Table Of Content

Contents Volume 34:1 February 2011 von Hippel, W. & Trivers, R. The evolution and psychology of self-deception Open Peer Commentary Khalil, E. L. The weightless hat: Is sel Bandura, A. Self-deception: A paradox revisited 16 optimal? Brooks, M. L. & Swann, Jr., W. B. Is social Kramer, P. & Bressan, P. Belief in Go interaction based on guile or honesty? 17 and in strong government as accidenta Buss, D. M. Domains of deception 1S by-products Dunning, D. Get thee to a laboratory 1S Kurzban, R. Two problems with “self-de: Egan, L. C. Self-deception is adaptive in itself No “self” and no “deception Frankish, K. Conscious thinking, acceptance, Lu, H. J. & Chang, L. Self-deceive t and self-deception 2 countermine detection Frey, U. & Voland, E. The evolutionary route McKay, R., Mijovi¢-Prelec, D. & Prelec, D. to self-deception: Why offensive versus defensive Protesting too much: Self-deception strategy might be a false alternative and self-signaling Fridland, E. Reviewing the logic of self-deception —_ 2: Mercier, H. Self-deception: Adaptation or Funder, D. C. Directions and beliefs of by -product P self-presentational bias a Pinker, S. Representations and decision rul Gangestad, S. W. Understanding self-deception in the theory of self-deception demands a co-evolutionary framework 2: Preti, A. & Miotto, P. Self-deception, social Gorelik, G. & Shackelford, Te Culture of desirability and psychopathology deception 2 Smith, D. L. Aiming at self-deception Harnad, S. Deceiving ourselves about Deflationism, intentionalism and 1] DIOLO] ?YI self-deception 2 purpose Heine, S. J. Evolutionary explanations need Suddendorf, T. Evolution, lies and foresi to account for cultural variation 26 biases Huang, J. Y. & Bargh, J. A. The selfish goal: Troisi, A. Deception through self-deception Self-deception occurs naturally from autonomous Take a look at somatoform disorders goal operation ; Vrij, A. Self-deception, lying, and the abilit Humphrey, N. It takes a thief to catch a thief to deceivi Johansson, P., Hall, L. & Gardenfors, P. Choice blindness and the non-unitary nature of the human mind 2 Authors’ Reponse Kenrick, D. T. & White, A. E. A single von Hippel, W. & Trivers, R. Reflections self-deceived or several subselves divided? on self-deception Contents Volume 34:2 April 2011 Mercier H. & Sperber D. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory Open Peer Commentary for a broad and developmental study of Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., reasoning & DeWall, C. N. Arguing, reasoning, and Oaksford, M. Putting reasoning and the interpersonal (cultural) functions of judgement in their proper argumentative place human consciousness d Opfer, J. E., & Sloutsky, V. On the Connolly, T. & Reb, J. Regret and design and function of rational arguments justification as a link from argumentation Pietraszewski, D. What is argument for? to consequentialism An adaptationist approach to argument and De Neys, W. The freak in all of us: Logical debate truth seeking without argumentation Poletiek, F. H. You can’t have your Dessalles, J.-L. Reasoning as a lie hypothesis and test it: The importance of detection device utilities in theories of reasoning Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. Reasoning is for Sternberg, R. J. When reasoning is thinking, not just for arguing persuasive but wrong Fox, J. Artificial cognitive systems: Where Stupple, E. J. N., & Ball, L. J. does argumentation fit in? 7 The chronometrics of confirmation bias: Evidence Frankish, K. Reasoning, argumentation, for the inhibition of intuitive judgements and cognition Uleman, J. S., Kressel, L. M., & Rim, S. Godfrey-Smith, P. & Yegnashankaran, K. Spontaneous inferences provide intuitive Reasoning as deliberative in function but beliefs on which reasoning proper depends dialogic in structure and origin Weber, E. U., and Johnson, E. J. Query Harrell, M. Understanding, evaluating, and theory: Knowing what we want by producing arguments: Training is necessary for arguing with ourselves reasoning skills Wiles, J. Reasoning, robots, and navigation: Johnson, J. A. The argumentative theory of Dual roles for deductive and abductive reasoning reasoning applies to scientists and philosophers, Wolfe, C. R. Some empirical too qualifications to the arguments for an Khlentzos, D. M. & Stevenson, B. argumentative theory True to the power of one? Cognition, argument, Wu, K. C.-C. Deliberative and reasoning 2 democracy and epistemic humility Kuhn, D. What people may do versus can do Authors’ Response Narvaez, D. The world looks small when Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. Argumentation: Its you only look through a telescope: The need adaptiveness and efficacy Contents Volume 34:3 June 2011 Précis Mandelbaum, E. What is the narrow content Carey, S. Précis of The Origin of Concepts of fence (and other definitionally and interpretation: lly primitive concepts)? Open Peer Commentary Mandler, J. M. A leaner nativist solution to the Allen, J. W. P. & Bickhard, M. H. origin of conce pts You can’t get there from here: Foundationalism Margolis, E. & Laurence, S. Bevond the and development building blocks model 139 Burge, T. Border crossings: Perceptual and Markman, A. B. Can developmental psychology post-perceptual object representation provide a blueprint for the study of adult cognition? 140 Butterfill, S. A. Infants’ representations McLaren, I. P. L., Wills, A. J. & Graham, S$ of causation Representation development perceptu il Gauker, C. Concepts are not icons learning, and concept formation Gelman, R. The case for continuity Overmann, K. A., Wynn, T. & Coolidge, Gentner, D. & Simms, N. Language and The prehistory of number concept analogy in conceptual change Poulin-Dubois, D. How to build a baby Gopnik, A. A unified account of abstract A new toolkit? structure and conceptual change: Probabilistic Rips, L. J. & caeaen S. J. Rebooting the models and early learning mechanisms bootstrap argument: Two puzzles for bootstrap Haman, M. & Hernik, M. Can multiple theories of concept development bootstrapping provide means of very early Ristau, C. A. Cognitive ethology, over-attribution conceptual development? of agency and focusing abilities as they relate to Heintz, C. Presuming placeholders are the origin of concepts relevant enables conceptual change Schlesinger, M. & Amso, D. Oculomotor skill Hill, C. S. Can Carey answer Quine? supports the development of object representations Keil, F. Graceful degradation and conceptual Shea, N. Acquiring a new concept is not development explicab a Kiss, S. The notion of incommensurability Spelke, E. S. Quinian bootstr apping or Fodorian can be extended to the child’s developing i sarenohenes Core and constructed knowledge theories of mind as well of number Korman, J. Concept revision is sensitive to Weiskopf, D. A. Language and mechanisms changes in category structure, causal history of concept learning Landy, D., Allen, C. & Anderson, M. L. Xu, F. Rational constructivism, statistical Conceptual discontinuity involves recycling inference, and core cognition old processes in new domains Machery, E. What is the significance of Author’s Response The Origin of Concepts for philosophe rs’ Carey, S$. Concept innateness, concept and psychologists’ theories of concepts? continuity, and bootstrapping Contents Volume 34:4 August 2011 _: M. & Love, B. C. Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Baye sian models of cognition 169 Open Peer Commentary Herschbach, M. & Bechtel, W. Relating Bayes to Al-Shawaf, L. & Buss, D. Evolutionary cognitive mechanisms psychology and Bayesian modeling Holyoak, K. J. & Lu, H. What the Bayesian Anderson, B. L. The myth of computational framework has contributed to underst nding level theory and the vacuity of rational analysis cognition: Causal learning as a case study Baetu, I., Barberia, L., Murphy, R. A. & Jenkins, G. W., Samuelson, L. K. & Baker, A. G. Maybe this old dinosaur isn’t extinct: Spencer, J. P. Come down from the clouds: What does Bayesian modeling add to Grounding Bayesian insights in developmental associationism? and behavioral processes Barsalou, L. W. Integrating Bayesian Lee, M. D. In praise of Ecumenical Bayes analy sis and mechanistic theories in Markman, A. B. & Otto, A. R. Cognitive grounded cognition systems optimize energy rather than Borsboom, D., Wagenmakers, E.-J. & information 207 Romeijn, J.-W. Mechanistic curiosity Navarro, D. J. & Perfors, A. F. Enlightenment will not kill the Bayesian cat grows from fundamentals 207 Bowers, J. S. & Davis, C. J. More varieties Norris, D. The illusion of mechanism: Mechanistic of Bayesian theories, but no enlightenment fundamentalism or enlightenment? 208 Chater, N., Goodman, N., Griffiths, T. L., Pietraszweski, D. & Wertz, A. E. Reverse Kemp, C., Oaksford, M. & Tenenbaum, J. B. engineering the structure of cognitive mechanisms 209 The imaginary fundamentalists: The unshocking Rehder, B. Taking the rationality out of truth about Bayesian cognitive science probabilistic models 210 Danks, D. & Eberhardt, F. Keeping Bayesian Rogers, T. T. & Seidenberg, M. S. Distinguishing models rational: The need for an account of literal from metaphorical applications of algorithmic rationality Bayesian approaches Edelman, S. & Shahbazi, R. Survival in a world Sewell, D. K., Little, D. R. & Lewandowsky, S. of probable objects: A fundamental reason Bayesian computation and mechanism: Theoretical for Bayesian enlightenment pluralism drives scientific emergence Fernbach, P. M. & Sloman, S. A. Don’t throw Speekenbrink, M. & Shanks, D. R. Is everyone out the Bayes with the bathwater Bayes? On the testable implications of Glymour, C. Osiander’s psychology Bayesian Fundamentalism Gopnik, A. Probabilistic models as theories of Uhlmann, E. L. Post hoc rationalism in science children’s minds Hayes, B. K. & Newell, B. R. The uncertain Authors’ Response status of Bayesian accounts of reasoning Jones, M. & Love, B. C. Pinning down the Heit, E. & Erickson, S. In praise of theoretical commitments of Bayesian cognitive secular Bavesianism models Contents Volume 34:5 October 2011 Elqayam, S. & Evans, J. St. B. T. Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking Open Peer Commentary Pfeifer, N. Systematic rationality norms pro Achourioti, T., Fugard, A. & Stenning, K. research roac lmaps and clarity Throwing the normative baby out with the Pothos, E. M. & Busemeyer, J. R. A case for prescriptivist bathwater 249 limited prescriptive normativism Bonnefon, J.-F. Norms for reasoning about Proust, J. Epistemic normati vitv from the decisions ( reasoner § viewpoint Brase, G. L. & Shanteau, J. The unbearable Quintelier, K. J. P. & Fessler, D. M. T. lightness of “Thinking”: Moving beyond simple Naturalizing the normative and the bridges concepts of thinking, rationality, and hypothesis between “is” and “ought” testing 25 Schurz, G. Truth-conduciveness as the primar Buckwalter, W. & Stich, S. Competence, epistemic justification of normative systems reflective equilibrium, and dual-system theories a” of reasoning Douven, I. A role for normativism 25: Spurrett, D. Reason is normativ and should Dutilh Novaes, C. The historical and be studied accordingly philosophical origins of normativism 25: Stanovich, K. E. Normative models in | Foss, J. Just the facts, and only the facts, about are here to stay human rationality? 2 Sternberg, R. J. Understanding reasoning: Let's Fuller, ‘he C8 Samuels, R. Overselling the case describe what we really think about against normativism 255 Stupple, E. J. N. & Ball, L. J. Normative Girotto, V. Undisputed norms and normal errors benchmarks are useful for studying individ icll in human thinking ay differences in reasoning Gold, N., Colman, A. M. & Pulford, B. D. Sun, Y. & Wang, H. Probability theor ] and Normative theory in decision making and perception of randomness: Bridging moral reasoning 256 “ought” and “is” Hahn, U. Why rational norms are indispensable z Thompson, V. A. Normativism versus mi Hrotic, §. Defending normativism - Waldmann, M. R. Neurath’s ship: The Kim, K. & Park, Y. Cultural and individual constitutive relation between normative differences in the generalization of theories descriptive theories of rationalit regarding human thinking 255 Weinberg, J. M. What is evaluative normativit McNair, S. & Feeney, A. Norms and high-level that we (mavbe) should avoid it? cognition: Consequences, trends, and antidotes Nickerson, R. S. Norms, goals, and the Authors’ Response study of thinking Evans, J. St. B. T. & Elqayam, S. Towards a Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. The “is-ought descriptivist psychology of reasoning and fallacy” fallacy 262 decision making Erratum Speekenbrink, M. & Shanks, D. R. Is everyone Bayes? On the testable implications of Bayesian Fundamentalism — Erratum Contents Volume 34:6 December 2011 Miiller, C. P. & Schumann, G. Drugs as instruments: A new framework for non-addictive psychoactive drug use ps} Open Peer Commentary Moro, L. & Noreika, V. Sacramental and Ahmed, S. H. Toward an evolutionary basis for spiritual use of hallucinogenic drugs resilience to drug addiction Pickard, H. The instrumental rationality Ainslie, G. Drugs’ rapid payoffs distort evaluation of addiction of their instrumental uses Reid, A. Drug addiction finds its own niche Banaschewski, T., Blomeyer, D., Spanagel, R. Why do we take drugs? From Buchmann, A. F., Poustka, L., the drug-reinforcement theory to a novel concept Rothenberger, A. & Laucht, M. Drugs as of drug instrumentalization instruments from a developmental child Sullivan, R. J. & Hagen, E. H. But is it and adolescent psychiatric perspective evolution. . .? Foxall, G. R. & Sigurdsson, V. Drug use Swendsen, J. & Le Moal, M. Flaws of as consumer behavior drug instrumentalization Goudie, A. J., Gullo, M. J., Rose, A. K., Troisi, A. Psychoactive drug use: Expand Christiansen, P., Cole, J. C., Field, M. & the scope of outcome assessment Sumnall, H. Nonaddictive instrumental Van Gulick, R. Drugs, mental instruments, drug use: Theoretical strengths and weaknesses and self-control Griffiths, M. D. Non-addictive psychoactive Warburton, D. M. Aspects of nicotine utilization drug use: Implications for behavioral Wu, K. C.-C. Governing drug use through addiction neurobiological subject construction: The sad Kippin, T. E. Does drug mis-instrumentalization loss of the sociocultural lead to drug abuse? Lende, D. H. Drug instrumentalization and Authors’ Response evolution: Going even further Miiller, C. P. & Schumann, G. To use or not Miller, G. F. Optimal drug use and rational to use: Expanding the view on non-addictive drug policy psychoactive drug consumption and its implications