Structural, vibrational and thermodynamic properties of carbon allotropes from first-principles: diamond, graphite, and nanotubes by Nicolas Mounet Submitted to the Department of Materials Science and Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Materials Science and Engineer iMSS OFTECHNOLOGY at the JUL 2 2 2005 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLO LIBRARIES June 2005 ) Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2005. All rights reserved. Autho..r.. ................... .............. .......... Department of Materials Science and Engineering February 23, 2005 Certified by .............................. . ...... Nicola Marzari AMAX Assistant Professor in Computational Materials Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by ..................... ' -~~~~~~C&b adeder R. P. Simmons Professor of Materials Science and Engineering Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Students ARCHIVES 2 Structural, vibrational and thermodynamic properties of carbon allotropes from first-principles: diamond, graphite, and nanotubes by Nicolas Mounet Submitted to the Department of Materials Science and Engineering on February 23, 2005, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Materials Science and Engineering Abstract The structural, dynamical, and thermodynamic properties of different carbon al- lotropes are computed using a combination of ab-initio methods: density-functional theory for total-energy calculations and density-functional perturbation theory for lattice dynamics. For diamond, graphite, graphene, and armchair or zigzag single- walled nanotubes we first calculate the ground-state properties: lattice parameters, elastic constants and phonon dispersions and density of states. Very good agree- ment with available experimental data is found for all these, with the exception of the c/a ratio in graphite and the associated elastic constants and phonon disper- sions. Agree:ment with experiments is recovered once the experimental c/a is chosen for the calculations. Results for carbon nanotubes confirm and expand available, but scarce, experimental data. The vibrational free energy and the thermal expan- sion, the temperature dependence of the elastic moduli and the specific heat are calculated using the quasi-harmonic approximation. Graphite shows a distinctive in-plane negative thermal-expansion coefficient that reaches its lowest value around room temperature, in very good agreement with experiments. The predicted value for the thermal-contraction coefficient of narrow single-walled nanotubes is half that of graphite, while for graphene it is found to be three times as large. In the case of graphene and graphite, the ZA bending acoustic modes are shown to be responsible for the contraction, in a direct manifestation of the membrane effect predicted by I. M. Lifshitz over fifty years ago. Stacking directly hinders the ZA modes, explaining the large numerical difference between the thermal-contraction coefficients in graphite and graphene, notwithstanding their common physical origin. For the narrow nan- otubes studied, both the TA bending and the "pinch" modes play a dominant role. For larger single-walled nanotubes, it is postulated that the radial breathing mode will have the! most significant effect on the thermal contraction, ultimately reaching the graphene limit as the diameter is increased. 3 Thesis Supervisor: Nicola Marzari Title: AMAX Assistant Professor in Computational Materials Science 4 Acknowledgments The work that I am going to present in the following pages was performed at MIT from January 2004 to February 2005. During that period, many things would not have been possible if a lot of people had not helped me in various ways. I would like to thank all of them, and I apologize in advance for any omission. First and foremost, I am very grateful to my thesis supervisor, Prof. Nicola Marzari, for his exceptional kindness and availability, for his attention on all the issues, scientific or not, that I met, and for his strong support. He fully inspired and motivated the work I am presenting here. I also greatly enjoyed being part of his research group, both because of the great competence of all of its members and the very friendly atmosphere that was always present. They helped me on countless occasions with patience and care, and I personally thank all of them. In alphabetical order, they are Mayeul D'Avezac, Dr. Matteo Cococcioni, Ismaila Dabo, Dr. Cody Friesen, Boris Kozinsky, Heather Kulik, Young-Su Lee, Nicholas Miller, Dr. Damian Scherlis, Patrick Sit, Dr. Paolo Umari, and Brandon Wood. I thank Dr. Paolo Giannozzi and Dr. Stefano de Gironcoli who were always very helpful in answering my questions. I also thank all the people developing the v-Espresso code ( http://www.pwscf.org/ ) for the truly exceptional work they are doing on this freely available ab initio code. I gratefully acknowledge financial support from NSF-NIRT DMR-0304019 and the Interconnect Focus Center MARCO-DARPA 2003-IT-674. I would also like to thank the Ecole Polytechnique of Palaiseau (France) and the Fondation de l'Ecole Polytechnique for making my studies in the USA possible. I give many thanks to my parents and brothers for all their useful advice and their constant support. Finally, I give my very special thanks to my wife Irina, who made my life so much easier. She has always been the strongest supporter of my work and study, whatever the cost was for her. My gratitude goes far beyond what I could express with words, and I am dedicating this thesis to her. 5 6 Contents 1 Introduction 15 2 Theoretical framework 19 2.1 Crystalline structures studied. 19 2.1.1 Diamond . 19 2.1.2 Graphene, graphite and rhombohedral graphite 20 2.1.3 Achiral nanotubes . 20 2.2 Density-Functional Perturbation Theory. 21 2.3 Thermodynamic properties . 27 2.4 Comnputational details. 29 3 Zero-temperature results 33 3.1 Structural and elastic properties .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.1. 1 Diamond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.1.2 Graphene and graphite ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.1.3 Single-walled nanotubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.2 Phonon dispersion curves ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42 3.2.1 Diamond and graphite ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42 3.2.2 Armchair and zigzag nanotubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 3.3 Interatomic force constants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52 4 Thermodynamic properties 59 5 Conclusions 77 7 A Acoustic sum rules for the interatomic force constants 79 A.1 Preliminary definitions. 80 . . . .symmetry A.2 Properties of the IFCs .................... 82 . . . . A.3 A new approach to apply the acoustic sum rules and index symmetry constraints . 87 . . . . . . A.4 Complexity of the algorithm ................. 90 A.4.1 Memory requirements. 90 . . . . . . A.4.2 Computational time. . . . . . . 91 A.5 Conclusion. .......................... . . . . . . 93 Bibliography 95 8 List of Figures ... . 19 2-1 Crystal structure of diamond ................ ... . 20 2-2 Crystal structure of graphene ............... ... . 21 2-3 Crystal structure of graphite and rhombohedral graphite ... . 22 2-4 Chiral vectors for armchair and zigzag SWNTs ...... ... . 22 2-5 Structure of an armchair (5,5) SWNT ........... ... . 23 2-6 Structure of a zigzag (8,0) SWNT ............. ... . 23 2-7 Axial view of an armchair (5,5) SWNT .......... ... . 24 2-8 Axial view of a zigzag (8,0) SWNT ............ 3-1 Ground state energy of diamond vs. lattice parameter ......... 34 3-2 Ground state energy of graphene vs. lattice parameter ........ 35 3-3 Contour plot of the ground state energy of graphite vs. lattice param- eters a and c/a .............................. 36 3-4 Ground state energy of graphite vs. c/a at fixed a = 4.65 a.u..... 37 3-5 Contour plot of the ground state energy of an armchair SWNT vs. r and I .................................... 40 3-6 Ground state energy of a relaxed armchair SWNT vs. 1 ........ 41 3-7 Phonon dispersions of diamond ..................... 43 3-8 Phonon dispersions of graphite (at the experimental c/a)....... 43 3-9 Phonon dispersions of graphene ..................... 44 3-10 Phonon dispersions of rhombohedral graphite ............. 44 3-11 Phonon dispersions of graphite (at the theoretical c/a) ........ 45 3-12 Phonon dispersions of an armchair (5,5) SWNT ............ 50 9 3-13 Phonon dispersions of a zigzag (8,0) SWNT .............. 51 3-14 Decay of the interatomic force constants vs. distance for diamond and graphene .................................. 53 3-15 Decay of the interatomic force constants vs. distance for graphite and graphene .................................. 54 3-16 Decay of the interatomic force constants vs. distance for graphene, armchair (5,5) and zigzag (8,0) SWNTs ................. 55 3-17 Phonon frequencies of diamond as a function of the number of neigh- bors included in the interatomic force constants ............ 56 3-18 Phonon frequencies of graphene as a function of the number of neigh- bors included in the interatomic force constants ............ 57 4-1 Lattice parameter of diamond vs. temperature ............ 60 4-2 In-plane lattice parameter of graphite and graphene vs. temperature . 61 4-3 Out-of-plane lattice parameter of graphite vs. temperature ...... 61 4-4 Axial lattice parameter of an armchair (5,5) SWNT vs. temperature . 62 4-5 Axial lattice parameter of a zigzag (8,0) SWNT vs. temperature . .. 62 4-6 Coefficient of linear thermal expansion for diamond .......... 63 4-7 In-plane coefficient of linear thermal expansion for graphite and graphene 64 4-8 Out-of-plane coefficient of linear thermal expansion for graphite . .. 65 4-9 Coefficient of linear thermal expansion along the axis for armchair (5,5) and zigzag (8,0) SWNTs ......................... 66 4-10 Mode Griineisen parameters for diamond ................ 67 4-11 In-plane mode Griineisen parameters for graphite .......... . 68 4-12 Mode Griineisen parameters for graphene ................ 68 4-13 Out-of-plane mode Griineisen parameters for graphite ......... 69 4-14 Mode Griineisen parameters along the axis for zigzag (8,0) SWNTs 69 4-15 Bending mode of a zigzag (8,0) SWNT ................. 71 4-16 "Pinch" mode of a zigzag (8,0) SWNT ................. 71 4-17 Radial breathing mode of a zigzag (8,0) SWNT ............ 72 10
Description: