ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION OF FARM ANIMALS CONTRIBUTORS JOHN VI. BARTLETT, Ph.D., Professor of Dairy Husbandry, Rut gers University, and Dairy Husbandman, New Jersey State Agricultural EXPfriment Station VICTOR BERLINER, Ph.D., formerly Professor of Animal Hus bandry, Mississippi State College of Agriculture JOSEPH EDWARDS, D.Sc., Cambridge University, Chairman, Pro duction Division, Milk Marketing Board, England J. A. HENDERSON, D.V.M., Head, Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario P. M.Sc., Profes~or of Poultry' Husbandry, Mas FRED JEFFREY, sachusetts State College ELLIS P. LEONARD, B.S., ,D.V.M., Professor and Head, Depart ment of Therapeutics and Small Animal Diseases, Director of Small Animal Clinic, Cornell University J. PERRY, B.Sc., M.A., Extension Professor of Dairy Hus ENOS bandry, Rutgers University RALPH P. REECE, Ph.D., Professor of Dairy Husbandry, Rutgers University, and Research Specialist, New Jersey State Agricultural Experiment Station CLAIR E. TERRILL, Ph.D., Animal Husbandman, UUlted States Sheep Experiment Station and Western Sheep Breeding Laboratory, Dubois, Idaho The Artificial Insemination "- of Farm Animals ENOS J. PERRY, Editor JOHN W. BARTLETT . JOSEPH EDWARDS CLAIR E. TERRILL . VICTOR BERLINER FRED P. JEFFREY· ELLIS P. LEONARD J. A. HENDERSON . RALPH P. REECE SECONb REVISED EDITION New Brunswick RUTGERS UNIVERSITY PRESS 1955 COPYRIGHT 1945 AND 1947 BY THE TRUSTEES OF RUTGERS COLLEGE IN NEW JERSEY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FIRST PRINTING, APRIL, 1945 SECOND PRINTING, OCTOBER, 1945 THIRD PRINTING, JUNE, 1946 REVISED EDITION, JUNE, 1947 SECOND REVISED EDITION, NOVEMBER, 1952 SECOND PRINTING, SECOND REVISED EDITION, FEBRUARY, 1955 MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE VAIL-BALLOU PRESS, BINGHAMTON, NEW YORK CONllENTS 1 HISTORICAL 3 ENOS J. PERRY 2 ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS 9 ENOS J. PERRY 3 THE ORGANS OF REPRODUCTION 13 JOSEPH EDWARDS 4 THE ROLE OF HORMONES IN REPRODUCTION 30 RALPH P. REECE- 5 GENERAL INFORMATION 65 ENOS J. PERRY 6 FACTORS INFLUENCING THE QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF SEMEN 87 ENOS J. PERRY 7 CATTLE , 103 ENOS J. PERRY 8 SHEEP AND GOATS 143 CLAIR E. TERRILL 9 HORSES AND JACKSTOCK 169 VICTOR BERLINER lO BIRDS 197 FRED P. JEFFREY 11 SWINE 210 ENOS J. PERRY 12 DOGS 216 ELLIS P. LEONARD VI Contents 13 WE MUST BREED BETTER LIVESTOCK 224 JOI;IN W. BARTLETT 14 SYSTEMS OF BREEDING 243 JOHN W. BARTLETT 15 SELECTION OF. SIRES 261 JOHN W. BARTLETT 16 ARTIFICIAL BJ-lEEDING ORGANIZATIONS 280 ENOS J. PERRY 17 THE SHIPPING ,OF SEMEN 307 ENOS J. PERRY 18 DISEASE IN RELATION TO ARTIFICIAL IN- SEMINATION 312 J. A. HENDERSON 19 FEEDING AND MANAGEMENT OF SIRES 323 JOHN W. BARTLETT INDEX 335 ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION OF FARM ANIMALS Chapter ~ , HISTORICAL ENOS J. PERRY THE FIRST SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH in..artificial insemination of do rpestic animals was conducted by the Italian physiologist. L., Spallanzani, in 1780. He had attained success with several amphibious animals when he decided to experiment on vivip arous species, using the dog first. Dogs were confined in Spal lanzani's house, and after a lapse of twenty days the bitch mani fested obvious signs of being in heat. Then with semen at body temperature she was artificially inseminated, the semen being deposited directly into the uterus with a pOinted syringe. Sixty two days folloWing insemination the bitch gave birth to three pups, all of which resembled not only the mother but also the dog from which the semen had been taken. In 1782 Spallan z~'s experiment was successfully repeated by P. Bossi ancl checked by Professor Branchi. These experiments proved, the feasibility of inducing pregnancy by artificial insemination, with the resultant birth of normal offspring. Spallanzani further discovered that the fertilizing power of semen resided in the sperm carried by the spermatic fluid. When the semen was filtered, the liquid that passed through was sterile, but the residue on the filter was high in fertilizing capacity. His discoveries gave rise to intensive investigations of the sex cells and the physiology of fertilization, but these studies did not, as one might have expected, stimulate any fur ther developments in artificial insemination for a long time. In fact, it was not until the latter part of the ninete~nth century that new experiments were undertaken both in Europe and America. Concerning research, W. Heape, of England, reported that a dog breeder, Everett Millais, between 1884 and 1896 art i- 3 4 . The Artificial Insemination of Farm Animals ficially insemipated a total of nineteen bitches, of which fifteen produced young. Heape wrote that in the light of this work it appears that ·artificial insemination is easy, that conception is as readily induced in that way as by normal coitus, and that a single ejaculation serves several bitches. He claimed that the method could be llsed to cross different dog breeds whose natu ral mating is impossible because of difference in size, and sug gested the plan as a means of studying genetic and telegonic factors. Heape also referred to research with mares, in which the object was to overcome sterility. Pearson, professor of vet erinary medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, wrote to Heape, statin that he and some other veterinarians had been successfu in the artificial inseminati n 0 mares on anum er of arms. In Europe, Plbnnis had artificially inseminated a bitch in 1876, an undertaking repeated by Albrecht in 1894 to investi gate problems in telegony, which at that time held the un divided attention of breeders of domestic animals. Artificial in st_mination was first used in European horse breeding in 1890 when the French veterinarian Repiguet advised its use as a ~ of overcoming sterility ~ In the studs of several European countries the percentage_ pf'conceptions obtained was very low, so investigations for the purpose of improving this condition were then begun. IIofessor~offman of Stuttgart recommended th~use of s~plementary artificial insemination follOWing natu ral mating. He wrote: "In any rationally conducted horse breed ing attempt it is necessary, as soon after copulation as possible, to introduce the sperm present directly into the uterus throug~ the uterus orifice." He gave a detailed description of his tech niques and the instruments necessary. After the stallion covered the mare, the semen depOSited in the vagina was collected from a depression in the lower vaginal wall with the aid of a specu lum and spoon. The semen was then sucked up with a special syringe, diluted with cow's milk, and injected into the uterus. He ,contended that the transference of semen to other mares was not a matter of practical importance, and left studies in tha~ field to others. In Denmark during this same period Sand and
Description: