eyond tructural djustment B S A eyond tructural djustment B S A he nstitutional ontext of T I C frican evelopment A D dited by icolas van de alle, E N W icole all, N B and Vijaya Ramachandran BEYOND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT Copyright © Nicolas van de Walle, Nicole Ball, and Vijaya Ramachandran, 2003. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2003 978-1-4039-6316-1 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. First published in 2003 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN™ 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 and Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England RG21 6XS. Companies and representatives throughout the world. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 978-1-4039-6317-8 ISBN 978-1-4039-8128-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9781403981288 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. First Palgrave Macmillan edition: November 2004 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ontents C Acknowledgements vii 1. Introduction: The State and African Development 1 Nicolas van de Walle 2. Financing Africa’s Development: Toward a Business Plan? 35 Ibrahim Elbadawi and Alan Gelb 3. Tax Reform and Democratic Accountability in 77 Sub-Saharan Africa Lise Rakner and Siri Golpen 4. African Governance and Civil Service Reforms 101 Dele Olowu 5. Forging Developmental Synergies Between States 131 and Associations Aili Mari Tripp 6. Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources: 159 Institutional Choice and Discretionary Power Transfers in Sub-Saharan Africa Jesse C. Ribot 7. Foreign Aid and State Administrative Capability in Africa 183 Arthur A. Goldsmith 8. Governance and the Private Sector in Africa 213 Linda Cotton and Vijaya Ramachandran 9. Governance and Private Investment in Africa 241 James J. Emery 10. Governance in the Security Sector 263 Nicole Ball, J. Kayode Fayemi, Funmi Olonisakin, Martin Rupiya, and Rocklyn Williams vi Contents Notes on Contributors 305 Index 309 cknowledgements A T his collection of essays has its origins in a project undertaken by the three editors for the Overseas Development Council (ODC) from 1999 to 2001. We wish to thank John Sewell, the ODC’s last president, for his support through out the life of the project. We are grateful to the Ford Foundation for the generous financial support it provided to theproject, and to Manuel Montes for his steadfast support throughout. In addition, Nicole Ball thanks the Swiss Development Corporation, which provided additional support for the security component of the project. Following the untimely closing of ODC, the project was housed at Georgetown University. We wish to thank Lola Brown and Mary Schmiedel for their excellent administrative support, and Paloma Bauer for research assistance. Finally, an early version of Chapter 6 by Jesse Ribot appeared in the journal Public Administration and Development (Vol. 23, No. 1, 2003) under the title “Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources: Institutional Choice and Discretionary Power Transfers in Sub Saharan Africa.” We thank the editors of that journal for permission to reprint this material. h a p t e r 1 C ntroduction: he tate and I T S frican evelopment A D Nicolas van de Walle M ost observers recognize that strong and effective governance is a key to Africa’s recovery. As the World Bank famously put it back in 1989, “underlying the litany of Africa’s development problems is a crisis of governance” (1989, p. 60). The region’s burst of political liberalization and democratization in the early 1990s significantly increased popular participation in political life, even if not all countries have made a smooth transition to multi-party electoral politics (Smillie, 1993; Bratton and van de Walle, 1997; Joseph, 1998). The emergence of inde- pendent media, opposition parties, and an increasingly rich and varied civil society have all been striking innovations. On the economic front, the mid-1990s witnessed a burst of growth, bringing many countries of the region their best economic results in two decades. Yet few observers would argue that this wave of good news has strengthened states or their ability to promote development. On the contrary, many of the states in the region continue to be in crisis. In the worst cases, central states are threatened by the kind of complete col- lapse that has already been witnessed in Somalia or Congo. Even in the most stable countries, states do not appear capable of spearheading structural transformation of the economy, given myriad problems of low capacity, fiscal crisis, and corruption. The weakness of central state institutions exacts a cost. In some coun- tries, there has been a clear deterioration of infrastructure, as an increas- ingly bankrupt state is unable to maintain the achievements of the past.Even more seriously, many observers have noted rising crime and law- lessness, particularly in the countryside, far away from the capital, where the reach of the state is weakest and law and order often not enforceable. 2 Beyond Structural Adjustment At the same time, the vacuum left by state retrenchment is being filled by new institutions, in innovative ways which suggest bright new possi- bilities (Fowler, 1991; Bratton, 1994). All over the region, there has been a veritable explosion of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), village associations, and civic groups of various persuasions and aims. In addition, virtually every country in the region has begun ambitious decentralization reforms to shift various policy responsibilities from the central state apparatus down to the provincial, district and local level. This combination of a continuing crisis of African state structures and the emergence of a significant voluntary sector and of local governments could have important economic and political implications for the region. As I will argue below, the donor community has advanced a fairly ideal- ized version of the current evolution that suggests that a distinctly African model of development is slowly emerging in which a retrenched state provides a small number of public goods, but then takes a back seat to actors in civil society for most development activities. Yet, little is known about the evolving relationships between central states and these emerging institutions. This book focuses on the implications of this evolving institutional landscape for the development of the Sub Saharan Africa region. It examines the empirical record, in other words what is currently happen- ing across the region; but also it ponders the normative implications of this evolution, in other words, what should be happening. The different contributions following this first chapter examine the impact of the growing institutional pluralism on aid and economic policy making. Focusing on the evolving nexus between the state and these other devel- opmental institutions, the authors analyze how the emergence of new institutional actors is altering the developmental role of the state. How are they affecting state capacities and the ability of the state to finance its developmental responsibilities? Does the role of foreign aid change as these new actors gain in importance? How much are NGOs and local governments changing the process and outcomes of development poli- cies? To what extent are development responsibilities being devolved away from the central government? What are the implications of the current evolution for donors and policy makers? These are the questions addressed by the authors in the chapters that follow. First, Elbadawi and Gelb examine the general financial context in which development will take place in the region. They argue that debt relief, greater aid effectiveness and a sustained increase in the flow of external resources to the region will be necessary to revitalize local economies. The necessary role of external aid is an implication of the chapter by Rakner and Gloppen, which examines the ability of African Introduction 3 governments to finance their development through own-revenues. The authors argue that tax reform has not progressed far in the 1990s, and they suggest that more systematic democratization of public life is necessary before African political systems exhibit the kind of public accountability that is the hallmark of modern government. A second set of chapters examines the institutional reform record in the 1990s. Olowu analyzes the evolution of civil service reforms in the region. Ribot looks at decentralization efforts and the emergence of local government. Nicole Ball and her colleagues examine the efforts to reform the important security sector, a critical factor for economic growth, since both domestic and international investors express concern about insecurity in various investor surveys. Goldsmith’s contribution focuses on the efforts of the donors to promote state capacity and argues that the record is more positive than many observers have argued. A third set of chapters examines the developmental role of non- governmental actors. The contributions vary in their approach and con- cerns but all share the view that private actors should be complementary with the central state, rather than in competition with it. All agree that a stronger central state ultimately helps private actors and vice versa. In her contribution, Tripp focuses on the NGO sector and civil society and their evolving relationship with the states of the region. Cotton and Ramachandran examine the private sector’s potential contribution to development. They argue that governance reforms by the central state are necessary before the private sector can help promote development. A similar message is provided by Emery’s chapter, which examines the many continuing obstacles to private investment created by the policies of state institutions. The rest of this introductory essay sets the stage for these different contributions. In the next section, I review the intellectual climate in which institutional reform was first conceived and initially implemented. A normative theory of state reform emerged from the debates within the scholarly and policy communities in the 1980s and early 1990s. I then ask whether the actual institutional evolution during the 1990s followed this idealized vision. Even as new actors have emerged and considerable institutional innovation has taken place, the developmental focus of the state has changed little. Governments have employed a political logic rather than a developmental one to shape their focus, in a context of aid dependency and resource scarcity. A final section then asks what impact the emerging institutional dispensation can have on development out- comes. As long as the central state is so weak, I argue that state elites will view other developmental actors as competitors rather than comple- ments. Strengthening the central state is thus a paradoxical prerequisite
Description: