DiseaseMarkers30(2011)197–212 197 DOI10.3233/DMA-2011-0775 IOSPress Associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the adiponectin gene with adiponectin levels and cardio-metabolic risk factors in patients with cancer a a b a RashaMazenAlKhaldi ,FahdAlMulla ,ShafikaAlAwadhi ,KusumKapila and a,∗ OlusegunA.Mojiminiyi aDepartmentofPathology,KuwaitUniversity,Safat,Kuwait bDepartmentofMedicine,FacultyofMedicine,KuwaitUniversity,Safat,Kuwait Abstract.Objectives: Theaimsofthisstudyareto(1)studytheinfluenceofpolymorphismsinadiponectingeneonadiponectin levelsandpotentialassociationswithbreast,prostateandcoloncancer;(2)investigatetheassociationsofadiponectinlevelswith otheradipokinesandbreast,prostateandcoloncancers. Subjects: Wemeasuredfastingadiponectin,leptin,insulin,Sexsteroidsin132(66females,66males)cancerpatientsand68age andsexmatchedapparentlyhealthysubjects. BodyMassIndex(BMI)andwaistcircumferencewereusedasindicesofobesity. InsulinResistancewasassessedusingHomeostasisModelAssessment(HOMA).Threesinglenucleotidepolymorphisms(SNP rs182052 (G-10066-A), SNPrs1501299 (276G >T),SNPrs224176 (45T>G)inadiponectin genewerestudied usingReal TimePolymeraseChainReaction. Results: GGgenotypeofSNPrs1501299wassignificantlyassociatedwithhigherlevelsofadiponectin(OR=1.2,95%CI(1.03– 1.3), p = 0.02); breast (OR= 8.6, 95%CI(1.03–71), p = 0.04), colon cancers (OR= 12, 95%CI(1.2–115), p = 0.03). GT genotypewasalsoassociatedsignificantlywithcoloncancer(OR=2.6,95%CI(1.1–6),p=0.03). HoweverSNPrs224176was associatedwithonlybreastcancer. Conclusion: OurresultsdemonstratethatadiponectingeneSNPrs1501299andSNPrs224176maybethepredisposingfactorsin somecancersbutourresultsdifferfromwhathasbeenreportedinotherpopulationssuggestingacomplexrelationshipbetween geneticvariationsandphenotypicadiponectinlevels. Keywords:Adiponectingene,SNPs,cancer,insulinresistance,adipokines ListofAbbreviations SHBG SexHormoneBindingGlobulin HOMA Homeostasismodelassessment DNA Deoxyribonucleicacid RNA Ribonucleicacid SNPs SingleNucleotidePolymorphisms AD AllelicDiscrimination KCCC KuwaitCancerControlCenter CI ConfidenceInterval BMI BodyMassIndex OR OddsRatio ELISA EnzymeLinkedImmunosorbentAssay ANOVA One-wayanalysisofvariance FSH FollicleStimulatingHormone SPSS StatisticalPackageforSocialSciences LH Luteinizinghormone mRNA messengerribosenucleicacid 1. Introduction ∗Corresponding author: Dr. O.A. Mojiminiyi, Department of There is emergingevidence that adipokinesare as- Pathology, FacultyofMedicineKuwaitUniversity, POBox24923 sociatedwithseveraltypesofobesityrelatedcancers. Safat,Kuwait,Code13110.Tel.:+96525319476;E-mail:segunade @yahoo.com. Adiponectin is an adipokine that is involved in the ISSN0278-0240/11/$27.502011–IOSPressandtheauthors. Allrightsreserved 198 R.M.AlKhaldietal./AssociationsofadiponectingeneSNPsincancer control of glucose, fat metabolism and insulin sen- resistance. Data of association analysis of these two sitivity with anti-diabetic, anti-atherogenic and anti- previouslymentionedSNPs havebeeninconsistentin inflammatory activities [1]. In addition to its func- differentpopulations. Forexample,astudyinGerman tionasaninsulinsensitizinghormone,adiponectinmay population has shown significant association of 45T playaroleintheregulationofcellgrowthanddeath[2, > G variant with obesity and insulin sensitivity [15] 3]. It inhibits proliferation of cell through selective- whereas a Japanese study found no such association lybindingandsequesteringthegrowthfactorssuchas withthesameSNP[13]. PlateletDerivedGrowthFactor(PDGF),Basicfibrob- Ontheotherhand,Haraetal.,observedanassocia- last growth factor and other factors, thus suppressing tionbetweenSNPsatpositions45and276andType2 their interaction with membrane receptors. Further- diabetesintheJapanesepopulation[12]. Haraandcol- more, adiponectin has been suggested to inhibit the leagues reported that subjects with the G/G genotype activationofnuclearfactorkappa-light-chain-enhancer atposition45ortheG/Ggenotype,atposition276had ofactivatedBcells(NF-κB),atranscriptionfactorthat a significantly increased risk of type 2 diabetes com- isinvolvedininitiatingsurvivalsignalingpathway[3]. paredwiththosehavingtheT/Tgenotypeatpositions Adiponectin also promotes apoptosis through activa- 45 and 276, respectively, indeed more than 40% of tion of a cascade of caspases −8, −9 and −3, which JapaneseindividualshavethehighriskG/Ggenotype leads to cell death. Hence, it has been proposed that which makes subjects genetically prone to decreased adiponectinisananti-canceradipokinethathasprotec- adiponectinlevels[12]. tiverolesagainstcarcinogenesis. Inanotherstudy,GalleleofSNPrs224176andG/G Lowlevelsofadiponectinhavebeenfoundinanum- genotypeofSNPrs1501299wereassociatedwithim- berofobesityrelatedcancersaswellascancersasso- paired glucose tolerance in Spanish population [16]. ciatedwithinsulinresistance[4]suchasbreast[5–7], The study has also reported that the G/G genotype prostate [8] and colon [9]. It has been suggestedthat for SNP rs1501299 was associated with lower serum reducedlevelsofadiponectinleadtothedevelopment adiponectinlevelscomparedtoG/TandT/Tgenotype ofinsulinresistanceandcompensatorychronichyper- andhence suggestingthatSNP rs1501299may affect inuslinemia which in turn lead to reduced liver syn- theexpressionofadiponectin[16].Reportsontheasso- thesis of IGFBP1 and IGFBP2. As a result levels of ciationsoftheseSNPshavealsobeeninconsistentand, bioavailableIGF1increasesfavoringthedevelopment inagreementwithreportsfromJapanese[13]andGer- oftumors. Inparallel,chronichyperinuslinemiadown man[17]populations,theGalleleofSNPrs224176did regulates the hepatic synthesis of SHBG, thereby in- notresultinanychangeinadiponectinconcentrations creasingfreesexhormones. Inaddition,lowlevelsof intheSpanishpopulation[15]. adiponectin may probably up-regulate fatty acid syn- Astheassociationsofthesecommonlystudiedpoly- thase(FAS) a keylipogenicenzymethathasbeenas- morphisms in the adiponectin gene with the risk of sociated with breast, prostate and colon cancers [10]. obesity related cancershave not been established and A novel signaling pathway linking adiponectin with publisheddataonotherassociationshavebeenincon- carcinogenesis is JNK pathway. This belongs to the sistent, the aims of this study are to (1) investigate mammalian mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinase theassociationbetweenadiponectinconcentrationand family that acts as a stimulator for different survival other adipokines and breast, prostate and colon can- signalingpathwaysincludingtumordevelopment[11]. cers, (2) study the influence of polymorphismsin the Figure 1, summarizesthe mechanismsthroughwhich adiponectin gene on adiponectin levels and potential obesityrelatedcancerscouldbemediated. associationswithbreast,prostateandcoloncancers. Screeningoftheadiponectinencodinggenehasled to the discovery of genetic variants and single nu- cleotide polymorphisms(SNPs) that have been found 2. Materialsandmethods to be associated with reduced circulating levels of adiponectin, Type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance and 2.1. Patientsandcontrols obesity[12–14]. TwocommonSNPshavebeenstud- ied extensively in the literature the substitution of T As part of the protocol approved by local ethical toGinexon245T>G (rs2241766)andsubstitution committeeinaccordancewiththeethicalstandardsin of G to T in intron 2 276G > T (rs1501299) along Helsinki declaration, we obtained fasting blood sam- withtheirassociationwithdiabetes,obesityandinsulin ples from 132 (66 females, 66 males) cancer patients R.M.AlKhaldietal./AssociationsofadiponectingeneSNPsincancer 199 Fig.1.Mechanismsthroughwhichobesityrelatedcancercouldbemediated. whowererecruitedfromKuwaitCancerControlCenter cumference(cm)atthefemoralgreatertrochanterand (KCCC).Thediagnosisofcancerwasmadeonclinical themaximalglutealprotuberancewerealsotaken. All basis, radiological findings and histological findings. anthropometric measurements were taken at the time Patientswererecruitedimmediatelyafterdiagnosisand ofsubject’senrollmentandblooddraw. beforestartingtreatment. Sixtyeight(34femalesand 34males)ageandsexmatchedapparentlyhealthyvol- 2.3. Laboratoryanalysis unteerswereenrolledfromKuwaitBloodBankCenter. Exclusioncriteriaincludedrefusaltoparticipateinthe Plasma adiponectin concentrations were measured studyaswellasthepresenceofotherendocrinedisease byEnzymeLinkedImmunosorbentAssay(ELISA)Kit (Diabetes, heart failure, renal failure) or ingestion of (HumanAdiponectinELISAKit,LincoResearch,Mis- anymedication(suchasthiazolidinedione)thataffects souri,USA).Theassaysensitivityis2ng/mL.Intra-and adiponectin,hormonesorlipidprofileatthetimeofthe Interassaycoefficientsofvariationwere4%and4.1% study. Patients with previoushistory of othercancers respectivelyatadiponectinconcentrationof7μg/mL. and recent history (within the previous 1–6 months) Plasma leptin was measured by using the (DSL-10- of weight gain or loss of 5% or more of their current 23100ACTIVEHumanLeptinELISAkit). Theassay weightwerealsoexcludedfromthestudy. sensitivity is 0.05 ng/mL, whereas the intra and inter assay coefficients of variation were 3% and 3.3% re- 2.2. Anthropometricmeasurements spectively at leptin concentration of 23 ng/mL. Lev- elsofFollicularStimulatingHormone(FSH),Luteiniz- Body weight (Kg) was measured in light clothing ing Hormone (LH), Total Testosterone and Sex Hor- without shoes and height (cm) was measured with a mone Binding Globulin (SHBG) were determined by stadiometer. Subsequently body mass index (BMI) usingIMMULITE1000Kits(SiemensHealthcareDi- (Kg/m2)wascalculatedaccordingtothefollowingfor- agnostics, Deerfield, USA). Fasting plasma glucose mula: BMI=Weight(Kg)/Height(m2). Waistcircum- was analyzed on an automated analyzer (Beckman ference(cm)attheleveloftheumbilicusandhipcir- DXC, Beckman Corporation, Brea, CA, USA) and 200 R.M.AlKhaldietal./AssociationsofadiponectingeneSNPsincancer Table1 Demographic,anthropometricandbiochemicalcharacteristicsofthestudypopulation Parameter Cancerpatients(n=132) Controls(n=68) p-Value TypeofCancer Breast(n=60) Prostate(n=14) Colon(n=58) Age(years) 49±2.4 59±8.7 53±7.7 60±5.2 NS BMI(Kg/m2) 28.8±4.1 27.7±3 27.9±6 26.0±3 NS WC(cm) 102±15 108±14 106±14 102.5±9 NS Systolicbloodpressure(mmHg) 131±20 131±20 131±20 130±12 NS Diastolicbloodpressure(mmHg) 80.6±6 80.6±6 80.6±6 81±8 NS Plasmaglucose(mmol/L) 6.8±6 6.8±2 7.3±1.7 5.8±0.5 <0.0001 TotalCholesterol(mmol/L) 6±1 7.1±2 5.6±1 6.6±1.1 NS HDL(mmol/L) 1.2±0.5 1.4±0.9 1.3±0.4 1.2±0.07 NS LDL(mmol/L) 3.9±2 4.9±1 3.7±1 4.4±0.6 NS Adiponectin(µg/mL) 8.45±4 10.4±3 8.6±4 4.1±2 <0.0001 Insulin(µIU/mL) 13±4.8 10.73±6 10.4±8.6 11.0±1.5 <0.0001 HOMA 4.3±0.4 3.4±0.5 3.3±0.2 3.0±0.7 <0.0001 BMI=BodyMassIndex,WC=WaistCircumference,HOMA=HomeostasisModelAssessment. fasting serum insulin was determined by an enzyme- izedbylogtransformationtouseparametrictests. De- linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (DSL-10-1600 scriptive statistics namely mean ± SD and 95% con- ACTIVE, Diagnostics Systems Laboratories, Texas, fidence interval(CI) were used as appropriate. Com- USA).HomeostasisModelAssessment(HOMA)was parison between mean values in the 2 groups (Pa- usedasanassessmentforinsulinresistancebyusingthe tients and Controls) was evaluated using student’s t HOMA-IR=glucose(mmol/L)Xinsulin(μIU/mL)/by test. Spearmancorrelationcoefficientwasusedtode- 22.5. scribe the associations between continuous variables of interest; the partial correlation analyses were used 2.4. DNAisolation to control for the effects of age, sex and BMI. The association between adiponectin genotypes and can- NucleospinBloodKit(Macherey-Nagel,Neumann- cer risk was determined by calculating the odds ratio Neader, Germany) was used to extract Deoxyribonu- (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using multi- cleic acid (DNA) from citrated bloodsamples, which variateand binarylogistic regressionwith adjustment providedan expectedyield range of 4–6 μg of DNA. fortheconfoundingeffectsofage, sexand BMI. The OnceDNAwasisolated,theDNAquantityandquality relationship between adiponectin, genotypesand bio- werecheckedusingaspectrophotometer. chemical findings were evaluated by one-way anal- ysis of variance (ANOVA). All the statistical analy- 2.5. Genotypingofpolymorphismsinadiponectin ses were performed with the Statistical Package for gene Social Sciences (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA), version 16.0. Thecriterionforstatisticalsignificancewasp< AllelicDiscrimination(AD)ofadiponectingenein 0.05. Hardy-WeinbergEquilibriumwasusedtoevalu- 200 samples was done by using 7500 fast Real Time ate the allele frequenciesusing the followingfacility: PolymeraseChainReaction(AppliedBiosystems,Fos- www.oege.org/software[18]. The powerof the study ter City, California, USA). SNPs were chosen based wascalculatedusingthefollowingfacility: http://hed- on the most commonly reported in the literature and wig.mgh.harvard.edu/samplesize/size.html[19]. The using Applied Biosystems SNP browser version 3.5. SPSSsoftwarewasalsousedtorecodeforeachcom- Three SNPs were studied as follows: SNP G-10066- bination. A (rs182052) in intron 1, SNP 276G>T (rs1501299) in intron 2, SNP 45T>G (rs224176) in exon 2. The selection of the SNPs was based on previous studies 3. Results showingassociationwithcancerinotherpopulation. 3.1. Demographic,anthropometricandbiochemical 2.6. Statisticalanalysis characteristicsofthestudypopulation Data were tested for normality using Kolmogorov Table1summarizesthedemographic,anthropomet- Smirnovtest. Non-parametricvariableswerenormal- ricandbiochemicalcharacteristicsofthestudypopula- 202 R.M.AlKhaldietal./AssociationsofadiponectingeneSNPsincancer Fig.2. Differences inadiponectin concentration according toHOMAindex. Thebarsrepresentthe95%confidenceinterval ofadiponectin concentrationandthecirclewithinthebarsrepresentsthemean. tion. Atotalof132(66femalesand66males)patients cer patients had significantly higher (p < 0.0001) with breast, prostate and colon cancer and 68 (34 fe- insulin levels and significantly higher (p < 0.0001) malesand34males)apparentlyhealthysubjectswere HOMAindexasshowninTable2. includedinthisstudy. 3.3.1. Stratificationofthestudypopulationaccording 3.2. Adiponectin tothesex Table 2 demonstrates the differences between obe- Table 2 demonstrates a significant difference in sity related parameters in control and patient groups levels of adiponectin in control and patient groups. of women and men respectively. We found a signifi- Cancer patients had significantly (p < 0.0001) high- cantdifferencein levelsofadiponectinin controland er adiponectinconcentrationsthan apparentlyhealthy patientgroupsoffemalesandmalesrespectively. Fe- subjects. Based on BMI and HOMA-sub grouping, malecancerpatientshadsignificantly(p=0.03)higher levelsofadiponectinwerelowerinobesethaninnon- adiponectinconcentrationsthandoapparentlyhealthy obesesubjects(6.9±4.1μg/mLvs.7.9μg/mL)(p = subjects. Inmalecancerpatientslevelsofadiponectin 0.03). Inaddition,insulinsensitivesubjects(HOMA< were significantly higher (p < 0.0001)than in appar- 2) had higheradiponectinlevelsthan insulin resistant entlyhealthysubjects. subjects (HOMA > 2) (Fig. 2). Adiponectinshowed sexualdimorphisminapparentlyhealthysubjects,with 3.3.2. Insulinandinsulinresistance female subjectshaving higheradiponectinlevelsthan Significant differences in insulin and HOMA were malesubjects(p < 0.0001)(Fig.3). However,Fig.3 foundbetween patientand controlgroupsof females. demonstratesthatthissexualdimorphismdisappeared Female cancer patients had significantly higher (p < incancerpatients(p>0.05). 0.0001) insulin levels and significantly higher (p = 0.008) HOMA index as shown in Table 2. Further- 3.3. Insulinandinsulinresistance more,therewasasignificantdifference(p<0.0001)in insulinandHOMAbetweencontrolandpatientgroups Significant differences in insulin and HOMA were of males. Males with cancer had significantly higher foundbetweenpatientandcontrolgroups;indeedcan- (p < 0.0001) serum insulin levels and subsequently R.M.AlKhaldietal./AssociationsofadiponectingeneSNPsincancer 203 Fig.3.SexualDimorphismofadiponectininthestudysubjects. Thebarsrepresentthe95%confidenceintervalofadiponectinconcentrationand thecirclewithinthebarsrepresentsthemean. significantlyhigherHOMAindexthandocontrolmale ly with estradiol but with BMI, waist circumference, subjects(Table2). insulin, HOMA and total testosterone. Total testos- teronecorrelatedpositivelywithwaist circumference, 3.3.3. Hormonaldifferencesbetweenpatientsand insulin levels and HOMA indexwhereasit correlated controls negativelywithadiponectinandestradiol. Femalecancerpatientshadsignificantlyhigher(p< Afteradjustmentforage,sexandBMI,adiponectin 0.0001)testosteronelevelsthandoapparentlyhealthy correlatedpositivelywithestradiolandnegativelywith female subjects as shown in Table 2. On the other insulinlevels,HOMAindexandtestosterone(Table4) hand,malecancerpatientshadsignificantlyhigher(p< indicating that the correlations between adiponectin 0.0001)estradiol levelsthan do male controlsubjects and these variables are independent of age, sex and asappearsinTable2. However,malecontrolsubjects BMI. hadsignificantlyhigher(p<0.0001)testosteronelev- els than do male cancer patientsas shown in Table 2. 3.3.5. Prevalenceratesofadiponectingenotypesin AsshowninTable2,levelsofFSHandLHinfemale thestudypopulation cancerpatientsweresignificantlyhigher(p<0.0001) Table5summarizestheprevalenceratesofadiponec- than female control subjects. Similar trend was ob- tingenotypeswhichwereinHardy-Weinbergequilib- served in male subgroups of patients and controls as riumamongthestudypopulation. shownin Table 2. Althoughpatientsgroups(females and males) have higher SHBG levels than apparently 3.3.6. Anthropometricandbiochemical healthysubjects,thedifferenceswerenotsignificantas characteristicsaccordingtoadiponectin showninTable2. genotypes Although no significant difference (p > 0.05) was 3.3.4. Correlationbetweenvariables observedinBMIamongadiponectingenotypesofSNP Table3presentstheresultsofSpearmanrankcorre- rs182052, homozygouscarriers of G/G allele had the lationsbetweenthevariablesofinterestinallsubjects highestBMI(30±7.4Kg/m2)followedbyA/Ageno- (patientsandcontrols).InsulinlevelsandHOMAindex types (29.8 ± 5 Kg/m2) and A/G genotypes (25.6 ± correlated positively and significantly with BMI and 5.8 Kg/m2). In contrast, the highest waist circumfer- Waistcircumference. Adiponectincorrelatedpositive- encewasfoundinhomozygouscarriersofA/A geno- 204 R.M.AlKhaldietal./AssociationsofadiponectingeneSNPsincancer Table3 Spearman’srankcorrelationsofvariablesofinterestamongallsubjects AGE BMI WC INS HOMA ADIPO E2 TES AGE r 1 BMI r 0.05 1 WC r 0.2∗∗∗ 0.5∗∗∗∗ 1 INS r 0.06 0.3∗∗∗∗ 0.3∗∗∗∗ 1 HOMA r 0.07 0.3 0.3 0.9∗∗∗∗ 1 ADIPO r −0.1∗ −0.1∗ −0.2∗∗ −0.2∗∗∗∗ −0.2∗∗∗∗ 1 E2 r 0.08 −0.07 0.02 −0.2 −0.2 0.2 1 TES r 0.09 −0.03 0.1 0.2∗∗∗∗ 0.1∗∗ −0.2∗∗ −0.2∗∗ 1 ∗p<0.05,∗∗p<0.01,∗∗∗p<0.001,∗∗∗∗p<0.0001,No∗=NoSignificance. Age= years, BMI= Body Mass Index (Kg/m2), WC= Waist Circumference (cm), INS = Insulin (µIU/mL),HOMA=HomeostasisModelAssessment,ADIPO=Adiponectin(µg/mL),E2=Estradiol (pg/mL),TES=Testosterone(ng/dL). Table4 Partialcorrelationcoefficientsamongsubjectsaftercorrectionforage,sex andBMI WC INS HOMA ADIPO E2 TES WC r 1 INS r 0.2 1 HOMA r 0.2 0.9∗∗∗∗ 1 ADIPO r 0.08 −0.3∗ −0.3∗ 1 E2 r 0.08 −0.1 −0.08 0.3∗∗∗∗ 1 TES r 0.04 0.03 −0.01 −0.4∗∗∗∗ −0.2∗ 1 ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, No ∗ = No Significance. Age=years, BMI=BodyMassIndex (Kg/m2), WC=WaistCircum- ference(cm),INS=Insulin(µIU/mL),HOMA=HomeostasisModelAs- sessment,ADIPO=Adiponectin(µg/mL),E2=Estradiol(pg/mL),TES =Testosterone(ng/dL). types(104.2±14.2cm)ofSNPrs182052,followedby Homozygous carriers of the G allele of SNP G/G (103.1± 16.2cm) and A/G genotypes(101.9± rs182052tendedtohaveloweradiponectinlevelsthan 12.6cm). However,thedifferencesdidnotreachsta- carriers of (A/A) or (A/G) genotypes [(G/G: 4.7 ± tistical significance (p > 0.05). There was also no 2μg/mL,A/A:5.5±3μg/mL,A/G:6.9±3.7μg/mL)] significantdifferenceinBMIandwaistcircumference but this differences were not significant. Among the betweentheSNPrs1501299andSNPrs2241766geno- genotypes of SNP rs2241766, homozygous carriers types indicating that variations in anthropometric in- of the G alleles had the highest levels of adiponectin dices are not related to genetic polymorphismsin the comparedwiththeothergenotypesasfollows: [(G/G: adiponectingene. 7.7±1.8μg/mL,T/T:6.8±4.1μg/mL,G/T:6.6± 4.1μg/mL)].Althoughvariationsininsulin,leptinand othervariableswereobservedamonggenotypesofSNP 3.3.7. Variationofadiponectinandotherobesity rs182052andSNPrs2241766,thedifferenceswerenot relatedparameterswithadiponectingenotypes statisticallysignificant,hence,datanotshown. inbothpatientsandcontrols Thereweresignificantdifferencesinadiponectinlev- 3.3.8. Adiponectingenotypesandmultivariatelinear els in SNP rs1501299 genotypes (Table 6). Table 6 regressionresults: showsthathomozygouscarriersof T allele (T/T)had Using multivariatelogistic regressionanalysiswith the lowest concentration of adiponectin compared to inclusionofageandsexasconfounders,wefoundthat theG/GorT/Ggenotypes. InsulinlevelsandHOMA (GG) genotype of SNP rs1501299 was significantly indexalsovariedsignificantlyamongSNPrs1501299 associated with levels of adiponectin (B = 0.2, p = genotypesasshowninTable6. Althoughleptinlevels 0.013)asshowninTable7. Alsohomozygouscarriers variedamonggenotypesofSNPrs1501299,thediffer- ofG allelearemorelikelytohavehigheradiponectin enceswerenotsignificant. levelsthan(T/T)or(T/G)genotypesofSNPrs1501299 R.M.AlKhaldietal./AssociationsofadiponectingeneSNPsincancer 205 Table5 Thedistributionofadiponectingenotypeswithinthestudypopulation Adiponectingenotype Numberofcontrols(n=68) Numberofpatients(n=132) SNPrs182052 AA 4(5.9%) 8(6.1%) AG 52(76.5%) 101(76.5%) GG 12(17.6%) 23(17.4%) SNPrs1501299 TT 46(67.6%) 63(47.73%) GT 21(30.9%) 55(41.67%) GG∗ 1(1.5%) 14(10.61%) SNPrs2241766 TT 50(73.5%) 84(63.64%) TG 18(26.5%) 43(32.58%) GG None 5(3.79%) TOTAL 68(100%) 132(100%) ∗SignificantDifferenceinthedistributionofGGgenotypebetweencontrolsandpatients. (OR = 1.2, 95%CI (1.0–1.3), p = 0.02). We also been evidence that the link between obesity and risk foundthatthisgenotypeisassociatedwithlowerinsulin of cancer is due, in part, to obesity-associated reduc- levels (OR = 0.8, 95%CI (0.8–0.9), p = 0.03). But tionincirculatingadiponectinlevels[23]. Tothebest thisgenotypewasnotfoundtobeassociatedwithany ofourknowledgemostofthestudieshaveshownthat parameters of obesity (BMI or waist circumference). cancerpatientshadloweradiponectinlevelscompared SNPrs2241766andSNPrs182052genotypeswerenot to their apparently healthy control subjects. Mant- foundtobeassociatedwithindicesofobesity,insulin zoresandcolleagues,haveshownthatlowercirculating resistanceandadiponectin(Table7). Usingbinarylo- adiponectin levels are associated with increased risk gisticregressionanalysiswithinclusionofageandsex ofbreastcancer[5,6]Furthermore,adiponectinlevels as confounders, SNP rs1501299was significantly as- havebeendemonstratedtobelowerinprostatecancer sociatedwithcancerinallpatients(OR=2.195%CI patients compared to benign prostatic hyperplasia or (1.3–3.6),p=0.004)asshowninTable8. Specifically healthycontrolsubjectsandinverselyassociatedwith GGgenotypewasstronglyassociatedwithcancerde- histologicalgradeandGleasonscore[24]. Ontheother velopment(OR=9.3,95%CI(1.2–73,p=0.04)inall hand,Biallargeonetal.,foundnoassociationbetween patients. Itisalsoassociatedwiththedevelopmentof adipokines,adiponectininparticularandprostatecan- breastcancer(OR=8.5,95%CI(1.03–71),p =0.04) cer [25]. One prospective nested case control study andcoloncancer(OR=12.0,95%CI(1.2–115),p = reportedthatplasmaadiponectinlevelswereinversely 0.03). SNPrs2241766wasassociatedwithbreastcan- associatedwiththeriskofcolorectalcancerinmen[9]. cer(OR=2.1,95%CI(1.1–4.1),p=0.03)butnotwith Findingsinthisstudycameasasurprisebecausewe prostateandcoloncancers. Wehavecorrectedforcon- were expecting to find lower adiponectin in associa- founderssuchasage, BMIandgender,aswealso in- tionwithobesityrelatedcancersasreportedinstudies cludedadiponectinasaconfounder,resultsdidnotdif- from other populationsmentioned earlier. Therefore, ferindicatingthattheassociationbetweenadiponectin ourfindingsof significantlyhigheradiponectinin pa- SNPswithobesityrelatedcancersisindependentofage tientswithcancerareatvariancewithotherpublished andsex. However,Table8showsthattheassociation studies. Ourresultscouldbeexplainedbyanumberof between GG genotype of SNP rs1501299 and breast factors. Firstofallitispertinenttonotethattheasso- cancer is dependenton age, adiponectin levels, BMI, ciationsofadiponectinwithobesityandobesityrelated andsex. factorssuchasinsulinresistanceareinagreementwith what is expected from published studies. For exam- ple,adiponectinwasinverselycorrelatedwithmarkers 4. Discussion of obesity BMI and waist circumferenceas shown in Tables3 and 4. Adiponectinalso showed the expect- Severalpublishedstudieshaveshownanassociation ed significant inverse relationships with insulin resis- betweenobesityandriskofdevelopingprostate,breast tance and insulin levels as shown in Tables 3 and 4. and colon cancers [20–22]. Additionally, there has BasedonHOMA sub-grouping,insulinsensitivesub- R.M.AlKhaldietal./AssociationsofadiponectingeneSNPsincancer 209 jects(HOMA<2)hadhigheradiponectinlevelsthan significantlyassociatedwithindicesofobesityinsharp insulin resistant subjects (HOMA > 2) as shown in contrasttoreportsfromotherpopulations. Astudyin Fig.2. HispanicfamiliesreportedthatSNPrs182052wasas- The higher levels of adiponectin in cancer patient sociatedwithfourofsixobesitymeasurements(BMI, groupscouldbeduetoslightlylower(butsignificant) Waist, WHR, subcutaneous fat) [17] and Yang et al., waist circumference in the patient group particularly (2007)reportedthatGalleleofSNPrs1501299wasas- in male cancer patients as shown in Table 2. Circu- sociatedwithreducedriskofobesity[32]. Inaddition, lating adiponectinin this study has been shown to be SNPrs2241766,eitherindependently[31]orasahap- negativelycorrelatedmoresignificantlywithwaistcir- lotypetogetherwithSNPrs1501299[15],wasstrongly cumferencethanBMIinagreementwithotherprevious associated with obesity and insulin resistance in non- studies[26,27]. Asestradiolcorrelatedpositivelywith diabetic German and Italian Caucasians. However, adiponectin,anotherimportantfactorthatcouldexplain thereareinconsistentresultsfromvariouspopulations thehighlevelsofadiponectininmalecancerpatientsis astheseassociationswerenotfoundinFrench[14]and thesignificantlylowertestosteroneandrelativelyhigh- Swedish [34] populations suggesting high variability erestradiollevelswhichinturncouldresultinincreased inphenotypicexpressionamongdifferentpopulations. productionof adiponectinin male cancer patients. In Thelackofsignificantassociationbetweenthestudied relationtosexsteroids,thefindingsinfemalesarediffi- SNPsandindicesofobesityisreflectedintheirlackof culttoexplain,femalecancerpatientshadsignificantly significantassociationswithleptin(Table6). higher testosterone levels which is expected to result Inthisstudy,thedifferencesincirculatingadiponec- in loweradiponectinlevelsdueto the factthattestos- tinbetweengenotypesofSNPrs182052werenotsta- teronesuppressesadiponectinproductionandalsolim- tisticallysignificant. Thismaybeexplainedbythefact its the production of HWM adiponectin in vivo and thatSNPrs182052isanintronicSNPthatmaynotaf- inculturedadipocytes[28–30]. However,thereis the fectthe proteinproductof adiponectingene. Howev- possibilitythattheeffectoftestosteroneonadiponectin er, we havealso foundthatthe G/G genotypeofSNP is differentin males and females. More significantly, rs1501299 resulted in higher serum adiponectin lev- females with cancer had higher estradiol due to their els. Our findings are in contrast with results report- higherBMIwhichcouldresultinhigherrateofperiph- ed in Japanese and Spanish populations that showed eralaromatization. Thus,itishighlyprobablethatthe lower adiponectin levels in G allele carriers of SNP effectofestradiolonincreasingcirculatingadiponectin rs1501299[13,14]. The mechanism by which the in- overrides a tendency of higher testosterone to reduce tronicSNPrs1501299canaffecttheexpressionlevelof adiponectin. Obviously,sexsteroidsplayaroleinreg- thegeneandincreasecirculatingadiponectincouldbe ulation of adiponectin levels and the regulation could explainedbyseveralfactors. Itmightbeduetoaspecif- differinmenandwomen. iclinkagestructureoritmayactwithcertainenviron- Discrepanciesbetweenourresultsandpreviousstud- mentalfactors and ultimately affectthe expression of iescouldalsobeexplainedbyethnic/racialdifferences; thegene(gene-environmentalinteraction). Onestudy indeedpreviousstudieswereconductedonpopulations has indicated that SNP rs1501299 is in moderate to fromUSA,EuropeandJapan. Geneticstudieshaveas- strong Linkage Disequilibrium with several polymor- sociatedseveraladiponectingenepolymorphismswith phismssuchasinsertion/deletion+2019placedinthe3 adiponectin levels, obesity, insulin resistance, Type un-translatedregion(UTR)–aregionwhichhasbeen 2diabetes,hypertensionandcardiovasculardiseasesin showntoplayaroleinthecontrolofgeneexpression somebutnotallstudies[12–14]. Inthisstudywehave by binding proteins that regulate mRNA processing, found that SNP 276G > T was significantly associ- translationordegradation[33]. Ontheotherhand,we ated with cancer in all patients while SNP rs2241766 showedthatneitherTnorGallelesofSNPrs2241766 wasassociatedwithbreastcancerbutnotwithprostate resulted in any change in adiponectin concentrations. andcoloncancers. Furthermore,incontrastwithwhat As SNP rs2241766 is a silent substitution (GGT → hasbeenreportedinotherpopulations,the(GG)geno- GGG),itmayindicatethatthisvariantdoesnotaffect type of rs1501299 was significantly associated with the expression of the gene. Our findings agree with higher levels of adiponectin and rs2241766 and SNP reportsfromJapaneseandGermanpopulations[11,28] rs182052 genotypes were not found to be associated which found no association between SNP rs2241766 with adiponectin,indicesof obesity andinsulin resis- and adiponectin but at variance with Menzaghiet al., tance. All the SNPs evaluated in this study were not whoshowedassociationofinsulinresistancewiththe 210 R.M.AlKhaldietal./AssociationsofadiponectingeneSNPsincancer Tallelewithdecreasedserumadiponectinlevels[37]. firmedbyotherstudies,therecouldbeaparadigmshift The conflicting association results in various popula- in the belief that adiponectin SNPs that cause higher tionssuggestacomplexrelationshipbetweenvariations adiponectinlevelsareassociatedwithdecreasedriskof in the adiponectin gene and phenotypic adiponectin cancer. levels. Thiscouldexplainthe differencebetweenour There are some limitations to this study. Although studyandthatofKaklamanietal.,whofoundincreased thenumberofstudysubjectsgivesthestudyastatisti- breast cancer risk in adiponectin gene SNPS that are calpowerof90%todetectthechangesinadiponectin associatedwithloweradiponectinlevelsanddecreased levels,thenumberofsubjectswithcertaingenotypesis riskofcancerwithSNPsthatincreaseadiponectinlev- smallandstudiesinlargerpopulationsarerequiredto els [37]. In this study we found a significant asso- confirmourfindings. Theassayusedinthisstudyiden- ciation between SNP rs1501299and cancer in all pa- tifiestotaladiponectinandcannotdistinguishbetween tients, breast, and colon cancer as shown in Table 8. the adiponectin isoforms, high- and low-molecular- Our finding of an association between an adiponetin weight complexes which may have different biolog- gene SNP that causes higher adiponectin and cancer ical activities. Studies have also shown that post- deserves further prospective association studies. It is translationalmodificationssuchasglycosylationatly- unlikelythatcancer-relatedweightlosscouldbeafac- sine residues located in the collagenous domain of tor in our patients since none of the patients reported adiponectin are major determinants of the biological significantweightloss. ThestudybyKaklamanietal., activityofadiponectin[41,42]. wasretrospectiveanddidnotincludedataontheBMI In conclusion, several adiponectin polymorphisms as well as other obesity-related metabolic parameters have beenshown to influenceadiponectinlevels[12– thatcouldinterferewiththegenotypeeffect[37]. 14]. To date, few studies explored the association of Discrepancies between our study and other associ- adiponectin polymorphisms with obesity related can- ation studies could also be explained by ethnic/racial cers. Our study has shown that the genetic polymor- differencesanditispossiblethatcertainallelesactually phism SNP rs1501299 is an important genetic regu- havedifferentfunctionsindifferentpopulations. Fur- lator that results in increased adiponectin levels and, thermore,differentSNPsinadiponectingenecangive paradoxically,maybethepredisposingfactorinthese rise to more than one allelic messenger ribose nucle- patients. Furtherstudieswill be necessary to confirm icacid(mRNA)formswhichinturnpossessdifferent theroleofSNPrs1501299andSNPrs2241766inthe biological functions as a result of differences in pri- developmentofobesityrelatedcancers. maryorhigherorderstructuresthatinteractwith oth- ercellularcomponents[38]. Therecentfindingofin- creasedlevelsoftissueadiponectininbreastcancerpa- Acknowledgment tientscomparedtocontrolsgivesfurthersupporttoour findingof an association between an SNP thatcauses higher adiponectin levels and cancer [39]. The study The financial supportreceived from the College of by Karaduman et al., also reported that, women with Graduate Studies (Research Administration grant – highlevelsoftissueadiponectinareatincreasedriskof YM11/07) and Kuwait Foundation for the Advance- developingbreastcancer than womenwith low tissue ment of Science grant number (2006-1302-05)is ac- adiponectinlevels [39]. Another recent study has re- knowledged.WeacknowledgecontributionoftheGen- portedthatserumadiponectinlevelswerehigherinad- eralFacilityKUProject(GM01/05). vancedthanorganconfinedprostatecancer[40]. This study also reported that adiponectin could be used as atumormarkertodifferentiatebetweenadvancedand ConflictofInterest localized stages of prostate cancer [40]. It is highly probablethat patients with advancedstages of cancer Noconflictofinterest. couldhavehighercirculatingadiponectinespeciallyif the cancer cells produce adiponectin. However there arenostudiesthathaveevaluatedtissueexpressionof adiponectininrelationtocirculatingadiponectinlevels Genesdiscussed and no studies have evaluatedadiponectinproduction fromtumorcells as a potentialtumormarker. Ifcon- Adiponectin-encodinggene: ADIPOQOrACDC
Description: