YALE CLASSICAL STUDIES YALE CLASSICAL STUDIES EDITED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICS by JEFFREY HENDERSON VOLUME XXVI ARISTOPHANES: ESS A TS IN INTERPRETA TION CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS CAMBRIDGE LONDON NEW YORK NEW ROCHELLE MELBOURNE SYDNEY CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521124669 © Cambridge University Press 1980 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 1980 This digitally printed version 2009 A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-521-23120-6 Hardback ISBN 978-0-521-12466-9 Paperback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Contents Introduction page vii Aristophanes' Acharnians i LOWELL EDMUNDS Aristophanes and Socrates on learning practical wisdom 43 MARTHA NUSSBAUM Aristophanes as a lyric poet 99 MICHAEL SILK Lysistrate: the play and its themes 153 JEFFREY HENDERSON War and peace in the comedy of Aristophanes 219 HANS-JOACHIM NEWIGER Introduction No special justification is needed for a new collection of interpretive essays on Aristophanes: of all the major writers of the fifth century he is surely (at least in the English-speaking world) one of the most neglected by classicists. The absence of up-to-date texts and commentaries for most of the plays exacerbates the problem. As anyone who has tried to teach Aristophanes in Greek or in translation will attest, the task of making the plays available to students is beset by many formidable problems not encountered in the case of other Greek authors. Aristophanes is a comic playwright composing in a defunct and often alien mode about topical subjects only imperfectly intelligible to a distant posterity. An ancient tragedian, historian, philosopher or orator has at least the advantage of writing in forms either still viable or made much more viable by extensive scholarly and critical exegesis. It seems to me that as a result an unfortunate trend has developed: Aristophanes, despite his own insistence to the contrary and despite his having written about the same topics as his contem- poraries, has more and more been denied the status of a serious and/or intelligible spokesman for his times. Rather than perform the difficult job of establishing a methodology for deciding the matter one way or the other, many scholars have decided that Aristophanes is primarily a humorist of genius whose views about matters of perennial concern are either undiscoverable or, if discoverable, much less important and useful than those recoverable from other contemporary sources. This volume is an attempt to reexamine such conclusions. Each contributor sets out from the assumption that Aristophanes' claim to be serious as well as humorous is sincere. Each attempts to discover the uniquely Aristophanic approach to topics of import- ance to students of Athenian history, literature and society. I hope that the result will go some way toward restoring Aristophanes to the list of those ancient voices still accorded an undivided and respectful hearing. Ann Arbor J-H. June igyg 5 Aristophanes Acharnians* LOWELL EDMUNDS 6 6e |3acriAe0s TOV 'HaioSov eaTecpavcocrev elmbv SiKaiov eTvai TOV 6TTi yecopyiav Kai eipf|vr)v TTpoKaXoupiEvov VIKOCV, OU TOV TToXetious Kai o^ayas 6I6£I6VTCC. The Contest of Homer and Hesiod, 32 2G ' Politics. . . are a stone attached to the neck of literature, which, in less than six months, drowns it. Politics in the middle of imaginative interests are like a pistol-shot in the middle of a concert. The noise is deafening without being emphatic. It is not in harmony with the sound of any of the instruments.'1 Thus Stendhal. He spoke ironically; but critics of Aristophanes are dead serious when they make this same distinction between poetry and politics, and proceed to shut their ears to all those supposed pistol-shots that every Aristophanic concert contains. Acharnians, like the other 'peace plays', thwarts this muffling of the ears, because the whole play is deafening. Aristophanes has a clear 'program'. The play is thoroughly political, beginning with its title, the name of the most hawkish demesmen of the day (Thuc. 2.21. 3), and with the name of the dove, Dicaeopolis, 'Just City'.2 * Full references for works cited in the footnotes are given in the Bibliography, pp. 34-6. 1. Beyle (1926), vol. 2, ch. 52 (p. 189). A similar statement is found in ch. 23 of The Charterhouse of Parma. 2. On the name, see Russo (1953) 133; de Ste Croix (1972) 365. 'Dicaeopolis' is not a comic compound, but is an historical name (IG n2 1622, line 685). It is one of 47 personal names ending in -TTOXIS listed in DornseifF (1957) 191-2. These names, as well as such adjectives as orrroAis (Soph. Ant. 370), OvyhroAis (Pind. 0. 2. 8), and the adjectival use of 8iKai6iToAis (Pind. P. 8. 22), show that the name cannot mean 'Just Citizen'. Whether the first element in these -TTOAIS compounds is verbal or adjectival, the second element is always 'city', not 'citizen'. If 5IKCXI6CO could mean 'to make just' (Pind. frag. 169S-M seems to be the only example), then 'Dicaeopolis' might mean 'He Who Makes the City Just'. But the analogies of such personal names as EChroAis, KaAAhroAis, KAeoTioAis, NeoiroXis, 'Aycrfte-TToAis, and others (in Dornseiffs list) suggests that the first element of'Dicaeopolis' is adjectival, and that the name means 'He of Just City'. I shall call him 'Just City'.
Description: