Beneath the Arches: Re-‐appropriating the Spaces of Infrastructure in Manchester A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2013 Brian Rosa Department of Geography School of Environment, Education and Development Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Figures ...................................................................................................................... 7 Appendices ............................................................................................................................ 13 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................. 14 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 15 Declaration ............................................................................................................................ 16 Copyright Statement ........................................................................................................... 16 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 17 Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2: The Tension of Fixity and Motion: Theorising Urban Infrastructure from the Ground Up ............................................................................................................ 30 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 30 2.2 Theorising Urban Infrastructure: Relational Conceptualisations .................... 31 2.3 Grounding Infrastructure: Spaces and Landscapes of Infrastructure as a Distinctive Category ..................................................................................................................... 34 2.3.1 Indeterminacy and the Residual Spaces of Infrastructure ........................................ 38 2.4 Analysing the Social Production of the Urban Built Environment: Political and Symbolic Economy ............................................................................................................... 40 2.4.1 Landscape and Symbolic Economy ...................................................................................... 44 2.5 Conclusion, Or, What it Means to Rethink Infrastructure from Below ............ 48 Chapter 3: Exploring the Discursive Production of the Built Environment: A Mixed-‐Method, Case Study Approach ........................................................................... 50 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 50 3.2 A Mixed Method, Case Study Approach ...................................................................... 51 3.2.1 Critical Discourse Analysis ...................................................................................................... 52 3.3 Interpretive Context: The Southern Fringe of Manchester as a Case Study .. 55 3.4 Methods of Data Collection ............................................................................................. 58 2 3.4.1 Preliminary Desk Research ..................................................................................................... 59 3.4.2 ‘Helicopter Interviews’ .............................................................................................................. 59 3.4.3 Archival Research ........................................................................................................................ 60 3.4.4 Semi-‐Structured Interviews with ‘Key Players’ .............................................................. 62 3.4.5 Interviews and informal discussions with owners, employees and patrons of businesses operating from railway arches ...................................................................................... 68 3.4.6 Visual Methods: Photographic Surveys .............................................................................. 70 3.4.7 Ethnographic Research ............................................................................................................. 71 3.5 Methods of Data Analysis ................................................................................................ 72 3.6 Limitations ........................................................................................................................... 74 3.7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 76 Chapter 4: The Spatial Impacts and Social Costs of the Elevated Railway in Industrial Manchester: 1830 to 1945 ........................................................................... 77 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 77 4.2 “Like a Spider’s Web”: The Railway and Urbanisation in Manchester, 1830-‐ 1899 78 4.3 Creative Destruction: On the Railways ‘Smashing their Way Through’ Manchester ..................................................................................................................................... 81 4.3.1 The Destructiveness of the Railway: Slum Clearance as Elite Consensus ........... 85 4.4 Railways and the Mutual Constitution of Slums and Suburbs ............................ 90 4.5 Railway Viaducts and their Aftermath: The Southern Fringe of Manchester and the Persistence of Dereliction, 1835-‐1945 .................................................................. 93 4.5.1 The Construction of the MSJ Viaduct ................................................................................... 93 4.5.2 Confirming Dereliction and Stagnant Property Values ............................................... 96 4.5.3 ‘Improvements’ of the Late 1800s as Proto-‐‘Regeneration’ Strategies ................ 98 4.5.4 The 1945 Nicholas Plan ......................................................................................................... 102 4.6 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 104 Chapter 5: Underneath the Arches: Cultural Representations of Urban Railway Viaducts and their Arches ............................................................................. 105 5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 105 5.2 Viaducts as Scenography: From the Infrastructural Sublime to Banal Backdrops (and Back Again) .................................................................................................. 106 3 5.2.1 Backdrop to Working Class Life ......................................................................................... 113 5.3 Looking Down on the City ............................................................................................. 118 5.4 Beneath the Arches: The Underside of Modernity ............................................... 121 5.4.1 The Lock-‐up: Dodgy Dealings and the Workingman’s Milieu ................................ 126 5.4.2 The Urban Gothic ...................................................................................................................... 131 5.5 Commodifying a Negative Image ................................................................................ 133 5.6 This City Wall .................................................................................................................... 136 5.7 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 137 Chapter 6: Railway Viaducts as Monuments: Heritage, Design, and Revalorisation in Castlefield, Manchester ............................................................... 139 6.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 139 6.2 The Rise of Industrial Heritage ................................................................................... 140 6.3 Castlefield ........................................................................................................................... 144 6.4 1967-‐1978: The Rising Cultural Value of Castlefield as a Heritage Landscape 147 6.5 1978-‐1988: The Emergence of a New Tourist Landscape .................................. 149 6.6 1988-‐1996: Commodifying the Heritage Landscape: The Central Manchester Development Corporation and the Reimaging of the Castlefield Basin ................... 154 6.7 1996-‐Present: The Limits of Heritage and ‘Killing Castlefield’ ........................ 165 6.8 Discussion: Castlefield and the Contradictions of Treating Infrastructure as Heritage ......................................................................................................................................... 172 Chapter 7: From Reluctant Rentiers to Structural Speculators: Railway Arches as Property Estate ............................................................................................................ 177 7.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 177 7.2 The Ownership of Railway Arches in Manchester ................................................ 178 7.3 Railway Arches: Residual Spaces of Infrastructure as Commercial Property 180 7.4 Changing Ownership Regimes, Management Strategies, and Public Sector Intervention in Manchester’s Railway Arches .................................................................. 182 7.4.1 1969-‐1985: Shedding Surplus Property and Entering the Market .................... 183 7.4.2 1985-‐1993: Refurbishment and Industrial Upgrading ............................................ 184 4 7.5 Making Spacia: Privatisation and Strategic Shifts of Railway Arch Management, 1993-‐2002 ......................................................................................................... 190 7.5.1 Network Rail: From Reluctant Rentier to Structural Speculator (and Back Again): 2002-‐present .............................................................................................................................. 193 7.5.1.1 Examining the Slowdown of Railway Arch Refurbishment ............................................ 195 7.6 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 197 Chapter 8: Infrastructure as Barrier to Commercial Expansion: Reinventing Gaythorn .............................................................................................................................. 200 8.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 200 8.2 Where is the City Centre and Why Does it Need to Expand? ............................. 201 8.2.1 The Imperative for Growth: Economic Restructuring and Neoliberal Expansionism ............................................................................................................................................. 203 8.3 Reinventing Gaythorn: Attempts to Create “A New City Centre Neighbourhood” on the “Wrong Side of the Tracks” ....................................................... 208 8.3.1 Introducing the Site ................................................................................................................. 208 8.4 A Barrier to Whom (and What)? The Permeability Fix ...................................... 231 8.5 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 234 Chapter 9: Narrating the Symbolic Economy of Railway Arches: From Industrial Gentrification to Post-‐Industrial Aestheticisation ........................... 237 9.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 237 9.2 Contextualising Gentrification .................................................................................... 239 9.2.1 The Specificity of Industrial Gentrification .................................................................... 241 9.3 Industrial Displacement as Entrepreneurial State Strategy: Tracing Policy in Manchester ................................................................................................................................... 243 9.3.1 From Industrial Displacement to Industrial Gentrification ................................... 245 9.4 The Central Role of Culture and Aestheticisation in the Invention of the Post-‐ Industrial Railway Arch ............................................................................................................ 247 9.4.1 The Countercultural Narrative of the Corridor’s Reinvention .............................. 249 9.4.2 Competing Images of Transgression, Pacification, and Indoctrination of Culture along WSW .................................................................................................................................................. 257 9.4.3 Consuming the Postindustrial Aesthetic: Loft Living and Railway Arch Chic (1993-‐2003) ............................................................................................................................................... 261 5 9.5 The Height of Railway Arch Chic and the Rise of the ‘Independents’ ............. 267 9.6 The Shift from the “Independents” to the “Corporates” and the Mainstreaming of the Corridor: 2002-‐2011 ...................................................................... 274 9.7 A New Wave of Industrial Gentrification? 2011-‐present .................................. 278 9.8 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 283 Chapter 10: Conclusions ................................................................................................. 285 10.1 Results and Key Contributions ................................................................................. 285 10.2 Limitations ...................................................................................................................... 291 10.3 Areas for Further Research: Striking a Chord ..................................................... 293 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................... 296 Word Count: 87,414 6 Table of Figures Figure 1: Map of Manchester city centre and its elevated railway infrastructure, including the boundaries of the study area in relation to the boundaries of the Central Manchester Development Corporation, 2013. Image source: Graham Bowden, University of Manchester Cartographic Unit. ____ 56 Figure 2: Map of three case study sub-‐areas within southern fringe study area, 2013. Image source: Graham Bowden, University of Manchester Cartographic Unit. ___________________________________________ 58 Figure 3: Table of interviewees and their institutional positions _________________________________________ 67 Figure 4: The Manchester railway network, 1910. Image source: Railway Clearing House. ___________ 81 Figure 5: Workers constructing railway viaducts, 1903. Image source: transportarchive.org.uk _____ 81 Figure 6: “Railway Engineering, Victoria Railway Arch,” 1850. Image source: Local Image Collection, MCC. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 84 Figure 7: “The Stockport Viaduct, just south of Manchester,” 1910. Often considered the largest brick structure in Europe, this viaduct was constructed by the Manchester & Birmingham Railway from 1837 to 1840. Image source: Greater Manchester County Records Office. _____________________________________ 84 Figure 8: A cropped selection from 1904 map of housing conditions. Grey signifies business premises, while the conditions of housing are represented in a gradient from dark brown to yellow (dark brown being slums). Image source: Marr (1904). _________________________________________________________________ 88 Figure 9: “Duke St., Brick arch railway bridge,” 1900. Terraced housing backing up to the MSJ viaduct in Castlefield, with viaduct leading to Central Station passing above. Image source: Local Image Collection, MCC. ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 89 Figure 10: “Ivy Street, near Liverpool Road,” 1900. Image source: Local Image Collection, MCC. _____ 89 Figure 11: “Models of Manchester: Faucher, Engels and Marr (based on information in Faucher, 1969; Engels, 1969; Marr, 1904).” Image source: Dennis 1984, p.82. ___________________________________________ 92 Figure 12: Housing clustered around the MSJ viaduct two years after its completion, 1851. Image source: Ordnance Survey. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 95 Figure 13: “Bugle Street off Gaythorne [sic] St., Knott Mill,” 1896. Due to note on bottom left, it appears that this image was created as a record for city council as part of the compulsory purchase process. Image source: Greater Manchester County Records Office. _____________________________________ 99 Figure 14: A. Bradburn, “Canals, Rochdale Canal, looking towards central station city, Manchester,” 1902. Image depicts the demolition of houses along Rochdale Canal associated with the creation of WSW. Image source: Local Image Collection, MCC. ______________________________________________________ 100 Figure 15: Zoomed selection from Marr’s map of slums in Manchester. Brown represents slum housing, with the MSJ viaduct and Central Station at the top. Image source: Marr, 1904. ______________________ 102 Figure 16: “New Iron Railway Viaduct at Manchester,” 1851. Original description from the Illustrated London News reads “This stupendous Viaduct …carries the railway traffic over the good-‐station of 7 those Companies, with which it communicates by hoists. It consists of an immense platform… supported by large cast-‐iron girders resting on Doric columns.” Image source: http://www.victorianweb.org/periodicals/iln/26.html. ________________________________________________ 109 Figure 17: S.G. Hughes, after T.T. Bury. “Entrance Into Manchester Across Water Street,” 1831. Image source: Science & Society Picture Library, image No. 10302187. _______________________________________ 109 Figure 18: Image from 1945 Nicholas Plan exemplifying the dreariness of railway viaducts. Image source: Nicholas (1945). __________________________________________________________________________________ 111 Figure 19: John Phillips. “52438 leads the Old Manchester Railtour Around the Ardwick Jn-‐Midland Jn Curve,” 1956. Image source: http://flickr.com/photos/72213853@N03/6956300260/. _____________ 113 Figure 20: Auguste Valette. “York Street Leading to Charles Street,” 1913. Image source: Manchester Art Gallery. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 115 Figure 21: L.S. Lowry, “The Viaduct, Store Street, Manchester,” 1929. The mill and chimney in the background, as well as the viaduct itself, have since been demolished. Image source: Manchester City Art Gallery. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 116 Figure 22: L.S. Lowry, “The Viaduct, Stockport,” 1969-‐1972. Image source: http://www.tate.org.uk/art/images/work/P/P03/P03279_10.jpg ____________________________________ 117 Figure 23: Gustave Doré, “Over London by Rail,” 1872. Image source: Science & Society Picture Library. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 120 Figure 24: Augustus Egg. “Past and Present, No. 3,” 1858. Image source: http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/egg-‐past-‐and-‐present-‐no-‐3-‐n03280. __________________________ 123 Figure 25: 1932 Cover of Flanagan and Allen sheet music published by Campbell, Connelly & Co. Ltd, reused under fair use under United States copyright law. Image Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Underneath_the_Arches_sheet_music.jpg _________________________ 124 Figure 26: Alf Tupper helps a man with a broken-‐down lorry. Image source: http://www.toughofthetrack.net/ ________________________________________________________________________ 128 Figure 27: “The Other Side of the Street.” A map of Coronation Street’s imaginary geography in 1975. Image source: Corriepedia http://coronationstreet.wikia.com/wiki/File:Coronation-‐street-‐map-‐ 1975.jpg ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 130 Figure 28: Scene from crime scene investigation in Prime Suspect. Image source: screen capture by Brian Rosa. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 132 Figure 29: Screen capture from Network Rail Property’s Location Library website. Image source: http://filming.networkrail.co.uk/locationlibrary.aspx. _________________________________________________ 134 Figure 30 Screen capture from Network Rail Property’s Location Library. Image source: http://filming.networkrail.co.uk/locationlibrary/backbromleystreet.aspx?t=1&theme_22=on. _____ 135 Figure 31: Image from Peel Location Guide. Image source: Peel (2011). ______________________________ 136 8 Figure 32: 1889 Goad insurance map of the Castlefield Basin. Image source: Digital Archives Association CD-‐ROM, accessed at the Map Library of the John Rylands University Library, Manchester. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 144 Figure 33: “Rochdale Canal,” 1974. Image source: Salford Local History Library. http://www.transportarchive.org.uk/getobject.php?rnum=T2384&searchitem=manchester&mtv=T2& pnum=7. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 149 Figure 34: Aerial photograph of Castlefield, 1989. Image source: Royal Commission on the Historic Monuments of England, courtesy of the Greater Manchester Archaeological Unit. ____________________ 153 Figure 35: An illustrated aerial view of Castlefield’s future landscape, 1989. Image source: LDR International/CMDC (1989). ______________________________________________________________________________ 154 Figure 36: Map of Castlefield, including railway lines and the boundaries of the Conservation area and Urban Heritage Park, 1998. Image source: Gibson and Hardman (1998, p.42). _______________________ 155 Figure 37: Recommendation for railway arch infill from Design Guidelines. Image source: LDR International/CMDC (1989). ______________________________________________________________________________ 157 Figure 38: Pedestrian movement diagram in Liverpool Road Environmental Improvement Strategy, 1990. Image source: DEGW/CMDC (1990). _____________________________________________________________ 159 Figure 39: Illustration of possible choices for viaduct signage in a Castlefield branding exercise, 1994. Image source: L&R Leisure (1994) ________________________________________________________________________ 160 Figure 40: Castlefield Junction, viewed from a train window, 1990. Note the signage for the Southern & Darwent timber merchants, who were soon to be displaced from their canal side location. Image source: Derek Brumhead. __________________________________________________________________________________ 161 Figure 41: Executives from the CMDC reviewing their model of Castlefield’s future, 1989. Image source: CMDC (1990a). ____________________________________________________________________________________ 162 Figure 42: A new viaduct for the Metrolink tram clad in ‘fake’ brick arches, 2010. Image source: Brian Rosa. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 164 Figure 43: Map from 1998 Castlefield Guide. Image source: Law (2007). _____________________________ 165 Figure 44: The Twisted Med, the café-‐bar that succeed Barça at Catalan Square, 2010. Image source: Brian Rosa. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 167 Figure 45: Recommendations on the visual framing of Castlefield’s viaducts in the Water Street Strategic Regeneration Framework, 2010. Image source: AECOM et.al. (2010). ______________________ 174 Figure 46: A Typical Railway Arch Cross-‐section. Image source: Hendey (1987). ____________________ 178 Figure 47: An example of an un-‐refurbished lock-‐up in one of the “scruffy bits”: Ardwick, Manchester, 2010. Image source: Brian Rosa. _________________________________________________________________________ 182 Figure 48: 1985 BRPB ad. Image source: Glasgow Herald (1985). ____________________________________ 186 Figure 49: The Spacia conversion of an auto repair garage into a letting agency, 2000. Image source: Len Grant. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 192 9 Figure 50: Cover of Spacia Corporate Overview, approximately 2006. Image source: Spacia (no date). ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 193 Figure 51: Breakdown of Spacia’s commercial properties by rental values and occupier type, circa approximately 2006. Most, but not all, of these properties are railway arches. Image source: Spacia (no date). ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ 194 Figure 52: The description and visual imagery of railway viaducts as boundaries in the City Centre Map. Source: City and Council Borough of Manchester (1967). ________________________________________ 202 Figure 53: The entire area of the city centre between the MSJ viaduct and the Mancunian Way were exclusively of industrial and distribution-‐based land uses, with the exception of the educational precincts and new BBC headquarters on Oxford Road and the newly built University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology campus. Equally striking is the clarity in which the railway viaducts hemmed in the zones of shopping, offices, and recreational and cultural uses of the city centre. Image Source: City and Council Borough of Manchester (1967). _______________________________________ 203 Figure 54: An image of Manchester City Centre’s ‘Evolving Central Core’ as consensually agreed by MCC, property developers, architects and surveyors as presented in the 2008 Whitworth Street West Strategic Regeneration Framework. The MSJ viaduct is the curving black line at the southern edge of the 2008 central core. Unfortunately, the image in the publicly available PDF is of low resolution. Source: HKR Architects et al. (2008). ____________________________________________________________________ 207 Figure 55: “Aerial Views, Hulme, Medlock Street District, Gaythorn Gas Works, Aerial view, Manchester,” 1930. Image depicts MSJ viaduct diagonally from top right to centre left. Gaythorn Gasworks and MacIntosh Mills can be seen to the South of the viaduct, with the limits of the commercial city centre ending abruptly at the viaduct. Image source: Local Image Collection, MCC 208 Figure 56: Gaythorn sub-‐area of the 1984 City Centre local plan. Northern Boundary is defined by the MSJ viaduct. Image source: MCC (1984). ________________________________________________________________ 209 Figure 57: Planning sub-‐areas for the 1984 City Centre Local Plan. The MSJ viaduct not only defines the boundary between sub-‐areas 20 and 21, but also between 19 and 18, 22 and 23, and part of 17 and 15. Image source: MCC (1984). __________________________________________________________________________ 210 Figure 58: The Gaythorn Site in the late 1980s, after arches were cleared but before environmental remediation. Image source: CMDC (1996). ______________________________________________________________ 210 Figure 59: A new walkway along the opened arches on Gaythorn site, circa approximately 1991. Image source: CMDC (1992). ______________________________________________________________________________ 211 Figure 60: Plaque affixed to the MSJ viaduct at the former site of Artworks from the Gasworks, 2012. Image source: Brian Rosa. _________________________________________________________________________________ 213 Figure 61: One of the ‘Artworks from the Gasworks’ installations, circa early 1990s. Image source: Aidan O’Rourke. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 214 10
Description: