ebook img

ARIES: NASA Langley's Airborne Research Facility PDF

11 Pages·2002·1.7 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ARIES: NASA Langley's Airborne Research Facility

ARIES: NASA Langley's Airborne Research Facility Michael S. Wusk NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia Abstract ARIES, or Airborne Research Integrated Experiments System, the aircraft is being used to conduct research to increase aircraft safety, operating In 1994, the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) efficiency and compatibility with future air traffic acquired a B-757-200 aircraft to replace the aging B- control systems. It is a vital research tool in support 737 Transport Systems Research Vehicle (TSRV). of the agency's Airframe Systems, Aviation Safety, The TSRV was a modified B-737-100, which served and Aviation Systems Capacity programs. as a trailblazer in the development of glass cockpit technologies and other innovative aeronautical The 757 is continuing work begun by the NASA 737- concepts. The mission for the B-757 is to continue 100 in state-of-the-art technologies such as electronic the three-decade tradition of civil transport cockpit displays, flight management systems and technology research begun by the TSRV. Since its flight safety devices. Langley's 737 was the first 737 arrival at Langley, this standard 757 aircraft has off Boeing's production line in 1967 and was in undergone extensive modifications to transform it service with NASA until it was decommissioned in into an aeronautical research "flying laboratory". 1997. Existing and projected research needs greatly With this transformation, the aircraft, which has been exceeded the capabilities of the 737. The 757 offered designated Airborne Research Integrated a more modern airplane that utilized electronic Experiments System (ARIES), has become a unique national asset which will continue to benefit the U.S. systems to a much greater extent, and more closely represented the current and projected commercial aviation industry and commercial airline customers fleet. During the coming decades, the 757 will better for many generations to come. This paper will support research and development of the aeronautical discuss the evolution of the modifications, detail the sub-systems for the airlines and the airframe and current capabilities of the research systems, and systems manufacturers. The airplane has already been provide an overview of the research contributions used for several research programs, including: already achieved. • Flight-tests to characterize the internal electromagnetic environment (EME) and validate the computational assessment of electromagnetic effects in commercial transport aircraft. 4 • The study of jet-engine contrails to determine their effects on the atmosphere 5. • Flight-tests using Global Positioning System (GPS) satellite data to perform automated landings of the airplane. 6 • Testing of a system to improve the safety and efficiency of aircraft during landing, Figure 1: NASA's Boeing 757-200 aircraft is' taxiing and takeoff by giving pilots a equipped to conduct a range ofresearch flight tests. computerized map showing airport ground operations. 7 • The study of Winter Runway Operations and Introduction aircraft braking performance on contaminated runways. 8 A Boeing 757-200 aircraft acquired by NASA in • Testing of an airborne system that allows 1994 is now serving as a "flying laboratory" for closely spaced approaches to landings aeronautical research. The aircraft has been during reduced visibility to increase airport extensively modified to support a broad range of capacity. 9 flight research programs to benefit the U.S. aviation industry and commercial airline customers. Called 1 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics • Evaluatioonfsystemtshatwouldprovide The candidate aircraft was the second 757 built and pilotswith betterstrategicandtactical the first one produced that was sold to an airline. It is weatheinrformatiownhileinflight. ]o powered by two Rolls Royce RB211-535E4 turbofan • Flight evaluations of integrated synthetic jet engines with each engine generating 40,100 lbs. of vision systems. ]] thrust. The maximum take-off weight is 251,000 lbs. The aircraft's max cruise is .86 Mach and it has a Future research will continue to focus on service ceiling of 42,000 ft. technologies to improve air safety, efficiency and performance. Historv NASA Langley Research Center operated a B-737- 100 for over twenty-five years as a "flying laboratory ''1. The aircraft was the prototype 737 produced by Boeing in 1967. After Boeing completed the certification testing with the aircraft, it was reconfigured with a research system, including an operational aft research flight deck, and delivered to Langley. The aft flight deck allowed for safe and efficient testing of advanced cockpit displays and integration of emerging navigation, communication, and flight guidance and control technologies. Over Figure 3:B-757 dimensions the next several decades it completed several thousand hours of research flight time, testing out Boeing used this number two aircraft during the FAA many of the concepts and technologies that exist in certification testing. The FAA certified the 757 class today's modem civil transport aircraft. During the of jet airliners on December 21, 1982, after 1,380 737's service at Langley, vital experience was gained hours of flight-testing over a 10-month period. First in the integration, modification, and operation of this delivery of a 757-200 took place December 22, 1982, highly complex research facility. This would become to launch customer, Eastern Airlines. Eastern placed an important factor in the development of a the aircraft into service January 1, 1983. This replacement aircraft. digitally equipped transport, designated N501EA, was flown by the airline until it's bankruptcy in 1991. The aircraft was mothballed at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas, Nevada until NASA finally obtained it from the Eastern Airline bankruptcy estate. Langley took possession of the $24-million aircraft March 23, 1994.2 Figure 2: NASA's First Flying Laboratory, the Boeing 737 In the early 1990's it became evident that the emerging research demands and evolving programmatic focuses were starting to overtake the Figure 4: NASA 557 after the purchaseJ?om Eastern, aging B-737. A search was begun for a replacement beJbre changing to the NASA color scheme. aircraft that would meet these growing demands and provide an able research platform to carry forward the research effort well into the new millennium. The After undergoing a thorough inspection and soon-to-be NASA B-757 was located after an completion of scheduled heavy maintenance checks the aircraft was delivered to Langley on May 19, exhaustive analysis of the projected needs and an 1994. Initial familiarization flights were conducted extensive survey of the jet airliner market. and some minor modifications were begun which 2 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics wouldallowthecompletioonftheElectromagnetic development and tests by the research community. Environmeenxtperime4nFt.ollowintghecompletion The RSIL is a ground-based laboratory version of the oftheseinaugurfalilghtteststh, emomentotuasskof ARIES on-board research system (described below) reconfiguringthe aircraft into its research and is used for the integration of key hardware and configuratiwonasbeguninearnesWt.hereathseB- software systems required for simulation. The second 737cameto Langleyalreadyconfigureads a major facility is the Flight System Integration functionintegstfacility,manyfactorsdictatetdhat Laboratory (FSIL), a flight-testing counterpart to the theB-757wouldundergoits metamorphoastis RSIL. The FSIL is used for the aircraft integration Langleyc,ompletebdyLangleycivil servanatnd and preflight validation of key hardware and software contractsotraffT.heexperiengcaeineodvetrheyears systems destined for ARIES. The third facility is the ofoperationwsiththeB-737provideadwealthof 757. ARIES currently features an on-board research corporatkenowledgaendan extremelcyapable system called Transport Research System (TRS) and workforcteocarryoutthetaskR. egardleosfsthese the Flight Deck Research Station (FDRS), both of invaluabrleesourcetsh,etaskathandwouldbea which are described later in detail. monumenotnaelrequirintgheeffortsofmanypeople andorganizationinsc,ludingextensivteechnical ARIES Concept Overview inputsfromBoeingandmanyoftheirsubsystem suppliersO.verthenextseveraylears,through One of the attributes that made the B-737 such a multiplephasetsh,eaircrafctontinueitdsevolution powerful research tool was the research or Aft Flight intoafunctioninflgighttesftacility. Deck (AFD) located in the cabin area of the aircraft. This allowed agreat majority of the research work to It wasduringthistime,inDecemb1e9r98t,hatthe be accomplished in the AFD while still maintaining a aircraftwasofficiallygiventhenameARIES, sterile two-crew safety cockpit up front, in the helpingto furtheridentifyits uniqueroleasa Forward Flight Deck (FFD). In retiring the B-737, contributinegntityinthefieldofaviatiornesearch. Langley's plan for the B-757 has always included the integration and installation of an AFD onto the Sim-to-Flight Concept aircraft. Resource and budgetary constraints have dictated that a delayed phased approach be used to Even before its arrival at Langley, ARIES had been achieve this full-up research system implementation. envisioned as an integral part of the Transport Research Facilities (TRF). The TRF is a set of tools Initial modifications to the B-757 cabin and cockpit have been focused at the establishment of the basic used in a simulation-to-flight concept. This concept incorporates common software, hardware, and experimental infrastructure, called the Transport processes for both ground-based flight simulators and Research System. The TRS is comprised of the the B-757, providing Government and industry with research computers and data collection systems used an efficient way to develop and test new technology to support the experiments and tests. This hardware is concepts to enhance the capacity, safety, and distributed throughout the cabin, cockpit, and cargo operational needs of the ever-changing national hold areas of the aircraft at both manned and airspace system 3. These facilities enable a smooth unmanned pallet stations. Major modifications continuous flow of the research from simulation to completed in support of the TRS included installation actual flight test. of cooling ducts and distribution of ship's power to each pallet location, and the installation of overhead Three major facilities are used in the simulation-to- cable trays in the cabin to accommodate data signal flight concept. The first is the Cockpit Motion wiring. Pallet configurations and cabin layouts have Faility (CMF), a multiple -cab, fixed- and motion- changed as the aircraft modifications have progressed based flight simulation laboratory that contains the to meet the intermediate research needs, but even Integration Flight Deck (IFD) simulator cab, the with the achievement of the current Coupled Baseline Research Flight Deck (RFD) simulator cab, and the configuration, the system maintains a great deal of Research System Integration Laboratory (RSIL). The designed-in flexibility. Several of the pallet locations IFD cab closely resembles the 757 forward flight are reserved for project-specific pallet installations. deck or cockpit and is used in support of flight- The modification and integration of project specific testing on the ARIES and for aircraft systems research equipment is the quintessential goal of the integration studies. The RFD cab is an advanced aircraft and the TRS. subsonic transport flight deck used for full-crew- workload and full-aircraft-systems integration Many of the evolving research efforts targeted to fly on ARIES require a real-world, out-the-window 3 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics view,or theabilityto fullycontrotlheaircraft ARIES Coupled Baseline Configuration througahnygivenphasoefflightincludintgake-off, landingroll-outandtaxi.Evenwiththeeventual The cabin layout for the current Coupled Baseline AFD,theleftseaotftheforwardflightdeckisthe configuration is show in Figure 5. The two main onlylocationthatallowsboth.Theconcepotfthe elements are the Flight Deck Research Station and FlighDt eckResearSchtatio(nFDRSw)asdeveloped the Transport Research System. The following to accommodathteeseresearcrhequiremenytes,t sections detail each of these elements respectively. maintatinhenormaultilityoftheaircrafat,ndprotect theleveol fsafetyandoversighnteedetdoconduct VIDEO/TEST DIRECTOR DATA PROCESSING viableresearcohperationTsh.eFDRSisessentiaally ONYX OPERATOR AND DISPLAY- SYSTEM reconfiguratoiofntheleftsideoftheforwardflight FLIGHT MANAGEMENT VIDEO RECORDING TECHNOLOGY deckfortestsubjecttosevaluatfelightsystemasnd SYSTEM SGI ONYX operationparlocedureAss. partof thisconcept, severamlodificatioannsdoperationcaolntrolhsave beenimplementoendtheaircrafatndarediscussed FLIGIIT DECK EXPERIMENTAL belowinmoredetail. RESEAIlCIt POWER / VIDEO ROUTING SWITCH STATION [ DISTRIBUTION [ Theaircrafhtasundergosneeveradlistincpthaseins FLIGtIT SYSTEMS /] DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM INTERFACE [ DO CONCENTRATOR reachingits currentconfiguratioInn. orderto WIRE INTEGRAI'ION UNII continueto advancethe researchprograms, modificatiopnhasehsavebeeninterspersewdith Figure 5: ARIES Baseline Cabin Layout periodosfresearcohperationTsh.eaircrafatchieved anoperationTarlanspoRrtesearcShystem(TRS)in Flight Deck Research Station (FDRS) June1997T.heinitialTRScapabilitieasllowetdhe With the Coupled Baseline configuration, the FFD's completioonf the LowVisibilityLandingand left side primary flight display (PFD), navigation SurfaceOperation(LsVLASOe)xperimeinntJuly display (ND), and control display unit (CDU) can be andAugusotf1997C. ompletioonftheUncoupled replaced with research units that can be driven by BaselinTeRSwasaccomplishinedDecemb1e9r98, experimental inputs from the Onyx computer. An allowintghedisplaoyfexperimengtaulidanctoethe experimental head up display (HUD), shown in FDRSF. ollowingthis,theaircraftcompletethde Figure 7, has also been installed, providing another WinerRunwayOperationressearcihn February method of displaying experimental displays to an 1999T.hethirdmajoprhasoefmodificatiofonrthe evaluation pilot. Additionally, the experimental TRSresultedin the currentCoupledBaseline system can provide inputs to the ship's flight control configuratioTnh.eCoupleBdaselinaellowsforthe computers, thus allowing automatic flight, including aircraftto be coupledto and flownusing coupled autolands. Whether flown manually or experimengtuaildanceT.hefirstresearpchrogramto coupled, the FDRS provides an evaluation pilot the makeuseoftheCoupleBdaselinweastheAirborne ability to assess the desired research concepts, be InformatiofonrLateraSlpacin(gAILS)flightsduring they advanced displays, cockpit procedures, or Augus1t999. aircraft performance. Duringtheaircraft'tsransformataiomnajoritoyfthe modificatiownesrecompletebdyNASAcivilservant andcontractoprersonnaetl LaRC.Severamlajor structurmalodificatiohnasvebeencompletedduring schedulehdeavymaintenanbcyecontracfat cilities. Theupcominigntegratioonf theaftflightdeck representhtsefinalstageofthecurrentlpylanned BaselinemodificationsT.his installation,in combinatiownithmultiplesystemuspgradews,ill requiresomerearrangemoefnttheBaselinpeallet locationassshowninthispaperb,ut will retain or enhance all the existing capabilities. At the time of this writing, this effort is in the final design reviews Figure 6: The 757features aFlight Deck Research and dedicated installation efforts are scheduled to Station on the left, or captain% side of the cockpit. begin insummer 2003. 4 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Toensurteheabilityoftherightseastafetpyilotto Standard audio, video and time functions exist at all adequateplryotectht eaircrafftromundesireedvents, manned pallet locations. Each of these pallets has an severasltandbiynstrumenhtasvebeenaddedtothe audio panel that provides the pallet occupants with instrumepnatnel(.Mostofthesemodificatiownsere the ability for two-way communications over any of drivenbythebasicdesigpnhilosophoyftheB-757, the four intercoms and two of the four radio sources. wheresystemfsailuremodesareall basedon The remaining two radios can be monitored by ensuringsufficienctontrolfor theleft seat.)In anyone, but only the flight deck crew is able to additiotnhecenteirslestandhasbeenreconfigured transmit. Each manned pallet also contains two 8" fortheinstallatioonfanadditionaClDU,allowing monitors that allow the pallet operators to select and foraseconsdafetpyilottositinthemiddljeumpseat monitor video images for enhanced situational andbeabletoprovideinputintoeithetrheship'sor awareness. Additionally, each pallet has an electronic theresearcnhavigatiosnystemA.fourthjumpseat time display driven by GPS-provided time code and a behindtherightpilotseatprovidesseatinfgora discrete event marker button that can be used to mark researchoerorbserver. events on the data recording. Pallet #1 -Flight Systems Interface This pallet provides flight controls iii.i.i.i.i.i..i.................... systems, thrust management systems, and the Pilot Selection Panel (PSP) monitoring. (The PSP is located in the flight deck and is the switch that selects between the iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii standard ship's control and the experimental control.) This pallet's systems provide the FDRS experimental displays (PFD and ND) and Experimental Display Control Panel (EDCP) with Figure 7: The FDRS experimental HUD power and setup control, as well as providing the HUD power, and signal conversion control and Transport Research System (TRS) mixing. This station will play a major role in the Fourteen test pallets/research workstations are in the integration and operation of the proposed AFD flight baseline layout as shown in Figure 5. Others are controls interface unit (FCIU). A secondary location added depending on research needs. There are twenty for the aircraft's Crew Chief, who would normally fly available pallet locations. Pallet stations are in the cockpit, is also provided at this pallet. During sequentially numbered by location, starting with the certain types of operations where a third safety pilot odd numbered pallets on the port side of the aircraft or research observer is required in the flight deck, the and the even numbered pallets onthe starboard side. Crew Chief can be repositioned to the number one 1. Flight Systems Interface pallet where he has appropriate communications and 2. Flight Management monitoring capability. 6. Onyx Computer 7. Experimental Power Distribution Pallet #2 -Flight Management 7A. Wire Integration Unit Operators at this pallet oversee and manipulate the 8. Onyx Operator experimental Flight Management and Navigation 9. I/O Concentrator systems. The pallet houses the 10. Video #1 (Video/Test Director) experimental Flight Management 11. Data Acquisition System (DAS) Computer (FMC) and a second 12. Data Processing &Display Station (DPDS) experimental CDU, as well as 13. Video #3 (Video Routing Switch) two Ashtech GPS receivers, and a 14. Video #2 (Video Recording) prototype WAAS GPS receiver, 15 Technology Transfer Area 1(TTA1) any of which can be used to 16 Technology Transfer Area 2 (TTA2) provide positional information to Stations 3, 4, 18, and 19 have been used for the experimental system. The individual project pallet installations at various times. pallet also controls three differential GPS (DGPS) The cabin area of stations 3 and 4 has been designed datalink radios that can also be used to transmit or for the eventual installation of an aft research flight receive a pseudo- Automatic Dependent deck. Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) signal. 5 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Pallet #6 -Onyx Computer Pallet #8 - Onyx Operator This is the primary research The Onyx Operator station computer on the aircraft. It serves to monitor and control drives the research displays and the Onyx computer. Operators serves as the experimental Flight start, monitor, and stop the Management System (FMS) research software running in and/or the Flight Control the Onyx computer. This Computer (FCC). The computer software typically runs the is a Silicon Graphics Inc. Onyx experimental displays and mainframe that has been specially re-housed and may also run any experimental flight hardened. It has eight Computer Processing algorithms or calculations Unit's (CPU's) @ 200 MHz each and three graphic required bythe research. pipes capable of driving 18 displays at 1024x768x60hz. The computer draws 7kva power Pallet #9 -I/O Concentrator and requires 850 cubic feet per minute cooling air at The I/O Concentrator pallet is the primary signal 40 degrees Fahrenheit. concentration point for the aircraft's subsystems ARINC 429 data busses; 757 Pallet #7 -Experimental Power Distribution research sensors, research This pallet is the interface between the aircraft computer, Data Acquisition electrical system generators and the experimental Systems (DAS), and other system. It controls the distribution of electrical power experimental system analog, to the individual research system digital, synchro and ARINC 429 pallets and components through signals. Utilizing a suite of VME switches and circuit breakers cards and a 133 MHz MCP604 located on the pallet. PowerPC processor, the pallet Experimental system power can converts the above signal be disconnected with an information to and from the SCRAMNet (Shared emergency shutdown switch Common Random Access Memory Network) located in the cockpit. Status of protocol that is used when transmitting data over the the research system electrical research system's fiber optic network ring. The loading can be monitored using the panel meters and SCRAMNet maximum throughput is 16MB/sec. The analyzers located within the pallet. The research pallet houses a quad switch junction box that forms system receives power inputs from each of the two the research system's fiber optic network ring. In engine generators (90 kva), auxiliary power unit (90 addition, it provides high-fidelity IRIG-B time to the kva), and external power sources. Research research system by utilizing a Time Frequency equipment located in the forward cargo bay isolates Processor (TFP) card whose internal oscillator is 28 volts DC and 115 VAC, 60 Hz from the l15V AC trained by signals from a GPS receiver 400 Hz bus generators. The research electrical system then distributes power via two power buses to each Pallet #10 -Video #1/Test Director pallet station. Each research pallet station is This pallet serves a dual role. It provides the primary interfaced to the research power buses through alocal monitoring and control station for the entire video power sub-panel to distribute power on that pallet. subsystem (total of 3 pallets). All research power wiring is distributed to the pallets In addition, it serves as the under the cabin floor to isolate it from research Flight Test Director station, signal/data wiring that is routed inthe overhead cable providing the Test Director trays. with communications capabilities and enhanced Pallet #7A -Wire Integration Unit situational awareness with a This unmanned pallet is the central wiring point for total of eleven video monitors all signals used by the experimental system. Its patch and a computer for data panel configuration allows for relatively easy monitoring and GPS-driven reconfiguration of multiple wire integration unit's positional display. The Test (WIU) sub-chassis for patching of signals to various Director has a separate communications panel to pallets allow independent communications on any available radio and intercom channel. The panel also includes a 6 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics tunableVHFradio(w/enablsewitchwhichallows parameters per second on an optical disk. The files anyaftcabinstationtostransmvitiathisVHF)a,nda can be moved to a floppy disk for later use by an public addresshandset for intra-aircraft experimenter or it may be sent to any device on the announcemeAnstst.hevideosystemcontrolt,he aircraft LAN. Once on the ground, the files may be palletusesninemonitorsforverifyingrecorded transcribed to a CD for permanent storage. The imagesandtwo feedbacmk onitorscapableof system controller is a Force Computer 68040 selectinagnyofthefourcameraandfourcomputer processor installed in a VME chassis running generatevdideosources.Thepalletalsohouses VxWorks. camercaontroulnitsforthefourcamersaourcetsh,e tailcamerhaeatearndcontrollearn,davideoselector Pallet #13 -Video #2 switchthatallowsanyoftheaudiosourceosnboard This is the primary video pallet toberecordeodnanyofthevideorecordings. for recording the video sources and for scan converting the Pallet # 11 -Data Acquisition System (DAS) signals into the correct output The DAS provides the data format. The system is capable of acquisition and storage of recording all of the video aircraft parameters from analog sources and contains a playback sensors, SCRAMNet fiber optic feature on VCR #1 for playing link, and the aircraft 429 busses. back video onboard the aircraft. A setup computer is used for The pallet contains 8 Super VHS system setup, control, and video recorders, 4 YEM scan monitoring. The heart of the converters for converting the computer-generated DAS is the Advanced Airborne sources, and 4 SONY scan converters for converting Test Instrumentation System (AATIS) pulse coded the video sources to the correct format for telemetry. modulation (PCM) system. The AATIS has the capability to monitor 96 analog data channels and Pallet #14 -Video #3 192 discrete inputs. Direct connection to analog The Video three pallet provides sensors is via the wire interface unit (WIU) and it's switching for the video associated signal-conditioning integrated circuitry. subsystem and recording of all The DAS is connected to the aircraft 429 busses via a audio sources. Two RM5000 custom built 429 interface to the Advanced Airborne routing switch matrices provide Test Instrumentation System (AATIS). The system is the ability to switch the currently configured to record 1,000 aircraft appropriate video sources parameters to magnetic tape using a Mars II tape throughout the aircraft recorder. Parameters can be recorded at a bit rate of Diagnostic and troubleshooting 555,555 bits/second for 20 hours at sampling rates of equipment as well as multiple video distribution 200, 50, 25, 12.5 and 6.25 Hz. The system is amplifiers for duplicating various video sources connected to the research system via SCRAMNet+ reside on this unmanned pallet. A Stancil audio fiber optic link. recorder continuously records all audio sources, including the cockpit voice audio. Pallet #12 - Data Processing & Display Station (DPDS_ Pallets #15 & 16- Technology Transfer Area (TTA) The DPDS takes serial PCM #1 #2 data, processed and recorded by This area allows DAS, and converts any of 1,000 researchers to data parameters to engineering accommodate up to units (i.e., altitude in feet) for 18 onboard display to a researcher at the observers, and DPDS pallet in real-time. provides them with The system provides various the appropriate easily configured display information to options, including plots, tabular facilitate the real- data, time histories, and many time transference of technological knowledge during different graphical formats. The display can be driven various flight tests. Each pallet has a 20" flat-panel by real-time data, or used to play back previously display that can be configured to display the desired recorded data. The DPDS can record as many as 500 research images. Additionally, two 8" monitors 7 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics locatedoneachpalletallowsthemonitorinogf Low Visibility Landing and Surface Operations additioniamlagesA.udiospeakearrseutilizedduring (LVLASO) and Runway Incursion Prevention onboarpdlaybacfkromVCR#1.Thesperovidean System (RIPS) 7 audiblesourcfeordemonstratioinntsheTTA.The A main focus of the research conducted at Langley is TTAareaalsoprovidesspacfeoradditionraelsearch the investigation of technology that will improve the palleltocations. safety and efficiency of aircraft movements on the surface during the operational phases of landing rollout, turn-off, inbound taxi and outbound taxi. In ARIES's Accomplishments poor visibility, at night, or at unfamiliar airports, operating safely on the airport surface at rates equal Since ARIES was purchased in 1994 the aircraft has (or better) to those in clear weather requires that both completed a variety of research efforts, most of pilots and controllers be provided with supplemental which have been focused at furthering the efficiency, information about the state of the airport and relevant effectiveness, and safety of civil transport aviation. traffic. It is hoped that by providing supplemental These studies have helped develop the technology guidance and situational awareness information to that will enable the aviation industry to reach the both pilots and controllers, safety margins will be national goal, set by President Clinton, of reducing increased and operations can be maintained atVisual the fatal aircraft accident rate by 80% in ten years Meteorological Conditions (VMC) capacities, and 90% in 25 years. A discussion of ARIES' regardless of actual visibility conditions. involvement in some of these programs follows. Initially conducted as part of the Low Visibility High Intensity Radiated Field Sources - (HIRF) 4 Landing and Surface Operations (LVLASO) In February 1995, the NASA LARC conducted a program, this effort has evolved into what is now series of aircraft tests aimed at characterizing the called the Runway Incursion Prevention System electromagnetic environment (EME) in and around a (RIPS). The change in name represents a Boeing 757 airliner. As the complexity and criticality programmatic evolution from ajoint research project of the functions performed by the on-board working capacity issues to a national effort electronics increases, so does concern about the addressing a critical safety issue. Certainly the vulnerability of these systems to electromagnetic demands for air travel continue to grow, but reported interference (EMI). Sources of EMI that are of surface incidents have continued to increase at an particular concern are man-made radio frequency alarming rate. Hazardous runway incursions rates (RF) sources generated external to the aircraft, such increased by more than 50 percent and at least five as radar and radio transmitters. These potential fatal airport surface accidents occurred from 1990- sources of EMI are collectively known as HIRF or 1999. In 2000, 431 surface incidents were reported, High Intensity Radiated Field sources. an all-time high. Reduced visibility was a contributing factor in many of these accidents and During the EME flight test, measurements were made incidents. of the electromagnetic energy coupled into the aircraft and the signals induced on select structures as Since 1996, ARIES has participated in a series of the aircraft was flown past known RF transmitters. flight experiments and demonstrations supporting this The aircraft was instrumented with an array of effort. ARIES has performed flight and taxi sensors positioned to study the electromagnetic operations for LVLASO at the Hartsfield Atlanta coupling characteristics and shielding effectiveness International Airport in 1997, and for RIPS at the of the aircraft's three main compartments; the flight Dallas-Ft. Worth Airport in 2000. To complete the deck, the avionics bay, and the passenger cabin. LVLASO and RIPS testing, ARIES was equipped ARIES flew a total of 56 data runs against four RF with experimental displays that were designed to sources. Predetermined flight profiles were flown to provide flight crews with sufficient information to ensure that electromagnetic energy impinged upon enable safe expedient surface operations in any the aircraft fuselage at various angles of incidence. weather condition down to a runway visual range The flight test provided data used to validate (RVR) of 300 feet. In addition to flight deck displays computational techniques for the assessment of and supporting equipment onboard the B-757, there electromagnetic effects in commercial transport were also ground-based components of the system aircraft. Such knowledge will improve the design that provided for ground controller inputs and the process, resulting in more robust and cost effective uplink of surveillance of airport surface movements. designs. The prototype system consisted of several advanced technologies that made up an integrated 8 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Figure 8: RIPS HUD and Electronic Map Displays communication, navigation, and surveillance (CNS) for similar potentially hazardous runway conditions, system. Airport Surface Detection Equipment-3 and establishing reliable correlation between ground (ASDE-3) data was fused with other surveillance data vehicle friction measurements and aircraft braking and was provided to both the controller and the test performance. Accomplishing these objectives would aircraft. Various algorithms analyzed the potential for not only give airport operators a better way to incursions and generated appropriate alerts. This evaluate runway friction and maintain acceptable specific implementation was designed to show operating conditions, but would also contribute to whether the concept was both operationally and reducing traction-related aircraft accidents. technically feasible. These technologies were tested using the ARIES aircraft with both NASA test pilots and commercial 757 captains acting as evaluation pilots. The integrated ground and airborne components resulted in a system that has the potential to significantly improve the safety and efficiency of airport surface movements, particularly as weather conditions deteriorate. Data resulting from these tests are being used to enhance the system's capabilities for future implementations and to develop and validate requirements for using these technologies in the future. Runway Winter Operations 8 Figure 9: NASA B757 makes a test run on a snowy Runway water, ice or snow was a factor in more than runway inMichigan. 100 airplane accidents between 1958 and 1993. Most of those accidents involved fatalities. In support of Since testing started in January 1996, five the national effort to reduce the fatal aircraft accident instrumented aircraft, including the Langley 737 and rate, the NASA Langley Research Center partnered 757, and 13ground test vehicles have been evaluated with Transport Canada and the FAA in a five-year at sites in Canada, the United States, and Norway, winter runway friction measurement program. The completing nearly 400 instrumented aircraft test runs on going research effort uses instrumented aircraft, and more than 8,000 ground vehicle runs. Tests have friction-measuring ground vehicles and test personnel been performed on a variety of runway conditions, from around the world. The major objectives of the where researchers have taken manual measurements Joint Winter Runway Friction Program include to monitor conditions before and after a test run coordinating different ground vehicle friction series. From this substantial friction database, measurements to develop a consistent friction scale engineers have developed an international runway 9 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics frictionindex(IRFI)tostandardifzriectionreporting evasive maneuver. Fewer bad-weather delays would fromdifferentdevicesandto minimizepilot mean financial savings for the airline industry, more difficultiesin makingcriticaltakeoffandlanding efficient airport operations, and travelers arriving at decisionsA.n IRFI methodologsytandardthat their destinations on schedule. definepsroceduarendaccurarceyquiremeinstusnder reviewforapprovbaylaninternationcaolmmittee. Synthetic Vision 11 Synthetic Vision System (SVS) research is being Theoverarllesultsfromthisprogramwillincrease conducted as a potential mitigation to the number one aircrafstafetyandthecapacitoyfairportswhere aviation safety hazard, Controlled Flight Into Terrain wintecronditionasresevereS.omeoftheresultasnd (CFIT), and the growing safety problem of runway tesptrocedurmesayalsoapplytohighwasyafety. incursions. SVS utilizes integrated, high-resolution databases and photo-realistic display concepts to Airborne Information for Lateral Spacin_ (AILS) provide improved situational awareness and path 9 control. Used in conjunction with integrity In 1999 NASA and Honeywell collaborated on a monitoring sensors such as radar or Forward-Looking joint effort to develop concepts, procedures, and Infra-Red (FLIR), Synthetic Vision Systems have the supporting technology to safely enable closely potential to provide substantial safety and spaced, independent, parallel approach operations. performance benefits. The Airborne Information for Lateral Spacing (AILS) system expanded on existing communication and navigation technology to allow planes to land safely in bad weather onparallel runways spaced as close as 2,500 feet. Currently, the minimum runway separation during low visibility is 4,300 feet, which means that some of the nation's biggest airports have to shut down one of their closely spaced runways when weather conditions deteriorate. Among the facilities AILS technology could impact are airports in Detroit, Seattle and Minneapolis. The NASA B-757 ARIES and a Honeywell Gulfstream IV (G-IV) were used in the flight test effort. Honeywell provided the airborne DGPS, ADS-B datalink, Traffic Alerting and Collision Figure 1O:SVS HUD image Avoidance System (TCAS) II w/AILS algorithms, and ground DGPS components. During the flight- The ARIES aircraft has been a key player in the SVS testing, both aircraft would be set up on closely- work completed at the NASA LaRC. Photo-realistic spaced parallel approach paths when the Gulfstream concepts have been successfully flown at Dallas-Ft. would begin to "stray" off course toward the B-757. Worth in 2000, and Eagle-Vail, Colorado in 2001. With the AILS system, the aircraft would "talk" to Using GPS positioning, the synthetic vision software each other via the ADS-B. DGPS signals provided creates a three-dimensional map of the surrounding precise information about each plane's location. The terrain. As the aircraft's position changes, this map AILS algorithms would monitor the intrusion and changes accordingly, providing the pilot with an trigger multiple levels of alerts. Ultimately, if accurate, 3D, moving display in the cockpit. In required, the system could initiate an automatically addition to the terrain, runways, path guidance, and flown evasive maneuver. Validation flights were other aircraft can also be integrated into the display. completed at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility and Digitally superimposing aerial photographs gives the in-flight demonstrations of the system were images a photo-realistic look. These images can be completed at Minneapolis-St. Paul International presented to the pilot on either a head down display Airport in November 1999 for FAA officials and (HDD) or a head up display (HUD). The other Government and industry representatives. The monochromatic HUD uses outlines and shading to demonstrations showed that safe weather- create the 3D terrain effect. Figure 10 is a HUD independent operations with closely-spaced runways image showing the mountainous terrain around could be viable through the simultaneous use of the, Eagle, Colorado. the AILS alerting fimctions, and simple, consistent pilot procedures that included a basic emergency 10 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.