ebook img

Bioactivity Assessment of Indian Origin—Mangrove Actinobacteria against Candida albicans PDF

18 Pages·2017·7.1 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Bioactivity Assessment of Indian Origin—Mangrove Actinobacteria against Candida albicans

marine drugs Article Bioactivity Assessment of Indian Origin—Mangrove Actinobacteria against Candida albicans J.G.S.PavanKumar1,AjithaGomathi1,VitorVasconcelos2,3,*andK.M.Gothandam1 ID 1 DepartmentofBiotechnology,SchoolofBiosciencesandTechnology,VITUniversity,Vellore632014,India; [email protected](J.G.S.P.K.);[email protected](A.G.);[email protected](K.M.G.) 2 CIIMAR/CIMAR—InterdisciplinaryCentreofMarineandEnvironmentalResearch,UniversityofPorto, TerminaldeCruzeirosdoPortodeLeixões,4450-208Matosinhos,Portugal 3 DepartmentofBiology,FacultyofSciences,UniversityofPorto,4069-007Porto,Portugal * Correspondence:[email protected];Tel.:+351-223401817 Received:27December2017;Accepted:9February2018;Published:12February2018 Abstract: Actinobacteriaisfoundtohaveapotentmetabolicactivityagainstpathogens. Thepresent studyrevealstheassessmentofpotentantifungalsecondarymetabolitesfromactinobacteriaisolated fromIndianmarinemangrovesediments. Thesampleswerecollectedfromthecoastalregionsof Muthupet,AndamanandtheNicobarIslands.Identificationwascarriedoutusing16SrRNAanalysis andbiosyntheticgenes(PolyketidesynthasetypeI/IIandNon-ribosomalpeptidesynthase)were screened. Actinobacteriawereassayedfortheirantifungalactivityagainst16clinicalCandidaalbicans andthecompoundanalysiswasperformedusinggaschromatography-massspectrometryGC-MS. The 31 actinobacterial strains were isolated and 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed that this ecosystemisrichonactinobacteria,withStreptomycesasthepredominantgenus. ThePCRbased screeningofbiosyntheticgenesrevealedthepresenceofPKS-Iinsixstrains,PKS-IIinfourstrains and NRPS in 11 strains. The isolated actinobacteria VITGAP240 and VITGAP241 (two isolates) werefoundtohaveapotentialantifungalactivityagainstallthetestedC.albicans. GC-MSresults revealedthattheactinobacterialcompoundswerebelongingtoheterocyclic,polyketidesandpeptides. Overall,thestrainspossessawidespectrumofantifungalpropertieswhichaffordstheproductionof significantbioactivemetabolitesaspotentialantibiotics. Keywords: actinobacteria; antifungal; polyketide synthase; non ribosomal peptide synthase; Candidaalbicans 1. Introduction Bacterial cell factories and their wide applications in search of added value products such as moleculartherapeuticsisboomingcurrently; theyhaveapromisingfutureasthesafestandmost efficientmedicinalproductdiscovery[1]. Floraandfaunaaswellasmicroorganismsaregoodsources toobtainawidevarietyofnaturalmedicinalproducts[2,3]. Actinobacteriaareverysignificantinthis regard[4],takenintoaccounttheirintrinsicpharmacologicalimportance[5].Thesecondarymetabolites producedbythesegrampositivebacteria,haveawidespectrumofactivitiessuchasantimicrobial, antiviral,immune-modulatoryandasanticanceragents[6]. Peptidesandpolyketidesarenoticeable andtheyareapotentialgroupofnaturalproducts,mainlysynthesizedbytwomajortypesofenzymes: non-ribosomalpeptidesynthases(NRPS)andpolyketidesynthases(PKS)[7]. Microbesharbouring these biosynthetic gene clusters are probable source of novel natural products. Polyketides have extensiveapplicationsasantibioticsinthepharmaceuticalindustry[8]. WithseveralclassesofPKS genesknown,typeIPKSencompassesmultidomainenzymesandtypeIIPKSiscomprisedofmany enzymes[9]. NRPSaremodularenzymeswithmultipledomains,namelyacetylation,condensation, andthioesterase[10]. Analysingthebiosyntheticgenesdepictsthepotentialofthemicrobetoproduce Mar.Drugs 2018,16,60;doi:10.3390/md16020060 www.mdpi.com/journal/marinedrugs Mar. Drugs 2018, 15, x 2 of 18 acetylation, condensation, and thioesterase [10]. Analysing the biosynthetic genes depicts the Mar.Drugs 2018,16,60 2of18 potential of the microbe to produce a particular type of natural product [11]. Moreover, gene guided metabolite studies also help in the avoidance of the redundant discovery of known compounds [12]. Tahpeasret igcuenlaers thyapveeo sfenrvateudr atol pbreo da ugcrte[a1t 1s]o.uMrcoer eoofv ienrt,egreesnteinggu nidaetudrmal eptarobdoluitcetss twuidthie sphalasromhaecloploingitchael raevloevidaannccee [1o]f. the redundant discovery of known compounds [12]. These genes have served to be agreAatpsaorut rfcreoomf itnrtaedreitsitoinnagl ntaetcuhrnailqpureosd, uscutcshw aitsh ipdheanrtmifiaccaotiloong icoarl rseclreeveanninceg [o1]f. pharmacologically impoArtpanart tmfricormobtersa idsiotliaotneadl ftreocmhn viqaruieosu,s seuccohsyassteimdesn, tthifiec 1a6tiSo rnRoNrAs cprheyenloingegnoetficp ahnaarmlysaicso sloeegmicsa ltloy bime panor etaffnictimenict rmobeethsoisdo ltaot epdoifnrot mouvt amrieoduisceincaolslyys itmempso,rtthaent1 6aSctrinRoNmAypcehtyelso [g1e3n]e. tMicaanngarloyvsies esceoemsysstteombse aarne evffiecryie nptrmometihsiondg tosopuoricnets oouft amcetidniocbinaacltleyriiam [p1o4r]t. aTnhteasceti nmoimcryocoertgeasn[1is3m].sM haanvger obveeene ciodseynsttiefmiesd aarse pvreorydupcroerms isinogf soaunrtciemsiocrfoabctiainl obcaoctmerpiaou[1n4d].s Thienscelumdiicnrgoo rgcaynpiesmmsychianv, ebneeeonmidyecninti,fi edboatstrpormodyuccinerss, cohflaonratimmpichreonbiicaoll caonmdp goruisnedmsyicnicnl u[1d5i]n. gInc yfapcetm, oyucrin c,unrereonmt yrceisne,abrcoht taroimmeydc itnos ,idcehnlotirfaym apcthineonmicoylceatneds wgriitshe manytciifnun[1g5a]l. Ipnrofapcet,rtoiuesr.c Rurerfeenrrtirnegs etaor cfhewai mpreedvtioouidse rnetpifoyratcst i[n1o6,m17y]c, etthees wpritehseanntt iwfuonrgka lfpocroupseesrt ioens . iRdeefnetrirfiynigngt omfiecwropbiraelv lieoaudssr efopro ratnsti[f1u6n,1g7a]l, mtheetapbreoslietne tpwroodrkucftoiocun saensdo ntoi dsecnreteifny itnhge misoiclraotebsia flolre athdes pforresaenntcifeu onfg abliomsyetnatbhoeltiitce gpernoedsu. cTtihoen raensdultto rescvreeaelns tthhee ioscocluatrersenfocre tohfe sperceosnednacreyo mfbeitoasbyonltihtee tgicengeesn eins . tThhee mreasujolrtirtyev eoaf lsththee ioscocluatrerse nacnedo fesneuconncidaaterys mtheetiarb oglrieteatg epnreosbianbitlhitey mianj obriitoysyonftthheesiizsoinlagt ensoavnedl meneutanbcoialtietesst,h heeinrcger epartioprriotibzaibnigli ttyhei nisboiloasteysn tfhore snizaitnugranl opvreoldmucett adbioscliotvese,rhye. nceprioritizingtheisolates fornaturalproductdiscovery. 2. Results 2. Results 2.1. Isolation and Identification of Mangrove Actinobacteria 2.1. IsolationandIdentificationofMangroveActinobacteria From 10 marine sediment samples collected, approximately 31 actinobacterial isolates were isolatFerdo mand1 0chmaararicnteeriszeeddi.m Feignutrsea m1 pillluesstcraotlelesc tthede ,isaoplaptriooxni manadte mlyo3r1phaocltoingoyb oafc ttehrei asltriasoinlas.t eTsabwlee r1e liissotlsa tthede astnrdaicnhsa orabctateinriezded i.nF tihgius rsetu1dilylu asltorantge swthitehi sthoela stiaomnpalnindgm loorcpathioolno.g Fyroomft heeacsthr aoifn sth.eT asbalme1plliinstgs sthiteess,t rsaeidnismoebnttasi nferodmin dthififsersetundt yspaolotsn gwwerieth ctohlelescatemdp tloin sgtulodcya ttihone .dFirvoemrsietayc hanodf tahbeusnadmapnlcien gofs itthese, osergdaimniesnmtss.f Irno mthidsi sffteurdeyn,t 3s1p sottrsawinesr heacvoell beceteend istoolsattueddy frtohmed Mivuetrhsuitpyeatn (d6 iasboulantdesa)n acnedo ffrtohme oArngadnaimsmans . aInndth tihses tNudicyo,b3a1rs tIrsalainnsdsh a(v25e biseoelnatiesso)l.a ItdedenftriofimcaMtiount houf ptehte( 6stirsaoilnast ews)aasn ddofnroem byA n16dSa mrDanNaAn dgetnhee sNeiqcuoebnacriInsgla nudsisn(g2 5thiseo plartiems)e.rIsd 2e7nFti fiacnadt io14n9o2fRt.h Mesotrsat ionfs twhae sadcotinneobbyac1t6eSriarD isNoAlatgeedn ewseerqeu feonucnindg tuos fianlgl uthnedperr imSetrresp2t7oFmayncdes1 4g9e2nRu.sM, owsthoiflet hfeeawc tinofo btahcete rsitaraisionlsa tewdewree roeff otuhned gtoenfaelrlau nRdheordSotrceopcctoums y(c1e)s, Cgeonryuns,ebwahctielerinfeewae o(f1)t haensdt rAaicntsinwomeryeceotfatlehse (g1e).n eSriagnRifhicoadnotclyo,c ctuhse (s1t)r,aiCnos rylinsteebda citne rTinaebalee (21 )waenrde iAdcetnintiofimedy caest anleosv(e1l) .spSiegcnieifis cbaanstelyd, tohne tshtrea binlassltis steimdiilnarTiatyb loef2 1w6SerrDeiNdAen tgifienede saesqnuoevneclessp. eIcni eosubra ssteuddoyn, athmeobnlga staslli mmileadriitay uosfe1d6,S rSDtaNrcAh gceanseeisne qaugeanrc ems.eIdniao uprrsotvueddy ,taom boen gefaflelcmtivede iafours etdhe, Sitsaorclahticoans eoinf aacgtainrombeadctiearpiar.o vedtobeeffectivefortheisolationofactinobacteria. Figure 1. (a) Sampling of mangrove sediments; (b) Pure culture of Actinobacteria: l. VITGAP080, 2. Figure1. (a)Samplingofmangrovesediments;(b)PurecultureofActinobacteria: l. VITGAP080,2. VVIITTGGAAPP224400,, 3.3V. ITVGITAGPA24P12,441., VI4T. GVAIPT2G58A;P(c2)5G8;r am(c)s taGinrainmg osftSatirneipntgom yocfe sSaltbriedpotflomavyucses(V IaTlbGidAoPfl2a4v1u)s. (VITGAP241). Mar.Drugs 2018,16,60 3of18 Table1.IsolatesobtainedinthisstudyandtheiraccessionID. Sequence-ID GenbankAccessionNumbers Organism SamplingLocation LatitudeandLongitude VITGAP080 KY608546 Streptomycesrochei Muthupet,Thiruvarur,TamilNadu 10.39N,79.49E VITGAP095 KY608547 Streptomycesvariabilis Muthupet,Thiruvarur,TamilNadu 10.39N,79.49E VITGAP103 KY608548 Streptomycessp. Muthupet,Thiruvarur,TamilNadu 10.39N,79.49E VITGAP104 KY608549 Streptomycessp. Muthupet,Thiruvarur,TamilNadu 10.39N,79.49E VITGAP105 KY608550 Streptomycessp. Muthupet,Thiruvarur,TamilNadu 10.39N,79.49E VITGAP229 KY608585 Streptomycessp. PortMout,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.40N,92.41E VITGAP231 KY608586 Streptomycessp. PortMout,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.40N,92.41E VITGAP232 KY608587 Streptomycessp. PortMout,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.40N,92.41E VITGAP233 KY608588 Streptomycesclavuligerus PortMout,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.40N,92.41E VITGAP235 KY608589 Streptomycessp. PortMout,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.40N,92.41E VITGAP238 KY608590 Streptomycessp. PortMout,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.40N,92.41E VITGAP240 KY608591 Streptomyceslividans Corbyn,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.38N,92.44E VITGAP241 KY608592 Streptomycesalbidoflavus Corbyn,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.38N,92.44E VITGAP242 KY608593 Streptomycessp. Corbyn,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.38N,92.44E VITGAP244 KY608594 Rhodococcussp. Corbyn,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.38N,92.44E VITGAP245 KY608595 Streptomycesviolascens Corbyn,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.38N,92.44E VITGAP246 KY608596 Corynebacterineaebacterium Corbyn,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.38N,92.44E VITGAP247 KY608597 Streptomycessp. Sippighat,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.36N,92.41E VITGAP248 KY608598 Streptomycessp. Sippighat,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.36N,92.41E VITGAP250 KY608599 Streptomycessp. Sippighat,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.36N,92.41E VITGAP253 KY608600 Streptomycessp. WandoorJetty,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.35N,92.37E VITGAP255 KY608601 Actinomycetalesbacterium Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.33N,92.43E VITGAP256 KY608602 Streptomycessp. Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.33N,92.43E VITGAP257 KY608603 Streptomycessp. Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.33N,92.43E VITGAP258 KY608604 Streptomycessp. Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.33N,92.43E VITGAP259 KY608605 Actinomycetalesbacterium Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.33N,92.43E VITGAP261 KY608606 Streptomycessp. Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.33N,92.43E VITGAP263 KY608607 Streptomyceschumphonensis Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.33N,92.43E VITGAP270 KY608608 Streptomycessp. MundaPahad,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.29N,92.42E VITGAP271 KY608609 Streptomycessp. Kalapahad,AndamanandNicobarIslands 11.36N,92.40E Mar.Drugs 2018,16,60 4of18 Table2.Novelactinobacterialstrainsobtainedinthisstudy;16SrDNAgenesequencesimilarities. IsolateNo. GenbankAccessionNo.oftheIsolates SamplingLocationoftheIsolates ClosestOrganism GenebankNo. SimilarityPercentage VITGAP080 KY608546 Muthupet,Thiruvarur,TamilNadu Streptomycesrocheistrain KP823705 96% VITGAP095 KY608547 Muthupet,Thiruvarur,TamilNadu Streptomycesvariabilis KU981101 95% VITGAP103 KY608548 Muthupet,Thiruvarur,TamilNadu Streptomycessp. CP013142 95% VITGAP105 KY608550 Muthupet,Thiruvarur,TamilNadu Streptomycessp. JQ009379 96% VITGAP235 KY608589 PortMout,AndamanandNicobarIslands Streptomycessp. KX279534 83% VITGAP240 KY608591 Corbyn,AndamanandNicobarIslands Streptomycesviolascens KU973980 91% VITGAP253 KY608600 WandoorJetty,AndamanandNicobarIslands Streptomycessp. KU884356 94% VITGAP255 KY608601 Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands Actinomycetalesbacterium EU368818 88% VITGAP257 KY608603 Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands Streptomycessp. JF736620 97% VITGAP258 KY608604 Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands Streptomycessp. KR817750 87% VITGAP261 KY608606 Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands Streptomycessp. KX928494 92% VITGAP263 KY608607 Burmanalla,AndamanandNicobarIslands Streptomyceschumphonensis NR_126175 94% VITGAP271 KY608609 Kalapahad,AndamanandNicobarIslands Streptomycessp. KT588654 92% Mar.Drugs 2018,16,60 5of18 2.2. GeneticScreening PCRscreeningoftheactinobacterialstrainsrevealedthepresenceofPKStypeI,PKStypeIIand NRPSbiosyntheticgenes. Ampliconsofdesiredsize[PKStypeI(bp-1.2kb),PKStypeII(bp-500bp), NRPS(bp-700bp)]showsthepresenceofthebiosyntheticgene. Table3liststhebiosyntheticgenetic potentialoftheactinobacterialstrains. Amongthe31strainsobtained,only14strainsshowedthe presenceoftypeIPKSgeneand6ofthestrainsshowedthepresenceoftypeIIPKSgene. Interestingly, allstrainsharboringtypeIIPKSwerealsofoundtoharbortypeIPKS. ThebiosyntheticpotentialoftheactinobacterialstrainsrevealsthattypeIPKSaremoreabundant thanthatoftypeII.TypeIPKSwasfoundtobeharboredbyabout20.8%oftheactinobacterialstrains, whiletypeIIPKSwasfoundonlywith8.3%. Remarkably,approximately34.7%ofstrainsshowed thepresenceofNRPSgene. AlmostallthestrainsharboringthegenesbelongtoStreptomycesgenus, whileoneofthestrainsrevealingthepresenceoftypeIPKSisRhodococcus. Interestingly,strains belongingtoothergenera,namelyCorynebacterineae,didnotharboranyofthestudiedgenes. Table3.Biosyntheticpotentialoftheactinobacterialisolates. Strains PKS(TypeI) PKS(TypeII) NRPS VITGAP080 + + + VITGAP095 + VITGAP105 + VITGAP240 + + VITGAP241 + + + VITGAP242 + + + VITGAP244 + VITGAP248 + VITGAP250 + VITGAP253 + VITGAP255 + VITGAP257 + VITGAP258 + + ‘+’indicatesthepresenceofbiosyntheticgene. 2.3. PhylogeneticAnalysisoftheActinobacteriStrains Phylogenetic analysis was performed by constructing the neighbor joining phylogenetic tree of all the strains to analyze the evolutionary relationship, and the distance was calculated by maximum-parsimonymethodusingMEGAsoftware(Figure2). Basedonthequerycoverageand the percentage of identity, the top aligned sequences were retrieved (Table 4). Significance of the branchorderwasdeterminedbybootstrapanalysisof1000replicates,seeFigures3–7(Thesefigures depicttheevolutionaryrelationshipsoftaxaofthequerysequencesNRPS(VITGAP241),TypeIPKS (VITGAP-240,VITGAP-241)TypeIIPKS(VITGAP-240,VITGAP-241).Theoptimaltreewiththesumof branchlengthsforeachsequenceare1.31645770,1.25726471,1.52648453,4.16276907,and16.20030581 respectively. Thepercentageofreplicatetreesinwhichtheassociatedtaxaclusteredtogetherinthe bootstraptest(1000replicates)areshownnexttothebranches. Thetreeisdrawntoscale,withbranch lengthsinthesameunitsasthoseoftheevolutionarydistancesusedtoinferthephylogenetictree. Theanalysisinvolved16,16,14,11and7nucleotidesequences. Codonpositionsincludedwere1st+ 2nd+3rd+Noncoding). Mar.Drugs 2018,16,60 6of18 MMara.r .D Druruggs s2 2001188, ,1 155, ,x x 66 o of f1 188 Mar. Drugs 2018, 15, x 6 of 18 FFFiiFigggiuugururreeer e2 22 ..2. PP.P hPhhyhyyllylooolggogeegenneneneettetiiictcci c tttrr rteeereeee eb bb aabassaseeesddedd o oo nnonn 1 11 6616SS6S Sr rrR RRrNRNNNAAAA g gg eegennenenee se sse eesqqequuqueueennenccnceecesses o soo ffof t fthth htehee se sst trtsrrataariianinnissns...s . SStrterpeptotommyyccese s sspp. . (V(VITITGGAAPP224400 && VVITITGGAAPP224411) ) sshhaarere ththee ccoonnsseerrvveedd ddoommaainin wwitihth aa ccoommmmoonn SSttrreeppttoommyycceesss psp.(. V(IVTIGTAGPA2P4204&0 V&I TVGIATGP2A4P1)2s4h1a) reshthareec otnhsee rcvoendsedrovmeda indowmitahina cwomithm oan caonmcemstoonr. aanncceesstotorr. .A Acctitninoommyycceteatalelse sb baacctetreiruiumm i sis f ofouunndd b bee t hthee n neeww d diviveerrssee s sppeeccieiess a ammoonngg t hthee e enntitriree g grroouupp o of ft hthee Aanctcinesotmoyr.c eAtaclteinsobmacytecreituamlesi sbafoctuenridumbe itsh feounenwd bdeiv tehres ensepwe cdiievsearmseo snpgetchieese anmtiroenggr othuep eonfttihree gSrtroeuppto mofy tchese SStrterpeptotommyyccese sf afammiliyly w witihth m mininimimuumm b booootststrtraapp v vaaluluee. .S Strterpeptotommyyccese ss spp. .i nin t wtwoo c claladdeess a arere c coommmmoonn a alolonngg fSatmreipltyomwyitchesm faimniimlyu wmitbho motisntirmapumva bluoeo.tsSttrraeppt vomalyucee.s Sstpre.pitnomtwycoesc lsapd. eins atwreoc colmadmeso anrae lcoonmgmwoitnh atlhoenigr wwitihth t htheeirir c clolosseelyly r reelalatetedd s sppeeccieiess, ,S Strterpeptotommyyccese sv vioiolalascscenens ss strtarainin. . cwloitshe ltyhreeirla ctleodseslpye rceielast,eSdtr seppteocmieysc, eSstvreiopltaosmceyncsess tvriaoilnas.cens strain. FFFiiFigggiuugururreeer e3 33 ..3. DD.D Deeennendnddrdrrooorggogrrgraaarmmamm o oo ffof N fNN NRRRPRPPSPSS S( ((V VV(IVIITTTIGTGGGAAAAPPP2P2244241141))1.).. ) . FFigiguurere 4 4. .D Deennddroroggraramm o of fT Tyyppee I IP PKKSS ( V(VITITGGAAPP224400).) . FFiigguurree 44.. DDeennddrrooggrraamm ooff TTyyppee II PPKKSS ((VVIITTGGAAPP224400)).. Mar.Drugs 2018,16,60 7of18 Mar. Drugs 2018, 15, x 7 of 18 Mar. Drugs 2018, 15, x 7 of 18 Figure 5. Dendrogram of Type I PKS (VITGAP241). FFiigguurree 55.. DDeennddrrooggrraamm ooff TTyyppee II PPKKSS ((VVIITTGGAAPP224411)).. FFiigguurree 66.. DDeennddrrooggrraamm ooff TTyyppeeI IIIP PKKSS( V(VITITGGAAPP224400).). Figure 6. Dendrogram of Type II PKS (VITGAP240). TTaabblele4 4..Q Quueerryyc coovveerraaggeea annddp peerrcceenntataggeeo offi dideenntittiytyo offt hthees seeqquueenncceess.. Table 4. Query coverage and percentage of identity of the sequences. Sequence Query Coverage % of Identity No of Hits SeqSueenqcueence QueQryuCeorvye Craogveerage%o%f Iodfe Indtietnytity NNoo ooff HHiittss NRPS_VITGAP241 99% >83% 15 NRPS_VITGAP241 99% >83% 15 NRPS_VITGAP241 99% >83% 15 Type I PKS VITGAP-240 99% >89% 15 TypTeyIpPeK IS PVKIST GVAITPG-2A40P-240 99% 99% >89>%89% 1155 TypTTeyyIppPeeK IIS PPVKKISTS G VVAIITTPG-G2A4A1PP--224411 80% 8800%% >79>>%7799%% 111333 TypTeyIpIeP KIIS PVKITSG VAIPT-G24A0P-240 56% 56% >70>%70% 1100 Type II PKS VITGAP-240 56% >70% 10 TypTeyIpIeP KIIS PVKITSG VAIPT-G24A1P-241 68% 68% >67>%67% 66 Type II PKS VITGAP-241 68% >67% 6 Mar. Drugs 2018, 15, x 8 of 18 Mar. Drugs 2018, 15, x 8 of 18 Mar.Drugs 2018,16,60 8of18 Figure 7. Dendrogram of Type II PKS (VITGAP241). FFiigguurree 77.. DDeennddrrooggrraamm ooff TTyyppee IIII PPKKSS ((VVIITTGGAAPP224411)).. 2.4. Antifungal Activity Prospect Evaluations 22..44.. AAnnttiiffuunnggaall AAccttiivviittyy PPrroossppeecctt EEvvaalluuaattiioonnss Actinobacterial strains harboring biosynthetic genes were tested for their antifungal activity againAAscctt ti1inn6oo bcblaaicnctitecerarialia lilss otsrltaariatneisns sho afhr abCro.b raoinlrbgiincbagin osbs iyoonbsttyhaneintthiecedgt iefcnr ogemsenw edesir aewgtneeosrtese tditce fsocterendtht eefroisrr aitnnh teTifiuirr nuagcnahtliifrauacpntigpvaiatlly liaa, cgTtaiavimnitsyitl 1aN6gaacdilniuns,it c Ia1nl6di sicoali.ln aAtiecmasloo ifnsCogl. atathlebesi c 1oan4f sCbo.i boat-lapbiionctaeendnstf iroaoblm tastidrnaieaidgn nsf,or osotmnicl ycd ei2na gtoenfro stsihtniecmT cir eu(nVcthIeTirrsGa piAnpP aT2lil4ri,0u Tcaahnmirdai lpVNpIaaTdlGlui,A ,TIPna2dm4i1ail). ANexmahdoiubni,g teItndhd eai1an4. ebAfifmoe-cpotinovtgee n tathinaetl i1-sct4ar anbidnioisd-,paooln tlaeycnt2tiivoaiflt ytsh tearamgiani(snV,s ItTo nGthlAye P2t2e 4sot0fe adtnh pdeamVth IT(oVGgIeATnGPs2.A 4IP1n)2te4erx0eh saitbninidtge dlVya,I TnthGeeAfsfeePc 2tti4wv1eo) aebnxiothia-icbcaittniveddei d asantlr aaeciftnfives cittpyivoaesg saaeinsnstsiet-dctha enbdtoeitsdhtea dlt yappcaetti hvoIi tgyae nnadsg. aIIniInt esPrte KtshtSie n ggtleeysn,tetehsde, spheaetwtnhcooegb eiaontatsrc.at iIcvnteitnesgrtre asfitnuinsrtgphloyesr,s etahstseteseden bttiowotnho. tbVyipIoTeaGcItAiavnPed2 4IsI1tr PaaKilnsSos gsephnooeswss,eehsdse entdhce e bapottrtrehas cettniyncpgee fo ufIr ttahhneerd Na tRItIeP nPSt iKogSne n.geV.eI nTVeGIsTA, GPhA2e4Pn12ce4a 1ls aoetxtsrhhaiocbtwiitneegdd tmfhueortrphere eprs reonantcteoeunontfictohened. NVacIRtTiPvGSiAtgyPe (n21e48.1 Vm aIlmTsGo d AsihaPmo2w4e1teeedrx )ht htihbeia tpnedr VemsIeTonGrceAep Poro2f 4nt0ho ue(1 nN3c eRmdPmaSc tgdiveiaintmye.e( 1Vte8IrTm).G mFAigdPui2ar4me1 e 8et eixlrhl)uitbshtiarteandteV smI TtohGreAe b Ppi2or4oa0cnto(i1vu3intmyce modf dathciateim vsiettrtyae ri(n)1.s8F V imgIuTmrGe dA8iPailm2lu4es0tt eraarn)t edtsh VtahInTe VGbiIAoTaPGc2tAi4v1Pi.t2 y4 0o f(t1h3e mstmra idnisaVmITetGerA).P F2i4g0uarned 8 VilIlTuGstAraPt2e4s 1t.he bioactivity of the stEErfaffifiinccisiee VnntItT aaGnntAtiiffPuu2nn4gg0aa all naacdctt iVivvIiiTttyyG wwAaaPss2 e4ex1xh.h ii bbiitteedd bbyy tthhee aaccttiinnoobbaacctteerriiaall ssttrraaiinnss.. AAss ooff oouurr kknnoowwlleeddggee,, tthhiiss iiEss fttfhhiceei efifnirrsts tta rnreetpipfouorrnttg aaannla aallycyztziivinnigtgy t thwheea asan nettxiifhfuuinbngigtaealdl p pbooytte etnnhtteiia aallicitttyyin oooffb aaaccctttiiennrooiabblaa csctttreearriiinaas oo. ffA IInsn ddoiifaa nonu oorr rikiggniinonw aaglgeaadiingnsest,t CtChaainsnd diisidd taah aeal lbfbiiirccsaatnn rsse (p(ccollirinnt iiaccanalal lppyaazttihnhogog gteehnness a))..n tTTifhhuoonuugggahhl pmmoataennnyyt ioaolffi tttyhh eeo fss attrrcaatiiinnnoss bppaoocsstessreeissass iionnfgg I ntthhdeeia gnge eonnreeigss iwnw eaergreea innnoosttt fCfuuannnccdttiiidooann aaallllblyyic aaancctstii vv(ceel,,i ntthhiceea tltw wpooa tsshttorraagiiennnsss e)e.xx hThihibboiitutiignnhgg bbmiiooaaanccytt iivovifitt yyt,h, heh aasrrtbbroaoiuunrrsee ddp ooosnnseees oosfifn tthgh eet hbbeiio ogssyeynnntethshe ewttiicec rggeee nnneoesst sfsuuunppcpptoioorrtntiiannlggly oo uaucrrt hihvyyepp, ootththheee stswiiss.o. strains exhibiting bioactivity, harboured one of the biosynthetic genes supporting our hypothesis. Figure 8. VITGAP240 & VITGAP241 showing significant activity against: (a) Clinical isolate 1 of Figure 8. VITGAP240 & VITGAP241 showing significant activity against: (a) Clinical isolate 1 of FCiagnudried a8 a. lbVicITanGsA (bP)2 C40li n&ic aVlI iTsGolAatPe2 24 1o fs Chaonwdiindag aslibgicnainfisc.a nt activity against: (a) Clinical isolate 1 of Candidaalbicans(b)Clinicalisolate2ofCandidaalbicans. Candida albicans (b) Clinical isolate 2 of Candida albicans. Mar.Drugs 2018,16,60 9of18 2.5. AntibioticSensitivityAssessmentofActinobacteriaStrains Toassesstheantibioticsensitivity, thestrainswerescreenedagainstthefollowingantibiotics: piperacillin,co-trimoxazole,ofloxacin,amikacin,erthyromicin,cefuroxime,tobramycin,ampicillin, tetracycline, ceftriazone, polmycin, nitrofurantin, rifampicin, clindamycin, netillin, ceftrazidime, novobiocin, aztreonam, cephotaxine, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, penicillin, methicillin, jancomycin,gentamycin,andvancomycin(Table5). BasedonPCRscreening(Table3),thepotential strainswhichharboredPKSandNRPSgeneandafewstrainswhichdidnotshowthepresenceofthe geneswerealsochosenrandomlyfortheassaytocomparethestrains. All the tested strains displayed significant sensitivity against most of the antibiotics used. TheHighestsensitivitywasobtainedagainstnetillin,novobiocin,cephotaxine(60%each),andlowest sensitivity was obtained against piperacillin, erthyromicin, nitrofurantin, chloramphenicol and jancomycin (6.6%). The strains exhibited resistance against the following antibiotics: aztreonam, streptomycin, penicillin, and methicillin. The strain VITGAP240 exhibited resistance to the following antibiotics: piperacillin, amikacin, erthyromicin, cefuroxime, ampicillin, polmycin, nitrofurantin, rifampicin, clindamycin, ceftrazidime, aztreonam, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, penicillin, methicillin, jancomycin and gentamycin. The strain VITGAP241 exhibited resistance topiperacillin, ofloxacin, erthyromicin, cefuroxime, tobramycin, ampicillin, ceftriazone, polmycin, nitrofurantin,clindamycin,ceftrazidime,aztreonam,streptomycin,penicillinandmethicillin. Hence, the strains VITGAP240 and VITGAP241 proved to be promising and pharmacological important targetsforthefuture,especiallyforantifungalbasedsecondarymetaboliteprofilingstudies. Table5.Antibiogramprofileofthestrains(R-resistant,S-sensitive). Strainswithoutthe Antibiotics StrainswiththeBiosyntheticGenes BiosyntheticGenes 80 95 240 241 242 105 248 250 253 255 258 103 105 261 263 Piperacillin R R R R S R R R R R R R R R R Co-Trimoxazole R S S S S S S S R R S R R R R Ofloxacin S S S R S R S R R S R R S S R Amikacin S S R S S R S R R R R R R S R Erthyromicin R S R R R R R R R R R R R R R Cefuroxime S S R R R R S R R R R R R R R Tobramycin R S S R R R R R R R R R R R R Ampicillin R S R R R S S R R R S R R R R Tetracycline R S S S S R R S R R S R R S R Ceftriazone S S S R S R S R R R S R R R S Polmycin S S R R R R S R R R R R R R R Nitrofurantin R R R S R R R R R R R R R R R Rifampicin S S R S S R S R R R R R R S R Clindamycin R R R R S R R R R R R R R R R Netillin S S S S S R S R R R S R S S R Ceftrazidime R S R R S R R R R R R R R R R Novobiocin S S S S S R S R R S S R S R R Aztreonam R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R Cephotaxine S S S S S R S S R R S R R S R Chloramphenicol R R R S R R R R R R R R R R R Streptomycin R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R Penicillin R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R Methicillin R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R Jancomycin R R R S R R R R R R R R R R R Gentamycin S S R S R R S R R R S R S S R Vancomycin R R S S R R R R R R R R R R R 2.6. GCMSAnalysisandScreeningofBioactiveCompounds ThecrudeextractofsecondarymetaboliteswasanalyzedwiththeGCMStechniquetoidentify thepossiblebioactivecompounds’availability. Figure9representativelyillustratesasample’sGCMS. Figures10–12arethesegregatedcompounds(Heterocyclic,Peptides,andPolyketides). Maximumof Mar. Drugs 2018, 15, x 10 of 18 2.6. GCMS Analysis and Screening of Bioactive Compounds The crude extract of secondary metabolites was analyzed with the GCMS technique to identify tMhaer .Dprousgssib20le18 ,b1i6o,a60ctive compounds’ availability. Figure 9 representatively illustrates a sam10polfe1’s8 GCMS. Figures 10–12 are the segregated compounds (Heterocyclic, Peptides, and Polyketides). Maximum of these compounds were found as unidentified or unpublished. Identified compounds thesecompoundswerefoundasunidentifiedorunpublished. Identifiedcompoundswerefoundwith were found with structural clarity and mostly equipped with functionally important structuralclarityandmostlyequippedwithfunctionallyimportantscaffolds/groups. Theconfirmed scaffolds/groups. The confirmed nature allowed us to screen them as the most suitable medications natureallowedustoscreenthemasthemostsuitablemedicationsagainstfungalinfections. against fungal infections. Figure 9. GCMS result of Actinobacteria secondary metabolite from marine mangrove sediment. Figure9.GCMSresultofActinobacteriasecondarymetabolitefrommarinemangrovesediment. 2.7. Pharmacological Property Predictions of Screened Compounds 2.7. PharmacologicalPropertyPredictionsofScreenedCompounds In order to find the most suitable antifungal medications, the compounds that were categorized Inordertofindthemostsuitableantifungalmedications,thecompoundsthatwerecategorized from GCMS studies were predicted for their possible biological activity potentials through from GCMS studies were predicted for their possible biological activity potentials through Molinspiration and PASS (Figure 13). Among the segregated Heterocyclic (Cpd1–Cpd8) (Figure 10), MolinspirationandPASS(Figure13). AmongthesegregatedHeterocyclic(Cpd1–Cpd8)(Figure10), peptides (Cpd9–Cpd12) (Figure 11), and polyketides (Cpd13–Cpd16) (Figure 12), a significant peptides(Cpd9–Cpd12)(Figure11),andpolyketides(Cpd13–Cpd16)(Figure12),asignificantprotease protease inhibition ability was found especially for peptide and polyketides. Particularly, the inhibitionabilitywasfoundespeciallyforpeptideandpolyketides. Particularly,theMolinspiration Molinspiration predictions revealed the strong Protease inhibitory potentials of all peptides (Cpd9– predictions revealed the strong Protease inhibitory potentials of all peptides (Cpd9–Cpd12) and polyketides(Cpd13–Cpd16)withapositivescorerangeof0.3to1. Apartfromthis,PASSprediction possibleactivityscoreof0.922(asNADPHperoxidaseinhibitor)wasfoundtohavebeenestablishedto theHeterocycliccompound;Cpd1indicateditspotentialantifungalmedicinalvalue.Theopportunistic

Description:
Bioactivity Assessment of Indian Origin—Mangrove. Actinobacteria against Candida albicans. J. G. S. Pavan Kumar 1, Ajitha Gomathi 1, K. M. Gothandam 1 ID and Vitor Vasconcelos 2,3,*. 1. Department of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences and Technology, VIT University, Vellore 632014, India;.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.