such as century than there has been in the fitst half police and radar records. lt would (to be century. There could hardly be less " effective) obviously require technical support in terms of "a network of laboraaories and The world's media were officially consunaats land also] a central ddtabase." informed of the findings of the Sturrock- A further objective for such a study-effort Rockefeller panel via a Stantord University would be the establishment "of one or more press release issued on the 29th June, 1998. mobile obseryatories-.. equipped with cameras ... opaical, infrcred, speclroscopic, The Sturrock-Rockefeller panel itself acous,ic, magnetic and radiation consisted of Von Eshleman; Thomas Holzer, High Altitude obseNatory in Boulder, Colo.; instruments." Randy Jokrpii, professor of planetary science. University of Arizona, Tucson; Francois However they stated it was Louange. managtng direclor of Fleximage, "aecessary to be reatistic and took for Paris. France; H. J. Melbsh, poroft essor of more modest apProaches that coutd be planetary science, University Arjzona, iniaiated without government action..- We Tucson; James J. Papike, professor oofl earth therefore inquire into what smatl positive and planetary sciences, University New bchya npgrievsa tceo uinlds tibtuet iomnasd es ubcyh s caise nsloisctise tiaetsd, AMeerxoicsop, aAclebu qCueenrqturee,; lGnsuteitnuthtee .f oRer itAz,e rGoesrpmaacne Medicine, Cologne, Germany; Charles Tolbert, journals, universities and foundations." professor of astronomy, University ol Virginia, harlottesville; and Bernard Veyret, The panel felt that the scientific study of C UFOS is hampered by the lack of reliable BBiooredleecatruoxm, aFgrnaenticces .L Eabsohrleatmorayn, Uannivde rHsiotylz eorf information on UFOS. due to the reluctance of peer-reviewed scientific journals to publish served as co-chairs of the Panel. asinirttu icpaletoisol incr eytlha eotinyng r ettohc eothm ipsm asedun bdojefe dcio tt uhTmaot ar"elam eecddhiy a ontthgsies" freeTlhye afuvlla tielaxbt olef tohen " Sthtuerr oSckS ERe wpoebrts"i t€is (htIp:/TWWW.JSE.COM). The report itself would be helpful in rectifying this situation. consists of some 50 pages of information They also believed that detailing the conclusions of the Sturrock "scientists at universifes would take an workshop and summaries of the various papers presented to the panel. inlerest in ahis Problem if they fela thaa their F"";l Sceptical Commentary on strong UFO proponents..-.- There are no the Sturrock-Rockefeller report: skeptical researchers among them. fhis is very curious if one is to contend this is Although the UFO community were some kind of balanced assessmert " generally happy with the "Sturrock report", - Kendrick Frazier (Editot, Skepaical lnquirer). sceptic organisations were much less impressed. The following comments are taken THE STURROCK-ROCKEFELLER REPORT: from CISCOP'S (Committee for lnvestigation A PERSONAL ASSESSMENT. Of Claims Of The Paranormal) press-release (Robert Moore) of July 6th, 1998 , in which various members of that body critically assessed the Sturrock So. at the end of the day, has the prospects Report. Here is a selection of comments from for ufology been radically changed by the their press statementl publication ol this report? Certainty not in the short term. All of the Sturrock Panel's Repor''t ]W ..h..y n iesw lsth?e. ..c.o Sncolumseio ncsa soefs t hdeo S rteumrroacink srelacleommemntse nred aUtiFoOnss (acnodn aclesorn iitn'sg v atnhoeu sir unexplained. But thaa we should now implementation) have been made many times devote government resources lo fudher before in the past. research is queslionable. ....The government should not divert funds and However, the "Sturrock report" has come lime from other more ttuitful scientific at an interesting time for lJfology, when the projects. Given limited resources for subject's mass popularity is on lhe wane. lt is scientific research, the evidence to date effectively the epitaph of the populist era, with regarding UFOS does not meria such strong it's "must try harder" message for the UFO attenlion.." - Paul Kurtz CSICOP Charrman movement. lt may, then, hopefully mark a new chapter (and beginning) for scientifically- "The SSE recommends the creation of oriented interest in this subject. govenment funded UFO research projects It has been claimed by some like the one ca ed GEPAN. lThis body] .... commentators that the composition of the strongly endorsed the Trans-en-Provence Sturrock-Rockefeller Panel (and the selectjon case... which GEPAN|SEPRA director Jean- of those asked to present papers) favoured a Jacques Velasco described ao the SSEb panel gf experls. Velasco did not inform the positive assessment of UFOS. lt is clear that SSE panel of screnlisas that a recent no sceptics were asked to present negative evidence for UFOS, only Ufologists, many of investigation by..,.. Eric Mailloa indicates whom are advocates of the ETH. tlhl aias,h uen Tforartnusn.aente-P trhovaetr cthe ec aSsSe Eis dai dho naxo.t Furthermore, it mouf st be noted that the panel was comprised members of an academic assembre a more balanced roster of UFO organisation championing the positive investigators tg present evidence to the scientific examination of paranormal panel of scientisb. The whole evaluation phenomena. process appeaE suspiciously weighted to one side of the UFO debale." Additionally, some of the case-studies - Philip J. Klass, CSICOP. presented to the panel are fairly weak in terms of evidential quality. Some (such as real" ls hcaievne tisfeicri opuasy ddoituTb tisn t helrhee is UaFnOy MphaennsoUmeeldn,a O (hsiuoc)h m aasy b boelid eexsp)l.ic Oabthlee rsa s(s uIFcOh question....... Most ol the prominent and as Trans-En-Provence, Maury island, Aurora, active members lof the Sturrock Panel] are Texas, and Ubatuba, Brazil) have a very strong believers in the rcality of such strong likelihood of being hoaxes. lt is phenomena. .,.The eight people who surprising that the flaws inherent in these prcvided the lestimony and evidence are all cases were not mentioned by the report, as t'*"-rt as they are fairly well-known (even, in some LIST OF UFO INCIDENTS PRESENTED instances, accepted) by many within the UFO TO THE STURROCK PANEL: community. The remaining cases, although interesting, are relatively obscure. The Vancouver lsland, Canada. 1981 difficulty with lhese obscure events is that any (photographic evidencel. flawE in lheir evidential quality are unlikely to Mccleod, Alberta, Canada. 27th Arrg, '1956 be widely known. (luminosittr estimation). Fort-De-France, Mertinique. Sep 1956 Allhough the UFO community have been (luminosit!' estimation). fairly content wath the findings of the Sturrock Pa.is, Jan 28 1994. (Radar event). report, the panel had some less-than- Haines City, Florida . Mar 1992 favourable things to say about contemporary (Vehicle interterence). Ulology! For example, it stated that the study Adelaide South Australia. 1977 of UFO reports deemed to have a high (Vehicle interference). evidential value by ufologists will not bring Liverpool C.eek, Queensland, Australia. 1997 about a resolution of the UFO problem. Such a (Vehicle interterence). judgement strikes at the heart of most current Thaxted, Essex, UK. 1977 UFO research-efforts, which attempt to (Vehicl€ interf erencel. understand UFOs through these very means. Mount Rouge, Quebec, Caneda. Sep 20 1992 (physiological effects). It also criticised the UFO community for Eggardon Hill, UK. (physiological effects). producing work below the standards expected Tyler, Texas, USA. Nov '1976 (physiological effectsl. by most scientisls and academic bodies. This is often the result of poor tunding, but it is also AndeBon, lndiana, USA. Aug l2 1981 (physiological effects). due (in many cases) to a lack of objectivity by Barnsley, Yorkshire, UK. Aug t5 1986 many within this fleld. (physiological effects). Lastly, it also deemed the extraterrestrial Dayton, Teras, USA. 29 Dec 1980. (physiological effects). hypothesis (ETH) as lacking in any conclusive saucpcp€pot rtinthga etv sidoemncee ,U aFltOho uegvhe nitts sheaevmes atno T("gCraihonrusisn-tEde nlle-ePf"fre.o cvNtseo nv)c .2e7, 1F9.a7n9ce, Jan 8th 198'l anomalous cause. This view is (again) nothing (injuries to vegetation). sreusreparricshinegrs, walelhreo upgrhob mabalyn y(i nA mperirvicaaten) "(A imniaurraienst et"o. vOecgte 2ta1t i1o9n8 2 unhappy with the Sturrock's panel less-than- Joe Le Taxi. sep 7th 198).7 enthusiastic support for the ETH. lt is, on lhe (injuries to vegetation). other hand, a boost lor those in the subject Mansfield, Ohio, USA. l8 Aug 1973 who feel the importance and influence of the (gravitational-inertial anomalies). ETH in this subject should be lessened. Council 8uffs, lowa, USA. Dec 7 't977 (anomalous d€bris). However, this report has clearly defined tCfaury island, USA. Jan21 1917 the UFO problem for the scientific community (anomalous debris). It has outlined - lo hiqh academic standards - Campinas, Brazil. Dec 141954 the nature oI the UFO problem and also (more (anomalous debris). importantly) the ways in which this problem Vaddo lsland, Sweden. Nov 11 1956 can be tackled in an objeclive and structured (anomalous debris). manner. Aurora, Texas, USA. Apiil 17 1897 (anomalous debris). As such it may well act as a springboa.d Washington, DC, USA. 1952 for other scienlific enquiries relating to UFOs in (anomalous debris). the near future. Ubatuba, Brazil. (anomalous debris). Maumee, Ohio, USA. 1967 (anomalous debris). t"""*l

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.