ARISTOTLE'S PRIOR AND POSTERIOR ANALYTICS APILTOTEI\OYL ANAI\YTIKA ARISTOTLE'S PRIOR AND POSTERIOR ANALYTICS A REVISED TEXT WITH INTRODUCTION AND COMMENTARY BY W. D. ROSS OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS Oxford University Press, Amen House, London E.C.4 GLASGOW NEW YORK TORONTO MELBOURNE WELLINGTON SOMBA Y CALCUTTA MADRAS KARACHI CAPE TOWN' JBADAN' NAIROS] ACCRA SINGAPORE FIRST EDITION 1949 REPRINTED LITHOGRAPHICALLY IN GREAT BRITAIN AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, OXFORD FROM CORRECTED SHEETS OF THE FIRST EDITION 1957 PREFACE IT is one hundred and five years since Waitz's edition of the Organon was published, and a commentator writing now has at his disposal a good deal that Waitz had not. The Berlin Academy has furnished him with a good text of the ancient Greek commentators. Heinrich Maier's Die Syllogistik des Aristoteles supplied what amounts to a full commentary on the Prior A nalytics. Professor Friedrich Solmsen has given us an original and challenging theory of the relation between the Prior A nalytics and the Posterior. Albrecht Becker has written a very acute book on the Aristotelian theory of the problematic syllogism. Other books, and articles too numerous to be mentioned here, have added their quota of com ment and suggestion. Among older books we have Zabarella's fine commentary on the Posterior Analytics, which Waitz seems not to have studied, and Pacius' commentary on the Organon, which Waitz studied less than it deserved. In editing the text, I have concentrated on the five oldest Greek manuscripts-Urbinas 35 (A), Marcianus 201 (B), Coislinianus 330 (C), Laurentianus 72.5 (d), and Ambrosianus 490 (olim L 93) (n). Of these I have collated the last (which has been unduly neglected) throughout in the original, and the third throughout in a photo graph. With regard to A, B, and d, I have studied in the original all the passages in which Waitz's report was obscure, and all those in which corruption might be suspected and it might be hoped that a new collation would bring new light. Mr. L. Minio has been good enough to lend me his report on the Greek text presupposed by two Syriac translations some centuries older than any of our Greek manuscripts of the Analytics, and a comparison of these with the Greek manuscripts has yielded interesting results; I wish to record my sincere thanks to him for his help, as well as to the librarians of the Bibliotheque Nationale, and of the Vatican, Marcian, Laurentian, and Ambrosian libraries. W.D.R. CONTENTS SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY ix INTRODUCTION I I. The Title and the Plan of the A nalytics 11. The Relation of the P"ior to the Posterior Analytics • 6 Ill. The Pure or Assertoric Syllogism 23 IV. The Modal Syllogism 40 V. Induction 47 VI. Demonstrative Science SI VII. The Second Book of the Posterio" Analytics 75 VIII. The Text of the Analytics 87 List of Manuscripts not included in the Sigla 93 SIGLA 98 ANALYTICS 99 Text and Critical apparatus 99 Conspectus of the contents 280 Table of the valid moods 286 ComIOenhuy 287 INDEXES Greek index 679 English index 688 SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY Aldine edition: Venice, 1495. Organum, ed. 1. Pacius: Frankfurt, 1592, etc. Aristotelis Opera, vol. i, ed. I. Bekker: Berlin. 1831. Organon, ed. T. Waitz, 2 vols.: Leipzig, 1844-6. PriQT Analytics, ed. and trans. H. Tredennick: London, and Cambridge. Mass., 1938. Analytica PriQTa, trans. A. J. Jenkinson, and Analytica PosteriQTa, trans. G. R. G. Mure: Oxford, 1928. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca: Alexander in Anal. Pr. I, ed. M. Wallies: Berlin, 1883. Themistius quae fertur in Anal. Pr. I Paraphrasis, ed. M. Wallies: Berlin, 1884- Ammonius in Anal. Pr. I, ed. M. Wallies: Berlin, 1899. Themistii in Anal. Post. 2 Paraphrasis, ed. M. Wallies: Berlin, 1900. Ioannes Philoponus in Anal. Pr., ed. M. Wallies: Berlin, 1905. Eustratius in Anal. Post. 2, ed. M. Hayduck: Berlin, 1907. Ioannes Philoponus in Anal. Post. and Anonymus in Anal. Post. 2, ed. M. Wallies: Berlin, 1909. Aquinas, St. Thomas, Comment. in Arist.libros Peri Hermeneias et Post. Anal.: Rome and Freiburg, 1882. Becker, A.: Die arist. TheQTie der MoglichkeitsschlUsse: Berlin, 1933. Bonitz, H.: Arist. Studien, 1-4, in Sitzungsb. der kaiserl. Akad. d. Wissen schajten, xxxix (1862), 183-280; xli (1863), 379-434; xlii (1863), 25-109; lii (1866), 347-423. Bywater, I.: Aristotelia: in J. oj Philol. 1888, 53. Calogero, G.: I Fondamenti della Logica Arist.: Florence, 1927. Colli, G.: Aristotele, Organon: Introduzione, traduzione e note. Turin, 1955. Einarson, B.: On certain Mathematical Terms in Arist.'s Logic: in A.].P. 1936. 33-54, 151-72. Friedmann, I.: Arist. Anal. bei den Syrern : Berlin, 1898. Furlani, G. : Il primo Libro dei Primi Anal. di Arist. nella versione siriaca di GiQTgio delle Nazioni, and Il secondo Libro, etc.: in Mem. Ace. Line., Cl. Sc. Mor., Ser. VI, vol. v. iii and VI. iii, 1935, 1937. Gohlke, P.: Die Entstehung der arist. Logik: Berlin, 1935. Heath, Sir T. L.: A History oj Greek Mathematics, 2 vols.: Oxford, 1921. Heath, Sir T. L.: A Manual ojGreek Mathematics: Oxford, 1931. Heiberg, J. L.: Mathematisches zu Arist.: in Abh. zur Ges<h. d. Mathem. Wissenschajten, 1904, 1-49. Kapp, E.: Greek Foundations oj Traditional Logic: New York, 1942. Lee, H. D. P.: Geometrical Method and Arist.'s Aceount oj First Principles: in Class. Quart. 1935, 1I3-Z9. Lukasiewicz, J.: Aristotle's Syllogistic jrom the Standpoint oj Modern FQTmal Logic: Oxford, 1951. Maier, H.: Die Syllogistik des Arist., 3 vols.: Tubingen, 1&,6-1900. Mansion, S.: Le Jugement d' existence chez Aristote: Louvain and Paris, 1946. Miller, J. W.: The Structure oj Arist. Logic: London, 1938. Nagy, A.: Contributo per la revisione del testo degli Anal.: in Rendic. Ace. Line., Cl. Sc. Mor., Ser. V, vol. viii, 1899, II4-29. x SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY Pacius, J.: Aristolelis Organon cum com~ntario analytico: Francofurti, 1597. Solmsen, F.: Die Entwicklung der ari~t. Logik und Rhetorik: Berlin, 1929. Solmsen, F.: 'The Discovery of the Syllogism', in Philos. Rev. 50 (1941), 410 ff. Stocks, J. L.: The Composition of Arist.'s Logical Works: in Class. Quart. 1933, II5-24· Waitz, T.: Varianten zu An·st. Organon: in Philol. 1857,726--34. Wallies, M.: Zur TextgeschichU der Erslen Anal.: in Rhein. Mw. 1917-18, 626--32· Wilson, J. Cook: Aristotelian Studies I: in Gottingische gelehrte Anzeiger, 1880 (1), 449-74. Wilson, J. Cook: On the Possibility of a Conception of the Enthymema earlier than that found in the Rhet. and the Pr. Anal.: in Trans. of the Oxford Philol. Soc. 1883-4, 5-{i. Zabarella, 1.: In duos Arist. Libros Post. Anal. Commmt.: Venice, 1582. Zabarella, 1.: Opera Logica: Venice, 1586. In the notes the Greek commentaries are referred to by the symbols Al., T., Am., P., E., An.