ebook img

Antarctic new particle formation from continental biogenic precursors PDF

54 Pages·2012·8.07 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Antarctic new particle formation from continental biogenic precursors

Atmos.Chem.Phys.Discuss.,12,32741–32794,2012 Atmospheric Dis www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/12/32741/2012/ Chemistry c ACPD u doi:10.5194/acpd-12-32741-2012 and Physics ss ©Author(s)2012.CCAttribution3.0License. Discussions io 12,32741–32794,2012 n P a p Thisdiscussionpaperis/hasbeenunderreviewforthejournalAtmosphericChemistry e Antarctic new r andPhysics(ACP).PleaserefertothecorrespondingfinalpaperinACPifavailable. particle formation | from continental D Antarctic new particle formation from is biogenic precursors c u ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. continental biogenic precursors io n P a p E.-M. Kyro¨1, V.-M. Kerminen1, A. Virkkula1,2, M. Dal Maso1,3, J. Parshintsev4, er TitlePage J. Ru´ız-Jimenez4, L. Forsstro¨m5, H. E. Manninen1, M.-L. Riekkola4, P. Heinonen6, | Abstract Introduction 1 and M. Kulmala D is Conclusions References 1DepartmentofPhysics,UniversityofHelsinki,Helsinki,Finland cu 2AirQualityResearch,FinnishMeteorologicalInstitute,Helsinki,Finland ss Tables Figures io 3DepartmentofPhysics,TampereUniversityofTechnology,Tampere,Finland n 4DepartmentofChemistry,UniversityofHelsinki,Helsinki,Finland Pa J I 5DepartmentofBiologicalandEnvironmentalSciences,UniversityofHelsinki,Helsinki, pe r J I Finland 6FINNARPlogistics,FinnishMeteorologicalInstitute,Helsinki,Finland | Back Close D Received:6November2012–Accepted:5December2012–Published:19December2012 is c FullScreen/Esc u Correspondenceto:E.-M.Kyro¨ (ella-maria.kyro@helsinki.fi) s s io PublishedbyCopernicusPublicationsonbehalfoftheEuropeanGeosciencesUnion. n Printer-friendlyVersion P a p InteractiveDiscussion e r 32741 | Abstract D is c ACPD u Over Antarctica, aerosol particles originate almost entirely from marine areas, with s s minor contribution from long-range transported dust or anthropogenic material. The ion 12,32741–32794,2012 Antarctic continent itself, unlike all other continental areas, has been thought to be P a p 5 practically free of aerosol sources. Here we present evidence of local aerosol produc- er Antarctic new tion associated with melt-water ponds in the continental Antarctica. We show that in particle formation airmassespassingsuchponds,newaerosolparticlesareefficientlyformedandthese | from continental particles grow up to sizes where they may act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Dis biogenic precursors The precursor vapours responsible for aerosol formation and growth originate very c u likely from highly abundant cyanobacteria Nostoc commune (Vaucher) communities of ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. 10 io localponds.Thisisthefirsttimewhenfreshwatervegetationhasbeenidentifiedasan n P aerosol precursor source. The influence of the new source on clouds and climate may a p increaseinfutureAntarctica,andpossiblyelsewhereundergoingacceleratingsummer e TitlePage r melting of semi-permanent snow cover. | Abstract Introduction D is Conclusions References 1 Introduction c 15 u ss Tables Figures Antarctica is experiencing dramatic changes especially in the Peninsula and west- io n ern part but also in the coastal areas around the whole continent (Chen et al., 2009; Pa J I Pritchard et al., 2009). These are also the areas with most of the continents exposed p e ground and high mountains. Especially the spring temperatures have been increasing r J I in these areas (Steig et al., 2009; Schneider et al., 2012) followed by increasing ice | 20 Back Close massloss(Pritchardetal.,2009)andiceshelfcollapses(Rignotetal.,2004).Inspring D is and summer, intense solar radiation melts snow and ice around the mountains as well c FullScreen/Esc u as areas with exposed ground and blue ice into ponds and lakes. The increasing tem- ss io perature decreases the overall surface albedo in these areas by enhancing the snow n Printer-friendlyVersion P 25 and ice melt (Hall, 2004). a p InteractiveDiscussion e r 32742 | TheAntarcticclimatesystemiscoupledtightlywithaerosolparticlesviaglobalwarm- D is ing and associated feedback processes involving aerosol-cloud interactions. The most c ACPD u s studied aerosol type in this respect is the natural sulphate aerosol originating from s oceanic dimethyl sulphide (DMS) emissions affected mainly by ocean biochemistry ion 12,32741–32794,2012 P 5 and wind speed (Korhonen et al., 2008). Another prominent aerosol type over Antarc- ap tica is sea salt (Shaw, 1988; Hara et al., 2011; Weller et al., 2011), the concentration e Antarctic new r andpropertiesofwhichareinfluencedbytheseaiceextent,windspeedandprobably particle formation | alsobytheseawatertemperature(Struthersetal.,2011).Inadditiontothesetwonat- from continental D uralaerosoltypes,smallamountsofdustandanthropogenicpollution-derivedparticles is biogenic precursors c areoccasionallylong-rangetransportedtoAntarctica(Shaw,1988;Fiebigetal.,2009). u 10 The Antarctic continent has been thought to be a weak source of primary aerosol par- ssio E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. ticles, mainly dust as well as pollen and bacteria (Gonza´les-Toril et al., 2009), and n P a negligible source of precursors for secondary aerosol particles. a p e TitlePage Here, we investigate secondary aerosol formation observed during the FINNARP r 2009 expedition at the Finnish Antarctic Research Station Aboa. Previous studies 15 | Abstract Introduction have shown that secondary Antarctic aerosols originate from oceanic DMS emissions D (O’Dowd et al., 1997; Davis et al., 1998; Asmi et al., 2010; Yu and Luo, 2010), long- is Conclusions References c range transport (Ito, 1993; Fiebig et al., 2009; Hara et al., 2011), or from intrusion of u ss Tables Figures upper tropospheric air into the boundary layer (Virkkula et al., 2009). Also local an- io n 20 thropogenicsourceshavebeenlinkedwithnewparticleformation(NPF)incontinental Pa J I Antarctica (Park et al., 2004). At Aboa, the particle formation takes mostly place in p e airmasses coming along the coastline (Koponen et al., 2003) or intruding from higher r J I altitude(Virkkulaetal.,2009).Observationsofgrowthofthesmallestclusterionssug- | Back Close gestthatthenucleationcanoccurevenintheboundarylayer(Asmietal.,2010).Ithas D alsobeensuggestedthatsecondaryorganicmatter,havingasignificantcontributionin is 25 c FullScreen/Esc u theAitkenandaccumulationmodes,couldcontributetothegrowthofaerosolparticles s s (Virkkula et al., 2006, 2009). However, observations of nanometer-sized secondary io n Printer-friendlyVersion organic aerosols have not been made over Antarctica. P a p InteractiveDiscussion e r 32743 | Ourprincipalgoalinthispaperistofindouttheoriginofsecondaryaerosolparticles D is and their precursors in the summer continental Antarctic atmosphere. In addition to c ACPD u s this, we aim to explore which vapours make the newly-formed particles to grow in s io 12,32741–32794,2012 size,andwhetherAntarcticsecondaryaerosolformationiscapableofproducingcloud n P condensing nuclei. a 5 p e Antarctic new r particle formation 2 Materials and methods | from continental D 2.1 Description of the site and measurements is biogenic precursors c u ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. The aerosol and atmospheric composition measurements discussed here were car- io n ried out between 5 December 2009 and 23 January 2010 at the Finnish Antarctic Re- P a search Station, Aboa (location is shown in Asmi et al., 2010), in Queen Maud Land, p 10 e TitlePage during the FINNARP 2009 expedition. The station is built on a nunatak Basen, ap- r proximately 500m a.s.l. and some 130km away from the open ocean in summer. Dur- | Abstract Introduction ing the summer, snow and ice on top of Basen melts into biologically active, shallow D ponds. The most abundant macroscopic organism in these ponds is cyanobacteria isc Conclusions References u 15 Nostoc commune (Vaucher). The majority of the ponds during FINNARP 2009 expe- ss Tables Figures dition were approximately 2km from the measurement site. The measurement site is io n located 200m upwind from the main building. Since winds blow most of the time from Pa J I the north-east, contamination by the station and vehicles that are used at the main pe r J I station is minimal. We measured aerosols continuously at about 3m a.g.l. The total particlenumbersizedistributioninthediameterrange10–500nmwasmeasuredusing | 20 Back Close aDifferentialMobilityParticleSizer(DMPS),andthesizedistributionsofpositivelyand D is negativelychargedparticlesinthediameterrange0.8–42nmweremeasuredusingan c FullScreen/Esc u s Air Ion Spectrometer (AIS). In order to get information on the aerosol chemical com- s io position, particles were collected on quartz filters and the filters were changed three n Printer-friendlyVersion P 25 times a week. Methanolic extracts obtained from the filter samples after ultrasound- a p InteractiveDiscussion assisted extraction were analyzed later in Finland using a comprehensive two dimen- e r 32744 | sional gas chromatography–time-of–flight mass spectrometer (GCxGC-TOF-MS). In D is addition, samples from the cyanobacterial mats and water were taken and analysed. c ACPD u s s 2.2 Measurement set-up and equipment ion 12,32741–32794,2012 P a Themeasurementsofneutralandchargedparticlesizedistributions,ozoneconcentra- p e Antarctic new r tionandchemicalfiltersampleswerecarriedoutduringtheFinnishAntarcticResearch 5 particle formation Program (FINNARP) 2009 expedition. All the devices were kept inside a small con- | from continental tainer,about200mupwindfromthemainstation,asdescribedbyVirkkulaetal.(2007) D is biogenic precursors and Asmi et al. (2010). The inlets were approximately 3m above the ground. For the c u DMPS and the filter sampling, a 25-mm inlet with flow splitter with no sector-control ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. io 10 was used. A separate, 35-mm copper inlet was used for the AIS and for the ozone n P monitor, a 6-mm-wide teflon tube was used as an inlet. a p e TitlePage r 2.2.1 Air-ion spectrometer | Abstract Introduction Measuring the ion concentration and charge distribution of aerosol particles offers an D effective method to study particle formation mechanisms. In this campaign the ion isc Conclusions References u 15 spectrometer was the only instrument able to measure directly the early stages of ss Tables Figures atmospheric nucleation and subsequent growth. New particle formation event analy- io n sis, including event classification and formation- and growth rate calculations for ion Pa J I spectrometerdatahasalreadywell-definedguidelines(Hirsikkoetal.,2005;Manninen pe r J I et al., 2010; Kulmala et al., 2012). The Air Ion Spectrometer (AIS) (Mirme et al., 2007) measures the mobility distributions of both negative and positive air ions simultane- | 20 Back Close ously in the range between 3.2 and 0.0013cm2V−1s−1, which corresponds to a mo- D is bility diameter range of 0.8–42nm. The mobility diameter, i.e. the Millikan diameter, is c FullScreen/Esc u applied when converting the measured mobility to the particle diameter (Ma¨kela¨ et al., ss io 2006). The AIS consist of two parallel cylindrical DMAs, one for classifying negative n Printer-friendlyVersion P 25 ions and the other for positive ions. The ions are simultaneously classified according a totheirelectricalmobilitywithdifferentialradialelectricfieldandcollectedto21electri- pe InteractiveDiscussion r 32745 | cally isolated sections. Each section has its own electrometer to measure the currents D is carried by the ions. The total flow into the AIS is 60Lmin−1, whereas the sample and c ACPD u −1 s the sheath flows of the DMAs are 30 and 60Lmin , respectively. s io 12,32741–32794,2012 n 2.2.2 Differential Mobility Particle Sizer P a p e Antarctic new The Differential Mobility Particle Sizer (DMPS) (Aalto et al., 2001) setup measures at- r 5 particle formation mospheric aerosol particle number size distribution between 10 and 700nm in diame- | from continental ter. The DMPS consists of Hauke-type DMA (28.0cm long), CPC (TSI 3772) as a par- D is biogenic precursors ticle detector, closed loop sheath flow arrangement and radioactive Carbon-14 beta c u neutralizer. The sample flow rate is 1Lmin−1 and the sheath flow rate is 10Lmin−1; ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. 10 both were checked regularly with a bubble flowmeter. The complete size distribution ion is obtained in a 6-min time resolution by changing the classifying voltage of the DMA. P a p The total aerosol number concentration is calculated from the measured number size e TitlePage r distribution. | Abstract Introduction 2.2.3 Filter sampling D is Conclusions References c u 15 ThefiltersamplingwastakenfromthesamesamplinglineasfortheDMPS.Thefilters ss Tables Figures that were used were quartz, 47mm in diameter (Whatman International, Kent, UK). io n −1 The flow rate was first 50Lmin but later (7 January 2010 onwards) it was changed P a J I into25Lmin−1.Nocut-offwasusedintheinlet.Filterswerestoredinpetrislidesunder p e a laminar flow hood inside the measurement container in room temperature. r J I | 2.2.4 Ozone analyzer Back Close 20 D is c FullScreen/Esc A continuous ozone analyzer O342M by Environnement S.A was used to monitor the u s s ozone concentrations. The analyzer was calibrated before the campaign at an accred- io n Printer-friendlyVersion itedcalibrationlaboratoryattheFinnishMeteorologicalInstitute(FMI).Theozonecon- P centration is detected by the difference in ultraviolet absorption between ambient air ap InteractiveDiscussion e and ozone-cleaned sample. One measurement cycle takes approximately 10s. r 25 32746 | 2.2.5 Cyanobacterial mat and water samples D is c ACPD u Samples from the ponds and cyanobacterial mats were takenon 3 January 2010. Two s s 50mL bottles were cleaned thoroughly with ethanol. One bottle was filled with water ion 12,32741–32794,2012 taken from the pond and another one with the water-Nostoc commune mixture. The P a p 5 samplesweretakenfromthesamepondonthetopofBasen.Thesizeofthepondwas er Antarctic new 2 approximately 40m and it was 10–20cm deep. Many similar ponds were found from particle formation 2 | the nunatak, the largest one being more than 100m in area. The bottles were stored from continental in a freezer and transported to Finland in frozen container. Dis biogenic precursors c u 2.3 Analysis of aerosol size distribution measurement ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. io n NPF events can be visually classified based on the shape of the particle size distribu- P 10 a tion into different types (Dal Maso et al., 2005; Yli-Juuti et al., 2009; Manninen et al., p e TitlePage 2010; Kulmala et al., 2012). The different types of events are signatures of NPF hap- r pening on different spatial and temporal scales and their shape is caused by the Eule- | Abstract Introduction rianwayofmeasuringtheairmass.Traditional“banana”-eventsaretypicallyobserved D is Conclusions References when NPF happens over geographically large area, whereas other types (e.g. “apple”, c 15 u “bump” and “wind-induced” all of which were observed at Aboa during FINNARP 2009 ss Tables Figures io expedition) represent more local NPF. n P The rate at which the newly-formed aerosol population grows (i.e. particle growth a J I p rate, GR) can be determined from the measured number size distributions by follow- e r J I ing the geometric mean size of the nucleation mode particles (Dal Maso et al., 2005; 20 | Yli-Juuti et al., 2011; Kulmala et al., 2012). The GR can be reliably determined only Back Close D for “banana”-type events. Size-distribution – dependent particle losses can be charac- is terizedbycondensationandcoagulationsinks(CSandCoagS,respectively)(Kulmala cu FullScreen/Esc s et al., 2001, 2012; Dal Maso et al., 2002). The CS is a value of how rapidly vapour s io molecules will condense onto pre-existing aerosol whereas CoagS determines how n Printer-friendlyVersion 25 P rapidly aerosol particles are removed trough coagulation scavenging. a p InteractiveDiscussion e r 32747 | Theformationrateofparticlesofcertainsize(J)iscalculatedbytakingintoaccount D is the time evolution of the particle number concentration and the losses due to coagula- c ACPD u s tionscavengingtothelargerpre-existingparticlesaswellasthegrowthoutofthesize s io 12,32741–32794,2012 range (Manninen et al., 2010; Kulmala et al., 2012). For charged particles, the losses n P due to ion-ion recombination and sources due to charging of the particles needs to be a 5 p also addressed (Manninen et al., 2010). e Antarctic new r particle formation | 2.4 Chemical analysis from continental D is biogenic precursors 2.4.1 Filter samples: elucidication of the aerosol particle components c u ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. A comprehensive two dimensional gas chromatograph-time-of-flight mass spectrom- io n eter (GCxGC-TOF-MS) from LECO (LECO Instrument Ltd., Stockport, Chesire, Eng- P 10 a land) was used for the elucidation of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds in p e TitlePage r aerosol particles. The methodology used for the extraction, derivatisation, individual isolationandidentificationofthecompoundswassimilartothatreportedearlier(Ruiz- | Abstract Introduction Jimenez et al., 2011a, b). Briefly, the compounds were extracted from the filters by D is Conclusions References sonication assisted extraction. Samples with and without derivatisation were analysed c 15 u in triplicate. The derivatisation step was necessary to increase the volatility of the ss Tables Figures io semivolatile and low-volatile compounds. 50ng of 2,4-dichlorobenzoic acid, used as n P internal standard (IS) for the derivatisation step, was added to the sample before the a J I p derivatisation. Sample solvent was then evaporated with a gentle stream of nitrogen. e r J I A mixture of 20µl of BSTFA containing TMCS (1%) and 20µl of pyridine was used 20 | as a derivatisation reagent. The reaction was accelerated by the application of ultra- Back Close ◦ 0 D sound for 30min at 35 C. Before GCxGC-TOF-MS analysis, 5ng of 1-1 -binaphthyl, is used as IS for the injection, was added. In a third step, the most compounds present cu FullScreen/Esc s in the extract were individually isolated and detected using the GCxGC-TOF-MS. The s io identification was based on the comparison of the spectral information obtained from n Printer-friendlyVersion 25 P the detector and the retention indexes calculated using authentic standards with the a p InteractiveDiscussion information provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Golm er 32748 | databases. Identified compounds were classified into seven groups according to their D is chemical composition: hydrocarbons, halogenated compounds, nitrogen compounds, c ACPD u s sulphur compounds, carboxyl, carbonyl and hydroxyl compounds. s io 12,32741–32794,2012 ThehighnumberofidentifiedcompoundsinGCxGC-TOF-MSmadethequantitation n P a challenging task. The semiquantitation of the identified compounds was achieved in a 5 p this research using the normalized response factor (NRF), calculated as follows: e Antarctic new r particle formation NRF=XNRF =XACi, (1) | from continental i A D IS is biogenic precursors c where AC is the peak area of the different analytes and A is the peak area obtained u 0 i IS ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. 10 for 1-1 -binaphthyl, used as the internal standard for the injection. io n An average of 261 compounds per sample was identified using the proposed P methodology.Theclassificationofthesecompoundsintothedifferentchemicalgroups ap e TitlePage (Fig.1)revealedthathydrocarbons,carboxylandhydroxylcompoundsarethefamilies r which contain most of the compounds. In comparison with the results provided in the | Abstract Introduction literature for aerosol particles collected at the SMEAR II station (Ruiz-Jimenez et al., 15 D 2011b), the total number of identified compounds in the Aboa samples was smaller, is Conclusions References c u but the relative composition of the particles in terms of number of compounds was the ss Tables Figures same. io n P a J I 2.4.2 Samples from water and Nostoc commune p e r J I Samples 1 (only water) and 2 (water with small piece of cyanobacteria) were taken 20 | from the freezer 20min before the extraction. 5mL of sample was subjected two times Back Close D to liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with 5mL dichloromethane as such (a) or after pH ad- is c FullScreen/Esc justment (100µL of 1M HCl) (b). Zero samples were made from distilled water (same u s s treatment as real samples). Sample 3 (piece of cyanobacteria, 142.7mg fresh weight) io n Printer-friendlyVersion 25 was extracted by static ultrasound assisted extraction with 10mL of acetone (30min) P a as a solvent (Kallio et al., 2006) and filtered through 0.45µ m syringe filter. Volume of p InteractiveDiscussion e allsampleswasreducedto5mLbyevaporationwithgentlestreamofnitrogenwithout r 32749 | heating. Two aliquots of 1.5mL were taken from each sample for the further analysis. D is ThesamplepreparationbeforetheinjectiontoGCxGC-TOF-MSwasidenticalwiththat c ACPD u s usedinthecaseofthefiltersamples.Intotal,135and227compoundswereidentified s io 12,32741–32794,2012 from water (sample 1 and 2) and algae (sample 3) samples, respectively. n P a p e Antarctic new r 3 Results and discussion 5 particle formation | from continental Duringthecampaign,threenewparticleformation(NPF)eventperiodswereobserved D (Fig.2,upperpanel).Infirsteventperiod,9to11December2009,theintensityofNPF is biogenic precursors c u was however very low, and occurred during an intrusion of air from higher altitudes. ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. This could be seen as an increase in the ozone concentration at the measurement io n site, but also in the HYSPLIT back-trajectories. The next two NPF periods were much P 10 a more intense compared to the first event period. In the following discussion we will p e TitlePage r focus on these two periods. The total particle concentration (contamination not taken into account) during the | Abstract Introduction campaign was on average few hundreds of particles per cm3, while during the event D 3 is Conclusions References periods it increased to several thousands of particles per cm (Fig. 2, second panel). c 15 u Thehighestconcentrationswereobservedduringthesecondeventperiod(1to3Jan- ss Tables Figures io uary 2010). n P From Fig. 2 one can see that the normalized response factor (NRF) of Group 2 a J I p (organic compounds that were enhanced during all event periods) compounds was e r J I increased during all NPF periods, whereas Group 1 (organic compounds that were 20 | present only during the second event period) compounds were observed only during Back Close D the NPF period 1 to 3 January 2010. Also the relative fraction of Group 2 compounds is was greatest during this period. cu FullScreen/Esc s s io n Printer-friendlyVersion P a p InteractiveDiscussion e r 32750 |

Description:
the Aitken and accumulation modes, sional gas chromatography–time-of–flight mass growth occurring throughout the advecting air mass for the duration
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.