ebook img

Art as Advocacy. Exploring curatorial practice by learning disabled artists as PDF

139 Pages·2017·0.94 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Art as Advocacy. Exploring curatorial practice by learning disabled artists as

Art  as  Advocacy.   Exploring  curatorial  practice  by  learning  disabled  artists     as  a  site  for  self-­‐advocacy.       Jade  French     The  University  of  Leeds     School  of  Fine  Art,  History  of  Art  and  Cultural  Studies           October  2017         1 The  candidate  confirms  that  the  work  submitted  is  her  own  and  that  appropriate  credit  has  been   given  where  reference  has  been  made  to  the  work  of  others.     This   copy   has   been   supplied   on   the   understanding   that   it   is   copyright   material   and   that   no   quotation  from  the  thesis  may  be  published  without  proper  acknowledgement.     The  right  of  Jade  French  to  be  identified  as  Author  of  this  work  has  been  asserted  by  her  in   accordance  with  the  Copyright,  Designs  and  Patents  Act  1988.     ©  2017  The  University  of  Leeds  and  Jade  French           2 Acknowledgements       I  would  like  to  extend  thanks  to  the  many  people  who  so  generously  contributed  to,  and  supported   the  work  presented  in  this  thesis.     Firstly,  I  would  like  to  thank  the  curators  -­‐  Leah  Jones,  Hannah  Bellass,  Tony  Caroll,  Diana  Disley  and   Eddie  Rauer,  the  artists  -­‐  James  Harper,  Mark  Simmonds  and  Alaena  Turner,  and  support  -­‐  Abi   Burrows  and  Donna  Bellass,  for  their  generous  insight,  hard  work  and  unwavering  commitment   during  this  project.  They  attended  a  year’s  worth  of  weekly  workshops  with  enthusiasm,  and  I  really   could  not  have  done  this  research  without  them.  Their  passion  for  both  the  arts  and  advocacy   remains  a  source  of  inspiration  to  me.     I  would  like  to  also  thank  my  brilliant  supervisory  team  -­‐  Helen  Graham,  Mal  Hampson,  Bec  Fearon   and  Emma  Rushton.  My  PhD  has  been  a  truly  amazing  experience  and  I  believe  this  is  mostly  down   to  the  fantastic  support  I  received.  I  thank  them  wholeheartedly  for  their  generous  time  and   encouragement,  and  for  also  giving  me  so  many  wonderful  opportunities  along  the  way.  Special   mention  to  Helen  Graham  for  her  tremendous  academic  support,  from  enabling  me  to  pursue  the   PhD  scholarship  to  writing  this  thesis.  Thank  you,  thank  you,  thank  you.     Many  thanks  to  the  staff  at  all  the  partner  organisations  -­‐  Halton  Speak  Out,  Bluecoat,  University  of   Leeds  -­‐  who  contributed  time  and  welcomed  me  into  their  places  of  work.       This  project  would  also  not  have  been  carried  out  without  financial  support.  A  big  thank  you  to  the   Arts  and  Humanities  Research  Council  for  selecting  this  project  for  scholarship,  the  Arts  Council   England   for   contributing   to   the   exhibitions   costs,   and   the   White   Rose   College   of   Arts   and   Humanities  who  have  personally  supported  me  to  attend  a  range  of  training  and  international   conferences  to  disseminate  this  work.  I  am  so  grateful  for  the  experiences  their  contributions  have   afforded  me.     Finally,  but  by  no  means  least,  thank  you  to  my  family  and  friends.  Melaneia  -­‐  thank  you  for  the   many  conversations  and  words  of  encouragement,  Andy  -­‐  thanks  for  listening  (and  for  the  brews).         3 Abstract         Over  the  past  40  years  within  the  UK  the  concept  of  self-­‐advocacy  has  gained  momentum  by   enabling  learning  disabled  people  to  speak  out  in  order  to  affect  change.  In  the  same  period,   inclusive  approaches  have  been  taken  up  both  in  research  and  in  the  arts,  reflecting  a  growing   recognition  of  learning  disabled  people  as  researchers,  artists,  performers  and  communicators.  Yet   curation  has  rarely  been  used  as  an  inclusive  practice  and  then  principally  in  museums  dealing  with   history  rather  than  in  the  context  of  art  galleries.       Via  a  practice-­‐led  research  approach,  Art  as  Advocacy  addressed  this  gap  by  exploring  the  potential   for  curatorial  practice  by  learning  disabled  artists  to  act  as  a  site  for  self-­‐advocacy.  It  brought   together  members  of  self-­‐advocacy  group  Halton  Speak  Out  and  members  of  Bluecoat's  inclusive   arts   project   Blue   Room,   to   curate   a   visual   arts   exhibition   titled   Auto   Agents.   These   curators   developed  an  exhibition  theme,  collaborated  with  artists,  commissioned  new  artwork  and  designed   accessible  interpretation  for  audiences.     Through  curating  Auto  Agents,  the  purpose  of  this  research  has  been  to  produce  a  rich  account  of   the  ways  in  which  curatorial  and  self-­‐advocacy  practices  intersect.  This  intersection,  whereby  tools   found   in   self-­‐advocacy   were   carried   over   into   curatorship,   provided   new   methodologies   that   enabled  curating  to  become  an  inclusive  practice.  This  attention  to  process  results  not  only  in   curating  becoming  more  usable  by  more  people,  but  also  more  transparent  and  rigorous.  By   achieving  this,  this  research  delineates  to  understanding  the  processes  and  practices  by  which  our   cultural  spaces  can  become  democratised.                   4 Table  of  Contents     Introduction  ................................................................................................................................  8   Summary  ...........................................................................................................................................  10   Thesis  Structure  ................................................................................................................................  11   Data  Collection  ..................................................................................................................................  13   Ethical  Approval  and  Informed  Consent  ..........................................................................................  13   Project  Website  .................................................................................................................................  15   The  Cast  ....................................................................................................................................  16   Halton  Speak  Out  ..............................................................................................................................  16   Bluecoat  ............................................................................................................................................  16   Curator:  Hannah  Bellass  ...................................................................................................................  17   Curator:  Tony  Carrol  .........................................................................................................................  18   Curator:  Diana  Disley  ........................................................................................................................  18   Curator:  Leah  Jones  ..........................................................................................................................  18   Curator:  Eddie  Raurer  .......................................................................................................................  19   Artist:  James  Harper  .........................................................................................................................  19   Artist:  Mark  Simmonds  .....................................................................................................................  19   Artist:  Alaena  Turner  .........................................................................................................................  20   Support:  Abi  Burrows  ........................................................................................................................  20   Support:  Donna  Bellass  .....................................................................................................................  20   Act  1:  Prologue  ..........................................................................................................................  21   Setting  the  Scene:  Inclusive  Arts  ......................................................................................................  22   The  Self-­‐Advocate  .....................................................................................................................  31   Citizens  Not  Victims  ..........................................................................................................................  31   ‘Speaking  Out’  ...................................................................................................................................  34   Autonomy…  It’s  Complicated  ...........................................................................................................  38   The  Curator  ...............................................................................................................................  41   The  ‘Autonomous’  Curator?  .............................................................................................................  41   No  Curator  Is  An  Island  .....................................................................................................................  45   Curator  as  Commissioner  .................................................................................................................  48   Is  Everybody  a  Curator?  ....................................................................................................................  49   Act  2:  So,  What  Is  A  Curator  Anyway?  .......................................................................................  52   Visiting  Galleries  and  Museums  ........................................................................................................  53   Reflecting  On  Visits  Together  ...........................................................................................................  61   An  Exhibition  Theme  Emerges  ..........................................................................................................  65   Act  3:  The  Commissioners  and  The  Commissioned  .....................................................................  73     5 Building  Networks  .............................................................................................................................  73   Selecting  Artists  .................................................................................................................................  76   Developing  the  Commissions  ...........................................................................................................  83   Including  Existing  Artwork  ................................................................................................................  93   Act  4:  Auto  Agents  .....................................................................................................................  96   That  Goes  There  ................................................................................................................................  96   Reimagining  Interpretation  ..............................................................................................................  99   The  Show  Must  Go  On  ....................................................................................................................  103   James  Harper:  Meet  at  the  Tree  .....................................................................................................  106   Mark  Simmonds:  Book  ....................................................................................................................  107   Alaena  Turner:  Secret  Action  Paintings  ..........................................................................................  108   Engagement  Events  ........................................................................................................................  109   Auto  Agents  at  The  Brindley  ...........................................................................................................  113   Act  5:  Epilogue  ........................................................................................................................  115   Bibliography  ............................................................................................................................  118   Appendix  .................................................................................................................................  139   James  Harper:  Meet  At  The  Tree  ....................................................................................................  139   Mark  Simmonds:  Book  ....................................................................................................................  139   Alaena  Turner:  Secret  Action  Paintings  ..........................................................................................  139                   6 List  of  Scenes       Act  2:  So,  What  Is  A  Curator  Anyway?    .......................................................................................  52   Scene  1:  So,  What  Is  A  Curator  Anyway?    ........................................................................................  52   Scene  2:  The  Fella  With  The  Scissors    ...............................................................................................  57   Scene  3:  It’s  Fate!  That  Funny  Word  Again………………………………………………………………………………...  67   Act  3:  The  Commissioners  and  The  Commissioned  .....................................................................  73   Scene  1:  What  About  Joe?    ...............................................................................................................  81   Scene  2:  But  We  Chose  Him?  ...........................................................................................................  86   Scene  3:  It’s  Complicated    .................................................................................................................  92   Act  4:  Auto  Agents  .....................................................................................................................  96   Scene  1:  Curator  to  Curator  ..............................................................................................................  96   Scene  2:  Black  Hat    ..........................................................................................................................  105   Scene  3:  The  Elephant  Man  ............................................................................................................  111         7 Introduction       “I  went  from  an  artist  who  makes  things  to  an  artist  who  makes  things  happen”  (Deller,  2012).     I  am  an  artist-­‐facilitator  who  has  been  running  participatory  and  inclusive  arts  projects  since  2009.   During  this  time,  I  have  worked  almost  exclusively  alongside  learning  disabled  people  to  explore  the   intersections  of  art,  disability  and  social  change,  often  examining  constructs  of  access,  agency  and   inclusion.  My  work  has  primarily  taken  the  form  of  art  exhibitions  and  workshop  programmes  but  I   have  also  produced  a  number  of  collaborative  book  projects,  films  and  zines.  As  this  type  of  work   typically  involves  vast  networks  of  people,  places,  organisations  and  institutions,  it  has  a  myriad  of   possible  labels.  Whilst  I  choose  to  describe  myself  as  an  artist-­‐facilitator,  this  practice  is  also  akin  to   that  of  an  inclusive  artist,  relational  artist,  community  artist,  collaborative  artist,  participatory  artist   and  socially-­‐engaged  artist  to  name  a  few  of  the  possible  descriptors.         My  label  of  choice  ‘artist-­‐facilitator’  is  used  to  define  an  artist  whose  role  requires  them  to  enable   others,  often  acting  as  a  mediator,  translator,  catalyst  and  synergist.  At  the  core  of  this  practice   artist-­‐facilitators  use  their  own  “knowledge  and  skills  to  facilitate  and  enable  other’s  creativity”   (Pringle,  2011,  p.  37),  often  employing  creative  ways  of  looking  at  and  engaging  with  art  through  a   process   that   is   active,   experiential   and   one   that   has   the   capacity   to   scaffold   learning.   When   effective,  it  is  hoped  that  this  learning  is  mutually  beneficial  and  able  to  travel  beyond  ‘those  in  the   room’  to  stakeholders,  and  furthermore,  out  into  the  public  realm.         For  me,  the  journey  to  this  PhD  began  staring  into  the  window  of  a  temp  agency.  I  had  moved  to   London  in  2009  after  undertaking  a  photography  degree.  To  support  the  many  unpaid  internships   at  galleries  and  museums,  I  needed  easy,  flexible,  paid  work.  Do  you  need  flexible  working  hours?   Can  you  support  someone  with  everyday  tasks?  Can  you  offer  flexible  approaches  to  support?  Apply   Within.  Not  only  was  this  my  first  job  as  a  support  worker,  it  was  my  first  experience  of  learning   disabled  people  all  together.  Needless  to  say  the  job  wasn’t  easy,  but  it  was  unique  and  challenged   me  creatively  which  spurred  me  to  seek  out  more  opportunities  like  it.  A  year  or  so  later  I  began   working  for  a  self-­‐advocacy  organisation  and  was  asked  to  run  an  art  group,  and  so  my  two   seemingly  separate  lives  collided;  art  and  advocacy.       8 Eager  to  simultaneously  consolidate  and  unravel  this  practice  in  aim  to  think  more  critically  about   my  work,  in  2011  I  undertook  an  MA  in  Inclusive  Arts  Practice  at  the  University  of  Brighton.  During   my  MA,  which  focused  on  collaboration  and  studio  practices  in  the  context  of  learning  disability   arts,   I   discovered   that   there   was   little   engagement   with   curatorial   practices   in   inclusive   arts   contexts  and  specifically,  how  to  involve  learning  disabled  people  into  this  process.  This  concept   became  my  dissertation  project  for  which  I  facilitated  a  group  of  learning  disabled  women  from   Barnet  Mencap  to  curate  an  exhibition  in  East  London's  Hoxton  Arches,  titled  You  Are  Artists,  I  am   Curator  (2013),  laying  the  foundations  for  this  PhD  study.  For  my  MA  I  focused  on  what  practices   were  required  to  enable  this  group  to  curate.  But  it  quickly  became  apparent  that  there  was   potential   for   this   practice   to   speak   to   issues   of   self-­‐advocacy   and   potentially   contribute   new   approaches  to  curatorship.     After  my  MA  I  was  keen  to  continue  exploring  this  idea.  After  searching  for  funding  models  which   were  able  to  support  collaborative  research,  I  came  across  the  Arts  and  Humanities  Research   Council’s  Collaborative  Doctoral  Award  (CDA)  scheme  which  has  been  specifically  designed  to   support  collaborations  between  universities  and  non-­‐academic  organisations.  I  decided  to  instigate   an  application  and  began  by  contacting  a  self-­‐advocacy  group  I  had  previously  worked  with  called   Halton  Speak  Out.  As  well  as  fulfilling  many  of  the  usual  roles  of  a  traditional  self-­‐advocacy  group,   Halton  Speak  Out  also  runs  an  established  performing  arts  group  called  Ella  Together.  Ella  Together   has  a  clear  agenda  -­‐  via  public  performances  -­‐  in  using  the  arts  to  challenge  perceptions  of  its   largely  disabled  cohort.  This  resonated  strongly  with  my  research  interests  and  the  organisation   remains  keen  to  develop  this  strand  of  their  practice.       However,  as  the  focus  of  the  project  was  curation,  I  was  also  keen  to  collaborate  with  a  second   organisation  to  draw  in  additional  expertise  in  Inclusive  Arts  and  curatorial  practice,  ensuring  the   broadest  reach  and  impact  for  the  exhibition  and  research.  The  second  partner  I  approached  was   Bluecoat,  an  iconic  arts  space  in  Liverpool.  Bluecoat  was  approached  not  just  because  of  its  well-­‐ regarded  art  gallery  and  engagement  programme  but  primarily  because  of  Blue  Room,  an  award   winning  inclusive  arts  project  for  learning  disabled  people.  Whilst  the  Blue  Room  members  create  a   breadth  of  art  work,  they  had  yet  to  engage  with  curatorial  practices  which  presented  a  key  area  for   the  groups  development.     Helen  Graham,  Associate  Professor  in  the  School  of  Fine  Art,  History  of  Art  and  Cultural  Studies  at     9 the  University  of  Leeds  took  the  lead  in  supervising  along  with  Fine  Art  Lecturer  Emma  Rushton,  and   drawing  upon  these  partners’  expertise  resulted  in  a  successful  bid  in  March  2014.       Summary     Over  the  past  40  years  within  the  UK  the  concept  of  self-­‐advocacy  has  gained  momentum  by   enabling  learning  disabled  people  to  speak  out  in  order  to  affect  change.  In  the  same  period,   inclusive  approaches  have  been  taken  up  both  in  research  (Walmsley  and  Johnson,  2003)  and  in  the   arts,  reflecting  a  growing  recognition  of  learning  disabled  people  as  researchers,  artists,  performers   and  communicators.  Whilst  this  has  resulted  in  a  proliferation  of  work  by  learning  disabled  people   in  the  performing  and  visual  arts  (Fox  and  Macpherson,  2015),  curation  has  only  rarely  been   explored  and  then  principally  in  museums  dealing  with  history  (Open  University,  2008;  Museum  of   Liverpool,  2014;  Access  All  Areas,  2017)  rather  than  in  the  context  of  art  galleries.  This  gap  in  the   practice  led  me  to  develop  this  research;  Art  as  Advocacy.  Via  a  practice-­‐led  approach,  this  research   explores  the  potential  for  curatorship  by  learning  disabled  artists  to  act  as  a  site  for  self-­‐advocacy,   examining  whether  curating  can  be  an  effective  way  for  this  group  to  communicate  collective   political  concerns  out  into  the  public  realm.     Importantly,  Art  as  Advocacy  is  underpinned  by  collaborating  with  two  organisations:  Halton  Speak   Out  and  Bluecoat.  From  these  organisation’s  memberships  I  recruited  five  learning  disabled  people   who  had  all  applied  to  take  on  the  role  of  a  curator;  Hannah  Bellass  and  Leah  Jones  from  Halton   Speak   Out,   and   Tony   Carroll,   Diana   Disley   and   Eddie   Rauer   from   Bluecoat’s   Blue   Room.   By   strategically  recruiting  the  curators  from  both  of  these  organisations,  I  was  able  to  bring  together   knowledge  and  skills  in  self-­‐advocacy  into  dialogue  with  knowledge  and  skills  in  artistic  expression.   Once  the  research  team  was  in  place,  myself  plus  two  support  workers  met  the  curators  weekly  at   Bluecoat  over  the  course  of  a  year  in  order  to  curate  an  exhibition.     The  result  was  Auto  Agents,  a  visual  arts  exhibition  which  opened  at  Bluecoat  on  26th  November   2016  to  15th  January  2017,  and  then  went  on  to  be  displayed  at  The  Brindley  in  Halton  between  4th   March   and   15th   April   2017.   Significantly,   both   the   participatory   process   of   curating   and   the   exhibition  theme  itself  came  together  to  address  an  issue  that  is  at  the  heart  of  advancing  the  rights   of  learning  disabled  people;  autonomy.  Autonomy,  or  in  the  words  of  the  curators  “what  it  means     10

Description:
cited thesis that “curating should be understood as fine art” (2014, p. 83). While Spaid agrees that curatorial ideas offer (though only temporarily) a genuine contribution to the life of the artworks involved, she identifies a crucial distinction in that she considers curatorial ideas to “co
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.