BOUNDARIES AND DOMINION An Economic Commentary on Leviticus Volume 1 Gary North Dominion Education Ministries, Inc. Harrisonburg, Virginia copyright, Gary North, 1999, 2007 This volume is part of a series, An Economic Commentary on the Bible. At present, the series includes the following volumes: *The Dominion Covenant: Genesis (1982, 1987) *Moses and Pharaoh (1985) *The Sinai Strategy: Economics and the Ten Commandments( 1986) *Tools of Dominion: The Case Laws of Exodus (1990) *Leviticus: An Economic Commentary (1994) Boundaries and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Leviticus (Full version of previous book, 1994, 2004) Edition:6/23/08 *Sanctions and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Numbers (1997) Inheritance and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Deuter- onomy (3 vols., 1999, 2003) Priorities and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Matthew (2000, 2003) Treasure and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Luke (2000, 2003) Sacrifice and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Acts (2000, 2003) Cooperation and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Romans (2001, 2003) Judgment and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on First Corin- thians (2001) Hierarchy and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on First Timo- thy (2003) An asterisk notes a printed volume. These are also available for viewing on www.freebooks.com. The other volumes are in PDF for- mat, and may be downloaded here: http://www.garynorth.com/public/department57.cfm. This book is dedicated to my son-in-law Joel McDurmon who may be able to extend the kingdom’s boundaries iii Table of Contents Volume 1 Foreword. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..vii Preface. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..xxxviii Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 Part I. Sacrifices (Lev. 1–7) Introduction to Part I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 1. Sacrifice, Stewardship, and Debt (1:1–4). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49 2. Priestly Representation (2:1–3). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .84 3. Leaven and Progressive Sanctification (3:1, 17). . . . . . . . . . .96 4. Corporate Responsibility (4:1–3). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..143 5. Proportional Payments to God (5:6–7). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..235 6. Sacred, Profane, and Common (5:14–19).. . . . . . . . . . . . ..262 7. Guardian of the Civil Oath (6:1–7). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..334 Part II. Cleansing (Lev. 8–16) Introduction to Part II. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..382 8. Wine as a Boundary Marker (10:8–11). . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..384 9. Biblical Quarantine (Lev. 13:45–46). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..410 Part III. Separation (Lev. 17–22) Introduction to Part III. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..437 10. The Promised Land as a Covenantal Agent (18:24–29). ..439 iv Volume 2 11. Gleaning: Charity Without Entitlement (19:9–10). . . . . ..467 12. Verbal Bonds and Economic Coordination (19:11–12). . ..520 13. Protecting the Weakest Party (19:13–14). . . . . . . . . . . . ..544 14. Impartial Justice vs. Socialist Economics (19:15). . . . . . ..581 15. Local Justice vs. Centralized Government (19:15). . . . . ..632 16. The State’s Monopoly of Vengeance (19:18). . . . . . . . . ..672 17. The Preservation of the Seed (19:19). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..702 18. Covenantal Fruit (19:23–25). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..751 19. Measuring Out Justice (19:33–37). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..781 20. Inheritance by Fire (20:2–5). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..837 21. Inheritance by Separation (20:22–26). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..879 Part IV. Covenantal Acts (Lev. 23–24) Introduction to Part IV. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..900 22. Mutual Self-Interest: Priests and Gleaners. . . . . . . . . . . ..902 23. Blasphemy and Civil Rights (24:14–22). . . . . . . . . . . . . ..922 Volume 3 Part V. Inheritance (Lev. 25–27) Introduction to Part V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..945 24. The Sabbatical Year (25:1–7). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..953 25. Boundaries of the Jubilee Land Laws (25:8–13). . . . . . . ..984 26. Economic Oppression by Means of the State (25:14–17).1038 27. Food Miracles and Covenantal Predictability (25:18–22).1071 28. The Right of Redemption (25:23–24). . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1088 29. Poverty and Usury (25:35–38). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1118 30. Promise, Adoption, and Liberty (25:39–43). . . . . . . . . ..1142 v Foreword 31. Slaves and Freemen (25:44–46). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1175 32. Mandatory Redemption Upon Payment (25:47–55). . . ..1212 33. Nature as a Sanctioning Agent (26:3–6). . . . . . . . . . . . ..1231 34. Limits to Growth (26:9–10). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1268 35. God’s Escalating Wrath (26:13–17). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1295 36. The Priesthood: Barriers to Entry (27:2–8). . . . . . . . . ..1305 37. The Redemption-Price System (27:9–15). . . . . . . . . . . ..1334 38. Tithing: Benefit of the Doubt (27:30–33). . . . . . . . . . . ..1361 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1368 Appendixes Appendix A: Sacrilege and Sanctions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1399 Appendix B: Rushdoony on the Tithe: A Critique. . . . . . . ..1417 Volume 4 Appendix C: Leaven as Exclusively Evil. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1491 Appendix D: The Church vs. Socialism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1516 Appendix E: Greek Mythology: The Myth of Classical Politics1556 Appendix F: The Covenantal Structure of Judgment. . . . . ..1583 Appendix G: Rushdoony on “Hybridization”: From Genetic Separation to Racial Separation. . ..1611 Appendix H: Malthusianism vs. Covenantalism. . . . . . . . . ..1641 Appendix I: Conspiracy, Forgery, and Higher Criticism. . . ..1692 Appendix J: Critics of the Five-Point Covenant Model. . . . ..1710 Scripture Index. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1750 Index. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1775 vi FOREWORD In the fall of 1991 I began a series of sermons on the first several chapters of Leviticus. My decision to preach on an obscure and difficult book (in the morning service, no less!) runs against the grain of contemporary pastoral theory. . . . Early on in my series, in fact, I spent most of one sermon explaining why a study of Leviticus is valuable for Christians. I am convinced that Leviticus is not only valuable but essential to a proper understanding of the New Tes- tament. But anyone who preaches on Leviticus to an American con- gregation at the end of the twentieth century owes somebody an explanation. Peter J. Leithart1 The Book of Leviticus, more than any other biblical book, has kept readers from getting to the biblical books that follow it. Leviticus calls to mind the old Negro spiritual: “So high, you can’t get over it; so low, you can’t get under it; so wide you can’t get around it.” But we should recall the conclusion: “So, hear the word of the Lord.” The problem is, Leviticus has to be taken as a unit. It is a very difficult book. Therefore, lots of people quit reading. Some make it through the five types of sacrifice. Others actually get through the consan- guinity laws. But not many people finish the book. Many are called, but few are chosen. Boundaries and Dominion is the full-length version of Leviticus: An Economic Commentary, which was published in hardback in 1994. This book is about the same size as Tools of Dominion (1990) and Inheritance and Dominion (1999). It serves as the back-up for Leviticus, with more detailed arguments. Perhaps I should have pub- lished the full version in hardback. But electronic publishing makes it 1. Peter J. Leithart, The Kingdom and the Power: Rediscovering the Centrality of the Church (Phillipsburg, New Jersey: P&R Publishing, 1993), p. ix. vii Foreword possible to do both. Why an Economic Commentary? You may be thinking: “Why should anyone write an economic com- mentary on the Bible?” My answer: “Because there is no neutrality.” This is another way of saying that all knowledge is based on some view of morality, which in turn provides a concept of historical cause and effect. The Bible teaches that God brings positive sanctions in history to those who obey His law (Lev. 26:3–13). Our knowledge advances, individually and corporately, as we increase both our understanding of His law and our covenantal obedience to His law: word and deed. This is also the basis of our success in history, long term. But the modern church only rarely preaches this message. The Bible speaks authoritatively in every area of life. This means that every area of life must be explored and then disciplined in terms of revelation in the Bible. We need specialized commentaries that apply biblical law to specific tasks: our occupations (jobs) and our cal- lings (unique services) before God. As we study the Bible from the perspective of modern academic disciplines, we will increase our knowledge of the Bible and also these academic disciplines. We will gain insights that were unavailable to commentators in earlier eras. That is to say,t here is supposed to be intellectual and moral progress in history. (Any widely heralded “biblical world-and-life view” that is not supported by detailed Bible commentaries on applied theology is either a sham or is in the very early development stage: a slogan rather than a reality. The church’s knowledge of the Bible is not static. This is why we should expect biblical exegesis to improve as time moves forward. The church will become progressively more alert to the interaction of biblical texts with specialized knowledge in all fields of study, but viii Foreword especially those dealing with man and his institutions. As history advances, our knowledge regarding our personal and corporate res- ponsibilities will increase. With greater knowledge comes greater res- ponsibility (Luke 12:47–48).2 This means that the church’s knowledge of the Bible cannot remain static. Only by sealing off culture from biblical ethics could the church’s knowledge of the Bible remain static. This is an impossible goal, for the ethics of the world that surrounds an ethically isolated, culturally defensive church eventually makes inroads into the thinking of its members. Ecclesiastical isolation is therefore an illegitimate goal. Nevertheless, a sealed-off church and a sealed-off external culture are the twin cultural goals of pietism3. Pietists seek to place an exegetical boundary around the arena of Christian responsibilit.y The narrower this boundary is, the pietist believes, the better. What this commentary is designed to show is that the church as an institution and Christians as individuals have far more responsibility than Protestant pietistic churches have taught for over four centuries. More to the point, these responsibilities will grow over time. But so will God’s grace in history. This is the meaning of progressive sanc- tification, both personally and corporately. There are a lot of laws in Leviticus. As in the case of my previous commentaries, I ask two questions of each law that I consider: (1) How was this law applied in ancient Israel? (2) How should it be applied today, if at all? A few commentators ask the first question about a few Mosaic laws. Hardly anyone since the year 1700 has bothered to ask the second, let alone answer it clearly. The art of 2. Gary North, Gary North, Treasure and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Luke, 2nd electronic edition (Harrisonburg, Virginia: Dominion Educational Ministries, Inc., 2003), ch. 28. This is posted on-line at www.garynorth.com. 3. J. Gresham Machen, “Christianity and Culture,” Princeton Theological Review, XI (1913), pp. 4–5. ix Foreword Christian casuistry faded: applying God’s law to specific cases. This Book Called Leviticus In a humorous book about psychologically afflicted people who cannot resist buying books, especially used books – I am one of these people – the author provides a brief history of what book reviewing might have been like before the invention of the printing press. Here is how he imagines an early book industry report on the sales of Lev- iticus: Highly publicized diet book published under the titleL eviticus. Sales flop. “Too many rules, too depressing, not enough variety, not enough attention to cholesterol,” cry the critics. “And for crying out loud, give it a decent title.”4 This parody is not too far from the opinion of the average reader who has started but not finished Leviticus. He sees it as a kind of “healthy living” diet book. It isn’t. Then what is Leviticus all about? It is a book about limits: boun- daries. There are a lot of boundaries laid down in the Book of Leviti- cus. Some of these limits are liturgical. Others are familial. Some are tribal. Some are dietary. There are also limits that have to do with the status of the Promised Land as God’s holy place of residence. Finally, a lot of these laws establish economic limits. I discuss these applica- tions at considerable length, especially the economic ones. That is why this commentary is even longer than Tools of Dominion. I offered several pages of reasons to justify the length of Tools of 4. Tom Raabe, Biblioholism: The Literary Addiction (Golden, Colorado: Fulcrum, 1991), p. 39. x
Description: