ABSTRACT Title of Document: APPLICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN OPERATIONS REFERENCE (SCOR) MODEL AT THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) Michael James Arendt Jr., Ph.D., 2012 Directed By: Roger C. Lipitz Chair in Public Policy and Private Enterprise, Dr. Jacques S. Gansler, School of Public Policy DoD’s supply-chain supports over 1 million uniformed, civilian, and contract employees, manages over $90 billion in inventory, and maintains some 15,000 aircraft, 300 ships, and 30,000 combat vehicles. The supply-chain is undeniably the backbone of DoD operations, ultimately enabling it to achieve mission success under a variety of situations. In recent years, the DoD has pursued numerous initiatives for the purposes of improving its supply-chain. Motivations to seek improvements (such as asset tracking, reduced errors, etc.), decreased costs, and increased responsiveness for the warfighter have been plentiful; however, measured improvement thus far has been difficult to ascertain. It is the intent of this research to establish a framework to enable DoD to use industry best practices and process improvements from the Supply Chain Operations Reference Model (SCOR) as a tool for Defense supply-chain modernization efforts. To accomplish this, the dissertation will address the following research questions: 1. How can the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model be adapted for use as an enterprise-level tool by the United States Department of Defense? 2. Once adapted, what barriers to the implementation of this new tool exist? 3. How can these barriers be overcome? APPLICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN OPERATIONS REFERENCE (SCOR) MODEL AT THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) By Michael James Arendt Jr. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2012 Advisory Committee: Professor Jacques S. Gansler, Chair Dr. Sandor Boyson Dr. Tom Corsi Ms. Lisa Harrington Dr. Paul Tesluk © Copyright by Michael James Arendt Jr. 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ............................................................................................................... v Chapter 1: Introduction to the Department of Defense Supply Chain ...................... 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Fundamental Definitions .......................................................................................... 4 Historical Baselines for Supply-Chain Management in Business ........................... 6 Military and Commercial Supply Chains ................................................................ 9 Chapter 2: Literature Review .................................................................................... 33 Introduction to Supply Chain Management (SCM) ............................................... 33 Metrics for Measuring Improvement in Supply Chain Management .................... 35 Cost as a Measure of Improvement .................................................................... 38 Cost and Activity Time as a Measure of Improvement ...................................... 40 Cost and Customer Responsiveness as a Measure of Improvement ................... 41 Flexibility as a Measure of Improvement ........................................................... 43 Integration as a Measure of Improvement .......................................................... 44 Frameworks for Measuring Supply-Chain Management Performance Improvement ............................................................................................................................ 47 SCOR in the Literature .......................................................................................... 48 SCOR at HP ........................................................................................................ 49 SCOR at Intel ...................................................................................................... 51 Chapter 3: The MILSCOR Framework .................................................................... 54 What is the SCOR Model? ..................................................................................... 54 Introduction to MILSCOR ..................................................................................... 56 What is MILSCOR? ......................................................................................... 57 Why is MILSCOR Important? ......................................................................... 62 MILSCOR’s Target Audience ............................................................................ 64 The MILSCOR Framework ............................................................................. 69 Weighting Metrics in MILSCOR ........................................................................ 75 MILSCOR Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Reliability ............................... 79 Supply Chain Reliability Perfect Condition Case: Body Armor ...................... 107 MILSCOR Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Responsiveness ..................... 108 MILSCOR Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Agility ................................... 115 Supply Chain Agility: Upside Supply Chain Flexibility Case: Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle (MRAP) ................................................................ 126 Supply Chain Agility: Downside Supply Chain Adaptability Case: F-22 Fighter ........................................................................................................................... 144 MILSCOR Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Cost ....................................... 150 Supply Chain Cost: Supply Chain Management Risk Mitigation Cost Case: Fuel ........................................................................................................................... 160 MILSCOR Performance Attribute: Supply Chain Asset Management ............... 162 Supply Chain Asset Management: Return on Program/Initiative Investment Case: DoD’s Corrosion Prevention Program .................................................... 165 ii Chapter 4: Transformational Elements for Organizational Change at DoD ........ 167 Leadership ............................................................................................................ 173 Leadership in the Literature .............................................................................. 173 Leadership Barriers at DoD .............................................................................. 177 Recommendations for Improvement ................................................................. 184 Vision, Mission, and Strategy .............................................................................. 187 Vision in the Literature ..................................................................................... 187 Mission in the Literature ................................................................................... 190 Strategy in the Literature .................................................................................. 192 Vision, Mission and Strategy Barriers at DoD ................................................. 195 Recommendations for Improvement ................................................................. 207 Culture .................................................................................................................. 209 Military Organizational Culture ........................................................................ 210 Cultural Barriers at DoD ................................................................................... 216 Recommendations for Improvement ................................................................. 231 Chapter 5: Transactional Elements for Organizational Change at DoD .............. 234 Structure ............................................................................................................... 235 Organizational Structure in the Literature ........................................................ 235 Structural Barriers at DoD ................................................................................ 241 Recommendations for Improvement ................................................................. 254 Systems ................................................................................................................ 257 Systems (Policies and Processes) in the Literature ........................................... 257 Systems (Policies and Processes) Barriers at DoD ........................................... 261 Recommendations for Improvement ................................................................. 270 Task Requirements and Individual Skills ............................................................ 273 Task Requirements and Individual Skills and Abilities in the Literature ......... 273 Task Requirements and Individual Skills and Abilities Barriers at DoD ......... 275 Recommendations for Improvement ................................................................. 281 Motivation ............................................................................................................ 284 Motivation in the Literature .............................................................................. 284 Motivation Barriers at DoD .............................................................................. 288 Recommendations for Improvement ................................................................. 298 Management Practices ......................................................................................... 299 Management Practices in the Literature ........................................................... 303 Management Practice Barriers at DoD ............................................................. 309 Recommendations for Improvement ................................................................. 320 Work Unit Climate ............................................................................................... 322 Work Unit Climate in the Literature ................................................................. 322 Work Unit Climate Barriers at DoD ................................................................. 325 Recommendations for Improvement ................................................................. 329 Chapter 6: Case TF-34/CF-34 Aircraft Engine ..................................................... 330 Chapter 7: Conclusion ............................................................................................. 336 Appendix A: Organizational Change Survey and Results ..................................... 337 Bibliography ............................................................................................................. 354 iii List of Tables Table 1. Adaptation of the Supply Chain Maturity Model for MILSCOR. ................ 61 Table 2. DoD Opportunities for Cost and Performance Improvement as Identified by the Defense Science Board ................................................................................. 62 Table 3. Differences Between Recent DoD Supply Chain Approaches and MILSCOR. .......................................................................................................... 67 Table 4. Selected Supply Chain IT Systems Applicable to MILSCOR. .................... 72 Table 5. Summary of MILSCOR Framework. ........................................................... 74 Table 6. Pair-Wise Weighting Methodology for MILSCOR. ..................................... 76 Table 7. Sample Contract Performance Evaluation Criteria for % of Orders Delivered in Full. ................................................................................................................. 90 Table 8. Sample Contract Performance Evaluation Criteria for Delivery Performance to Customer Commit Date. ................................................................................. 94 Table 9. Number of Distinct Business Systems at DoD. ............................................ 98 Table 10. Sample Contract Performance Evaluation Criteria for Perfect Condition.106 Table 11. MILSCOR Supply Chain Cycle Time Components. ................................ 110 Table 12. MILSCOR Flexibility Components. ......................................................... 116 Table 13. MILSCOR Upside Supply Chain Flexibility Input Components. ............ 119 Table 14. MILSCOR Upside Supply Chain Flexibility Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time Components. ........................................... 120 Table 15. Sample Contract Performance Evaluation Criteria for Upside Supply Chain Flexibility. ......................................................................................................... 125 Table 16. MILSCOR Upside Supply Chain Adaptability Components. .................. 129 Table 17. MILSCOR Upside Supply Chain Adaptability Input Components. ......... 132 Table 18. MILSCOR Upside Supply Chain Adaptability Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time Components. ........................................... 135 Table 19. MILSCOR Downside Adaptability Components. .................................... 138 Table 20. MILSCOR Downside Adaptability Input Components. ........................... 140 Table 21. MILSCOR Downside Adaptability Resource Availability Assessment & Ramp-up/Lead Time Components. ................................................................... 141 Table 22. MILSCOR Cost Components. .................................................................. 152 Table 23. Inventory of DoD's Discrete Business Systems as of 2011. ..................... 199 Table 24. Organizational Missions Related to Business System Modernization at DoD. .................................................................................................................. 202 Table 25. Typical DoD and Commercial Supply Chain Performance Metrics. ....... 225 Table 26. Types of Organizational Structures. ......................................................... 241 Table 27. Leadership Competencies. ........................................................................ 283 Table 29. Selected Theories of Management. ........................................................... 307 Table 30. Comparison of Transformational and Transactional Elements between TF34 and CF34 Support Approaches. .............................................................. 334 iv List of Figures Figure 1. Distribution of Goods and Services in DoD Supply Chains. ...................... 58 Figure 2. Pair-Wise Comparison Continuum. ............................................................. 76 Figure 3. Example Pair-Wise Comparison for MILSCOR Weighting. ...................... 77 Figure 4. MILSCOR Reliability Metric Structure. ..................................................... 80 Figure 5. MILSCOR Responsiveness Metric Structure. ........................................... 108 Figure 6. MILSCOR Agility Metric Structure. ......................................................... 115 Figure 7. MILSCOR Cost Metric Structure. ............................................................. 150 Figure 8. MILSCOR Asset Management Metric Structure. ..................................... 162 Figure 9. MILSCOR Framework for Organizational Change. ................................. 171 Figure 10. Competing Values Framework Adapted for DoD. .................................. 214 Figure 11. Competing Values Framework Adapted for DoD. .................................. 228 Figure 12. Support Options for Government and Contractors. ................................. 252 Figure 13. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. ................................................................. 286 v Chapter 1: Introduction to the Department of Defense Supply Chain Introduction DoD’s supply-chain supports over 1 million uniformed, civilian, and contract employees, manages over $90 billion in inventory, and maintains some 15,000 aircraft, 300 ships, and 30,000 combat vehicles.1 The supply-chain is undeniably the backbone of DoD operations, ultimately enabling it to achieve mission success under a variety of situations. To accomplish this feat, DoD spends roughly $270 billion per year on supply-chain operations without doing a world-class job (in response, reliability, costs etc.). Moreover, maintenance costs have risen 87 percent in the last decade while the United States has undertaken military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. In recent years, the DoD has pursued numerous initiatives for the purposes of improving its supply-chain. Motivations to seek improvements (such as asset tracking, reduced errors, etc.), decreased costs, and increased responsiveness for the warfighter have been plentiful; however, measured improvement thus far has been difficult to ascertain. Despite numerous initiatives, a disconnect exists between the vision for supply-chain modernization and the level of progress made to date. Luckily for the Department, the efficiency and effectiveness improvements it seeks to make are not new—in fact, the private sector has spent the last several decades embracing technology, modern 1 Estevez, A. (2010). High-risk logistics planning: progress on improving Department of Defense supply chain management. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense. 1 supply-chain management practices and process improvement methodologies for the purposes of maximizing efficiency and effectiveness while reducing costs. For example, many world-class firms today such as Wal-Mart, Dell, Fed Ex, and Caterpillar are able to provide greater levels of service, move more goods through the supply-chain, and sell to customers across the globe for a fraction of what DoD spends to achieve inferior results. Many of these practices and process improvements can be carried over and applied to the military setting. It is the intent of this research to establish a framework to enable DoD to use industry best practices and process improvements from the Supply Chain Operations Reference Model (SCOR) as a tool for Defense supply-chain modernization efforts. To accomplish this, the dissertation will address the following research questions: 1. How can the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model be adapted for use as an enterprise-level tool by the United States Department of Defense? 2. Once adapted, what barriers to the implementation of this new tool exist? 3. How can these barriers be overcome? To address these questions the dissertation is organized in the following manner. First, fundamental definitions regarding the supply chain will be provided. Next a review of the supply chain management practices in business 2
Description: