ebook img

Biotic and multi-scale abiotic controls of habitat quality: their effect on coral-reef fishes PDF

14 Pages·2011·0.76 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Biotic and multi-scale abiotic controls of habitat quality: their effect on coral-reef fishes

Vol. 437: 201–214, 2011 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published September 15 doi: 10.3354/meps09280 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Biotic and multi-scale abiotic controls of habitat quality: their effect on coral-reef fishes Alastair R. Harborne1,2,*, Peter J. Mumby2, Emma V. Kennedy1, Renata Ferrari2 1Marine Spatial Ecology Laboratory, Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hatherly Laboratory, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK 2Marine Spatial Ecology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Goddard Building, University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia ABSTRACT: The influence of habitat quality on a species’ demographics is critical for understand- ing its ecology and effective conservation. However, quantifying habitat quality is problematic because it may comprise of abiotic components at different spatial scales and also be influenced by biotic processes. This study investigated the relationship between reef-associated Caribbean fishes and habitat quality at 2 spatial scales: (1) multiple characteristics of Montastraea annularis coral colonies (<1 m2) and (2) coral density in a 5 × 5 m plot around each microhabitat. Further- more, the influence on habitat quality of 2 biotic factors (predation pressure and interactions between competitively superior territorial damselfishes and other species) was considered. A total of 102 M. annulariscolonies within thirty 25 m2plots were surveyed on a Belizean forereef. Gen- eralised linear mixed-effect models demonstrated that both damselfishes and other reef - associated species were correlated with colony-scale habitat quality (more abundant on taller, refuge-rich colonies). Adult reef-associated species were also correlated with larger-scale habitat quality, being more abundant on colonies with high densities of other Montastraeacolonies within 25 m2(probably higher quality home ranges). However, the presence of damselfishes was associ- ated with reduced abundances of other reef-associated species on M. annulariscolonies, reflect- ing the importance of both biotic and abiotic controls of habitat quality. On reefs, coral mortality will reduce the density of optimal colonies and potentially increase the proportion occupied by damselfishes. This may lead to smaller populations of inferior competitors as they are increasingly displaced onto sub-optimal microhabitats. KEY WORDS: Anthropogenic stress · Community ecology · Ecosystem degradation · Fish behaviour ·Fish recruitment Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION spatial and temporal scales, and may change during an organism’s ontogeny (Mueller et al. 2009). Conse- Habitat quality is a key variable affecting the distri- quently, there is a growing literature considering bution, abundance, and demographic rates of spe- habitat quality through a combination of biotic and cies, and a full appreciation of its controls has impor- abiotic factors (e.g. Shima et al. 2008), habitat quality tant implications for conservation (e.g. Franklin et al. at different scales (e.g. Mueller et al. 2009), and how 2000, Fleishman et al. 2002). Despite its importance, habitat quality affects different age classes of species assessing habitat quality is frequently problematic (e.g. Bacheler et al. 2009). A greater multi-scale because it requires an understanding of a range of understanding of the controls of habitat quality is biotic and abiotic factors that may vary at multiple vital because the loss of suitable habitat is the great- *Email: [email protected] © Inter-Research 2011 · www.int-res.com 202 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 437: 201–214, 2011 est threat to the survival of species worldwide (Bar- Schmitt et al. 1999, White & Warner 2007, Shima et bault & Sastrapradja 1995). al. 2008). We link habitat quality to adult and juvenile Coral-reef fishes represent an excellent model sys- fishes separately because different life-phases within tem for investigating the controls of habitat quality. an ecological community may have different habitat Reef fishes are diverse, relatively easy to census, and requirements (Almany 2004a). By considering differ- many species are closely associated with benthic ent functional aspects of habitat quality, this study communities that provide them with spatially vari- provides greater insights into the proximate drivers able resources at a range of scales. For example, of fish abundance than the well-established correla- coral growth and bioerosion creates small-scale tions with overall coral cover (e.g. Bell & Galzin 1984) crevices that are critical for most reef-associated or rugosity at a single scale (e.g. Luckhurst & Luck- fishes (Hixon & Beets 1993), and corals providing hurst 1978). such refuges support higher abundances of fishes Combining these abiotic assessments of habitat (Holbrook et al. 2002). These refuges provide forag- quality with biotic considerations is critical because ing, spawning, and nesting sites (Robertson & Shel- there may be a significant difference between funda- don 1979), can help fishes maintain themselves in mental habitat quality (habitat quality in the absence high-flow environments (Johansen et al. 2008), and of competition) and the realised habitat quality ex - sheltering in refuges reduces the high risk of preda- perienced by competing individuals (Johnson 2007), tion on reefs (Hixon 1991). Loss of this scale of com- as previously demonstrated for coral-reef fishes plexity, from stressors such as bleaching and hurri- (Munday 2001). There are a range of biotic processes canes, has been demonstrated to have dramatic occurring within reef fish communities, including effects on reef-associated species (Jones & Syms larval supply (Doherty & Fowler 1994), predation 1998, Wilson et al. 2006, Pratchett et al. 2008). How- (Hixon 1991) and competitive interactions (Munday ever, in addition to coral colony-scale complexity, et al. 2001), and many are affected by habitat com- spatially variable coral recruitment and survival plexity (Almany 2004a,b, Geange 2010). This study leads to changing densities of colonies across reefs. aims to provide new insights into how the combined The influence of this larger-scale complexity on reefs influences of multi-scale abiotic habitat quality, pre- (tens of square metres) is poorly understood, but may dation pressure and competition affect reef fish affect the hunting efficiency of predators that abundances. The competitive interaction considered actively chase prey (Eklöv & Diehl 1994), decrease in this study is the territorial behaviour of dam- agonistic encounters between territorial and non-ter- selfishes. Many adult damselfishes pugnaciously ritorial species (Levin et al. 2000), alter settlement defend territories against intruders in order to main- patterns (Stier & Osenberg 2010) and provide a wider tain both food resources and egg masses (Robertson range of foraging sites within fish home ranges. 1996), and the aggressive adults are the superior Here we quantify habitat quality at both of these 2 competitors in a range of asymmetric interactions nested spatial scales: the smaller microhabitat scale, with other fish species (Foster 1985, Sweatman 1985, which occurs within individual coral colonies and Carr et al. 2002). Abiotic habitat quality and preda- includes variables such as colony size and number of tion pressure are likely to affect all reef-associated crevices, and the larger-scale density of colonies in species, but the competitive dominance of dam- the surrounding area. Although produced by biotic selfishes may represent an additional biotic control processes, primarily coral growth, these benthic on the abundance of non-damselfishes. Furthermore, habitat quality variables are categorised as abiotic as the competitive interaction between damselfishes they are functionally different from biotic processes and other species on Caribbean reefs may have affecting fish abundances, such as predation and increased dramatically since the disease-induced competition. We then consider the effects of these loss of Acropora cervicornisthat has led to reductions multi-scale metrics of abiotic habitat quality on reef- of this primary damselfish habitat and increased associated Caribbean reef fishes by assuming that damselfish use of other coral species (Precht et al. high abundances of fishes will be correlated with 2010). high-quality habitat traits. Note that this study does In summary, this study aims to provide novel not attempt to provide insights into the detailed insights into how the abundances of different com- mechanisms causing the variations in fish abun- ponents of an ecological community are determined dances, which will be a complex combination of fac- by both biotic and multi-scale abiotic factors that tors such as settlement and post-settlement habitat control habitat quality. We tested 3 hypotheses: (1) choices and subsequent survival (e.g. Tolimieri 1998, the abundances of reef-associated fishes are influ- Harborne et al.: Reef fish habitat quality 203 enced by abiotic habitat quality at both coral 8 cm (Kramer & Chapman 1999). During a period of colony-scale and the larger-scale metric of density 10 min within each plot, all piscivorous fishes were of surrounding corals, (2) biotic factors (competition identified, counted, and sized to the nearest cm and predation) significantly affect fish abundances (seeSupplement 1 at www.int-res.com/articles/suppl/ and change fish abundances predicted by patterns m437p201_supp.pdf for a list of species). Plot-scale, of abiotic habitat quality alone, and (3) the most rather than colony-scale, estimates of piscivory were aggressive damselfish species will have the greatest used because relatively site-attached ‘resident’ pre - competitive influence on the abundance of other dators have large home ranges (Popple & Hunte reef-associated species. 2005) and the even more mobile transient predators also have important effects on prey densities (Hixon & Carr 1997). Biomass data are most appropriate for MATERIALS AND METHODS the consideration of trophic relationships among fish (Bohnsack & Harper 1988). Therefore, the total bio- Study site mass of piscivorous fishes within each plot was cal - culated using allometric relationships (Bohnsack & The study was conducted in March 2009 on a sec- Harper 1988). Large-bodied serranids are not signifi- tion (<2 km) of the Belize Barrier Reef, just south of cant predators of juvenile fishes (Stallings 2008), and Carrie Bow Cay (16°48.173’N, 88°4.928’W). Using a were excluded from the predation variable included small section of reef for the entire study minimised in explanatory models of juvenile reef-associated the variation in potentially confounding factors such species. Other taxa that are most appropriately mea- as larval supply and fishing pressure. All surveys sured at this plot scale (such as roaming herbivores) were conducted within the species-rich ‘Montastraea were not recorded because they are unlikely to have reef’ habitat (forereef habitats visually dominated direct effects on reef-associated fishes. Following by Montastraea corals) at a depth of ca. 10 m and each fish survey, Montastraea spp. colonies were <100m from the escarpment. The dominant Montas- counted and their heights recorded to assess plot- traea annularis(sensu stricto) (Ellis & Solander, 1786) scale complexity (Fig. 1). represented the microhabitat scale considered, and the density of Montastraeaspp. colonies surrounding each focal colony represented the larger scale of Montastraea annulariscolony-scale surveys complexity. M. annularis is the primary reef-builder in the Caribbean, and colonies are formed by thick Within each 25 m2plot, between 1 and 4 Montas- columns with living tissue only found on the top of traea annularis colonies (total = 102 colonies) were the columns (Weil & Knowlton 1994). These upper randomly selected and surveyed (Fig. 1). The few surfaces form a series of distinct lobes (ramets) sepa- colonies in the plots that were obviously cleaning sta- rated by crevices which, along with the chambers tions were avoided. Firstly, the species and life-phase among the columns, are used as refuges by fishes (determined by colouration or a size of <4 cm for (Ebersole 1985). In addition to being one of the most species without distinct colour phases) of all non- structurally complex corals in the Caribbean (Eber- piscivorous fishes associated with the colony were sole 1985), M. annulariscolonies support a variety of recorded (see Supplement 1 for a list of species). gorgonians that provide additional fish refuges. Indi- These surveys rarely recorded large reef-associated vidual M. annulariscolonies were separated by areas species, such as adult parrotfishes, but the focus on of reef framework covered by a thin layer of carbon- smaller species more intimately linked with individ- ate sand and rubble. ual coral colonies is consistent with the aims of the study. Furthermore, cryptic species such as blennies and gobies were recorded when observed, but Plot-scale surveys destructive techniques are required to comprehen- sively survey these taxa (Willis 2001). Secondly, the In order to categorise the larger scale of complex- width and depth of every crevice (generally between ity, 30 plots of 5 × 5 m were haphazardly chosen and M. annularis ramets) were measured. The height of delineated by tape measures (subsequently ‘plot- the colony was also recorded. Finally, the entire scale’ complexity). Most of the fishes associated with colony, plus a scale bar, was videoed with a high - coral colonies are small, and a plot of 25 m2 is ap - resolution digital camera (Sanyo Xacti). Subsequently, propriate for the home ranges of fishes less than ca. the digital video of each colony was projected onto a 204 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 437: 201–214, 2011 binomial error structures and the logit link function. A total of16 explanatory variables and selected interactions were used to explain the presence/ absence of each species (see Table 2, all colony-scale parameters except ‘number of Montastraeacolonies’ and ‘biomass of predators’ which are mea- sured at the plot scale). Other dam- selfish species were included in the models because confamilial inter- actions are well-established, and the presence of adult damselfishes was used as an explanatory variable as this life phase is the most aggressively territorial (Robertson 1996). The abun- dances of other reef-associated spe- cies on the same coral were not in- cluded because damselfishes are the superior competitor for space Fig. 1. Colony-scale (solid arrows) and plot-scale (dotted arrows) parameters measured for each Montastraea annularis colony surveyed. Plot-scale pre- and are unlikely to be influenced by dator biomass also measured their presence. Montastraea colonies >50cm were used as the explanatory large monitor for counting the number of gorgonians variable to ensure the plot-scale metric of complexity present. The number of gorgonians was hypothe- represented functionally important corals. The inter- sised to have an important effect on fish abundance action between plot-scale complexity and predator because they affect visual fields, and high densities biomass was included to establish whetherplot-scale may com promise mating and feeding behaviour complexity may be important because it affects the (Rilov et al. 2007). The digital video, in combination hunting efficiency of predators. Explanatory variables with bespoke image analysis software (Vidana; freely were log or square-root transformed where necessary available from www. ex. ac. uk/msel), was also used to to improve normality. measure colony area. Since sampling of Montastraea annularis colonies was nested within plots, a random variable repre- senting plot number was included within the analy- Data analysis ses. Therefore, generalised linear mixed-effects mod- els were performed using the lme4 package (Bates & Generalised linear models were used to examine Maechler 2009. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models the relationship between all the abiotic and biotic using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-31. variables and the abundance of fishes. Firstly, models http://CRAN.R-project.org/ package= lme4) in R (R were constructed for damselfishes. Few juvenile dam- Development Core Team 2008). Models were fitted selfishes were recorded, so models focused on the ef- using the procedure outlined by Crawley (2007). fect of habitat quality variables on the abundance of Briefly, a maximal model was fitted including all fac- adults of each species. Four species of adult dam- tors and interactions. Least significant terms were selfishes were seen during the study: Stegastes adus- then removed in turn, starting with the highest-order tusand S. diencaeus(which were considered together interactions. After each term was removed, models because of the difficulties of distinguishing them were compared to ensure that term removal did not reliably underwater), S. partitus, S. planifronsand Mi- lead to a significant increase in deviance. Terms crospathodon chrysurus. Multiple adults of each spe- were removed until the model contained only signif- cies were rarely found on a single coral (4 out of 102, icant terms or removal of any non-significant terms maximum number of adults on a single colony was 3). caused a significant increase in deviance (minimal Therefore, it was appropriate to transform the abun- adequate model). dances of each damselfish species into presence/ Generalised linear mixed-effects models were also absence per Montastraea annularis colony, and use used to examine the correlation between explanatory Harborne et al.: Reef fish habitat quality 205 variables and the abundance of other adult and RESULTS juvenile reef-associated species (i.e. non-piscivores, non-damselfishes; subsequently ‘reef-associated spe- Colony and plot-scale properties cies’). Too few intermediate-phase fish were re - corded to allow meaningful analysis of this life stage Plots had a mean of 10.4 (SE = 1.2) Montastraea (see Table 1). Response variables were count data spp.colonies >50 cm. Mean biomass of all predatory and, therefore, Poisson error structures and the log fishes was 304.5 g 25 m−2(SE = 106.2 g 25 m−2), and link function were used with the mixed-effects mod- mean biomass of predatory fishes excluding large- els. Investigations into the distribution of the count bodied serranids was 246.6 g 25 m−2 (SE = 101.7 g data demonstrated that the variables were not 25m−2) (see Supplement 1 for biomasses of each spe- overdispersed and Poisson error structures were cies). Mean colony height was 0.83 m (SE = 0.03 m), appropriate (see Supplement 2 at www.int-res.c om/ mean area was 3508 cm2 (SE = 273 cm2), and each articles/suppl/m437p201_supp.pdf). The exp lana tory colony had a mean of 15.4 crevices (SE = 1.4). When variables were as for damselfish models, but with the all crevices were pooled, median crevice width was addition of the interaction between the number of 4cm and median depth was 11 cm. Each colony sup- Montastraea spp. colonies >50 cm in height within ported a mean of 8.2 (SE = 0.4) gorgonians. the plot and the number of adult damselfishes. This Colony area was strongly positively correlated with interaction aimed to seek evidence that plot-scale colony height and the number of crevices and gor- complexity may be important because it reduces the gonians on the colony (Pearson product-moment number of agonistic interactions. correlation coefficients, r > 0.50, p < 0.001). Such The generalised linear models provide an under- collinearities can lead to unstable parameter esti- standing of the effects of plot-scale and colony-scale mates during multiple regression (Crawley 2007). variables on the different fish taxa, but are not Therefore, colony area was excluded from the well suited to address additional questions such as generalised linear mixed-effects models. All other whether particular colony types facilitated the co- variables had only modest, weak or non-significant occurrence of the competitively superior adult terri- correlations (Pearson product-moment correlation torial damselfishes (Stegastes adustus, S. planifrons coefficient, r < 0.41) with the exception of colony and S. diencaeus; Robertson 1996) and other reef- height and the number of crevices on the colony associated species or whether colonies with only (Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, r = damself ishes or only reef-associated species are sig- 0.65, p < 0.001). nificantly different. Therefore, multivariate statistics The 102 Montastraea annulariscolonies supported were used to establish which characteristics (colony a total of 214 fish, with a majority (57.5%) being reef- height and area, number of gorgonians on each associated species (Table 1). The most abundant colony, and the number, median width, and median reef-associated species were Canthigaster rostrata depth of crevices) of Montastraea annularis colonies (34 fish recorded), Thalassoma bifasciatum (27), appeared to influence their habitat quality for differ- Sparisoma aurofrenatum (15), Chromis cyanea (12) ent components of the fish community. For the analy- and Halichoeres garnoti (10) (see Supplement 1 for ses, the data were split into colonies supporting (1) no abundances of each species). reef-associated fishes or adult territorial damsel - fishes, (2) reef-associated species only, (3) adult terri- torial damselfishes only, and (4) territorial damsel - Models of habitat quality and biotic interactions fishes and reef-associated species. The normalised characteristics of colonies supporting these different The abundances of Stegastes adustus/diencaeus fish taxa were analysed using analysis of similarities and S. planifrons on Montastraea annularis colonies (ANOSIM) (Clarke 1993). ANOSIM returns a statistic were negatively correlated with each other, but the R, which is a measure of separation among groups abundance of Microspathodon chrysurus was not a where 0 indicates complete mixing and 1 represents significant term in either model (Table 2, Supple- full clustering in which all samples within groups are ment2). The presence or absence of S. partituson a more similar to one another than to any sample in colony was negatively related to the abundance of S. another group. The discriminating characteristics be- planifrons, and the reciprocal relationship was also tween groups of colonies identified by ANOSIM as included in the final model for S. planifrons. None of being significantly different were determined using the Stegastes species had a significant effect on the similarity percentage (SIMPER) analysis (Clarke 1993). presence or absence of the large-bodied M. chrysu- 206 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 437: 201–214, 2011 rus on colonies. S. planifrons was most frequently this parameter with the number of crevices for M. seen on taller colonies, and S. adustus/diencaeusand chrysurusand with crevice depth for S. planifrons. S. planifronswere more abundant on colonies with a Reef-associated species were more abundant on tall large number of crevices. M. chrysurusand S. plani- colonies, and adult abundance increased with in- fronswere more frequent on colonies with narrower creasing numbers of gorgonians (Table 3, Fig. 2a,d, crevices, and there was a significant interaction of Supplement 2). Adult reef-associated species were significantly correlated with crevice number (Fig. 2b), median width Table 1. Abundance (total number of fish and percentage of Montastraea anddepth (being associated with more annularis colonies occupied) of each damselfish species and other reef - numerous wider and deeper crevices), associated fishes considered in this study. 102 M. annulariscolonies surveyed and the interactions among these para- meters, while juveniles were correlated Fish species/group Life phase No. % of colonies occupied with the intera ction between crevice of fish (no. of colonies) number and median width. Further- Microspathodon Juvenile 0 0.00 (0) more, adult reef-associated species chrysurus Intermediate/Adult 10 7.84 (8) were positively correlated with the Stegastes adustus/ Juvenile 0 0.00 (0) number of Montastraea spp. colonies diencaeus Adult 18 16.67 (17) >50 cm in the plot (Fig. 2c) and the bio- Stegastes leucostictus Juvenile 9 8.82 (9) mass of predators, but negatively cor- Adult 0 0.00 (0) related with the interaction term be- Stegastes partitus Juvenile 4 3.92 (4) tween these 2 plot-scale variables. The Adult 28 23.53 (24) use of high-quality colonies only ap- Stegastes planifrons Juvenile 2 1.96 (2) peared to occur in the absence of dam- Adult 20 16.67 (17) selfishes. The abundance of adult and Other reef-associated Juvenile 65 37.25 (38) species Intermediate 4 3.92 (4) juvenile reef-associated species was Adult 54 27.45 (28) significantly negatively correlated with Total 214 78.43 (80) the abundance ofStegastes planifrons, and adult reef-associated species were Table 2. Minimal adequate generalised linear mixed-effects models for the presence/absence of adult damselfishes on Mon- tastraea annularis colonies. Values are model coefficients with p-values in parentheses. ×: interaction term. −: term not included in model. ns: non-significant term(p > 0.05). Removal of non-significant terms led to a significant increase in model deviance Model term Response variable Stegastes adustus/ Stegastes Stegastes Microspathodon diencaeus partitus planifrons chrysurus Intercept −4.57 (<0.001) −1.66 (<0.001) −17.73 (0.007) −2.11 (0.376) Abundance of adult Stegastes adustus/diencaeus − ns ns ns Abundance of adult Stegastes partitus ns − −19.18 (0.996) ns Abundance of adult Stegastes planifrons −2.20 (0.066) −17.15 (0.994) − ns Abundance of adult Microspathodon chrysurus ns ns ns − Number of gorgonians ns ns ns ns Colony height ns ns 6.07 (0.043) ns Number of crevices (NoC) 1.14 (0.021) ns 2.61 (0.029) ns Median crevice width (MCW) ns ns −10.84 (0.076) −4.42 (0.045) Median crevice depth (MCD) ns ns ns ns NoC ×MCW ns ns ns 1.41 (0.004) NoC ×MCD ns ns ns ns MCW ×MCD ns ns 4.73 (0.024) ns NoC ×MCW ×MCD ns ns ns ns Number of Montastraeacolonies (NoMC) ns ns ns ns Biomass of predators (BoP) ns ns ns ns NoMC ×BoP ns 0.08 (0.018) ns ns Harborne et al.: Reef fish habitat quality 207 also negatively correlated with the a bundance of S. Multivariate analyses of habitat quality adustus/diencaeus. Juvenile reef-associated species were positively as sociated with the presence of Micro - ANOSIM demonstrated that there was significant spathodon chrysurus. variation (Global R = 0.266, p = 0.001) among colonies supporting no juvenile reef-associated fishes or adult territorial damselfishes Table 3. Minimal adequate generalised linear mixed-effects models for the (46 Montastraea annularis colonies), abundances of adult and juvenile reef-associated species on Montastraea annularis colonies. Values are model coefficients with p-values in paren- only juvenile reef associated species theses. ns: non-significant term (p > 0.05) (23), only adult territorial damselfishes (18), or both territorial damselfishes Model term Response variable and juvenile reef-associated species Adult Juvenile (15). Similarly, there was significant variation (Global R = 0.275, p = 0.001) Intercept −36.76 (0.016) −3.38 (<0.001) among colonies supporting no adult No. of adult Stegastes adustus/diencaeus −0.99 (0.013) ns No. of adult Stegastes partitus ns ns reef-associated fishes or adult territor- No. of adult Stegastes planifrons −1.36 (<0.001) −0.94 (0.003) ial damselfishes (49 Montastraea an- No. of adult Microspathodon chrysurus ns 0.59 (<0.001) nularis colonies), only adult reef - No. of gorgonians 1.23 (0.016) ns associated species (20), only adult Colony height 1.51 (0.010) 1.20 (0.011) No. of crevices (NoC) 20.15 (0.006) ns territorial damselfishes (25), or both Median crevice width (MCW) 17.40 (0.035) ns territorial damselfishes and adult reef - Median crevice depth (MCD) 12.10 (0.043) ns associated species (8). Pairwise com- NoC ×MCW −13.14 (0.002) 0.42 (<0.001) parisons among groups of colonies NoC ×MCD −7.69 (0.007) ns MCW ×MCD −7.18 (0.031) ns were qualitatively similar for both ju- NoC ×MCW ×MCD 5.11 (0.003) ns venile and adult reef-associated spe- No. of Montastraeacolonies (NoMC) 0.99 (0.009) ns cies: all pairs were significantly differ- NoMC ×No. of adult damselfishes ns ns ent (p ≤ 0.028) with the exception of Biomass of predators (BoP) 0.71 (0.009) ns BoP ×NoMC −0.35 (0.001) ns the comparisons between colonies sup- porting only reef-associated fishes and e e c 8 c 8 n a n c a a d d n 6 n 6 u u b b a a s 4 s 4 e e ci ci e e p 2 p 2 s s ult ult d d 0 A A 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 20 40 60 80 100 Coral colony height (m) No. of crevices e e c c 8 n 8 n c a d a d d n n 6 u 6 u b b a a s s 4 e 4 e ci ci e e p sp 2 e s 2 ult nil Ad 00 5 10 15 20 25 uve 00 0.5 1 1.5 2 J No. of Montastraea colonies in plot Coral colony height (m) Fig. 2. Scatter plots of selected relationships between habitat complexity variables and the abundance of (a−c) adult and (d)juvenile reef-associated fish species(non-damselfishes, non-piscivores). n = 102 colonies 208 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 437: 201–214, 2011 those supporting only territorial dam- -egd spadcrpsccs(onatroaccrcidi(pbdatadhatbnswTqriaannshTMaieeeemeecrorioinnnfsllpsnaoioeooeeueauoh eei.. tfeefcoEaveecallssll tdmrdrlnrtnmnbpdnta ilfefauosocsloeysvvho2lheffcbu t2tttviiuq tttiel ea-- olenneiisssetc siiags0roati si0laelnn(aacchtdahh l urtibmasee rseeieiilTc nc0lnnhtlsm0lnyasseeegeeglr ireoeireeytsafhuirsolueto9atnmssnsi6oi po tcfefsss e, hdfp ssl tlsptnrea eioorretpb) ,aay) sgeigotfaeslo, sier4 ea, noet,ot totihdecc- cecptl s np hta r et fy hciaads aa lenahofniihtarhashxsos i na fwao tdo eaaut osiaensdnet s&hsi edavbeln a fsgsadn ngrma gnfistt gystp lu Do cdadeuspotmtand eeot ufdbb hr e fd4 onpbntis, tpiosrhlun ir oarpe nddrI o 5 ndsifeasd ec.d scileeiuitidowt aSet oflnrwsnctho& opg f )bpaihencd saeeetadessv2hseria.ri lwvsiCwtdti e a ob reecot p a ts eartevimtwga0b p-piefattoa,yc n i5s urreaactreUnleCesnoh sneeaqr0anbeofltenrweorii t ees)gh crn tes-wry dwftndcdofrici9enntu.gSeoc asmelt, a ornaee-wwi a ht tiiea e ysd e)i d leeaae SheanlnlSasrld lsgeal.doebcn efs y wmrefeiagia idtrslrs sspIesadgiIssvnoo- tca nc e iynieaT o sos rrOM. sssoeaitar. aibiea uaohinflbdthc iegnowl yv ufdnhcehdd rm ranecsh,mco i lnCNnoeso ,cceP eifaggrspeofeasisrsubsssi cteaefadialgilnsoitissserowresEos omlrotd bs pcctuyotahaist c ede aii i,(len ohssyo cv oneaannaR estci olsotMelih l( ma cuatocrieai osetliccudllhtf giDbsrsrng(wnaa tticiiaioeevliuaon nldocnLrdetthcaieccp uaslaos ltttie cnioare--atnesuddeemieahe d dhacel rnansfpseeddrehseqy tnnrdrfsr rmsrys old fflelp e l egarlaoai seeeiabsflue iiwrl t o lah m dstm elbasseiod l rrctr eepppi.bbtt ioassassëossy behh caattaeyrhncwhahaets rnuuuhleppepWrioitohlnlsoermlbdiioee me tnnnieeeeaba icnepnppgeeerooeteeeteaalarat&ssfiinnddnhddgnyyeeyessssss---r------------ttttl,., Table 4. SIMPER analysis for comparisons among characteristics of Montastraea annulariscolonies supporting different categories of damselfishes and juvenile reefassociated fishes. Top right cells in the table show significances of pairwise comparisons. Columns indicate which characteristics were larger within significant pairwiscomparisons (e.g. only crevice depth larger on colonies supporting ‘No juvenile reef-associated fishes or adult territorial damselfishes’ in comparison to those supportin‘Juvenile reef-associated fishes only’). Figures in parentheses indicate percentage contribution to the pairwise difference: percentage contribution = average squaredistance/average dissimilarity between colonies supporting the different fish groups. ns: not significant (p > 0.05) Colonies supporting: No juvenile reef-associated Juvenile reef-associated Adult territorial damselfishes Both juvenile reef-associated fishes or adult territorialfishes only (n = 23) only (n = 18) fishes and adult territorial damselfishes (n = 46) damselfishes (n = 15) No juvenile reef-associated R = 0.194; p = 0.001 R = 0.284; p = 0.001 R = 0.558; p = 0.001fishes or adult territorial Crevice width (25.1) Height (22.0) Area (23.0)damselfishes Number of gorgonians (16.7) Number of crevices (20.1) Number of crevices (20.8) Height (16.2) Crevice depth (20.0) Height (19.1) Area (15.3) Number of gorgonians (13.3) Number of gorgonians (17.0) Number of crevices (11.8) Crevice width (12.3) Crevice depth (15.0) Area (12.3) Juvenile reef-associated Crevice depth (14.8) ns R = 0.116; p = 0.024fishes only Area (24.0) Number of crevices (18.8) Number of gorgonians (16.5) Height (13.7) Crevice depth (9.2) Adult territorial −− nsdamselfishes only Both juvenile reef-associated Crevice width (5.1)Crevice width (17.8) −fishes and adult territorialdamselfishes Harborne et al.: Reef fish habitat quality 209 Table 5. SIMPER analysis for comparisons among characteristics of Montastraea annulariscolonies supporting different categories of damselfishes and adult reef -associated fishes. Top right cells in the table show significances of pairwise comparisons. Columns indicate which characteristics were larger within significant pairwisecomparisons (e.g. only crevice width larger on colonies supporting ‘No adult reef-associated fishes or adult territorial damselfishes’ in comparison to those supporting‘Adult reef-associated fishes only’). Figures in parentheses indicate percentage contribution to the pairwise difference: percentage contribution = average squared distance/average dissimilarity between colonies supporting the different fish groups. ns: not significant (p > 0.05) Colonies supporting: No adult reef-associated Adult reef-associated fishes Adult territorial damselfishes Both adult reef-associated fishes or adult territorialonly (n = 20) only (n = 25) fishes and adult territorial damselfishes (n = 49) damselfishes (n = 8) No adult reef-associated R = 0.203; p = 0.003 R = 0.263; p = 0.001 R = 0.717; p = 0.001fishes or adult territorial Crevice depth (22.5) Area (19.2) Number of crevices (26.8)damselfishes Height (16.7) Number of gorgonians (18.3) Height (22.8) Number of gorgonians (16.7) Height (17.9) Area (15.8) Area (15.0) Number of crevices (15.7) Crevice depth (15.7) Number of crevices (11.7) Crevice depth (12.1) Number of gorgonians (9.0) Adult reef-associated Crevice width (17.5) ns R = 0.226; p = 0.028fishes only Number of crevices (28.8) Crevice depth (20.3) Area (17.1) Height (17.0) Number of gorgonians (8.6) Crevice width (8.3) Adult territorial Crevice width (16.8)− nsdamselfishes only Both adult reef-associated −Crevice width (17.8) − fishes and adult territorial damselfishes Lohlpar((lbgacsfcfcshtbadhc(lodtalcoqoaiTtnwhst atipmaimaanJcGhhiieieehhtaaoiodfnflntfrbtealaeeariouuaunovhaaoartsnra i rmaogDeeeeeaeilnmmdhbrbmmdbawripecneamladlaoeSgp th.ngtdorr a fypaohl e ehld emii ilpsrial i naethppe n yta,rooytettistcbmdeabnhcoaisedsae ad litoaaai3teetsmccicelas lsnn s caefowspyveeeguvbir bmfbe bsc rtttefsaiofoo,ctns fnss scr eoirp risea o e ripxoiieeimicetnarponmtnircs-ttsptadoPhot setatt fnr vele cfneienrratoaoDeicp almhho e e s chtia eneto owavoaaot a rnrp qsstrrrty2slitot2mexaao)as ufcsqafet c)aarscnttrratccsrh ated tlt u0ef nbr 0tptei lftaeia htfieihb ocenuiethael sn em iqre e oiala0eel1ie0ohs idneeaoihaxnefcflhmvaeiolsariic o asgslnubpl 7aon7 -teadr6nfarf lfeculasmia ialtg feab aa.atb f te e tt)itaplrt.3s fp )a terimlighbnmtyafe ss.bulgy ctih.feOfciramt sesold ooiobile o(e tsowierir rlaaiois oirsHo he iOdo s2esqartosttwenrnrctrueoetstf cteehrot-nynair.(neha aawaaoyhi a0nbriuraun o ergheutwpcunsstgncfei saatfo nntd tet t0iehtFhllc apwctos f i arar pdietoeaatsiesentnisn-ddsiai8(adr k oheb solasqwnce nbn bt.asnr banvfS,stuei sgqle h) nhire soeribs to. cubtye gtidtot,na nmuiysvbi icy eurrre toitdraouro,isaltbtiQa xaohh tr na e cromhceeena twu harh 6nhmafbtss hlr ludyllaalatrfaeet l qlgohrxs.nbu dl oeecti lohti%ou1u se s hly,c mtat ib gsesdgaut aadladt nipnasaaqf tyb rio02dctttm ha oo isaf iyshtmiitcl it eh nansslrnppa uaofq0t01y sfocteerr tc e ytbo obe csaldohmdfaaletidcic ylmlhgg aa09 aurpoi r f aiceefineeialdcatibgser nr atveeni edfokl 8r9eeloncnoa l rrsrmashsh piagetiy saiteshtcaspdecot)5 rtesntgme eitlhs oigs il eai hssei.a itqeytwi o,isr rtfoftomb )illnn cliceeita picettcsrsi-t ilhdp-a-m(es. afe)nuooyfnuuc Saalals o sg etowarit sis oshsi ptteaa eabsg,nn snta oaits lddbcdc iaiahafOes aaaarray ds hngsiretmooiiettttllg ms aasriiboldnntfmietnnnnniieehbeahehlsiteeeuregesnoeeooootfaotllllfliiiiiiiilnddkgdddndeeyyeeeoeeyeessssss-----r---r-r--r--- -rtff 210 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 437: 201–214, 2011 tiatives. This research should address the effects of tors (Hixon & Beets 1993, Nemeth 1998, Almany habitat quality on both abundance and key demo- 2004a,b). Finally, the abundance of adult reef-associ- graphic parameters to ensure that there is no decou- ated species was positively correlated with the num- pling between density and reproductive success, as ber of gorgonians on Montastraea annulariscolonies. has been reported in some bird studies (Van Horne Gorgonians can inhibit the ability of territorial fishes 1983). to see predators, find mates and feed (Rilov et al. 2007), but their effect on non-territorial species is poorly understood and they may provide additional Microhabitat-scale habitat quality refuges. All the groups of fishes associated with Montas- traea annularis colonies were distributed non - Plot-scale habitat quality randomly, presumably because of a combination of settlement preferences, differential post-settlement The increased abundance of adult reef-associated mortality, and inter-colony movement. Specifically, fishes on colonies in habitat areas with high densities both damselfishes and reef-associated species were of other colonies has not been documented previ- more abundant on large, complex colonies. Height ously, but reinforces the need to consider habitat and number of crevices were particularly important complexity at multiple scales. It seems likely that as metrics, as 4 models of fish abundances or pres- fish home ranges increase with body size (Kramer & ence/absences were significantly positively corre- Chapman 1999), plots with more coral colonies are lated with one or both of them. These variables are likely to provide greater opportunities for foraging, correlated with each other because large colonies mating and predator refuges as fishes move about tend to have a greater number of ramets and hence a the reef. Corals surrounded by other corals may also greater number of crevices among these ramets. receive more fish recruits and experience reduced However, the 2 variables did occur singly within density-dependent mortality than more isolated models, indicating that they have some independent corals (Stier & Osenberg 2010). Furthermore, fishes explanatory power. Colony height, irrespective of may have fewer agonistic interactions with dam- complexity, may be important for at least 4 reasons. selfishes in more complex habitats (Levin et al. 2000), Firstly, there is some evidence that tall colonies pro- but the interaction term in our models was not signif- vide fishes with a better view of approaching preda- icant. Finally, the significant interaction term be - tors (Nemeth 1998). Secondly, taller colonies offer a tween the density of Montastraea spp. colonies and better chance for fishes to observe mates and max- the biomass of predators provides some support for imise the effectiveness of courtship displays (Rilov et evidence from other ecosystems that more complex al. 2007). Thirdly, planktivorous food is more abun- habitats can affect the hunting ability of predators dant higher in the water column, and can affect the (Eklöv & Diehl 1994). The lack of a correlation distribution of planktivores (Clarke 1992). Finally, between abundances of juvenile reef-associated spe- settlement may simply scale with colony size and, if cies or the presence or absence of adult damselfishes post-settlement mortality is density independent, on a M. annulariscolony and plot-scale coral density larger colonies will subsequently support more fishes. is presumably because these individuals forage or The positive correlations of fish abundance to the maintain a territory on a single colony, and whether number of crevices are likely to be driven by the this colony is isolated or not is of limited importance need for predator avoidance (Hixon & Beets 1993), compared to access to refuges. but will also reflect the use of crevices as spawning, nesting and foraging sites (Robertson & Sheldon 1979). As highlighted previously (e.g. Nemeth 1998), Influence of biotic factors on habitat quality simply having more crevices available was not always the only important factor determining fish While reef-associated species are more abundant abundance and the particular characteristics of the on large, complex Montastraea annularis colonies, crevices were also important, e.g. adult Stegastes their use of these corals was significantly negatively planifronsand Microspathodon chrysuruswere more correlated with the presence of adult damselfishes, abundant when crevices were narrower. These perhaps driven by damselfish influences on settle- patterns may reflect fishes seeking refuges that ment rates (e.g. Sweatman 1985) and post-settlement match their body shape and size and exclude preda- mortality (e.g. Carr et al. 2002). As hypothesised,

Description:
Laboratory, Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hatherly Laboratory, .. reliably underwater), S. partitus, S. planifrons and Mi-.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.