Art as Advocacy. Exploring curatorial practice by learning disabled artists as a site for self-‐advocacy. Jade French The University of Leeds School of Fine Art, History of Art and Cultural Studies October 2017 1 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Jade French to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2017 The University of Leeds and Jade French 2 Acknowledgements I would like to extend thanks to the many people who so generously contributed to, and supported the work presented in this thesis. Firstly, I would like to thank the curators -‐ Leah Jones, Hannah Bellass, Tony Caroll, Diana Disley and Eddie Rauer, the artists -‐ James Harper, Mark Simmonds and Alaena Turner, and support -‐ Abi Burrows and Donna Bellass, for their generous insight, hard work and unwavering commitment during this project. They attended a year’s worth of weekly workshops with enthusiasm, and I really could not have done this research without them. Their passion for both the arts and advocacy remains a source of inspiration to me. I would like to also thank my brilliant supervisory team -‐ Helen Graham, Mal Hampson, Bec Fearon and Emma Rushton. My PhD has been a truly amazing experience and I believe this is mostly down to the fantastic support I received. I thank them wholeheartedly for their generous time and encouragement, and for also giving me so many wonderful opportunities along the way. Special mention to Helen Graham for her tremendous academic support, from enabling me to pursue the PhD scholarship to writing this thesis. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Many thanks to the staff at all the partner organisations -‐ Halton Speak Out, Bluecoat, University of Leeds -‐ who contributed time and welcomed me into their places of work. This project would also not have been carried out without financial support. A big thank you to the Arts and Humanities Research Council for selecting this project for scholarship, the Arts Council England for contributing to the exhibitions costs, and the White Rose College of Arts and Humanities who have personally supported me to attend a range of training and international conferences to disseminate this work. I am so grateful for the experiences their contributions have afforded me. Finally, but by no means least, thank you to my family and friends. Melaneia -‐ thank you for the many conversations and words of encouragement, Andy -‐ thanks for listening (and for the brews). 3 Abstract Over the past 40 years within the UK the concept of self-‐advocacy has gained momentum by enabling learning disabled people to speak out in order to affect change. In the same period, inclusive approaches have been taken up both in research and in the arts, reflecting a growing recognition of learning disabled people as researchers, artists, performers and communicators. Yet curation has rarely been used as an inclusive practice and then principally in museums dealing with history rather than in the context of art galleries. Via a practice-‐led research approach, Art as Advocacy addressed this gap by exploring the potential for curatorial practice by learning disabled artists to act as a site for self-‐advocacy. It brought together members of self-‐advocacy group Halton Speak Out and members of Bluecoat's inclusive arts project Blue Room, to curate a visual arts exhibition titled Auto Agents. These curators developed an exhibition theme, collaborated with artists, commissioned new artwork and designed accessible interpretation for audiences. Through curating Auto Agents, the purpose of this research has been to produce a rich account of the ways in which curatorial and self-‐advocacy practices intersect. This intersection, whereby tools found in self-‐advocacy were carried over into curatorship, provided new methodologies that enabled curating to become an inclusive practice. This attention to process results not only in curating becoming more usable by more people, but also more transparent and rigorous. By achieving this, this research delineates to understanding the processes and practices by which our cultural spaces can become democratised. 4 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 8 Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Thesis Structure ................................................................................................................................ 11 Data Collection .................................................................................................................................. 13 Ethical Approval and Informed Consent .......................................................................................... 13 Project Website ................................................................................................................................. 15 The Cast .................................................................................................................................... 16 Halton Speak Out .............................................................................................................................. 16 Bluecoat ............................................................................................................................................ 16 Curator: Hannah Bellass ................................................................................................................... 17 Curator: Tony Carrol ......................................................................................................................... 18 Curator: Diana Disley ........................................................................................................................ 18 Curator: Leah Jones .......................................................................................................................... 18 Curator: Eddie Raurer ....................................................................................................................... 19 Artist: James Harper ......................................................................................................................... 19 Artist: Mark Simmonds ..................................................................................................................... 19 Artist: Alaena Turner ......................................................................................................................... 20 Support: Abi Burrows ........................................................................................................................ 20 Support: Donna Bellass ..................................................................................................................... 20 Act 1: Prologue .......................................................................................................................... 21 Setting the Scene: Inclusive Arts ...................................................................................................... 22 The Self-‐Advocate ..................................................................................................................... 31 Citizens Not Victims .......................................................................................................................... 31 ‘Speaking Out’ ................................................................................................................................... 34 Autonomy… It’s Complicated ........................................................................................................... 38 The Curator ............................................................................................................................... 41 The ‘Autonomous’ Curator? ............................................................................................................. 41 No Curator Is An Island ..................................................................................................................... 45 Curator as Commissioner ................................................................................................................. 48 Is Everybody a Curator? .................................................................................................................... 49 Act 2: So, What Is A Curator Anyway? ....................................................................................... 52 Visiting Galleries and Museums ........................................................................................................ 53 Reflecting On Visits Together ........................................................................................................... 61 An Exhibition Theme Emerges .......................................................................................................... 65 Act 3: The Commissioners and The Commissioned ..................................................................... 73 5 Building Networks ............................................................................................................................. 73 Selecting Artists ................................................................................................................................. 76 Developing the Commissions ........................................................................................................... 83 Including Existing Artwork ................................................................................................................ 93 Act 4: Auto Agents ..................................................................................................................... 96 That Goes There ................................................................................................................................ 96 Reimagining Interpretation .............................................................................................................. 99 The Show Must Go On .................................................................................................................... 103 James Harper: Meet at the Tree ..................................................................................................... 106 Mark Simmonds: Book .................................................................................................................... 107 Alaena Turner: Secret Action Paintings .......................................................................................... 108 Engagement Events ........................................................................................................................ 109 Auto Agents at The Brindley ........................................................................................................... 113 Act 5: Epilogue ........................................................................................................................ 115 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................ 118 Appendix ................................................................................................................................. 139 James Harper: Meet At The Tree .................................................................................................... 139 Mark Simmonds: Book .................................................................................................................... 139 Alaena Turner: Secret Action Paintings .......................................................................................... 139 6 List of Scenes Act 2: So, What Is A Curator Anyway? ....................................................................................... 52 Scene 1: So, What Is A Curator Anyway? ........................................................................................ 52 Scene 2: The Fella With The Scissors ............................................................................................... 57 Scene 3: It’s Fate! That Funny Word Again………………………………………………………………………………... 67 Act 3: The Commissioners and The Commissioned ..................................................................... 73 Scene 1: What About Joe? ............................................................................................................... 81 Scene 2: But We Chose Him? ........................................................................................................... 86 Scene 3: It’s Complicated ................................................................................................................. 92 Act 4: Auto Agents ..................................................................................................................... 96 Scene 1: Curator to Curator .............................................................................................................. 96 Scene 2: Black Hat .......................................................................................................................... 105 Scene 3: The Elephant Man ............................................................................................................ 111 7 Introduction “I went from an artist who makes things to an artist who makes things happen” (Deller, 2012). I am an artist-‐facilitator who has been running participatory and inclusive arts projects since 2009. During this time, I have worked almost exclusively alongside learning disabled people to explore the intersections of art, disability and social change, often examining constructs of access, agency and inclusion. My work has primarily taken the form of art exhibitions and workshop programmes but I have also produced a number of collaborative book projects, films and zines. As this type of work typically involves vast networks of people, places, organisations and institutions, it has a myriad of possible labels. Whilst I choose to describe myself as an artist-‐facilitator, this practice is also akin to that of an inclusive artist, relational artist, community artist, collaborative artist, participatory artist and socially-‐engaged artist to name a few of the possible descriptors. My label of choice ‘artist-‐facilitator’ is used to define an artist whose role requires them to enable others, often acting as a mediator, translator, catalyst and synergist. At the core of this practice artist-‐facilitators use their own “knowledge and skills to facilitate and enable other’s creativity” (Pringle, 2011, p. 37), often employing creative ways of looking at and engaging with art through a process that is active, experiential and one that has the capacity to scaffold learning. When effective, it is hoped that this learning is mutually beneficial and able to travel beyond ‘those in the room’ to stakeholders, and furthermore, out into the public realm. For me, the journey to this PhD began staring into the window of a temp agency. I had moved to London in 2009 after undertaking a photography degree. To support the many unpaid internships at galleries and museums, I needed easy, flexible, paid work. Do you need flexible working hours? Can you support someone with everyday tasks? Can you offer flexible approaches to support? Apply Within. Not only was this my first job as a support worker, it was my first experience of learning disabled people all together. Needless to say the job wasn’t easy, but it was unique and challenged me creatively which spurred me to seek out more opportunities like it. A year or so later I began working for a self-‐advocacy organisation and was asked to run an art group, and so my two seemingly separate lives collided; art and advocacy. 8 Eager to simultaneously consolidate and unravel this practice in aim to think more critically about my work, in 2011 I undertook an MA in Inclusive Arts Practice at the University of Brighton. During my MA, which focused on collaboration and studio practices in the context of learning disability arts, I discovered that there was little engagement with curatorial practices in inclusive arts contexts and specifically, how to involve learning disabled people into this process. This concept became my dissertation project for which I facilitated a group of learning disabled women from Barnet Mencap to curate an exhibition in East London's Hoxton Arches, titled You Are Artists, I am Curator (2013), laying the foundations for this PhD study. For my MA I focused on what practices were required to enable this group to curate. But it quickly became apparent that there was potential for this practice to speak to issues of self-‐advocacy and potentially contribute new approaches to curatorship. After my MA I was keen to continue exploring this idea. After searching for funding models which were able to support collaborative research, I came across the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s Collaborative Doctoral Award (CDA) scheme which has been specifically designed to support collaborations between universities and non-‐academic organisations. I decided to instigate an application and began by contacting a self-‐advocacy group I had previously worked with called Halton Speak Out. As well as fulfilling many of the usual roles of a traditional self-‐advocacy group, Halton Speak Out also runs an established performing arts group called Ella Together. Ella Together has a clear agenda -‐ via public performances -‐ in using the arts to challenge perceptions of its largely disabled cohort. This resonated strongly with my research interests and the organisation remains keen to develop this strand of their practice. However, as the focus of the project was curation, I was also keen to collaborate with a second organisation to draw in additional expertise in Inclusive Arts and curatorial practice, ensuring the broadest reach and impact for the exhibition and research. The second partner I approached was Bluecoat, an iconic arts space in Liverpool. Bluecoat was approached not just because of its well-‐ regarded art gallery and engagement programme but primarily because of Blue Room, an award winning inclusive arts project for learning disabled people. Whilst the Blue Room members create a breadth of art work, they had yet to engage with curatorial practices which presented a key area for the groups development. Helen Graham, Associate Professor in the School of Fine Art, History of Art and Cultural Studies at 9 the University of Leeds took the lead in supervising along with Fine Art Lecturer Emma Rushton, and drawing upon these partners’ expertise resulted in a successful bid in March 2014. Summary Over the past 40 years within the UK the concept of self-‐advocacy has gained momentum by enabling learning disabled people to speak out in order to affect change. In the same period, inclusive approaches have been taken up both in research (Walmsley and Johnson, 2003) and in the arts, reflecting a growing recognition of learning disabled people as researchers, artists, performers and communicators. Whilst this has resulted in a proliferation of work by learning disabled people in the performing and visual arts (Fox and Macpherson, 2015), curation has only rarely been explored and then principally in museums dealing with history (Open University, 2008; Museum of Liverpool, 2014; Access All Areas, 2017) rather than in the context of art galleries. This gap in the practice led me to develop this research; Art as Advocacy. Via a practice-‐led approach, this research explores the potential for curatorship by learning disabled artists to act as a site for self-‐advocacy, examining whether curating can be an effective way for this group to communicate collective political concerns out into the public realm. Importantly, Art as Advocacy is underpinned by collaborating with two organisations: Halton Speak Out and Bluecoat. From these organisation’s memberships I recruited five learning disabled people who had all applied to take on the role of a curator; Hannah Bellass and Leah Jones from Halton Speak Out, and Tony Carroll, Diana Disley and Eddie Rauer from Bluecoat’s Blue Room. By strategically recruiting the curators from both of these organisations, I was able to bring together knowledge and skills in self-‐advocacy into dialogue with knowledge and skills in artistic expression. Once the research team was in place, myself plus two support workers met the curators weekly at Bluecoat over the course of a year in order to curate an exhibition. The result was Auto Agents, a visual arts exhibition which opened at Bluecoat on 26th November 2016 to 15th January 2017, and then went on to be displayed at The Brindley in Halton between 4th March and 15th April 2017. Significantly, both the participatory process of curating and the exhibition theme itself came together to address an issue that is at the heart of advancing the rights of learning disabled people; autonomy. Autonomy, or in the words of the curators “what it means 10
Description: