ebook img

Brokeback Mountain PDF

153 Pages·2010·0.88 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Brokeback Mountain

AMERICAN INDIES Series Editors: Gary Needham and Yannis Tzioumakis AMERICAN INDIES This series of books discusses contemporary American films that have found B commercial success but which have not been constrained by the formal and R ideological parameters of mainstream Hollywood cinema. Each volume O explores a specific film and combines original research with clearly defined classroom-orientated frameworks of film analysis. K E BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN B A GARY NEEDHAM C Upon its release in 2005, Brokeback Mountain became a major cultural K event and a milestone in independent American filmmaking. Based M on the short story by Annie Proulx and directed by Ang Lee, Brokeback Mountain situated a love story between two closeted cowboys at the heart O of American mythology, film spectatorship and genre. Brokeback Mountain U offered an independent and queer revision of the conventions and clichés N of the western and the melodrama through a studied exploration of T homophobia and the closet. This book examines Brokeback Mountain in A relation to indie cinema, genre, spectatorship, editing, and homosexuality. I In doing so, it brings film studies and queer theory into dialogue with one N another and explains the importance of Brokeback Mountain as both a contemporary independent and queer film. Key Features • Provides an overview of Focus Features as a hybrid company operating across both the mainstream and independent cinema sectors • Analyses Brokeback Mountain as a western and places it within G an enduring historical and cultural context of relations between A homosexuality and the genre R Y • Analyses Brokeback Mountain as a melodrama examining the film’s N relationship to concepts of pathos, backward feeling and passivity E E • Proposes a new way of thinking about gay spectatorship that takes into D account how editing and cruising relate to one another H BROKEBACK A M Gary Needham is Lecturer in Media and Cultural Studies at Nottingham Trent University. MOUNTAIN isbn: 978 0 7486 3383 8 Edinburgh University Press E 22 George Square, Edinburgh eh8 9lf d in GARY NEEDHAM www.euppublishing.com b u r g Cover image: scene still from Brokeback Mountain, 2005. © Focus Features/The Kobal Collection h Brokeback Mountain MM22117799 -- NNEEEEDDHHAAMM PPRREE..iinndddd ii 88//22//1100 1133::4466::2222 American Indies Series Editors: Gary Needham and Yannis Tzioumakis Titles in the series include: The Spanish Prisoner Yannis Tzioumakis 978 0 7486 3368 5 (hbk) 978 0 7486 3369 2 (pbk) Brokeback Mountain Gary Needham 978 0 7486 3382 1 (hbk) 978 0 7486 3383 8 (pbk) Memento Claire Molloy 978 0 7486 3771 3 (hbk) 978 0 7486 3772 0 (pbk) Lost in Translation Geoff King 978 0 7486 3745 4 (hbk) 978 0 7486 3746 1 (pbk) Forthcoming titles include: Far From Heaven Glyn Davis 978 0 7486 3778 2 (hbk) 978 0 7486 3779 9 (pbk) MM22117799 -- NNEEEEDDHHAAMM PPRREE..iinndddd iiii 88//22//1100 1133::4466::2222 Brokeback Mountain Gary Needham Edinburgh University Press MM22117799 -- NNEEEEDDHHAAMM PPRREE..iinndddd iiiiii 88//22//1100 1133::4466::2222 © Gary Needham, 2010 Illustrations appear courtesy of the following copyright holders: Focus Features (Figures 1, 2, 6–11); United Artists/MGM (Figure 3); AMG (Figure 4); Kino Video (Figure 5) Edinburgh University Press Ltd 22 George Square, Edinburgh www.euppublishing.com Typeset in 11/13pt Monotype Baskerville by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire, and printed and bound by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham and Eastbourne A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 0 7486 3382 1 (hardback) ISBN 978 0 7486 3383 8 (paperback) The right of Gary Needham to be identifi ed as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. MM22117799 -- NNEEEEDDHHAAMM PPRREE..iinndddd iivv 88//22//1100 1133::4466::2222 Contents Series Preface vi Acknowledgements ix Introduction: Brokaholics Anonymous 1 1 The Indie in Focus 8 2 Queering the Western 31 3 A Pathetic State of Affairs: Brokeback Mountain and Melodrama 79 4 When Jack and Ennis Meet: Cruising as a Mode of Gay Spectatorship 94 Notes 121 Bibliography 131 Index 139 MM22117799 -- NNEEEEDDHHAAMM PPRREE..iinndddd vv 88//22//1100 1133::4466::2222 Series Preface In recent years American independent cinema has not only become the focus of signifi cant scholarly attention but as a category of fi lm it has shifted from a marginal to a central position within American cinema – a shift that can be also detected in the emergence of the label ‘indie’ cinema as opposed to independent cinema. The popularisation of this ‘indie’ brand of fi lmmaking began in the 1990s with the com- mercial success of the Sundance Film Festival and of specialty distribu- tor Miramax Films, as well as the introduction of DVD, which made independent fi lms more readily available as well as profi table for the fi rst time. At the same time, fi lm studies started developing courses that distinguished American independent cinema from mainstream Hollywood, treating it as a separate object of study and a distinct dis- cursive category. Despite the surge in interest in independent cinema, a surge that involved the publication of at least twenty books and edited collections alongside a much larger number of articles on various aspects of inde- pendent cinema, especially about the post-1 980 era, the fi eld – as it has developed – still remains greatly under- researched in relation to the changes of the past twenty years that defi ne the shift from independent to ‘indie’ cinema. This is partly because a multifaceted phenomenon such as American independent cinema, the history of which is as long and complex as the history of mainstream Hollywood, has yet to be adequately and satisfactorily documented. In this respect, academic fi lm criticism is still in great need to account for the plethora of shapes, forms and guises that American independent cinema has manifested itself in. This is certainly not an easy task given that independent fi lm has, indeed, taken a wide variety of forms at different historical trajectories and has been infl uenced by a hugely diverse range of factors. It is with this problem in mind that ‘American Indies’ was conceived MM22117799 -- NNEEEEDDHHAAMM PPRREE..iinndddd vvii 88//22//1100 1133::4466::2222 Series Preface vii by its editors. While the history of American independent cinema is still being written with more studies already set to be published in the forth- coming years, and while journal articles are enhancing our understand- ing of more focused aspects of independent fi lmmaking, the ‘American Indies’ series has been created to provide the necessary space to explore and engage with specifi c examples of American ‘indie’ fi lms in a great depth. Through this format, ‘American Indies’ aims to encourage an examination of both the ‘indie’ text and its contexts, of understanding how ‘indie’ fi lms operate within a particular fi lmmaking practice but also how ‘indies’ have been shaping a new formation of American cinema. In this respect, ‘American Indies’ provides the space for a detailed exami- nation of industrial, economic and institutional concerns alongside the more usual formal and aesthetic considerations that have histori- cally characterised critical approaches of independent fi lms. ‘American Indies’ is a series of comprehensive studies of carefully selected examples of recent fi lms that reveal in great detail the many sides of the phenom- enon of the recently emerged American ‘indie’ cinema. As the fi rst book series to explore and defi ne this aspect of American cinema, ‘American Indies’ has had the extremely diffi cult task of pro- ducing a comprehensive set of criteria that informs its selection of titles. Given the vastness of the fi eld, we have made several editorial decisions in order to produce a coherent defi nition of this new phase of American independent cinema. The fi rst such choice was to concentrate on recent examples of independent cinema. Although the word ‘recent’ has often been used to include fi lms made in the post-1 980 period, as editors we decided that the cut-o ff point for fi lms to be included in this series would be the year 1996. This was an extremely signifi cant year in the inde- pendent fi lm sector, ‘the year of the independents’ as was triumphantly proclaimed by the Los Angeles Business Journal in February 1997, for a number of reasons. Arguably, the most signifi cant of these reasons was the dynamic entrance in the fi lm market of Fox Searchlight, a new type of a specialty fi lm division created by 20th Century Fox in 1995 with the explicit intention of claiming a piece of the increasingly large inde- pendent fi lm market pie. Fox Searchlight would achieve this objective through the production and distribution of fi lms that followed many of the conventions of independent fi lm as those were established after the success of sex, lies and videotape in 1989. These conventions had since then started being popularised by a number of fi lms produced and distributed by Miramax Films, an independent company that was taken over by MM22117799 -- NNEEEEDDHHAAMM PPRREE..iinndddd vviiii 88//22//1100 1133::4466::2222 viii Series Preface Disney after the phenomenal box offi ce success of several of its fi lms at approximately the same time as 20th Century Fox was establishing its specialty division. The now direct involvement of entertainment conglomerates like Disney and Fox in the independent fi lm sector had far- reaching effects. Arguably, the most important of these was that the label ‘independ- ent’, which for critics and the cinema going public (wrongly) signifi ed economic independence from major fi lm companies like Disney, Fox, Paramount, Universal, etc., obviously ceased to convey this meaning. Instead, critics and public alike started using increasingly the label ‘indie’ which suggested a particular type of fi lm that adhered to a set of conventions as well as a transformed independent cinema sector that was now driven by specialty companies, most of them subsidiaries of major entertainment conglomerates. It is this form of ‘independent’ cinema that has produced some of the most interesting fi lms to come out of American cinema in recent years that ‘American Indies’ has set out to explore in great depth and which explains our selection of the label ‘indies’ instead of independents. We hope readers will enjoy the series Gary Needham and Yannis Tzioumakis American Indies Series Editors MM22117799 -- NNEEEEDDHHAAMM PPRREE..iinndddd vviiiiii 88//22//1100 1133::4466::2222 Acknowledgements There are many people to thank who supported, discussed and put up with my obsession with Brokeback Mountain. They are Karen Boyle, Kay Dickinson, Dimitris Eleftheriotis, Amelie Hastie, Joanne Hollows, Chris Holmlund, Sian Lincoln, Claire Molloy, Liz Morrish, Martin O’Shaughnessy, Lydia Papadimtriou, Denis Provencher, Christopher Pullen, Amy Villarejo, Dave Woods and Greg Woods. A special thanks to Glyn Davis, co-c onspirator in all things queer, and Belen Vidal, both of whom read chapter drafts and were able to make many useful sug- gestions. Jackie Jones, thanks for your patience. This book would not be what it is without the support and friendship of Yannis Tzioumakis. We conceived of the series together and few will ever know how much of this particular book was made possible by him. I can’t thank him enough. And fi nally, to David Oswald, for love and support, thanks for not quitting. MM22117799 -- NNEEEEDDHHAAMM PPRREE..iinndddd iixx 88//22//1100 1133::4466::2222

Description:
Since its release in 2005, Brokeback Mountain became a major cultural event and a milestone in independent American filmmaking. Based on the short story by Annie Proulx and directed by Ang Lee, Brokeback Mountain situated a love story between two closeted cowboys at the heart of American mythology,
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.