Atmos.Chem.Phys.Discuss.,12,32741–32794,2012 Atmospheric Dis www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/12/32741/2012/ Chemistry c ACPD u doi:10.5194/acpd-12-32741-2012 and Physics ss ©Author(s)2012.CCAttribution3.0License. Discussions io 12,32741–32794,2012 n P a p Thisdiscussionpaperis/hasbeenunderreviewforthejournalAtmosphericChemistry e Antarctic new r andPhysics(ACP).PleaserefertothecorrespondingfinalpaperinACPifavailable. particle formation | from continental D Antarctic new particle formation from is biogenic precursors c u ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. continental biogenic precursors io n P a p E.-M. Kyro¨1, V.-M. Kerminen1, A. Virkkula1,2, M. Dal Maso1,3, J. Parshintsev4, er TitlePage J. Ru´ız-Jimenez4, L. Forsstro¨m5, H. E. Manninen1, M.-L. Riekkola4, P. Heinonen6, | Abstract Introduction 1 and M. Kulmala D is Conclusions References 1DepartmentofPhysics,UniversityofHelsinki,Helsinki,Finland cu 2AirQualityResearch,FinnishMeteorologicalInstitute,Helsinki,Finland ss Tables Figures io 3DepartmentofPhysics,TampereUniversityofTechnology,Tampere,Finland n 4DepartmentofChemistry,UniversityofHelsinki,Helsinki,Finland Pa J I 5DepartmentofBiologicalandEnvironmentalSciences,UniversityofHelsinki,Helsinki, pe r J I Finland 6FINNARPlogistics,FinnishMeteorologicalInstitute,Helsinki,Finland | Back Close D Received:6November2012–Accepted:5December2012–Published:19December2012 is c FullScreen/Esc u Correspondenceto:E.-M.Kyro¨ (ella-maria.kyro@helsinki.fi) s s io PublishedbyCopernicusPublicationsonbehalfoftheEuropeanGeosciencesUnion. n Printer-friendlyVersion P a p InteractiveDiscussion e r 32741 | Abstract D is c ACPD u Over Antarctica, aerosol particles originate almost entirely from marine areas, with s s minor contribution from long-range transported dust or anthropogenic material. The ion 12,32741–32794,2012 Antarctic continent itself, unlike all other continental areas, has been thought to be P a p 5 practically free of aerosol sources. Here we present evidence of local aerosol produc- er Antarctic new tion associated with melt-water ponds in the continental Antarctica. We show that in particle formation airmassespassingsuchponds,newaerosolparticlesareefficientlyformedandthese | from continental particles grow up to sizes where they may act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Dis biogenic precursors The precursor vapours responsible for aerosol formation and growth originate very c u likely from highly abundant cyanobacteria Nostoc commune (Vaucher) communities of ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. 10 io localponds.Thisisthefirsttimewhenfreshwatervegetationhasbeenidentifiedasan n P aerosol precursor source. The influence of the new source on clouds and climate may a p increaseinfutureAntarctica,andpossiblyelsewhereundergoingacceleratingsummer e TitlePage r melting of semi-permanent snow cover. | Abstract Introduction D is Conclusions References 1 Introduction c 15 u ss Tables Figures Antarctica is experiencing dramatic changes especially in the Peninsula and west- io n ern part but also in the coastal areas around the whole continent (Chen et al., 2009; Pa J I Pritchard et al., 2009). These are also the areas with most of the continents exposed p e ground and high mountains. Especially the spring temperatures have been increasing r J I in these areas (Steig et al., 2009; Schneider et al., 2012) followed by increasing ice | 20 Back Close massloss(Pritchardetal.,2009)andiceshelfcollapses(Rignotetal.,2004).Inspring D is and summer, intense solar radiation melts snow and ice around the mountains as well c FullScreen/Esc u as areas with exposed ground and blue ice into ponds and lakes. The increasing tem- ss io perature decreases the overall surface albedo in these areas by enhancing the snow n Printer-friendlyVersion P 25 and ice melt (Hall, 2004). a p InteractiveDiscussion e r 32742 | TheAntarcticclimatesystemiscoupledtightlywithaerosolparticlesviaglobalwarm- D is ing and associated feedback processes involving aerosol-cloud interactions. The most c ACPD u s studied aerosol type in this respect is the natural sulphate aerosol originating from s oceanic dimethyl sulphide (DMS) emissions affected mainly by ocean biochemistry ion 12,32741–32794,2012 P 5 and wind speed (Korhonen et al., 2008). Another prominent aerosol type over Antarc- ap tica is sea salt (Shaw, 1988; Hara et al., 2011; Weller et al., 2011), the concentration e Antarctic new r andpropertiesofwhichareinfluencedbytheseaiceextent,windspeedandprobably particle formation | alsobytheseawatertemperature(Struthersetal.,2011).Inadditiontothesetwonat- from continental D uralaerosoltypes,smallamountsofdustandanthropogenicpollution-derivedparticles is biogenic precursors c areoccasionallylong-rangetransportedtoAntarctica(Shaw,1988;Fiebigetal.,2009). u 10 The Antarctic continent has been thought to be a weak source of primary aerosol par- ssio E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. ticles, mainly dust as well as pollen and bacteria (Gonza´les-Toril et al., 2009), and n P a negligible source of precursors for secondary aerosol particles. a p e TitlePage Here, we investigate secondary aerosol formation observed during the FINNARP r 2009 expedition at the Finnish Antarctic Research Station Aboa. Previous studies 15 | Abstract Introduction have shown that secondary Antarctic aerosols originate from oceanic DMS emissions D (O’Dowd et al., 1997; Davis et al., 1998; Asmi et al., 2010; Yu and Luo, 2010), long- is Conclusions References c range transport (Ito, 1993; Fiebig et al., 2009; Hara et al., 2011), or from intrusion of u ss Tables Figures upper tropospheric air into the boundary layer (Virkkula et al., 2009). Also local an- io n 20 thropogenicsourceshavebeenlinkedwithnewparticleformation(NPF)incontinental Pa J I Antarctica (Park et al., 2004). At Aboa, the particle formation takes mostly place in p e airmasses coming along the coastline (Koponen et al., 2003) or intruding from higher r J I altitude(Virkkulaetal.,2009).Observationsofgrowthofthesmallestclusterionssug- | Back Close gestthatthenucleationcanoccurevenintheboundarylayer(Asmietal.,2010).Ithas D alsobeensuggestedthatsecondaryorganicmatter,havingasignificantcontributionin is 25 c FullScreen/Esc u theAitkenandaccumulationmodes,couldcontributetothegrowthofaerosolparticles s s (Virkkula et al., 2006, 2009). However, observations of nanometer-sized secondary io n Printer-friendlyVersion organic aerosols have not been made over Antarctica. P a p InteractiveDiscussion e r 32743 | Ourprincipalgoalinthispaperistofindouttheoriginofsecondaryaerosolparticles D is and their precursors in the summer continental Antarctic atmosphere. In addition to c ACPD u s this, we aim to explore which vapours make the newly-formed particles to grow in s io 12,32741–32794,2012 size,andwhetherAntarcticsecondaryaerosolformationiscapableofproducingcloud n P condensing nuclei. a 5 p e Antarctic new r particle formation 2 Materials and methods | from continental D 2.1 Description of the site and measurements is biogenic precursors c u ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. The aerosol and atmospheric composition measurements discussed here were car- io n ried out between 5 December 2009 and 23 January 2010 at the Finnish Antarctic Re- P a search Station, Aboa (location is shown in Asmi et al., 2010), in Queen Maud Land, p 10 e TitlePage during the FINNARP 2009 expedition. The station is built on a nunatak Basen, ap- r proximately 500m a.s.l. and some 130km away from the open ocean in summer. Dur- | Abstract Introduction ing the summer, snow and ice on top of Basen melts into biologically active, shallow D ponds. The most abundant macroscopic organism in these ponds is cyanobacteria isc Conclusions References u 15 Nostoc commune (Vaucher). The majority of the ponds during FINNARP 2009 expe- ss Tables Figures dition were approximately 2km from the measurement site. The measurement site is io n located 200m upwind from the main building. Since winds blow most of the time from Pa J I the north-east, contamination by the station and vehicles that are used at the main pe r J I station is minimal. We measured aerosols continuously at about 3m a.g.l. The total particlenumbersizedistributioninthediameterrange10–500nmwasmeasuredusing | 20 Back Close aDifferentialMobilityParticleSizer(DMPS),andthesizedistributionsofpositivelyand D is negativelychargedparticlesinthediameterrange0.8–42nmweremeasuredusingan c FullScreen/Esc u s Air Ion Spectrometer (AIS). In order to get information on the aerosol chemical com- s io position, particles were collected on quartz filters and the filters were changed three n Printer-friendlyVersion P 25 times a week. Methanolic extracts obtained from the filter samples after ultrasound- a p InteractiveDiscussion assisted extraction were analyzed later in Finland using a comprehensive two dimen- e r 32744 | sional gas chromatography–time-of–flight mass spectrometer (GCxGC-TOF-MS). In D is addition, samples from the cyanobacterial mats and water were taken and analysed. c ACPD u s s 2.2 Measurement set-up and equipment ion 12,32741–32794,2012 P a Themeasurementsofneutralandchargedparticlesizedistributions,ozoneconcentra- p e Antarctic new r tionandchemicalfiltersampleswerecarriedoutduringtheFinnishAntarcticResearch 5 particle formation Program (FINNARP) 2009 expedition. All the devices were kept inside a small con- | from continental tainer,about200mupwindfromthemainstation,asdescribedbyVirkkulaetal.(2007) D is biogenic precursors and Asmi et al. (2010). The inlets were approximately 3m above the ground. For the c u DMPS and the filter sampling, a 25-mm inlet with flow splitter with no sector-control ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. io 10 was used. A separate, 35-mm copper inlet was used for the AIS and for the ozone n P monitor, a 6-mm-wide teflon tube was used as an inlet. a p e TitlePage r 2.2.1 Air-ion spectrometer | Abstract Introduction Measuring the ion concentration and charge distribution of aerosol particles offers an D effective method to study particle formation mechanisms. In this campaign the ion isc Conclusions References u 15 spectrometer was the only instrument able to measure directly the early stages of ss Tables Figures atmospheric nucleation and subsequent growth. New particle formation event analy- io n sis, including event classification and formation- and growth rate calculations for ion Pa J I spectrometerdatahasalreadywell-definedguidelines(Hirsikkoetal.,2005;Manninen pe r J I et al., 2010; Kulmala et al., 2012). The Air Ion Spectrometer (AIS) (Mirme et al., 2007) measures the mobility distributions of both negative and positive air ions simultane- | 20 Back Close ously in the range between 3.2 and 0.0013cm2V−1s−1, which corresponds to a mo- D is bility diameter range of 0.8–42nm. The mobility diameter, i.e. the Millikan diameter, is c FullScreen/Esc u applied when converting the measured mobility to the particle diameter (Ma¨kela¨ et al., ss io 2006). The AIS consist of two parallel cylindrical DMAs, one for classifying negative n Printer-friendlyVersion P 25 ions and the other for positive ions. The ions are simultaneously classified according a totheirelectricalmobilitywithdifferentialradialelectricfieldandcollectedto21electri- pe InteractiveDiscussion r 32745 | cally isolated sections. Each section has its own electrometer to measure the currents D is carried by the ions. The total flow into the AIS is 60Lmin−1, whereas the sample and c ACPD u −1 s the sheath flows of the DMAs are 30 and 60Lmin , respectively. s io 12,32741–32794,2012 n 2.2.2 Differential Mobility Particle Sizer P a p e Antarctic new The Differential Mobility Particle Sizer (DMPS) (Aalto et al., 2001) setup measures at- r 5 particle formation mospheric aerosol particle number size distribution between 10 and 700nm in diame- | from continental ter. The DMPS consists of Hauke-type DMA (28.0cm long), CPC (TSI 3772) as a par- D is biogenic precursors ticle detector, closed loop sheath flow arrangement and radioactive Carbon-14 beta c u neutralizer. The sample flow rate is 1Lmin−1 and the sheath flow rate is 10Lmin−1; ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. 10 both were checked regularly with a bubble flowmeter. The complete size distribution ion is obtained in a 6-min time resolution by changing the classifying voltage of the DMA. P a p The total aerosol number concentration is calculated from the measured number size e TitlePage r distribution. | Abstract Introduction 2.2.3 Filter sampling D is Conclusions References c u 15 ThefiltersamplingwastakenfromthesamesamplinglineasfortheDMPS.Thefilters ss Tables Figures that were used were quartz, 47mm in diameter (Whatman International, Kent, UK). io n −1 The flow rate was first 50Lmin but later (7 January 2010 onwards) it was changed P a J I into25Lmin−1.Nocut-offwasusedintheinlet.Filterswerestoredinpetrislidesunder p e a laminar flow hood inside the measurement container in room temperature. r J I | 2.2.4 Ozone analyzer Back Close 20 D is c FullScreen/Esc A continuous ozone analyzer O342M by Environnement S.A was used to monitor the u s s ozone concentrations. The analyzer was calibrated before the campaign at an accred- io n Printer-friendlyVersion itedcalibrationlaboratoryattheFinnishMeteorologicalInstitute(FMI).Theozonecon- P centration is detected by the difference in ultraviolet absorption between ambient air ap InteractiveDiscussion e and ozone-cleaned sample. One measurement cycle takes approximately 10s. r 25 32746 | 2.2.5 Cyanobacterial mat and water samples D is c ACPD u Samples from the ponds and cyanobacterial mats were takenon 3 January 2010. Two s s 50mL bottles were cleaned thoroughly with ethanol. One bottle was filled with water ion 12,32741–32794,2012 taken from the pond and another one with the water-Nostoc commune mixture. The P a p 5 samplesweretakenfromthesamepondonthetopofBasen.Thesizeofthepondwas er Antarctic new 2 approximately 40m and it was 10–20cm deep. Many similar ponds were found from particle formation 2 | the nunatak, the largest one being more than 100m in area. The bottles were stored from continental in a freezer and transported to Finland in frozen container. Dis biogenic precursors c u 2.3 Analysis of aerosol size distribution measurement ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. io n NPF events can be visually classified based on the shape of the particle size distribu- P 10 a tion into different types (Dal Maso et al., 2005; Yli-Juuti et al., 2009; Manninen et al., p e TitlePage 2010; Kulmala et al., 2012). The different types of events are signatures of NPF hap- r pening on different spatial and temporal scales and their shape is caused by the Eule- | Abstract Introduction rianwayofmeasuringtheairmass.Traditional“banana”-eventsaretypicallyobserved D is Conclusions References when NPF happens over geographically large area, whereas other types (e.g. “apple”, c 15 u “bump” and “wind-induced” all of which were observed at Aboa during FINNARP 2009 ss Tables Figures io expedition) represent more local NPF. n P The rate at which the newly-formed aerosol population grows (i.e. particle growth a J I p rate, GR) can be determined from the measured number size distributions by follow- e r J I ing the geometric mean size of the nucleation mode particles (Dal Maso et al., 2005; 20 | Yli-Juuti et al., 2011; Kulmala et al., 2012). The GR can be reliably determined only Back Close D for “banana”-type events. Size-distribution – dependent particle losses can be charac- is terizedbycondensationandcoagulationsinks(CSandCoagS,respectively)(Kulmala cu FullScreen/Esc s et al., 2001, 2012; Dal Maso et al., 2002). The CS is a value of how rapidly vapour s io molecules will condense onto pre-existing aerosol whereas CoagS determines how n Printer-friendlyVersion 25 P rapidly aerosol particles are removed trough coagulation scavenging. a p InteractiveDiscussion e r 32747 | Theformationrateofparticlesofcertainsize(J)iscalculatedbytakingintoaccount D is the time evolution of the particle number concentration and the losses due to coagula- c ACPD u s tionscavengingtothelargerpre-existingparticlesaswellasthegrowthoutofthesize s io 12,32741–32794,2012 range (Manninen et al., 2010; Kulmala et al., 2012). For charged particles, the losses n P due to ion-ion recombination and sources due to charging of the particles needs to be a 5 p also addressed (Manninen et al., 2010). e Antarctic new r particle formation | 2.4 Chemical analysis from continental D is biogenic precursors 2.4.1 Filter samples: elucidication of the aerosol particle components c u ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. A comprehensive two dimensional gas chromatograph-time-of-flight mass spectrom- io n eter (GCxGC-TOF-MS) from LECO (LECO Instrument Ltd., Stockport, Chesire, Eng- P 10 a land) was used for the elucidation of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds in p e TitlePage r aerosol particles. The methodology used for the extraction, derivatisation, individual isolationandidentificationofthecompoundswassimilartothatreportedearlier(Ruiz- | Abstract Introduction Jimenez et al., 2011a, b). Briefly, the compounds were extracted from the filters by D is Conclusions References sonication assisted extraction. Samples with and without derivatisation were analysed c 15 u in triplicate. The derivatisation step was necessary to increase the volatility of the ss Tables Figures io semivolatile and low-volatile compounds. 50ng of 2,4-dichlorobenzoic acid, used as n P internal standard (IS) for the derivatisation step, was added to the sample before the a J I p derivatisation. Sample solvent was then evaporated with a gentle stream of nitrogen. e r J I A mixture of 20µl of BSTFA containing TMCS (1%) and 20µl of pyridine was used 20 | as a derivatisation reagent. The reaction was accelerated by the application of ultra- Back Close ◦ 0 D sound for 30min at 35 C. Before GCxGC-TOF-MS analysis, 5ng of 1-1 -binaphthyl, is used as IS for the injection, was added. In a third step, the most compounds present cu FullScreen/Esc s in the extract were individually isolated and detected using the GCxGC-TOF-MS. The s io identification was based on the comparison of the spectral information obtained from n Printer-friendlyVersion 25 P the detector and the retention indexes calculated using authentic standards with the a p InteractiveDiscussion information provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Golm er 32748 | databases. Identified compounds were classified into seven groups according to their D is chemical composition: hydrocarbons, halogenated compounds, nitrogen compounds, c ACPD u s sulphur compounds, carboxyl, carbonyl and hydroxyl compounds. s io 12,32741–32794,2012 ThehighnumberofidentifiedcompoundsinGCxGC-TOF-MSmadethequantitation n P a challenging task. The semiquantitation of the identified compounds was achieved in a 5 p this research using the normalized response factor (NRF), calculated as follows: e Antarctic new r particle formation NRF=XNRF =XACi, (1) | from continental i A D IS is biogenic precursors c where AC is the peak area of the different analytes and A is the peak area obtained u 0 i IS ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. 10 for 1-1 -binaphthyl, used as the internal standard for the injection. io n An average of 261 compounds per sample was identified using the proposed P methodology.Theclassificationofthesecompoundsintothedifferentchemicalgroups ap e TitlePage (Fig.1)revealedthathydrocarbons,carboxylandhydroxylcompoundsarethefamilies r which contain most of the compounds. In comparison with the results provided in the | Abstract Introduction literature for aerosol particles collected at the SMEAR II station (Ruiz-Jimenez et al., 15 D 2011b), the total number of identified compounds in the Aboa samples was smaller, is Conclusions References c u but the relative composition of the particles in terms of number of compounds was the ss Tables Figures same. io n P a J I 2.4.2 Samples from water and Nostoc commune p e r J I Samples 1 (only water) and 2 (water with small piece of cyanobacteria) were taken 20 | from the freezer 20min before the extraction. 5mL of sample was subjected two times Back Close D to liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with 5mL dichloromethane as such (a) or after pH ad- is c FullScreen/Esc justment (100µL of 1M HCl) (b). Zero samples were made from distilled water (same u s s treatment as real samples). Sample 3 (piece of cyanobacteria, 142.7mg fresh weight) io n Printer-friendlyVersion 25 was extracted by static ultrasound assisted extraction with 10mL of acetone (30min) P a as a solvent (Kallio et al., 2006) and filtered through 0.45µ m syringe filter. Volume of p InteractiveDiscussion e allsampleswasreducedto5mLbyevaporationwithgentlestreamofnitrogenwithout r 32749 | heating. Two aliquots of 1.5mL were taken from each sample for the further analysis. D is ThesamplepreparationbeforetheinjectiontoGCxGC-TOF-MSwasidenticalwiththat c ACPD u s usedinthecaseofthefiltersamples.Intotal,135and227compoundswereidentified s io 12,32741–32794,2012 from water (sample 1 and 2) and algae (sample 3) samples, respectively. n P a p e Antarctic new r 3 Results and discussion 5 particle formation | from continental Duringthecampaign,threenewparticleformation(NPF)eventperiodswereobserved D (Fig.2,upperpanel).Infirsteventperiod,9to11December2009,theintensityofNPF is biogenic precursors c u was however very low, and occurred during an intrusion of air from higher altitudes. ss E.-M.Kyro¨ etal. This could be seen as an increase in the ozone concentration at the measurement io n site, but also in the HYSPLIT back-trajectories. The next two NPF periods were much P 10 a more intense compared to the first event period. In the following discussion we will p e TitlePage r focus on these two periods. The total particle concentration (contamination not taken into account) during the | Abstract Introduction campaign was on average few hundreds of particles per cm3, while during the event D 3 is Conclusions References periods it increased to several thousands of particles per cm (Fig. 2, second panel). c 15 u Thehighestconcentrationswereobservedduringthesecondeventperiod(1to3Jan- ss Tables Figures io uary 2010). n P From Fig. 2 one can see that the normalized response factor (NRF) of Group 2 a J I p (organic compounds that were enhanced during all event periods) compounds was e r J I increased during all NPF periods, whereas Group 1 (organic compounds that were 20 | present only during the second event period) compounds were observed only during Back Close D the NPF period 1 to 3 January 2010. Also the relative fraction of Group 2 compounds is was greatest during this period. cu FullScreen/Esc s s io n Printer-friendlyVersion P a p InteractiveDiscussion e r 32750 |
Description: