ebook img

Biological Foundations of Music (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences) PDF

479 Pages·2003·7.37 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Biological Foundations of Music (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences)

THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF MUSIC Isabelle Peretz Robert J. Zatorre Editors OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Zat-fm.qxd 6/5/03 11:16 PM Page i THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF MUSIC This page intentionally left blank THE CO GNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF MUSIC Edited by ISABELLE PERETZ Départment de Psychologie, Université de Montréal,C.P.6128, Succ.Centre-Ville,Montréal, Québec,H3C 3J7,Canada and ROBERT J.ZATORRE Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University,Montreal, Quebec,H3A 2B4,Canada 1 Zat-fm.qxd 6/5/03 11:16 PM Page iv 1 Great Clarendon Street,Oxford   Oxford University Press is a department ofthe University ofOxford. It furthers the University’s objective ofexcellence in research,scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Bangkok Buenos Aires Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kolkata Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi São Paulo Shanghai Taipei Tokyo Toronto Oxford is a registered trade mark ofOxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc.,New York © The New York Academy ofSciences,Chapters 1–7,9–20,and 22–8,and Oxford University Press,Chapters 8 and 21.Most ofthe materials in this book originally appeared in The Biological Foundations ofMusic, published as Volume 930 ofthe Annals ofthe New York Academy ofSciences,June 2001 (ISBN 1-57331-306-8). This book is an expanded version ofthe original Annals volume. The moral rights ofthe author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2003 All rights reserved.No part ofthis publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted,in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing ofOxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law,or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope ofthe above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press,at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library Library ofCongress Cataloging in Publication Data (Data available) ISBN 0 19 852519 2 (Hbk) 0 19 852520 6 (Pbk) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Typeset by Newgen Imaging Systems (P) Ltd.,Chennai,India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by T.J.International Ltd,Padstow Zat-fm.qxd 6/5/03 11:16 PM Page v PREFACE Over the past decade there has been an explosion in research activities on music perception and performance,and their correlates in the human brain.This sudden increase in scient- ific work on music has been motivated in part by the idea that music offers a unique oppor- tunity to better understand the organization of the human brain. The other major motivation for exploring the neural substrates of musical activities is that they may shed light on the functional origin and biological value ofmusic.Like language,music exists in all human societies.Like language,music is a complex,rule-governed activity,and appears to be associated with a specific brain architecture.Moreover,sensitivity to musical struc- ture develops early in life,without conscious effort,in the large majority ofthe population. Music also appears to be specific to humans,although some investigators have begun to examine its possible evolutionary origins in other species’.1 Unlike most other high-level functions ofthe human brain—and unlike language—only a minority ofindividuals become proficient performing musicians through explicit tutor- ing.This particularity in the distribution of acquired skills confers to music a privileged role in the study ofbrain plasticity.Another distinction from language is that a large vari- ety of sensory-motor systems may be studied because of the many different ways of pro- ducing music.These variable modes ofauditory expression enable interesting comparisons across systems. Given both its similarities with language and its divergence from it,we believe that the relationship between music and the brain is ofcentral importance for the domain ofcog- nitive neuroscience.The fact that musical activities have generally been considered as an exquisite product ofhuman culture,and as such are often assumed to be merely a cultural artifact,should not be taken as an impediment to achieving a scientific understanding of its underlying basis.In fact,we would argue that the cultural overlay associated with music confers upon it a key role for understanding the biology of human cognitive functions. Indeed,the ubiquity ofmusic,its developmental features,and its brain substrates raise the question ofthe nature and the extent ofits biological foundations,and how these interact with culture. In this context,it is remarkable to note that the study ofmusic as a major brain function has been relatively neglected. Neuropsychological questions related to musical abilities have been of occasional interest to neurologists and psychologists since the last century (e.g.Ref.2 for pioneering work),but systematic,sustained investigations have been rare until recently.Several developments—both theoretical and technological—have created a profound change in the way in which music studies are perceived,thereby enabling us to present this volume as a beginning to the scientific study of the neurobiology of music. First,one should mention the development of cognitive psychology during the latter half of the twentieth century; cognitive psychologists were among the first to recognize the Zat-fm.qxd 6/5/03 11:16 PM Page vi vi  value of music as a means of studying perception, memory, attention, and performance (see Refs 2–5 for the three benchmark textbooks). Second, neuropsychology, which had always been based on knowledge from neurophysiology and neuroanatomy,began also to adopt experimental and cognitive paradigms,permitting advances in understanding lesion effects on musical functions.Third,developmental psychologists exploited new techniques that allowed them to probe the mind ofeven neonates.Finally,and most dramatically per- haps with the arrival on the scene ofneuroimaging techniques such as fMRI and MEG,the stage was set for the explosion to which we alluded above,and which forms the core ofthe present volume. The objective ofthe conference,from which most ofthe present texts are derived,was to demonstrate the dynamism and richness ofthe discipline.The conference was held in May 2000 in New York,and was initiated and sponsored by the New York Academy of Science. Major scientists from six different countries,working in a variety ofinterrelated disciplines and pursuing sustained research activities on music were invited to present their work. Most responded enthusiastically and addressed issues crucial to a better understanding of the neural substrates underlying musical functions.Their presentations first appeared in the Annals ofthe New York Academy ofSciences,volume 930,under the title ‘The Biological Foundations of Music’ in 2001. Given the success of this issue, Oxford University Press invited us to edit an updated version ofit in their collection ofbooks.We eagerly accepted and invited a few other major players in the field who originally presented a poster to pub- lish a full chapter in the present volume.Therefore,you will find here an updated version ofthe 25 original chapters as well as three new chapters. The contributions in the present volume will reveal how much progress has been made in the field over the last decade. Besides providing research overviews, many texts also delineate significant avenues for future research.Indeed,it is clear that this is a very young field still,and that much remains to be done.We hope that the material presented in this volume,coupled with an increase ofinterest for the biological foundations ofmusic in the scientific and general community,represent the initial spark for building a solid and stim- ulating cognitive neuroscience ofmusic. I.P.and R.Z. February 2003 References 1. Wallin,N.,B.Merker and S.Brown(ed.) (2000) The Origins ofMusic.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press. 2. Bouillaud, J. (1865) Sur la faculté du langage articulé. Bulletin de l’Académie de Médecine 30, 752–68. 3. Deutsch,D.(ed.) (1982) The Psychology ofMusic.New York:Academic Press. 4. Dowling,W.and D.Harwood(1986) Music Cognition.Series in cognition and perception.New York.Academic Press. 5. Sloboda, J. (1985) The Musical Mind: The Cognitive Psychology of Music. London: Oxford University Press. Zat-fm.qxd 6/5/03 11:16 PM Page vii CONTENTS List ofcontributors page xi Part I The origins ofmusic 1 Musical predispositions in infancy:an update page 3 Sandra E.Trehub 2 The quest for universals in temporal processing in music page 21 Carolyn Drake and Daisy Bertrand 3 Mechanisms ofmusical memory in infancy page 32 Jenny R.Saffran 4 Music,cognition,culture,and evolution page 42 Ian Cross 5 Is music an evolutionary adaptation? page 57 David Huron Part II The musical mind 6 The roots ofmusical variation in perceptual similarity and invariance page 79 Stephen McAdams and Daniel Matzkin 7 Tonal cognition page 95 Carol L.Krumhansl and Petri Toiviainen 8 Learning and perceiving musical structures:further insights from artificial neural networks page 109 Barbara Tillmann,Jamshed J.Bharucha,and Emmanuel Bigand Part III The neurons ofmusic 9 Neurobiology ofharmony perception page 127 Mark Jude Tramo,Peter A.Cariani,Bertrund Delgutte,and Louis D.Braida 10 Intracerebral evoked potentials in pitch perception reveal a functional asymmetry ofhuman auditory cortex page 152 Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel,Kimberly Giraud,Jean-Michel Badier, Patrick Marquis,and Patrick Chauvel Zat-fm.qxd 6/5/03 11:16 PM Page viii viii  11 The neural processing ofcomplex sounds page 168 Timothy D.Griffiths Part IV Musical brain substrates 12 Music and the neurologist:a historical perspective page 181 John C.M.Brust 13 Brain specialization for music:new evidence from congenital amusia page 192 Isabelle Peretz 14 Cerebral substrates for musical temporal processes page 204 Séverine Samson and Nathalie Ehrlé 15 Cerebral substrates ofmusical imagery page 217 Andrea R.Halpern 16 Neural specializations for tonal processing page 231 Robert J.Zatorre 17 Exploring the functional neuroanatomy ofmusic performance, perception,and comprehension page 247 Lawrence M.Parsons 18 Comparison between language and music page 269 Mireille Besson and Daniele Schön 19 Musical sound processing:EEG and MEG evidence page 294 Mari Tervaniemi 20 Processing emotions induced by music page 310 L.J.Trainor and L.A.Schmidt 21 A new approach to the cognitive neuroscience ofmelody page 325 Aniruddh D.Patel 22 How many music centres are in the brain? page 346 Eckart O.Altenmüller Part V Musical expertise/brain plasticity 23 Functional organization and plasticity ofauditory cortex page 357 JosefP.Rauschecker 24 The brain ofmusicians page 366 Gottfried Schlaug 25 Representational cortex in musicians page 382 C.Pantev,A.Engelien,V.Candia,and T.Elbert 26 The brain that makes music and is changed by it page 396 Alvaro Pascual-Leone Zat-fm.qxd 6/5/03 11:16 PM Page ix  ix Part VI Relation ofmusic to other cognitive domains 27 The sounds ofpoetry viewed as music page 413 Fred Lerdahl 28 Does exposure to music have beneficial side effects? page 430 E.Glenn Schellenberg

Description:
Music offers a unique opportunity to better understand the organization of the human brain. Like language, music exists in all human societies. Like language, music is a complex, rule-governed activity that seems specific to humans, and associated with a specific brain architecture. Yet unlike most
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.