ebook img

Attachment Of A Microcaddisfly (Trichoptera : Hydroptilidae) Pupa To The Leg Of A Water Scorpion, Ranatra Buenoi (Heteroptera : Nepidae) PDF

3 Pages·2002·0.96 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Attachment Of A Microcaddisfly (Trichoptera : Hydroptilidae) Pupa To The Leg Of A Water Scorpion, Ranatra Buenoi (Heteroptera : Nepidae)

Vol. 113, No. 4, September&October, 2002 267 ATTACHMENT OF A MICROCADDISFLY (TRICHOPTERA: HYDROPTILIDAE) PUPA TO THE LEG OF A WATER SCORPION, RANATRA ££/£AW(HETEROPTERA: NEPIDAE) 1 DavidE. Bowles^,Jason L. Loekliiw ABSTRACT:Amicrocaddisflypupa(Trichoptera: Oxyethira)wasfoundattachedtothelegofa predatory water scorpion (Hemiptera: Ranatra). Other reported instances ofOxyethira pupae attachingtoaquaticinsectsindicatethisbehaviormaybecommonforthisgenus.Thebehavioral mechanismsthatpermittedthemicrocaddisflytoattachitselftothewaterscoipionwithoutbeing attackedareunknown. The caddisfly genus Oxyethira, (Trichoptera: Hydroptilidae), is distrib- utedworldwideandapproximately40species areknownfromNorthAmerica (Wiggins 1996). MoultonandStewart(1997) reported 17 species ofOxyethira occurinTexas.Thewaterscorpion,RanatrabuenoiHungerford(Heteroptera: Nepidae),iswidelydistributedinthesoutheasternU.S.,includingTexas (Sites and Polhemus 1994). Recently, we collected aR. buenoinymph to which an early pupa ofOxyethira was firmly attached on the left metathoracic femur (Fig. 1). Both ends ofthe formerlarval case had been attached to the nepid's leg, the ends were sealed, andapolysis ofthe larval cuticlewas evident. How- ever, ecdysis had not yet occurred and the early, pharate pupa could be dis- mm cernedthroughtheold larvalcuticle. Thelengthofthepupawas2.8 (case 3.2mm) and theR. buenoiwas16.5 mm in length (headto apex ofrespiratory siphons). The specimens were hand collected on 14 June 1999 in a stream W pool ofDry Creek, Montgomery County, Texas (N 30° 14' 19.8" 95° 19' 21.6"). In addition, 17 fifth instar Oxyethira larvae and two adult R. buenoi mm were collected with a benthic sampling net (600 mesh) at the same loca- tion and sampling date. Larvae formost species ofOxyethira have not been associatedwith adultstages sowewereunable to determinethe specific iden- tity ofthese specimens. WhiteandFox(1979) foundseveralpupalcasesofOxyethiraaztecaMosely that were fastened to a dragonfly nymph, Macromia georgiana (Sel.), col- lected from a South Carolina stream. Our finding of Oxyethira pupating on anotheraquatic insect suggests that such behaviormay be fairly common for this genus. Oxyethira azteca also commonly occurs throughout most ofeast- ernTexas,andthespecimenswecollectedcouldrepresentthisspecies.Whether this instance represents directed phoresy or is a more random action is un- 1 ReceivedJanuary28,2002. AcceptedFebruary23,2002. 2TexasParksandWildlifeDepartment,P.O. Box 1685,San Marcos,Texas 78667. 3 DepartmentofBiology, SouthwestTexas StateUniversity,SanMarcos,Texas 78666. ENT. NEWS 113(4): 267-269,September&October, 2002 268 ENTOMOLOGICALNEWS '^Ksi"i''ft**** Figure 1. A waterscoipion,Randtra buenoi Hungerford, witha microcaddisfly (Oxyethria sp.) attachedtothemetathoracic femur. known. Thepossibility exists that the caddisfly mayhavemistaken the leg of the water scorpion to be a twig or similar inanimate object. White and Fox (1979)suggestedthattheattachmentofOxyethirapupaetothedragonflynymph theycollectedwas relatedto thepaucityofnaturalhabitatandsuitableattach- ment sites in the channelized stream they studied. This was not the circum- stance for the present study location because the flowing stream contained ample woody debris and riparian vegetation. Althoughtheproboscisofthewaterscoipionwecollectedis incloseprox- imity to themicrocaddisfly, thebodyofthe latterwas fully intactandhadnot been pierced. The closeness ofthe nepid's proboscis to apotential food item suggests thatmicrocaddisflies mightnotplay a role in the diet ofthesepreda- tory insects orthat itwas unable orunwilling to attackthe larva as itattached itselfprior to pupation. Also, the nepid simply could have been unaware that the caddisfly was present. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS WethankRobertW. Sites,SharonKnightJasper,andanonymousreviewers forcomment- ingonanearlierdraftofthispaper.KarimAzizandGaryCaldwellassistedwithpreparationof thephotograph. Vol. 113, No. 4, September& October, 2002 269 LITERATURE CITED Moulton, S. R., Ill, and K. W. Stewart. 1997. A preliminary checklist ofTexas caddisflies (Trichoptera). Pp.349-353,InR.W. HolzenthalandO.S.Flint,Jr. [editors], Proceedingsof the 8th International SymposiumonTrichoptera, 1995, Ohio Biol. Surv., Columbus. Sites, R. W.,andJ. T. Polhemus. 1994. Nepidae(Hemiptera)oftheUnitedStatesandCanada. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:27-42. White,T. R., and R. C. Fox. 1979. Chironomid (Diptera) larvae and hydroptilid (Trichoptera) pupae attachedto a macromiid nymph (Anisoptera). Notulae Odonatologicae 1:76-77. Wiggins, G. B. 1996. Larvae ofthe North American caddisfly genera (Trichoptera), 2nd ed. Univ. ofToronto Press,Toronto.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.