APR + (Advanced Power Reactor Plus) Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Company, Republic of Korea Overview Full name Advanced Power Reactor Plus Acronym APR + Reactor type PWR Coolant Light Water Moderator Light Water Neutron Spectrum Thermal Neutrons Thermal Capacity 4290 MW(th) Electrical Capacity 1560 MW(e) gross 1505 MW(e) net Design Organization Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co. Last update 11-06-2013 1. Introduction The Advanced Power Reactor Plus (APR+), an improved nuclear power reactor with 1500MW electric power to succeed the Republic of Korea’s current Advanced Power Reactor 1400 (APR1400), has been developed as a two-loop evolutionary pressurized water reactor by adopting a number of advanced design features to further enhance safety, economics, and reliability. The Korean government and nuclear industry cooperatively launched the “Nuclear Technology Development Plan 2012 (Nu-Tech 2012 plan)” in December 2006. The goal of this plan is to enhance technical competitiveness in the global market and to have an intellectual property-free reactor design. The main project under the Nu-Tech 2012 plan is the development of APR+ standard design and related key technologies. The APR+ technology development project consists of three sub-projects: 1) the feasibility study for the APR+ development, 2) the key technology development for the APR+ design, and 3) the APR+ standard design development. The first sub-project, feasibility study for APR+ development, has been carried out for 2 years from August 2007 to July 2009. The major goals of this study are to identify top-tier requirements, to develop a conceptual design, and to evaluate safety, economics, and performance characteristics of the APR+ conceptual design. From this study, it is concluded that the APR+ design can be developed as a two loop evolutionary pressurized water reactor with a number of advanced design features to enhance safety and economics based on the APR1400 technology. For the economic enhancement, the APR+ reactor core power has been determined to be increased to 4,290 MWth which corresponds to a 1500MWe class nuclear power plant. Also, the plant design development has been performed so that several new construction technologies can be introduced in order to shorten the construction period. For the safety improvement, a number of advanced design features are introduced in the APR+ design such as the improved direct vessel injection (DVI+), advanced fluidic device (FD+), passive auxiliary feedwater system (PAFS), and four independent trains of safety systems, mechanically as well as electrically, based on N+2 design concept. As severe accident mitigation design features, the emergency reactor depressurization system (ERDS) for rapid depressurization during high pressure severe accident scenarios and the enhanced in-vessel retention through external reactor vessel cooling (IVR-ERVC) system are newly incorporated. Also, technical countermeasures against the unexpected beyond design basis natural disaster have been selected for incorporation into the APR+ standard design. The major design requirements for the safety and performance goals set for APR+ are listed in Table 1. TABLE 1. APR+ DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE GOALS General Requirement Performance requirements and economic goals Type and capacity : PWR, 1500 MWe Plant availability : greater than 92% Plant lifetime : 60 years Unplanned trips : less than 0.2 times per year Seismic design : SSE 0.3g Refueling interval : 18 months or longer Safety goals : Construction period : 36 months (N-th plant) from Core damage frequency < 1.0E-6/RY first concrete (F/C) to fuel loading (F/L) Containment failure frequency < 1.0E-7/RY Economic goal : ≥ 20% cost advantage over Occup. radiation exposure < 1 man -Sv / RY fossil fueled power plants The second sub-project, key technology development for the APR+ design, is intended to develop and demonstrate major advanced design features in order to support APR+ standard design development focusing on six (6) technologies: 1) safety injection system optimization and development including the improved Direct Vessel Injection (DVI+) and the advanced fluidic device (FD+), 2) passive auxiliary feedwater system (PAFS), 3) multiple severe accident mitigation system, 4) automatic load follow operation, 5) improved control element drive mechanism (CEDM), and 6) combined modularization of components and structure. Finally, the third sub-project, APR+ standard design development, launched in April 2009 aiming at acquiring the standard design approval from the Korean nuclear regulatory body by 2013. The APR+ RCS configuration is the same as that of the APR1400 as shown in Figure 1. The APR+ standard design development is completed by incorporating the key technologies developed from the second sub-project, the state-of-the-art design features accepted globally and the design improvements and lessons learned from design and construction of the APR1400. The first APR1400 units are being built in the Republic of Korea as Shin-Kori Nuclear Power units 3 and 4 (SKN 3&4). Additionally the self-developed new reactor coolant pump (RCP) and man machine interface system (MMIS) technologies will be implemented in the APR+ design. Also, the reactor core design and safety analyses are performed using the new specific code packages which are also under development in parallel with the APR+ development. Finally, the increased reactor power up to 4,290 MWth will be accomplished by adding sixteen (16) fuel assemblies to the APR1400 reactor core. Figure 1. APR+ Reactor Coolant System Configuration 2. Description of the Nuclear Systems 2.1 Primary circuit and its main characteristics The APR+ is characterized as a two-loop evolutionary PWR. The APR+ core thermal power is uprated to 4,290 MWth, which corresponds to a 1,500 MWe class nuclear power plant. This power rating is 108% of the APR1400 core power and is considered to be the maximum power output with a two-loop reactor coolant system (RCS) configuration while minimizing component size change. As shown in Figure 1, the APR+ RCS contains two primary coolant loops, each of which consists of one 1.07-meter (42-inch) inside diameter (ID) hot leg, two 0.76-meter (30-inch) ID cold legs, one steam-generator (SG) and two reactor coolant pumps (RCPs). One pressurizer (PZR) with heaters is connected to the hot leg of the RCS. The full power hot leg temperature of APR+ was increased from 323.9oC (615oF) of the APR1400 to 326.1oC (619oF) to optimize the RCS design parameters. The total RCS flowrate is increased to about 103% of the APR1400, which is optimized through the primary component sizing. In the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) design, four direct vessel injection (DVI) lines are connected to supply emergency core cooling water from the in-containment refuelling water storage tank (IRWST). Level probes are added in the hot leg to monitor the water level during mid-loop operation. The RCS overpressure protection and reactor safety depressurization functions are established by four (4) pilot-operated safety relief valves (POSRVs) while the emergency reactor depressurization valves (ERDVs) provide rapid depressurization function dedicated for severe accidents. On the secondary side of the SGs, two main steam lines are arranged on each SG, and each steam line has five non-isolable main steam safety valves (MSSVs), one main steam atmospheric dump valve (MSADV), and two main steam isolation valves (MSIVs). The APR+ design employs the passive auxiliary feedwater system (PAFS) that removes core decay heat and RCS residual heat through SGs to establish and maintain the plant in a safe shutdown condition when the normal feedwater supply is not available. The PAFS, which is intended to completely replace the conventional active auxiliary feedwater system, is one of the advanced passive safety features adopted in APR+. The PAFS cools down the steam generator secondary side and eventually removes the decay heat from the reactor core by introducing a natural driving force mechanism. A schematic diagram of arrangements and locations of the primary components and safety- related systems are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. Schematic Diagram of Primary Components and Safety Systems 2.2 Reactor core and fuel design The reactor core of APR+ is designed to generate 4,290 MW thermal power with an average volumetric power density of 101.9W/cm3. The reactor core consists of 257 fuel assemblies made of fuel rods containing uranium dioxide (UO ) fuel. The number of control element 2 assemblies (CEAs) used in the core is 109 in which 97 CEAs are full-strength reactivity control assemblies and the rest are part-strength CEAs. The absorber materials used for full- strength control rods are boron carbide (B C) pellets while Inconel alloy 625 is used as the 4 absorber material for the part-strength control rods. The core is designed for an operating cycle of 18 months or longer with a maximum rod burnup as high as approximately 60,000 MWD/MTU, and has an increased thermal margin of more than 10% to enhance safety and operational performance. A portion of the fuel rods contains uranium fuel mixed with a burnable absorber of gadolinium (Gd O ) to suppress 2 3 excess reactivity after fuelling and to help control the power distribution in the core. The neutron flux shape is monitored by means of 65 fixed in-core instrumentation (ICI) assemblies. The possibility of utilizing the mixed oxide (MOX) fuel up to 1/3 core is considered in the core design. Eight additional reserve CEAs are installed to increase the reactivity control capability, if necessary, for MOX fuel loadings. Also, the APR+ reactor core is designed to be capable of daily load follow operation. The fuel assembly consists of fuel rods, spacer grids, guide tubes, and upper and lower end fittings. 236 locations of each fuel assembly are occupied by the fuel rods containing UO 2 pellets or the burnable absorber rods containing Gd O -UO in a 16 × 16 array. The remaining 2 3 2 locations are 4 CEA guide tubes and 1 in-core instrumentation guide tube for monitoring the neutron flux shape in the core. The HIPER16TM fuel, which will be used for APR+, has the capability of a batch average discharge burn-up as high as 65,000 MWD/MTU and has an increased overpower margin as compared to the previous fuel design (PLUS7TM). The HIPER16TM mid-grid design has high through-grid dynamic buckling strength for the enhanced seismic performance. The top nozzle has easy reconstitutability features and hold-down spring force was optimized to reduce the fuel assembly bow. The debris filtering and capturing features are implemented in the bottom grid by combining the debris filtering bottom grid and the long bottom end plug to reach the target of zero fuel failure. The bottom nozzle has a low pressure drop features with rectangular flow holes. The integrity of HIPER16TM fuel has been enhanced by increasing the fretting wear resistance and debris filtering efficiency. Also, the safety of HIPER16TM fuel has been enhanced by increasing the seismic performance which is related to the spacer grid crush strength and dynamic stiffness. 2.3 Fuel handling and transfer systems The fuel handling system is designed for a safe and rapid handling and storage of fuel assemblies from the receipt of fresh fuel to the shipment of spent fuel. The major equipment of the system comprises the refuelling machine, the CEA change platform, the fuel transfer system, the fresh fuel elevator, the CEA elevator and the spent fuel handling machine. The refuelling machine is located in the containment building and moves fuel assemblies into and out of the reactor core and between the core and the fuel transfer system. The spent fuel handling machine, located in the fuel building, carries fuel to and from the fuel transfer system, the fresh fuel elevator, the spent fuel storage racks, and the spent fuel shipping cask areas. 2.4 Primary components 2.4.1 Reactor pressure vessel The reactor pressure vessel is a vertically mounted cylindrical vessel with a hemispherical lower head welded to the vessel and a removable hemispherical upper closure head as shown in Figure 3. The internal surfaces in contact with the reactor coolant are cladded with austenitic stainless steel to prevent corrosion. The reactor vessel diameter of the APR+ is bigger than that of the APR1400 to accommodate additional fuel assemblies by about 0.3 m (1 ft). The reactor pressure vessel contains internal structures, core support structures, fuel assemblies, control rod assemblies, and control and instrumentation components. Figure 3. Reactor Pressure Vessel and Internals The structural integrity of the reactor pressure vessel is verified through a structural sizing and fatigue evaluation, which calculates the stresses of the heads, shell and nozzles under thermal and pressure loads. The direct vessel injection (DVI) nozzles are attached to the reactor vessel for the direct emergency coolant injection as a part of the safety injection system. The location of DVI nozzle is above the cold leg nozzles to avoid the interference with reactor vessel external nozzles and support structure. The life time of the reactor pressure vessel is extended to 60 years by the use of low carbon steel, which has lower contents of Cu, Ni, P, S, resulting in an increase of brittle fracture toughness. The inner surface of the reactor vessel is cladded with austenitic stainless steel or Ni-Cr-Fe alloy. The reactor vessel is designed to have an end-of-life RT of 21.1oC (70oF). NDT The reactor vessel is basically manufactured with a vessel flange, a hemispherical bottom head, and three shell sections of upper, intermediate and lower. The vessel flange is a forged ring with a machined ledge on the inside surface to support the core support barrel, which in turn supports the reactor internals and the core. The three shell sections, the bottom head forging and vessel flange forging are joined together by welding. Also, four inlet nozzle forgings, two outlet nozzle forgings, four DVI nozzle forgings, and sixty-one ICI nozzles are also welded. The upper closure head is fabricated separately and is joined to the reactor vessel by bolting. The dome and flange are welded together to form the upper closure head, on which the control element drive mechanism (CEDM) nozzles are welded. 2.4.2 Reactor internals The reactor internals consist of the core support structures, which include the core support barrel, upper guide structure barrel assembly and lower support structure, and the internal structures. The core support structures are designed to support and orient the reactor core fuel assemblies and control element assemblies, and to direct the reactor coolant to the core. The primary coolant flows in through the reactor vessel inlet nozzles from the reactor coolant pump, passes through the annulus between the reactor vessel and core support barrel, through the reactor vessel bottom plenum and core, and finally flows out through the outlet nozzles of the reactor vessel connected to the hot legs. The core support barrel and the upper guide structure are supported at its upper flange from a ledge in the reactor vessel flange. The flange thickness is increased to sustain the enhanced seismic requirements. All reactor internals are manufactured of austenitic stainless steel except for the hold-down ring, which is made of high-tension stainless steel. The hold-down ring absorbs vibrations caused by the load to the axial direction of internal structures. The upper guide structure, which consists of the fuel assembly alignment plate, control element shroud tubes, the upper guide structure base plate, CEA shrouds, and an upper guide structure support barrel, is removed from the core as a single unit during refuelling by means of special lifting rig. 2.4.3 Steam generators The steam generator (SG) is a vertical inverse U-tube heat exchanger with an integral economizer, which operates with the RCS coolant in the tube side and the secondary coolant in the shell side as shown in Figure 4. The basic design feature of the APR+ steam generator is the same as that of the APR1400. The heat transfer area of the SG is increased to accommodate the uprated thermal power by increasing the height of U-tubes. The height is increased by about one (1) foot as compared to that of the APR1400. Therefore, the upper shell diameter and the head dome radius of the SG would increase by 10 inches and 5 inches, respectively. The SG vessel material is changed from SA-508 Grade 1A to high strength alloy steel, SA-508 Grade 3 class 2, to reduce the total weight of the SG using the optimized thickness of the SG vessel. The moisture separators and steam dryers on the shell side of the SG limit the moisture content of the exit steam to less than 0.25 w/o during normal operation. To preclude uncontrolled steam releases and resultant uncontrolled cooldown of the RCS, the main steam isolation valves (MSIVs) are designed as fail-close. Redundant MSIVs to meet the single failure criteria are provided in each main steam line. The capacity of the spring-loaded main steam safety valves (MSSVs) is sufficient to limit the maximum steam generator secondary side pressure in accordance with the requirements. The MSSVs discharge steam to the atmosphere outside the reactor containment building. The leak- before-break concept is applied to the main steam lines to reduce the need for redundant supports of the piping and, thus, the construction and maintenance costs will be reduced. To improve the operability, the angle of nozzle in the hot leg side of the primary system is modified to enhance the stability of mid-loop operation. The SG water level control system is designed in such a way that the water level is controlled automatically over the full power operating range. The economizer feedwater nozzle provides a passage of feedwater to the economizer, which is installed to increase the thermal efficiency of the steam generator at the cold side, and experiences a high temperature gradient. The feedwater nozzles are designed to endure the excessive thermal stress which causes an excessively large fatigue usage factor. The downcomer feedwater nozzle attached in the upper shell of SG also provides small portion of feedwater to the downcomer to facilitate internal recirculation flow. 10% of full power feedwater flow is provided to the downcomer feedwater nozzle and the remaining feedwater to the economizer feedwater nozzle at a reactor power higher than 15%, below which all feedwater is supplied to the donwncomer feedwater nozzle. Steam Outlet Nozzle Steam Dryer Centrifugal Separator Upper Taps, 550.5" Secondary Manway Steam Dryer Drain NWL Recirculation Nozzle Downcomer Feddwater Nozzle 0% NR, 400.5" Downcomer Tube Support Plate Evaporator Tube Bundle Shroud 0% WR, 150.5" Center Support Cylinder Economizer Economizer Feedwater Nozzle Handhole Tubesheet Blowdown Nozzle Nozzle Dam Figure 4. Steam Generator 2.4.4 Pressurizer The pressurizer (PZR) is equipped with nozzles for sprays, surgeline, pilot-operated safety relief valves (POSRVs), emergency reactor depressurization valves (ERDVs), and pressure and level instrumentations. The RCS overpressure protection and manual safety depressurization functions are established by four (4) POSRV assemblies while ERDVs provide a rapid depressurization function dedicated for severe accidents. The volume of pressurizer (PZR) is 80.7 m3, being larger than the ratio of power increase from the APR1400, which would reduce the potential causes of plant unavailability by more effectively accommodating overpressure transients as well as reactor coolant volume shrinkage or swelling due to temperature/load changes. 2.4.5 Integrated head assembly (IHA) APR+ adopts the integrated head assembly (IHA) to simplify structural configuration of the upper closure head region of the reactor vessel and to improve maintenance convenience as shown in Figure 5. By adopting the IHA, the occupational exposure dose, component storage area and overhaul duration are expected to be reduced significantly. The newly developed control element drive mechanism (CEDM) is implemented in the APR+ design. It will be able to operate for a longer period of time and to allow the CEDM motor and coil assembly to be suitable for the load follow operation. The CEDM power cable is installed at the upper part of the coil housing. This arrangement can simplify the CEDM coil assembly and enhance the coil cooling performance. The reduced cooling air flow will also contribute to the simplification of the RV head area system related to the CEDM because the cooling fan size and seismic loads can be reduced. Figure 5. Integral Head Assembly 2.4.6 Reactor coolant pumps The newly developed RCP is implemented in the APR+ design. This RCP is the same model as, but larger in size than that that for the Shin-Ulchin Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 (SUN 1&2), the first construction plant utilizing new RCPs. It has several improved design features as compared to the RCP for APR1400 as shown in Figure 6. For example, the use of standstill seal minimizes the RCS water leakage via the shaft seal under simultaneous loss of seal injection water and component cooling water after and/or during the station blackout. The spool piece, which connects the pump shaft to the thrust bearing shaft, provides enough space to replace the mechanical seal without lifting the thrust bearing assembly. To find an optimal hydraulic design that satisfies all of the hydraulic performance requirements of APR+ RCP, an RCP model test has been performed. The APR+ RCP model test data are the reference for guaranteeing performance of prototype RCP. Another purpose of the model test is to acquire the 4-quadrant curve of the accepted hydraulic model. The 4-quardrant curve is the performance curve for all the possible pump flow and rotation conditions. The 4-quadrant curve is used for input data for safety analysis. Figure 6. SKN 3&4 RCP(left) vs. APR+ RCP(right) 2.4.7 RCS Piping Since the pipe whip restraint and the support of the jet impingement shield in the piping system of earlier plants are expensive to build and maintain and could lead to a potential degradation of plant safety, the Leak-Before-Break (LBB) principle is adopted for the piping system of APR+. The LBB principle is applied to the main coolant lines, surge lines, and pipes in the shutdown cooling system and the safety injection system. The application of LBB reduces the redundant supports of the pipe in the NSSS pipe system since the dynamic effects of postulated ruptures in the piping system can be eliminated from the design basis. Therefore, the cost of design, construction and maintenance is reduced. 2.5 Reactor auxiliary systems 2.5.1 Chemical and volume control system (CVCS) The CVCS of the APR+ is not required to perform any safety functions such as safe shutdown and accident mitigation. This system is basically for the normal day-to-day operation of the plant. The components related to charging and letdown functions, however, are designed as a safety grade and reinforced to assure the reliability for normal and transient conditions. Two centrifugal charging pumps and a flow control valve provide required charging flow. For normal operation, only one charging pump is used to supply the required minimum flow of 12.6 kg/s. Pressure reduction of the letdown flow from the reactor coolant system occurs at the letdown orifice and the letdown control valve. Then the letdown flow passes through the regenerative and letdown heat exchangers, where the temperature reduction takes place. Following pressure and temperature reduction, the flow passes through a purification process at the filters and ion exchangers. After passing through the purification process, the letdown flow is diverted into the volume control tank (VCT) which is designed to provide a reservoir of reactor coolant for the charging pumps and for the dedicated seal injection pumps for the reactor coolant pumps. 2.5.2 Component cooling water system
Description: