Beyond Biopolitics patricia ticineto clough and craig Willse, eds. Beyond Biopolitics Essays on the Governance of Life and Death Duke University Press Durham and London 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-f ree paper ♾ Typeset in Quadraat by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-i n- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. A version of Chapter 1, “National Enterprise Emergency: Steps Toward an Ecology of Powers,” by Brian Massumi, appeared in Theory, Culture & Society 26:6 (2009) and is printed by permission of the publisher, SAGE Publications. A version of Chapter 2, “Human Security/National Security: Gender Branding and Population Racism,” by Patricia Ticineto Clough and Craig Willse, appeared in Social Text 105 28:4 (2010) and is printed by permission of the publisher, Duke University Press. A version of Chapter 3, “‘The Turban Is Not a Hat’: Queer Diaspora and Practices of Profiling,” by Jasbir K. Puar, appeared in Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times (2007) and is printed by permission of the publisher, Duke University Press. A version of Chapter 4, “Strict Scrutiny: The Tragedy of Constitutional Law,” by Sora Y. Han, appeared in Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties 4:1 (2008) and is printed by permission of the journal. A version of Chapter 8, “Strange Circulations: The Blood Economy in Rural China,” by Ann S. Anagnost, appeared in Economy and Society 35:4 (2006) and is reprinted by permission of the publisher, Taylor & Francis Ltd. contents Acknowledgments vii IntroductIon Beyond Biopolitics: The Governance of Life and Death Patricia Ticineto Clough and Craig Willse 1 part i Unexceptional control: Governance, race, and population 1. National Enterprise Emergency: Steps Toward an Ecology of Powers Brian Massumi 19 2. Human Security/National Security: Gender Branding and Population Racism Patricia Ticineto Clough and Craig Willse 46 3. “The Turban Is Not a Hat”: Queer Diaspora and Practices of Profiling Jasbir Puar 65 4. Strict Scrutiny: The Tragedy of Constitutional Law Sora Y. Han 106 part ii preemption: death and life- itself 5. Necrologies; or, the Death of the Body Politic Eugene Thacker 139 6. Mnemonic Control Luciana Parisi and Steve Goodman 163 7. Thanato- tactics Eyal Weizman 177 part iii transforming Value: the Measure of life capacities 8. Strange Circulations Ann S. Anagnost 213 9. Necropolitical Surveillance: Immigrants from Turkey in Germany Çağatay Topal 238 10. From the Race War to the War on Terror Randy Martin 258 part iV technological investments: temporality, Media, and Methodologies 11. “Seeing” Spectral Agencies: An Analysis of Lin+Lam and Unidentified Vietnam Una Chung 277 12. Here We Accrete Durations: Toward a Practice of Intervals in the Perceptual Mode of Power Amit S. Rai 306 13. Fascia and the Grimace of Catastrophe May Joseph 332 14. Blackness and Governance Fred Moten and Stefano Harney 351 Bibliography 363 Contributors 381 Index 385 acknoWledGMents Many of the chapters in this book are elaborations of presentations given at a symposium held at the Graduate Center, City University of New York (cunY), in 2006. We are thankful for the support of the Center for the Study of Women and Society, which hosted the symposium, and the Graduate Center, for funding the event. We are especially grateful to all those who participated in the symposium, and from whom we learned so much. Many graduate students and faculty at cunY have made possible the ongoing elaboration of social theory and social criticism that has informed this collection. In light of that effort, we happily thank each other. This collection represents the work we did together when we were first active at the Center for the Study of Women and Society (Patricia was director and Craig a fellow) and now as fellow sociolo- gists. Doing the work of scholarship together proved rewarding and productive. We also thank our current and former colleagues at cunY, espe- cially Neil Smith, David Kajanzian, Michelle Fine, Joe Rollins, Vic- toria Taylor Pitts, Soniya Munshi, Greg Goldberg, Jean Halley, Hosu Kim, Jonathan Cutler, Jacqueline Berman, Jeff Bussolini, Ananya Mukherjea, Grace M. Cho, Lauren Jade Martin, Una Chung, Jamie Skye Bianco, Rachel Schiff, Mitra Rastegar, Sam Han, Elizabeth Bullock, Aaron Weeks, Kate Jenkins, Kim Cunningham, Deborah Gambs, and Karen Gregory. We thank as well our friends and col- leagues from our wider circles whose support and thoughtful en- gagement made this work possible, especially Dean Spade, Christina Han- hardt, Kerwin Kaye, Beth Bernstein, Em Thuma, Jackie Orr, Vivian Nixon, Anahid Kassabian, Amit Rai, Joseph Schneider, Steven Seidman, Anne Hoff- man, Norman Denzin, Jasbir Puar, Stefano Harney, and Bruce Reis. To our families we also send thanks: Christopher Martin Clough, Elizabeth Hariss Clough, and Lucy Nash Clough, as well as the Steppe family, the Willse family, the Spade- Goldschmidt- Lenz family, and David Proterra. Finally, we would like to thank everyone at Duke University Press—Ken Wissoker, Sharon Torian, Courtney Berger, Jade Brooks, Neal McTighe, Jeff Canaday, and Christine Choi. We especially wish to thank J. Reynolds Smith, who stood behind this work from the start. viii Acknowledgments patricia ticineto clough and craig Willse Beyond Biopolitics The Governance of Life and Death Both in the United States and around the world, neoliberalism con- tinues to raise difficult questions about the rightful conduct of the state. This is in part because in neoliberalism an extralegal admin- istrative discourse has turned the legitimacy of governance over to technical systems of compliance and efficiency that underwrite the relationship of the state and the economy with a biopolitics of war, terror, and surveillance. From the very start of Barack Obama’s ad- ministration, for example, there was an intensification of an admin- istrative and bureaucratic legality, even though the administration was set to reformulate neoliberalism. In the first few months of 2009, the administration responded to the debate regarding prac- tices of torture authorized and administered by U.S. government and military officials during the Bush regime’s “war on terror.” The practice of waterboarding was particularly controversial. While public knowledge of waterboarding already existed, a series of events—Attorney General Eric Holder’s unequivocal comment during a confirmation hearing on January 16, 2009, that waterboard- ing is torture, Obama’s issuance of an executive order on January 22, 2009, banning the use of harsh interrogation tactics, and the release in April 2009 of the so- called torture memos—coalesced to produce calls for the investigation and possible prosecution of Bush admin- istration officials who had authorized waterboarding. While some members of the Obama administration voiced an interest in “mov-
Description: