AWAKENING THE EYE This page intentionally left blank AWAKENING THE EYE ROBERT FRANK’S AMERICAN CINEMA GEORGE KOUVAROS University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis • London Parts of chapter 1 were previously published as “ ‘Time and How to Note It Down’: The Lessons of Pull My Daisy,” Screen 53, no. 1 (Spring 2012): 1–1 7. A slightly shorter version of chapter 2 was previously published as “He’s Not There: Robert Frank’s Me and My Brother,” Screening the Past, no. 29 (2010). Copyright 2015 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechan- ical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 290 Minneapolis, MN 55401-2 520 http://www.upress.umn.edu Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kouvaros, George. Awakening the eye: Robert Frank’s American cinema / George Kouvaros. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8166-9556-0 (hc) ISBN 978-0-8166-9559-1 (pb) 1. Frank, Robert, b. 1924 — Criticism and interpretation. I. Title. PN1998.3.F7325K68 2015 791.4302'33092—dc23 2014043032 Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper The University of Minnesota is an equal- opportunity educator and employer. 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Introduction: Awakening the Eye 1 1 “Time and How to Note It Down” 31 Pull My Daisy 2 He’s Not There 61 Me and My Brother, One Hour 3 “A Better Way to Live” 91 Conversations in Vermont, Liferaft Earth, About Me: A Musical, Cocksucker Blues 4 “The Fire of Pain” 121 Life Dances On . . . , Home Improvements, The Present 5 Fragments Shored against My Ruins 153 Moving Pictures, True Story Coda: The Circle 185 Paper Route Notes 199 Index 215 This page intentionally left blank ACKNOWLEDGMENTS An Australian Research Council Discovery Grant helped fund the re- search and writing of this book. The bulk of the research occurred at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, where I was able to view the films and videos that comprise the Robert Frank Collection. The hospitality provided by the MFAH was extraordinary. In particular, I thank curator of film and video Marian Luntz and her colleagues in the Film Depart- ment, assistant curator Tracy Stephenson, and community outreach and administration assistant Ray Gomez. Their dedication, profes- sionalism, and kindness over the course of a number of extended visits made the period of research an absolute delight. For me this book will always be linked to the friendships formed at the MFAH. Securing permission to reproduce photographs and images would not have been possible without the support of Lauren Panzo, director at Pace/MacGill Gallery in New York. I am deeply indebted to Lauren for graciously responding to my numerous requests and bringing the project to Robert Frank’s attention. A great deal of what I learned about Frank’s working methods came from time spent with his editor, Laura Israel, who also provided me with copies of the films and videos and helped arrange the production of stills. She did this while juggling numerous professional commitments as well as completing the pro- duction of her documentary on Frank’s career. During the course of the research, I was fortunate to have a number of conversations with two experts on Frank’s career: Sarah Greenough, senior curator and head of the Department of Photographs at the Na- tional Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., and Anne Wilkes Tucker, cura tor of photography at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston. Their writings on Frank’s photographs were invaluable in shaping my own ◆ vii understanding. At the University of New South Wales, colleagues John Golder, Maija Howe, Michelle Langford, Sean Pryor, and Melanie Rob- son provided useful feedback on the manuscript. Thanks also go to Paul Pavlou for assistance with the reproduction of images. This is my third publication with the University of Minnesota Press. Former executive editor Richard Morrison played an important role in bringing each of the books to fruition. Humanities editor Danielle Kasprzak took over this project at a crucial time. Her commitment to the project was a major factor in its completion. As with each and every publication, it is to the members of my family that I owe the greatest debt. Their patience, support, and love are essential. Finally, I thank Robert Frank for granting permission to reproduce the images that appear in this book. viii ◆ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Introduction AWAKENING THE EYE The 1989 edition of Robert Frank’s autobiographical photobook The Lines of My Hand begins with a collage composed of two strips of film placed side by side (see Plate 1). At the center of each of the film frames is a large eye superimposed on a coastal scene. The reflection of a small rectangular object passes across and, at times, obscures our view of the eye. In the left- side strip, we can see the outline of a dog gazing along the coastline. The superimposition of the eye on the coastal landscape recalls Dziga Vertov’s famous image of the camera- eye in his 1929 film Man with a Movie Camera. By combining an image of a human eye with a close- up of a camera lens, Vertov constructs a rendition of the central principle of his filmmaking practice: the movie camera’s ability to supersede the capacities of natural perception. Vertov’s exploration of the capacities of the camera- eye culminated with the formulation of a new model for documentary filmmaking: “Kino- eye = kino- seeing (I see through the camera) + kino- writing (I write on film with the camera) + kino- organization (I edit). The kino- eye method is the sci- entifically experimental method of exploring the visible world.”1 Frank’s collage acknowledges the legacy of Vertov’s pioneering for- mulation. It too speaks of a desire to establish new ways of seeing and writing through the camera. But whereas Vertov’s championing of the camera- eye is framed in trenchant opposition to humanist principles, Frank’s superimposition of the eye onto the coastal scene draws inspi- ration from a Romantic tradition that positions the external world as a mirror for inner processes. This interaction of inner and outer worlds is affirmed in the accompanying text: ◆ 1