cover next page > title: Bach, Beethoven and the Boys : Music History As It Ought to Be Taught author: Barber, David W.; Donald, David C. publisher: Sound And Vision isbn10 | asin: 0920151108 print isbn13: 9780920151105 ebook isbn13: 9780585223063 language: English subject Music--History and criticism, Music--Humor, Composers-- Humor. publication date: 1996 lcc: ML65.B1947 1996eb ddc: 780/.9 subject: Music--History and criticism, Music--Humor, Composers-- Humor. cover next page > < previous page cover-0 next page > Bach, Beethoven and the Boys < previous page cover-0 next page > < previous page cover-1 next page > Bach, Beethoven and the Boys Music History As It Ought to Be Taught David W. Barber Sound and Vision Toronto < previous page cover-1 next page > < previous page page_i next page > Page I TABLE OF CONTENTS Author's Note & Acknowledgements III Preface VI Getting the Ball Rolling Early Music 1 Now We're Getting Somewhere Josquin 11 Palestrina 13 Gesualdo 17 A Few Englishmen Byrd 25 Clarke 28 Purcell 29 Going Baroque Monteverdi 37 Vivaldi 41 Bach 45 Handel 53 Some Classic Examples Haydn 65 Mozart 70 < previous page page_i next page > < previous page page_ii next page > Page II Those Romantic Types Beethoven 79 Wagner 84 Brahms 90 Follow the Leider Schubert 97 Schumann 101 The Russians Are Coming, the Russians Are Coming The Mighty Five 109 Tchaikovsky 114 A Ridiculously Short History of Opera Opera 121 The Mess We're in Now Stravinsky 129 Schoenberg 132 The English Country Gardeners 135 Ives 138 Where Do We Go from Here? Cage 143 Coda 146 < previous page page_ii next page > < previous page page_iii next page > Page III AUTHOR'S NOTE & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When I was studying music at Queen's University (believe it or not, I did earn an honors B.Mus. degree, with a concentration in voice performance and music history), one of my music-history professors gently pulled me aside one day and told me that, although my work was good, I was "too easily distracted by the non-essentials." This book will, I suppose, only confirm that judgment. I feel it's important to stress that the historical information in this book is all true (well, almost all of it is true). When Bach left Cöthen for Leipzig, he really did have 11 linen shirts "at the wash." If you don't believe me you could look it up for yourself. Some well-meaning former friends of mine who read the manuscript in preparation made the comment that they found all the footnotes distracting. If you have this problem, too, please feel free to ignore the footnotes. But I warn you, you'd be missing some of the best parts.1 Thanks to the usual round of friends and relations for moral support and patiently enduring my historicomical ramblings and non sequiturs, and to Geoff and Jacky Savage of Sound And Vision and Dave Donald for his illustrations and expertise. I'm glad for this 10th-anniversary edition, which offers the chance to correct many niggling errorswithout (I hope) introducing any new ones. DWB Kingston, 1986; Toronto, 1996 1 Alternatively, you could read only the footnotes and ignore the main body of the text. Suit yourself. < previous page page_iii next page > < previous page page_iv next page > Page IV ABOUT THE AUTHOR David Barber is a journalist and musician and the author of five other humorous books about music. Formerly the entertainment editor of the Kingston Whig-Standard, he now divides his time between working as a copyeditor at the Toronto Globe and Mail and, with his wife, Judy Scott, operating their bookstore/café, White Knight Books and The Dormouse Café, in Westport, Ont. As a composer, his works include two symphonies, a jazz mass based on the music of Dave Brubeck, a Requiem, several short choral works and numerous vocal-jazz arrangements. In his spare time he is an avid kayaker and reader of mysteries and enjoys performing with his vocal-jazz group, Barber and the Sevilles. ABOUT THE ILLUSTRATOR Dave Donald can't remember when he didn't scrawl his little marks on most surfaces, so it doesn't come as much of a surprise that he now makes a living doing just that. He is currently freelancing his way through life and doing all the things he wanted to do if he didn't have a full-time job. Dave is an avid music listener who likes to look for the funny side in anything. Classical music gives him lots to look at. This book represents his second illustrative collaboration with David Barber. < previous page page_iv next page > < previous page page_v next page > Page V PREFACE It was high time somebody did for the history of music what Messrs Sellar and Yeatman did for the history of England. Those of you learned enough to know 1066 And All That will remember that Julius Caesar came to Britain and found the woad-painted inhabitants "weeny, weedy and weaky" and that the Romans were Top Nation at the time because of their classical education. Anglo-Saxon England had kings with names like Filthfroth and Brothelbreath. William-and-Mary were stuck together like copulating dogs, and so on. And all that. Without the benefit of a collaborator, David W. Barber has ranged a bigger world than England and come up with a work funnier than that classic misguide to historical truth. He has done the job, and nobody else has to do it now. The point I want to make now before you meet B. and B. (to say nothing of the B. named Johannes and for that matter, the one called Benjamin or Bela) is that what you will be laughing at is the truth. There is not a single false note in this short-playing record. If Barber says that Richard Wagner was born in 1813, you can take it that he was. Check in Grove's twenty-volume Dictionary of Music and Musicians if you like, but the effort, to say nothing of the money, won't procure you a more accurate date. If he says that Stravinsky's Rite of Spring was first performed in Paris in 1913, there is no need for you to consult my father, who swore he was there. You can't consult him, anyway, for he has joined the great democracy of the dead wherein cinema pianists (my father was one of those) lie snugly with virtuosi, John Lennon and academic stretto-wanglers. Barber, however, tells us something you won't find in Grovenamely, that Nijinsky made an erotic gesture during the performance and this did not please the Parisians, who knew all about erotic < previous page page_v next page > < previous page page_vi next page > Page VI gestures but, with Gallic savoir-faire, liked to keep them in their place or places, one of which was not the opera house. That Barber was the one man for this sane and demented history should have been apparent to all who consulted A Musician's Dictionary, which contains such wisdom as "English Horn: A woodwind instrument so named because it is neither English nor a horn. Not to be confused with the French Horn, which is German" and "Wrong Notes: it must be understood that this is a relative term, and applies only to those examples performed by someone else. Wrong notes performed by oneself are always referred to as ornaments." The Barber history, which is ready to explode on you as soon as you have read, if you have, I don't care much anyway, this preface, is equally wise, meaning mad. With music the two terms do not square up to each other in anything like a meaningful opposition. Wise men look like Beethoven, meaning they didn't wash and have lost their hair brush, and Beethoven was certainly mad. I mean, you have to be mad to practise an art that doesn't know why it exists in the first place. I mean, we know what hamburgers are for, also sex, but we don't know the purpose of music. That's why we have Muzak, which knows all too well why it exists. It exists primarily because nobody knows how to switch it off. By a curious chance (I do not joke, any more than Barber does) I got up at five this morning because my cough was keeping my sleeping partner awake (my wife, if you must know). As any musician will tell you, there is only one thing to do when you wake at five, and that is to compose a fugue. I composed a fugue, and then the mail came, with Barber's typescript. It is a fugue for four voices, in A minor. It is the twenty-second fugue I have written in little over a week. God knows why I am writing fugues. It is certainly not to awaken the sleeping soul of Bach. Fugue is something that gets into you and, when one has composed forty-eight of the bastards, flies, or fugues, out again. Barber's book confirmed that I am not alone in my madness. It made me feel better, and it cured my cough. No, it (damn and blast it) didn't. So my heartiest commendation of an admirable work of scholarship"gapped," true, as academics say of melodies that are, in fact, gapped but, where there are no gaps, crammed with accuracy. I will not say again that it is funny, since this will com- < previous page page_vi next page > < previous page page_vii next page > Page VII pel you to set your jaw and dare Barber to make you laugh. Take it for its truth. When you have read it you will know a great deal of musical history. Whether you will think it worth knowing is another matter. For music is another name for dementia. Who would spend his life spinning combinations of twelve notes if he were sane? There are better things worth spinning, but I can't think just what they are at the moment. I got up too early. © Anthony Burgess Monte Carlo, December 7, 1985 < previous page page_vii next page >
Description: