Title Pages - Oxford Scholarship Oxford Scholarship Online Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic Joseph Farrell and Damien P. Nelis Print publication date: 2013 Print ISBN-13: 9780199587223 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001 Title Pages (p.i) Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic (p.ii) (p.iii) Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic (p.iv) Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Oxford University Press 2013 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in 2013 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001/acprof-9780199587223-miscMatter-1 1/2 Title Pages - Oxford Scholarship a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available ISBN 978–0–19–958722–3 Printed in Great Britain by the MPG Printgroup, UK Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work. Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001/acprof-9780199587223-miscMatter-1 2/2 Preface - Oxford Scholarship Oxford Scholarship Online Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic Joseph Farrell and Damien P. Nelis Print publication date: 2013 Print ISBN-13: 9780199587223 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001 (p.v) Preface This volume has its distant origin in a conference held at the Fondation Hardt, in Vandoeuvres, Geneva on 22–4 March 2007. Two papers delivered on that occasion are not included here, A. Barchiesi’s contribution, ‘La Guerre sociale dans l’Enéide de Virgile: naissance d’un peuple’, will appear as part of the published version of his 2011 Sather Lectures. M. Leigh’s paper, ‘Troy, Sicily and Rome: Vergil’s Boxing Match and the Problem of Eryx’, has appeared in HSCPh 105 (2010), 117–55 under the title, ‘Boxing and Sacrifice in the Epic: Apollonius, Vergil, and Valerius’. The conference, which was generously sponsored by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Société Académique de Genève, and the Faculty of Arts and the Department of Classics of the University of Geneva, was organized as one of the regular meetings of the ‘Réseau international de recherche et de formation à la recherche dans le domaine de la poésie augustéenne’, a research network which includes the following universities: Cambridge; Dublin (Trinity College) Florence; Geneva; Heidelberg; Lille; London (King’s College); Oxford; Rome (La Sapienza); and Udine. The idea for the conference arose from discussions among the members which took place in the gardens of Corpus Christi College in Oxford, during an earlier meeting of the network held on 22–4 September 2005. Some of the papers read at that conference have now been published in a volume entitled Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture (Oxford, 2009), edited by P. Hardie. The papers of the previous meeting of the network, held in Heidelberg on 15–17 April 2004, were edited by J. P. Schwindt and published as La Représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne (Heidelberg, 2005). The topic chosen for the Geneva meeting arose directly from discussions concerning A. Gowing’s Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture (Cambridge, 2005). This book may be considered as a tribute to the richness of Gowing’s work and as an attempt to follow through on one of the many ideas for further research arising from it. The editors would like to thank all those who did so much to make the Geneva conference such a https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001/acprof-9780199587223-miscMatter-4 1/2 Preface - Oxford Scholarship pleasant and memorable occasion, especially colleagues at the University of Geneva and the staff at the Fondation Hardt, particularly Monica Brunner and Pierre Ducrey. Special thanks are of course due to the contributors to this volume and (p.vi) to all those involved in the research network which gave rise to the conference in Geneva; without their expertise, their good will, and their patience, this collection of papers would never have been published. We would also like to thank all the staff at OUP for their constant help and endless patience, especially Hilary O’Shea, Taryn Das Neves, Kizzy Taylor-Richelieu and the anonymous readers. And so finally, with Propertius, we can say to all concerned (3.4.10): ite et Romanae consulite historiae! Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001/acprof-9780199587223-miscMatter-4 2/2 List of Contributors - Oxford Scholarship Oxford Scholarship Online Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic Joseph Farrell and Damien P. Nelis Print publication date: 2013 Print ISBN-13: 9780199587223 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001 (p.ix) List of Contributors Joseph Farrell is Professor of Classical Studies at the University of Pennsylvania. Damien P. Nelis is Professor of Latin at the University of Geneva. Mario Citroni is Professor of Latin Literature at the ‘Istituto Italiano di Scienze Umane’ (Florence). He is the author of an edition and commentary on Martial Book I (1975), of studies on the author–public relationship in Latin poetry, including Poesia e lettori in Roma antica (1995) and on various aspects of the relation between literature and society in the Roman world. He is currently working on literary canons in ancient literature. Maria Luisa Delvigo is Professor of Latin Literature at the University of Udine. She is the author of Testo virgiliano e tradizione indiretta: Le varianti probiane (Pisa, 1987) and Servio e la poesia della scienza (Pisa, 2011). She works mainly on the text of Virgil, on philology and literary criticism in antiquity, and on scientific poetry, particularly Lucretius. Alain Deremetz is Professor of Latin Literature at the University of Lille. He is a specialist in Latin poetry and in the ancient novel. He is the author of studies devoted to the history of interpretation and to literary pragmatics and of Le Miroir des Muses: Poétiques de la réflexivité à Rome (Lille, 1995). Jacqueline Fabre-Serris is Professor of Latin Literature at the University of Lille. She is the author of Mythe et poésie dans les Métamorphoses d’Ovide: Fonctions et significations de https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001/acprof-9780199587223-miscMatter-6 1/3 List of Contributors - Oxford Scholarship la mythologie dans la Rome augustéenne (1995), Mythologie et littérature à Rome: La réécriture des mythes aux 1ers siècles avant et après J.-C. (1998), and Rome, l’Arcadie et la mer des Argonautes: Essai sur la naissance d’une mythologie des origines en Occident (2008), and has published many articles on the Latin literature, on the mythology and mythography, on Gender Studies, and on the reception of antiquity. She is co-director of the electronic reviews Dictynna and Eugesta, of a series on ‘Mythography’ published by Presses du Septentrion, and editor of two websites: Polymnia (〈http://polymnia.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/〉) and EuGeStA (〈http://eugesta.recherche. univ-lille3.fr/〉). (p.x) Monica R. Gale is Associate Professor of Latin at Trinity College, Dublin. She is the author of Myth and Poetry in Lucretius (Cambridge, 1994), Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition (Cambridge, 2000), and other books and articles on late Republican and Augustan poetry, and is currently working on a commentary on the complete poems of Catullus for the Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics series. Bill Gladhill is an Assistant Professor at McGill University. He has published a number of articles on Roman poetry and prose, and is currently completing a book entitled Rethinking Roman Alliance, as well as an edition of Pontano’s Parthenopaeus. Alain M. Gowing is Professor of Classics at the University of Washington in Seattle, where he has been on the faculty since 1988 after receiving his Ph.D. from Bryn Mawr College. His chief interests lie in the area of Roman historiography and literature, especially of the imperial period. His most recent book is Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture (Cambridge, 2005), and he is currently working on a book-length study of the role of Rome and urban space in Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Philip Hardie is a Senior Research Fellow at Trinity College, Cambridge. He has recently published Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature (2012), and is currently completing a commentary on Ovid, Metamorphoses 13–15 (Fondazione Valla), co-editing the volume on the Renaissance in the ‘Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature’, and writing a short book on the reception of the Aeneid. Jean-Christophe Jolivet is Professor of Latin at the University of Lille. His main research and teaching interests are in Latin poetry, intertextuality, and especially the influence of Homeric scholarship on Virgil and Ovid. The author of Allusion et fiction épistolaire dans les Héroïdes d’Ovide (Rome, 2001), he is currently working on a book entitled L’Homère romain: Recherches sur les études homériques à Rome et leur influence sur la poésie augustéenne. Mario Labate https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001/acprof-9780199587223-miscMatter-6 2/3 List of Contributors - Oxford Scholarship is Professor of Latin Literature at the University of Florence. His studies mainly deal with Augustan poetry, and in this field, he has worked mainly on elegy and epic poetry, and in particular on Ovid. He is also interested in Latin satire and narrative and has written several articles on Horace and Petronius. (p.xi) Fiachra Mac Góráin is Lecturer in Classics at University College London. He studied at Trinity College Dublin and at the University of Oxford, where he wrote his doctorate on tragedy and the dionysiac in Virgil’s Aeneid. He is currently writing a book entitled Virgil’s Dionysus. Jürgen Paul Schwindt is Professor of Classical Philology at the University of Heidelberg. He is the author and editor of books and articles on Latin literature of the classical period and on literary theory and aesthetics. He is the editor of the ‘Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften’ and is now working on books dealing with the theory of philology and the semiotics of Latin love elegy. Gail Trimble is Brown Fellow and Tutor in Classics at Trinity College, Oxford, and was previously a Junior Research Fellow at Trinity College, Cambridge. She is writing a commentary on Catullus 64, with newly edited text, for the series Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries. She has also published articles on Ovid and on the history of Catullan scholarship. (p.xii) Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001/acprof-9780199587223-miscMatter-6 3/3 Introduction Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic Joseph Farrell and Damien P. Nelis Print publication date: 2013 Print ISBN-13: 9780199587223 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001 Introduction Joseph Farrell Damien P. Nelis DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.003.0001 Abstract and Keywords A considerable body of recent scholarship has been devoted to investigating the ways in which societies remember, studying not only what they construct as memorable but also why and how they do so.1 Adopting a narrower focus, this volume examines the ways in which different aspects and images of the Roman Republic are created and exploited by the Augustan poets. Our subject immediately suggests two obvious strategies: on the one hand, emphasis on a strictly historical project; on the other, concentration on versions of literary history. The latter has been more popular and influential in recent Latin scholarship, but the former has not been without its adherents, as the lively debate in recent historical research has fought over the value of ancient literary sources for reconstructing the early history of Rome and, crucially, for the origins of the Republic and the struggle of the orders.... A considerable body of recent scholarship has been devoted to investigating the ways in which societies remember, studying not only what they construct as memorable but also why and how they do so.1 Adopting a narrower focus, this volume examines the ways in which different aspects and images of the Roman Republic are created and exploited by the Augustan poets. Our subject immediately suggests two obvious strategies: on the one hand, emphasis on a strictly historical project; on the other, concentration on versions of literary history. The latter has been more popular and influential in recent Latin scholarship, but the former has not been without its adherents, as the lively debate in recent historical research has fought over the value of ancient literary Page 1 of 18 Introduction sources for reconstructing the early history of Rome and, crucially, for the origins of the Republic and the struggle of the orders.2 Simultaneously, recent work on Livy has provided strong support for a pre-Actian dating for the beginning of the composition of his history, and so has vastly improved our appreciation of the complexity and subtlety of this extraordinarily ambitious and influential historiographical project.3 In addition, more sophisticated readings of Roman historians in general that are themselves influenced by the application of New Critical techniques of close reading developed by critics of poetic texts, have begun in turn to impinge on the ways in which the Latin poetry of the Augustan age is (p.2) interpreted.4 Just as historical writers employ the materials of poetry and what we now call fiction—myth and metaphor, artful structuration, and the careful activation of intertextual possibilities involving models in both prose and verse—Augustan poets reveal their keen awareness of and interest in different historiographical modes, such as those of universal history, regal chronicles, and the tropes of annalistic writing. They are also interested in some of the characteristic themes and devices of historical writing, such as battle narrative, civil conflict, ethnography, speeches, and debates, even as they too engage intertextually with precise historiographical models in pointed and influential ways.5 The challenge for this volume, then, is not so much to ask whether the Augustan poets are concerned with Roman history, but to gain greater clarity with regard to the questions of how and to what end they may be seen as presenting their past as a specifically Republican history. In setting out to think about this vast topic, one which can only be treated in a highly selective manner in a book such as this, a series of obvious questions comes immediately to mind. Are there any particular aspects of the Republic that Augustan poets seem to remember with particular frequency and immediacy? Equally, are there any aspects they seem to prefer to forget? How do they shape the past in relation to the present: do they favour narratives of continuity, rupture, or repetition? What other forms of periodization do they adopt? And finally, how are we to define any given poet as ‘Augustan’? Amidst such a bewildering array of questions, it seems advisable to attempt to seek some solid ground as a starting point. Looking back: the search for ‘the beginning’ It is characteristic of ancient and modern historical writing to emphasize the roots or causes of a historical process or event—in short, to identify (p.3) when it ‘begins’. If we can identify the Augustan period with a time when one might conceive of the Republic as a thing of the past, when does this period begin? Alain Gowing’s Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture, a brilliant exploration of the ways in which memories of the Republic function in early Imperial literature, has illustrated the potential richness of this topic; but, crucially, Gowing begins his survey with the age of Tiberius. In doing so, in a manner which is of course deliberately reminiscent of the opening chapters of Tacitus’ Annals, he underlines in the clearest possible Page 2 of 18 Introduction fashion the liminal status of the Augustan period and the ways in which differing interpretations of its achievements depend on how we define it. At the very heart of any attempt to understand this period and its transitions must lie sensitivity to the Augustan negotiation of the tension between, on the one hand, a rhetoric based on idealizing myths of origins and the concept of restoration in a res publica restituta and, on the other, the presentation of the past as a period of endless civil war leading to the subsequent need for a radical renewal of the Roman political system.6 It has long been recognized that literary texts can provide us with insights into these questions and into the realities and ideologies of the age. But for the literary scholar to exploit fully the potential of this line of enquiry, it is necessary to re-examine both what we think we know about the dating of key texts and some of the ways in which literary historians traditionally periodize Latin poetry, particularly, but not only, the division between Republican or Triumviral literature and Augustan. Several of the best-known and most influential works of Augustan poetry were produced in the 20s BC, which is to say, in the first decade after the Battle of Actium; and these reflect the overwhelming importance of Augustus’ victories as confirming his pre- eminence.7 In this sense, Actium would seem to serve as the essential point of transition between the end of Triumviral disorder and the inauguration of a new age. But representations of Actium in this period tend to forget that Augustus’ real opponent in this battle was his fellow triumvir, Marcus Antonius—i.e. that Augustus’ glorious victory was the decisive battle in a civil war. Instead of recalling this uncomfortable fact, monuments and poems insistently (p.4) allude to or name Cleopatra as the defeated party, converting Actium in memory into a victory over a foreign power.8 In this as in other ways, the poets of the 20s seem eager to forget the recent past and to begin anew, even if the very concept of beginning anew seems inconsistent with that of a restored Republic, which itself makes sense only with reference to a period of civil disturbance and not to a foreign war.9 But on the other hand, it is possible to argue that many elements often considered as hallmarks of ‘Augustan’ literary culture were actually very much in place in the poetry that was being produced several years before Actium. This is true whether we think primarily of social and semi-institutional elements, such as Maecenas’ cultivation of an elite literary sodality, or of characteristic themes that these poets share, such as the idea of a golden age and the tendentious construction of literary genealogy, or, certainly, of the exacting standards of taste and refinement that these poets all exemplify. In all of these ways, if we focus on the careers of the poets rather than that of Augustus, we cannot ignore certain continuities between their pre- and post- Actian selves.10 Just as a pre-Actian dating for Livy has highly important implications both for our understanding of the nature of his whole project and the true extent of his influence on contemporary literary production, so the recent dating of Propertius’ first book to 33 BC has profound implications for Page 3 of 18