ijcrb.webs.com NOVEMBER 2012 INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS VOL 4, NO 7 Apologies: A Powerful Tool for Personal and Organizational Success Hershey H. Friedman, Ph.D. Professor of Business and Marketing Department of Finance and Business Management Brooklyn College, CUNY James Lynch, J.D. Assistant Professor of Law and Business Department of Finance and Business Management School of Business Brooklyn College, CUNY Linda W. Friedman, Ph.D. Professor of Statistics & Computer Information Systems Baruch College Zicklin School of Business and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York Abstract This paper examines what constitutes a good apology and the shortcomings of a bad apology. The art of making an apology is an important tool for organizational success. Knowing when to apologize and how to apologize correctly is a skill that should be mastered. The purpose of this paper is to provide vital information to executives on how to apologize correctly. The paper includes examples of apologies, some good and some not so good, drawn from real life. Keywords: Apologies, Remorse, Good Apologies, Bad Apologies, Real World Examples Of Apologies. Introduction The advent of the Internet has given rise to the popularity and influence of social media. Communication among people now takes the form of Twitter, Facebook and blog posts. Marketers are discovering that ―word of mouse‖ can be considerably more potent than word of COPY RIGHT © 2012 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 1 3 ijcrb.webs.com NOVEMBER 2012 INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS VOL 4, NO 7 mouth. If an organization commits a blunder, its gaffe might go viral and everyone in the world will know about it. The organization can become the object of criticism and ridicule, making it necessary to take steps to protect its reputation. The ability to effectively apologize is a crucial skill in the Internet Age; every executive should know how to use this powerful tool (Friedman, 2006). It is very difficult for an organization to cover up mistakes, and a smart organization realizes that this is a futile approach which only helps to magnify the original mistake. For example, President Nixon‘s cover-up of Watergate exacerbated the serious problems associated with the break in of the Democratic National Committee headquarters. According to Slansky and Sorkin (2006: 3-4), had Nixon apologized for Watergate, there would have been no need for him to resign. Unfortunately, Nixon‘s personality, which has been described as arrogant, narcissistic, and aloof, was such that it was impossible for him to show contrition. During an interview with David Frost in 1977, Nixon stated: ―If they want me to get down and grovel on the floor, no. Never.‖ (Slansky and Sorkin, 2006: 4). Ironically, according to Slansky and Sorkin (2006: 3), the ―Apology Era took root… with the spectacle of Richard Nixon‘s 1952 ‗Checkers speech‘.‖ In that speech, named for Checkers, the dog given to Nixon‘s two young daughters, Vice President Nixon defended himself against a financial slush fund scandal. He allowed himself to ―wallow in the muck of self-pity‖, however, he did not express any regret or issue a formal apology in the famous 30-minute speech. The practice of holding people accountable for their actions, would ultimately result in Nixon‘s removal from the Oval Office. The ability and willingness to apologize is not only important in commerce and interpersonal relations, but on the political stage as well. The strained relations between the Armenians and the Turkish communities continue to exist because the Turkish people have not adequately COPY RIGHT © 2012 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 1 4 ijcrb.webs.com NOVEMBER 2012 INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS VOL 4, NO 7 expressed remorse for the genocide that occurred almost 100 years ago. The Tur kish act of marching the Armenian populace into the Syrian Desert still burns in Armenian souls. Likewise, Japan‘s neighbors are not convinced that Japan is sincerely remorseful for its violent actions during World War II. There have been numerous apologies from Japanese officials but they have been seen as inadequate since full responsibility has not been taken for such horrific crimes as forcing women from occupied countries such as Korea and China into sexual slavery as ―comfort women.‖ The Japanese are not using strong enough words to communicate the deep remorse and shame felt for their horrific behavior during World War II (Tae-Ick, 2010). Formal apologies can be an admission of guilt which carries the weight of more than just moral responsibility. There can be legal ramifications when an organization apologizes (Helmreich, 2012; Smith, 2008: 253-258). It should be noted, however, that simply saying ―I‘m sorry‖ does not necessarily have to be interpreted as a sign of responsibility. After all, people say this upon hearing of the death of a friend‘s parent and in no way can this be construed as an admission of guilt. There are situations though where an expression of regret can be taken as an admission of guilt. This paper will examine what constitutes a good apology and how people can apologize effectively and correctly. Good Apologies A good apology has to have several elements. Some use the ―Five R‘s as a mnemonic device to remember what needs to be done. These are: (1) Recognition, (2) Remorse, (3) Repentance, (4) Restitution, and (5) Reform (or Request for forgiveness). COPY RIGHT © 2012 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 1 5 ijcrb.webs.com NOVEMBER 2012 INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS VOL 4, NO 7 Friedman and Friedman (2011) explain the above characteristics: Recognition: The individual or organization making the apology must recognize that a wrong was committed. Remorse: The remorse must be sincere, not simply “regret” at being caught. There is a big difference between remorse and regret. The person or organization should make it clear that they are ashamed of what they did and will never do it again. Repentance: The remorse must be communication to the offended parties – companies can and should use the media – and an explanation as to why the offense was committed should be made. Restitution: Reparations and / or restitution should be offered. Reform: It has to be clear that this will never occur again and that serious reform has taken place. The apology, if done correctly, heals all wounds and allows both parties to move ahead and forget about the past. According to Weisul (2011), there are nine crucial elements to an effective apology. These are: 1. Everyone has to agree on the facts and what actually happened. 2. The offender must take full responsibility for what happened. 3. The apologizer must say the actions that were taken were wrong. 4. The offender must use a phrase such as “I was wrong.” 5. The offender must express sincere regret. 6. If the victim(s) wants the apology to be made in public or in written form, the offender should comply. 7. The offender should be willing to offer reparations/monetary compensation. 8. You can only apologize for things for which you are responsible. 9. The apology has to be genuine. COPY RIGHT © 2012 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 1 6 ijcrb.webs.com NOVEMBER 2012 INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS VOL 4, NO 7 Many organizations and people make the mistake of believing that an apology is a sign of weakness. In actuality, it can be a sign of strength and compassion. It enables the offended party to restore and rehabilitate a wounded ego and get back to normal. We now realize that victims of crimes can feel the effects of the occurrence for an entire lifetime. Unfortunately, there are people who commit suicide when no apology is offered or the apology is inadequate. For these people, their egos have been totally destroyed. In other areas, hospitals have found that apologies may reduce the incidence of lawsuits (Cohen, 2000). Many medical schools now teach students to apologize for mistakes rather than try to cover them up. Hospitals are finding that apologies by doctors result in fewer malpractice lawsuits than the old approach in which doctors refuse to take responsibility. A number of states have even passed ―immunity for apology‖ laws that enable physicians to apologize and show how sorry they are for what happened without having their own words used against them in litigation. There are situations where restitution and/or reparations do not make sense. However, in the corporate setting, restitution/reparations are a good way to show true remorse. For example, McDonald‘s had falsely claimed that its French fries and hash browns were fried in pure vegetable oil. It turned out that the company used lard. McDonald‘s did more than apologize to Hindus and vegetarians about their ersatz vegetarian French fries and hash browns. The settlement also included a payment of 10 million dollars for charities and educational organizations connected with Hindus and vegetarians (Friedman, 2006). COPY RIGHT © 2012 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 1 7 ijcrb.webs.com NOVEMBER 2012 INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS VOL 4, NO 7 Bad Apologies As noted above, a good apology can be restorative and mend a broken relationship. There is no guarantee that the offended party will accept the apology, but a genuine apology has the ability to heal the wronged party and restore his/her dignity. A bad apology, on the other hand, has the potential to make things worse. One reason for a bad apology is that the offender is extremely self-centered and may be unaware of how his or her action caused another person pain or humiliation (Lazare, 2004: 163-165). The offender might even be so self-centered that he or she does not know how to show remorse. The offender may possibly apologize after finding out that the other party no longer likes him. The apology will not be based on guilt or shame and could come out like: ―I am sorry that you are upset with me.‖ Some examples of bad apologies: “I apologize for whatever happened.” This apology is ineffective because the speaker is not taking full responsibility (Miller 2008). Indeed, the apologizer cannot take full responsibility and express sincere regret if s/he is so vague about what was done. The offense should be clearly stated. “Mistakes were made.” According to Miller (2008), the apologizer should be using an active voice. The passive voice is being used to shift blame and not take full responsibility. “If anyone has been hurt by my actions, I am sorry.” This is also a pseudo-apology where the apologizer is not taking responsibility for his/her actions. COPY RIGHT © 2012 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 1 8 ijcrb.webs.com NOVEMBER 2012 INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS VOL 4, NO 7 “To the degree that you were hurt…” Miller (2008) asserts that with this type of a pology, the apologizer is hinting that the offended party may not have been harmed that much by the offense. The responsibility has been shifted in a very clever and sneaky way to the victim. “I am sorry that you feel that way.” McGuire (2008) feels that this type of apology also shifts the blame to the victim. In effect, the apologizer is hinting that the offended party has overreacted by feeling insulted. “The big but.” McGuire (2008) observes that adding the word ―but‖ in an apology has the effect of undoing the apology. Also, shifting blame to alcohol (―I was drunk‖), genetic predisposition (―we men have needs…‖), parents (―It is my father‘s fault‖), or addiction (―I am a sex addict‖) should not be part of a sincere apology. The apologizer has to take full responsibility and should not give excuses. If one wishes to apologize correctly, one must not look for excuses. Take full responsibility and make sure to use words that strengthen the apology rather than weaken them. These include ―very,‖ ―terrible,‖ ―awful,‖ ―horrified,‖ and ―appalled.‖ One should not be afraid to say: ―I feel terrible about what I have done. It was very wrong and I am appalled and sickened by the pain I caused you. I am so sorry…‖ For those who need help writing a letter of apology, there are several websites that provide assistance. One website (http://www.apologyletters.net/), offers 67 apology letter templates for all sorts of apologies such as letters of apology to bosses, girlfriends, customers, etc. Some may feel that it is a ―cop-out‖ to use pre-written letters of apology but, at least, these can be used as a guide. COPY RIGHT © 2012 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 1 9 ijcrb.webs.com NOVEMBER 2012 INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS VOL 4, NO 7 Real-Life Examples of Good Apologies One of the best apologies in the corporate world was made by JetBlue‘ founder and CEO, David Neeleman; it was sincere and from the soul. David Neeleman made a classic apology for flight cancellation chaos that occurred in 2007. The apology appeared in numerous newspapers as well as the company website. A video was posted on YouTube in which the CEO apologized to his customers. Neeleman also used the apology as an opportunity to introduce a JetBlue Airways Customer Bill of Rights. Dear JetBlue Customers, We are sorry and embarrassed. But most of all, we are deeply sorry. Last week was the worst operational week in JetBlue‘s seven year history. Many of you were either stranded, delayed or had flights cancelled following the severe winter ice storm in the Northeast… Words cannot express how truly sorry we are for the anxiety, frustration and inconvenience that you, your family, friends and colleagues experienced. This is especially saddening because JetBlue was founded on the promise of bringing humanity back to air travel, and making the experience of flying happier and easier for everyone who chooses to fly with us. We know we failed to deliver on this promise last week … Note that Mr. Neeleman strengthened his apology by saying ―deeply sorry‖ and ―truly sorry.‖ Goolpacy (2012) says the following about the JetBlue apology: This JetBlue apology will be remembered for a long time to come for so many reasons. No excuses, no defensive explanation—just a straightforward acknowledgement of the pain experienced by passengers and a very credible promise to fix it. Another corporate apology that was quite good was offered by Apple. Apple had a huge public relations nightmare in 2010 when the iPhone 4 was introduced and there was an avalanche of customer complaints about the poor antenna design (Cooper, 2010). Apple apologized and COPY RIGHT © 2012 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 2 0 ijcrb.webs.com NOVEMBER 2012 INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS VOL 4, NO 7 admitted that its phones inflated signal strength and sometimes erroneously displayed full signal strength on the phone‘s bar graph. The following letter was sent in response to the complaints. Dear iPhone 4 Users, The iPhone 4 has been the most successful product launch in Apple‘s history. It has been judged by reviewers around the world to be the best smartphone ever, and users have told us that they love it. So we were surprised when we read reports of reception problems, and we immediately began investigating them. Here is what we have learned. To start with, gripping almost any mobile phone in certain ways will reduce its reception by 1 or more bars. This is true of iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, as well as many Droid, Nokia and RIM phones. But some users have reported that iPhone 4 can drop 4 or 5 bars when tightly held in a way which covers the black strip in the lower left corner of the metal band. This is a far bigger drop than normal, and as a result some have accused the iPhone 4 of having a faulty antenna design. At the same time, we continue to read articles and receive hundreds of emails from users saying that iPhone 4 reception is better than the iPhone 3GS. They are delighted. This matches our own experience and testing. What can explain all of this? We have discovered the cause of this dramatic drop in bars, and it is both simple and surprising. Upon investigation, we were stunned to find that the formula we use to calculate how many bars of signal strength to display is totally wrong. Our formula, in many instances, mistakenly displays 2 more bars than it should for a given signal strength. For example, we sometimes display 4 bars when we should be displaying as few as 2 bars. Users observing a drop of several bars when they grip their iPhone in a certain way are most likely in an area with very weak signal strength, but they don‘t know it because we are erroneously displaying 4 or 5 bars. Their big drop in bars is because their high bars were never real in the first place. To fix this, we are adopting AT&T‘s recently recommended formula for calculating how many bars to display for a given signal strength. The real signal strength remains the same, but the iPhone‘s bars will report it far more accurately, providing users a COPY RIGHT © 2012 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 2 1 ijcrb.webs.com NOVEMBER 2012 INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS VOL 4, NO 7 much better indication of the reception they will get in a given area. We are also making bars 1, 2 and 3 a bit taller so they will be easier to see. We will issue a free software update within a few weeks that incorporates the corrected formula. Since this mistake has been present since the original iPhone, this software update will also be available for the iPhone 3GS and iPhone 3G. We have gone back to our labs and retested everything, and the results are the same— the iPhone 4‘s wireless performance is the best we have ever shipped. For the vast majority of users who have not been troubled by this issue, this software update will only make your bars more accurate. For those who have had concerns, we apologize for any anxiety we may have caused. As a reminder, if you are not fully satisfied, you can return your undamaged iPhone to any Apple Retail Store or the online Apple Store within 30 days of purchase for a full refund. We hope you love the iPhone 4 as much as we do. Thank you for your patience and support. In another context, Willy Brandt, Chancellor of West Germany, visited Poland in December 7, 1970. He made a surprise visit to a memorial in Warsaw that honored Polish Jews slaughtered by the Nazis during the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising in 1943. Brandt, in a gesture of guilt, remorse, and sorrow, silently knelt there in the rain. His sincerity was obvious and the Polish prime minister hugged him and wept (Tae-ick, 2010). The people of Poland and Germany were moved by this. In fact, one can find pictures all over the Internet showing Brandt kneeling at the Warsaw Ghetto memorial as it has become an important symbol. On December 6, 2000, German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder said the following at a speech dedicating Willy Brandt Square in Warsaw (Boskovitch, 2010): This image of Willy Brandt kneeling has become a symbol. A symbol of accepting the past and of understanding it as an obligation for reconciliation. As an obligation for a common future. Like so many Germans and Poles I will never forget this image. It has come to be a reminder and a political credo for entire generations. COPY RIGHT © 2012 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 2 2
Description: