Badiou: a philosophy of the new

202 Pages·0.824 MB·English

by  Badiou, Alain;Pluth, Ed

Badiou
Published:
Jeremy Ahearne, Michel de Certeau
Peter Burke, The French Historical Revolution: The Annales School 1929–1989
Michael Caesar, Umberto Eco
M. J. Cain, Fodor
Filipe Carreira da Silva, G. H. Mead
Rosemary Cowan, Cornel West
George Crowder, Isaiah Berlin
Maximilian de Gaynesford, John McDowell
Reidar Andreas Due, Deleuze
Eric Dunning, Norbert Elias
Matthew Elton, Daniel Dennett
Chris Fleming, Rene Girard
Edward Fullbrook and Kate Fullbrook, Simone de Beauvoir
Andrew Gamble, Hayek
Neil Gascoigne, Richard Rorty
Nigel Gibson, Fanon
Graeme Gilloch, Walter Benjamin
Karen Green, Dummett
Espen Hammer, Stanley Cavell
Christina Howells, Derrida
Fred Inglis, Clifford Geertz
Simon Jarvis, Adorno
Sarah Kay, Žižek
Valerie Kennedy, Edward Said
Chandran Kukathas and Philip Pettit, Rawls
Moya Lloyd, Judith Butler
James McGilvray, Chomsky
Lois McNay, Foucault
Dermot Moran, Edmund Husserl
Michael Moriarty, Roland Barthes
Stephen Morton, Gayatri Spivak
Harold W. Noonan, Frege
James O’Shea, Wilfrid Sellars
William Outhwaite, Habermas, 2nd Edition
Kari Palonen, Quentin Skinner
John Preston, Feyerabend
Chris Rojek, Stuart Hall
William Scheuerman, Morgenthau
Severin Schroeder, Wittgenstein
Susan Sellers, Helene Cixous
Wes Sharrock and Rupert Read, Kuhn
David Silverman, Harvey Sacks
Dennis Smith, Zygmunt Bauman
James Smith, Terry Eagleton
Nicholas H. Smith, Charles Taylor
Felix Stalder Manuel Castells
Geoffrey Stokes, Popper
Georgia Warnke, Gadamer
James Williams, Lyotard
Jonathan Wolff, Robert Nozick
Badiou
A Philosophy of the New
Ed Pluth
polity
Copyright © Ed Pluth 2010
The right of Ed Pluth to be identifi ed as Author of this Work has been
asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act
1988.
First published in 2010 by Polity Press
Polity Press
65 Bridge Street
Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK
Polity Press
350 Main Street
Malden, MA 02148, USA
All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the
purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or
by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or
otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-4277-2 (hardback)
ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-4278-9 (paperback)
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Typeset in 10.5 on 12 pt Palatino
by Toppan Best-set Premedia Limited
Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Limted, Bodmin,
Cornwall
The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for
external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the
time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for
the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or
that the content is or will remain appropriate.
Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any
have been inadvertently overlooked the publisher will be pleased to
include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.
For further information on Polity, visit our website: www.politybooks.
com
Contents
Guide to Abbreviations of Badiou’s Publications vi
Introduction 1
1 Badiou’s Philosophical Background 17
2 Being and Event 29
3 Situations and Events 48
4 Logics of Worlds 67
5 Infi nity and Truth 85
6 Badiou’s Theories of the Subject 104
7 Ethics and Affects 128
8 Politics 154
Conclusion 175
Select Bibliography 186
Index 188
Guide to Abbreviations of
Badiou’s Publications
AF “The Adventure of French Philosophy”
B Briefi ngs on Existence
BE Being and Event
C The Century
Con Conditions
E Ethics
I De l’idéologie
IT Infi nite Thought
LM Logiques des mondes
M Manifesto for Philosophy
Meta Metapolitics
NN Number and Numbers
NR Le Noyau rationnel de la dialectique hégélienne
P Polemics
PB “Philosophy as Biography”
Po “Politics: A Non-Expressive Dialectics”
PP Peut-on penser la politique?
S De quoi Sarkozy est-il le nom?
SA “The Subject of Art”
SP Saint Paul
TC Théorie de la contradiction
TS Théorie du sujet
TW Theoretical Writings
WL “What is to Live?”
Introduction
Ni Dieu ni homme [Neither god nor man]
(C 216n53)
“One is right to revolt against the reactionaries . . .”
In a candid moment at a recent conference, Alain Badiou expressed
his frustration and surprise at the fact that so many of his peers –
he had in mind the generation of student and worker activists
known as soixante-huitards, or “68ers” – developed a strong
hostility toward their former militant engagement. Although his
comment was delivered almost as a passing remark, it was more
than that: his dismay about people turning against something they
once believed is directly connected to one of his philosophy’s over-
arching concerns. Badiou is interested in the conditions of conver-
sion, conviction, resolution, persistence, and then, on the other
side, wavering, doubt, and retreat. His philosophy is interested in
describing the conditions under which a militant engagement
changes into a reaction against that engagement itself, and how
someone can suddenly become opposed to the very possibility of
a similar engagement ever happening again. And what are the
conditions under which a militant engagement can continue,
instead of burning out or reversing? Badiou came up with a little
ethical formula once that captures his orientation quite nicely:
“love what you will never believe twice.” It is a bit obscure, but it
should mean something like “do not be ashamed about being con-
vinced of something that you feel you actually should not be con-
vinced of, and have great diffi culty justifying . . .”
2 Introduction
Badiou asks these kinds of questions not only with respect to
political movements (although these do seem to have pride of
place) but also for all sorts of things that enthuse human beings
every so often, such as romances, scientifi c discoveries, and artistic
innovations. In fact, along with politics, love, science, and art are
the four fi elds of human practice in which what he calls “truths”
are possible. And although his experience with lapses in faith may
have been the trigger for much of his philosophical activity, it is
safe to say that he is actually more concerned with describing (and
defending) the possibility of fi delity within all of these domains;
fi delity to those events that can lead human beings to put their
happiness, and sometimes even their livelihood at stake, often
against their better judgment, for what appears to be (and may well
be) nothing more than a stupid idea: something as silly, say, as a
new way of doing mathematics, or a hunch that a new way of
making sound has musical value.
The most common reference in Badiou’s work is, as I mentioned,
politics, and most of his key examples, and many of his key con-
cepts, come from political theory and political history, with a
strongly Marxist infl ection. But not always. Using an unfamiliar
but colorful term, Badiou describes as Thermidorian the type of
reaction he witnessed, and was vexed by, among members of his
generation after 1968. Students of the French Revolution would
recognize the term, since it is usually used to describe the period
just after Robespierre’s infamous reign of terror. The Thermidorian
period (named after one of the months of the French Revolutionary
calendar – covering mid-July to mid-August) was characterized by
social and political moderation. Now, Badiou is not saying that
anything about May 1968 and its long aftershocks compares to the
intensity of the French Revolution, as far as its achievements and
actual historical signifi cance goes. Nor does it compare to other
revolutionary events of the twentieth century – the Russian Revo-
lution of 1917, and the Cultural Revolution in China, to use two
more of Badiou’s standard references. Badiou does want to say,
however, that despite the diffi culty in determining the signifi cance
of May 1968, the period that followed can be characterized as
another Thermidorian reaction. And to such a period corresponds
a distinctive form of subjectivity, one based on the cessation of a
previous and also always possible revolutionary fervor. Thus, the
Thermidorian is not just any political conservative, but someone
who is saying no to something he or she once encountered, to
something he or she once was, or to something he or she once