ebook img

apple and samsung at the supreme court PDF

604 Pages·2017·17.37 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview apple and samsung at the supreme court

January 2017 JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW Collected Writings of Banner & Witcoff in 2016 Copyright 2017 Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., subject to any previously granted rights. Further duplication is not permitted without permission. All rights reserved. These materials are designed to provide thought-provoking ideas and information on the subjects covered. These materials are not legal advice and should not be used as such. The ideas and information provided may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Banner & Witcoff, Ltd. or its lawyers, may not reflect current legal developments, and are not guaranteed to be correct, accurate, complete or up-to-date. Viewing or use of these materials does not create and attorney-client relationship between you and any lawyer of Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., and you should not act upon the information contained without legal advice. You are welcome to contact any author for further information or advice on the subject of his or her writings. Table of Contents Journal of Intellectual Property Law January 2017 Collected Writings of Banner & Witcoff, Ltd. in 2016 Banner & Witcoff Firm Profile ..............................................................................................19 COPYRIGHTS .....................................................................................................................20 DESIGN PATENTS .............................................................................................................48 LITIGATION .......................................................................................................................70 PATENTS .............................................................................................................................147 POST-ISSUANCE PROCEEDINGS…………………………………………………….230 TRADEMARKS ...................................................................................................................327 TRADE SECRETS………………………………………………………………………...361 ADDITIONAL PUBLISHED WORKS .............................................................................367 WEBINARS ..........................................................................................................................374 MEDIA MENTIONS ...........................................................................................................399 ABOUT THE AUTHORS ...................................................................................................527 COPYRIGHTS U.S. Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.…………...21 Rajit Kapur Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (April 26, 2016) U.S. Supreme Court Will Weigh in on Star Athletica LLC v. Varsity Brands Inc..................25 Darrell G. Mottley Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (May 2, 2016) The Metaphysical Quandary of Copyright Protection for Fashion Designs: Supreme Court May Provide Answers in Varsity Brands, Inc. v. Star Athletica, LLC......................................30 Darrell G. Mottley Banner & Witcoff IP Update (June 8, 2016) U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.........................................36 Rajit Kapur Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (June 17, 2016) SCOTUS Clarifies Standard for Awarding Attorneys’ Fees in Kirtsaeng.............................41 Ernest V. Linek Intellectual Property Magazine (June 17, 2016) Google Books Story Comes to an End…………………………………...................................44 Ernest V. Linek Intellectual Property Magazine (July 7, 2016) DESIGN PATENTS Apple and Samsung at the Supreme Court: Case Proves Need for Design Patents in Overall IP Strategy…………………........................................................................................................49 Bradley J. Van Pelt, Kevin C. Keenan and Sean J. Jungels Banner & Witcoff IP Update (June 8, 2016) Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Samsung v. Apple………………….................................54 Steve S. Chang. Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (October 12, 2016) Steve Jobs Heard in Supreme Court…………………………..…………................................59 Steve S. Chang EE Times (October 18, 2016) Another Bite at the Apple? Supreme Court Reverses and Remands to the Federal Circuit………………………………………………………………………………………...…63 Steve S. Chang and Richard S. Stockton Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (December 7, 2016) SCOTUS Apple v. Samsung Ruling, Just the FAQs..................................................................66 Steve S. Chang EE Times (December 8, 2016) LITIGATION Federal Circuit’s En Banc Decision in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc. Makes Significant Determinations Relating to the Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion…...71 Jason S. Shull Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (February 16, 2016) Federal Circuit Panel Not Sweet on TC Heartland’s Petition to Change Rules for Patent Venue…………………………………………………………………………………………….75 R. Gregory Israelsen Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (March 14, 2016) Federal Circuit Rejects Opportunity to Limit Patent Suits in Eastern District of Texas….79 R. Gregory Israelsen Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (May 5, 2016) Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc. — U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Federal Circuit’s Framework for Enhanced Damages Under § 284……………………………………………………………………………………………...83 Matthew P. Becker Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (June 14, 2016) 2016 Patent Developments for IT Practitioners……………….……………………….……..87 Bradley C. Wright. Virginia Information Technology Legal Institute (September 30, 2016) SCA Hygiene: Mountain or Mole Hill? That is the Question………………………………115 Ernest V. Linek Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (November 3, 2016) 2016 Recent Developments in Patent Law – Case Law……………….…………………….118 Bradley C. Wright Presented to The D.C. Bar (December 12, 2016) PATENTS Clarity of Thought: Telling Congress How to Improve § 101……………………..….……148 Brian Emfinger World Intellectual Property Review (March 1, 2016) McRO v. Namco Bandai……………………………………………………………………….154 Ross A. Dannenberg The IP Litigator (March 7, 2016) Patent Agent Privilege Confirmed by Federal Circuit………………………….…………..158 Ernest V. Linek Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (March 8, 2016) Case Review: Merck Defeated in BMS Patent Row………………………………………...162 Ernest V. Linek Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review (April 7, 2016) All Software Inventions Are Not Necessarily Abstract: Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.…168 Peter Nigrelli and Aseet Patel Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (May 31, 2016) Agreement Drafting Tips to Safeguard IP Rights…………………………………………..173 Rebecca P. Rokos Banner & Witcoff IP Update (June 8, 2016) Alice Turns Two…………………………………………………………..…………………...178 Aseet Patel and Peter Nigrelli Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (June 15, 2016) Patent Office’s Continuation Filing Deadline Rule Upheld by the Federal Circuit………182 Ernest V. Linek Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (June 22, 2016) Full Federal Circuit Affirms District Court on Inapplicability of On-Sale Bar to MedCo’s Transactions…………………………………………………………………………...………187 Ernest V. Linek Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (July 12, 2016) Brexit’s Effect on Intellectual Property……………….………………………………..……192 Bradley J. Van Pelt Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (July 13, 2016) Abstract Ideas: A Common-Sense Distinction in Electric Power Group v. Alstom …….…196 Joshua Davenport and Aseet Patel Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (August 5, 2016) McRO Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America Inc. et al.……………………………….….…200 Ross A. Dannenberg, Aseet Patel and Peter Nigrelli Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (September 15, 2016) 4 Tips for Overcoming Abstract Idea Rejection……………….……………………………204 Phillip Articola Law360 Expert Analysis (October 5, 2016) At Two, Alice Toddles Along……………………………………….…….………..…………208 Peter Nigrelli and Aseet Patel Banner & Witcoff IP UPDATE (December 20, 2016) An Intro to Double Patenting…………………………………….…………………..………214 H. Wayne Porter Banner & Witcoff IP UPDATE (December 20, 2016) Starting Up IP: Priorities for Early-Stage Companies……………………….......................219 Victoria R. M. Webb and Bennett A. Ingvoldstad Banner & Witcoff IP UPDATE (December 20, 2016) Adding to Your Company’s Bottom Line with Intangible Assets: Creating, Maintaining & Advancing Your IP Portfolio…………………........................................................................224 Bradley J. Van Pelt and Luke S. Curran Banner & Witcoff IP UPDATE (December 20, 2016) POST-ISSUANCE PROCEEDINGS PTAB Denies Amgen’s IPR in Win for AbbVie – Article “Suggests a High Degree of Unpredictability” in the Art at Time of Invention……………………………..……………231 Robert H. Resis Banner & Witcoff PTAB Highlights (February 4, 2016) PTAB Denies Lupin’s IPR in Win for Pozen – Claimed Tablet That Provided Coordinated Drug Release Not Suggested by Prior Art, Which Had a Preferred Formulation That Provided the Reverse Release…………………………………………..…………………….235 Robert H. Resis Banner & Witcoff PTAB Highlights (March 9, 2016) Finally, the PTAB Gets Told to Give Patent Owners in IPR Some Due Process …………239 Charles W. Shifley Banner & Witcoff PTAB Highlights (March 17, 2016) More March Madness: PTAB Slams Petitioner and Insufficient IPR Petition………...…243 Craig W. Kronenthal Banner & Witcoff PTAB Highlights (March 31, 2016) A Patent Owner’s Guide to Handling IPRs in the Higher-Survival Patent Arena of Biotech and Pharmaceuticals…………………………………………………………………..………247 Robert H. Resis Bloomberg BNA’s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal (April 8, 2016) A Petitioner’s Guide to Handling IPRs in the Higher-Survival Patent Arena of Biotech and Pharmaceuticals…………………………………………………………………..…...………252 Robert H. Resis Bloomberg BNA’s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal (April 15, 2016) U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. Lee….……257 Robert H. Resis and Marc S. Cooperman Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (April 25, 2016) A Midwestern Patent Lawyer in Justice Roberts’ Court…………………………...………261 Marc S. Cooperman Federal Circuit Bar Association Bench & Bar (May 1, 2016) Is Broadest Reasonable Interpretation the Appropriate Standard in an IPR? U.S. Supreme Court to Decide……………………………………………………………………………..…264 Robert H. Resis and Benjamin Koopferstock Banner & Witcoff IP UPDATE (June 8, 2016) U.S. Supreme Court Decides Cuozzo Speed v. Lee…………………………………..………269 Robert H. Resis Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (June 20, 2016) The IPR Trial – A Play in Three Acts……………………………………………..…………272 Charles W. Shifley The IP Litigator (June 27, 2016) Patent Owner’s Parent Application Disclosing Osteoporosis Treatment Methods Did Not Enable the Challenged CIP Claims……………………………………………..……………281 Robert H. Resis Banner & Witcoff PTAB Highlights (July 11, 2016) “Your PTAB Judges Will Be Experts” -- Right? … Not So Fast…………………..………285 Charles W. Shifley Banner & Witcoff PTAB Highlights (July 26, 2016) Patent Owner! Your Burdens in IPR – Broadest Reasonable Construction, Preponderance of Evidence, Severely Limited Amendment – But Burden to Prove You Deserve Your Patent? Yes ………………………………………………………………………....…………289 Charles W. Shifley Banner & Witcoff PTAB Highlights (July 27, 2016) Patent Applicants: Want to Avoid Broadest Reasonable Interpretation in Inter Partes Review? That’s Right – Use Means Clauses…………………………………………………293 Charles W. Shifley Banner & Witcoff PTAB Highlights (August 3, 2016) In Your IPR, Your Expert Declares…So That’s Evidence By Itself, Right? No, Not So Much……………………………………………………………………………………………297 Charles W. Shifley Banner & Witcoff PTAB Highlights (August 30, 2016) Late to File Your IPR, But the PTAB Says You’re OK? Don’t Worry, the Federal Circuit Can’t Care……………………………………………………………………………..………301 Charles W. Shifley Banner & Witcoff PTAB Highlights (September 27, 2016) Federal Circuit Hears Arguments in Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.………………………………………………………………………………………..….…305 Surendra K. Ravula Banner & Witcoff Intellectual Property Alert (October 6, 2016) IPR: Histrionics and Statistics………………………………………………………..………309 Charles W. Shifley World Intellectual Property Review (November 10, 2016) Return to Sender: A Place the PTAB May No Longer Go…………………………………315 Charles W. Shifley

Description:
The Metaphysical Quandary of Copyright Protection for Fashion Designs: Supreme Court Intellectual Property Magazine (June 17, 2016) . Patent Owner! . “Supreme Court Grills Apple, Samsung Over Value of Design Patents,” Steve . creating and fostering a firm culture that values the differences.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.