<DOCINFOAUTHOR""TITLE"AnalysingCitizenshipTalk:Socialpositioninginpoliticalandlegaldecision-makingprocesses"SUBJECT"Dapsac19"KEYWORDS""SIZEHEIGHT"240"WIDTH"160"VOFFSET"4"> AnalysingCitizenshipTalk DiscourseApproachestoPolitics,SocietyandCulture Theseriesincludescontributionsthatinvestigatepolitical,socialandculturalprocesses fromalinguistic/discourse-analyticpointofview.Theaimistopublishmonographs and edited volumes which combine language-based approaches with disciplines concernedessentiallywithhumaninteraction—disciplinessuchaspoliticalscience, international relations, social psychology, social anthropology, sociology, economics, andgenderstudies. The book series complements the Journal of Language and Politics, edited by Ruth WodakandPaulChilton. Generaleditors RuthWodakandGregMyers UniversityofLancaster Editorialaddress:RuthWodak BowlandCollege,DepartmentofLinguisticsandModernEnglishLanguage UniversityofLancaster,LancasterLA14YT,UK [email protected]@lancaster.ac.uk Advisoryboard IrèneBellier AndreasH.Jucker MaisondesSciencesdel’Homme,Paris,France UniversityofZurich MichaelBillig GeorgeLakoff LoughboroughUniversity UniversityofCaliforniaatBerkeley JanBlommaert J.R.Martin UniversityofGhent UniversityofSydney PaulChilton LuisaMartínRojo UniversityofEastAnglia UniversidadAutonomadeMadrid J.W.Downes JacobL.Mey UniversityofEastAnglia UniversityofSouthernDenmark TeunA.vanDijk ChristinaSchäffner UniversitatPompeuFabra,Barcelona AstonUniversity MikhailV.Ilyin Polis,Moscow Volume19 AnalysingCitizenshipTalk:Socialpositioninginpoliticalandlegal decision-makingprocesses EditedbyHeikoHausendorfandAlfonsBora Analysing Citizenship Talk Social positioning in political and legal decision-making processes Editedby Heiko Hausendorf UniversityofBayreuth Alfons Bora UniversityofBielefeld JohnBenjaminsPublishingCompany Amsterdam(cid:1)/(cid:1)Philadelphia TM Thepaperusedinthispublicationmeetstheminimumrequirements 8 ofAmericanNationalStandardforInformationSciences–Permanence ofPaperforPrintedLibraryMaterials,ansiz39.48-1984. LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationData AnalysingCitizenshipTalk:Socialpositioninginpoliticalandlegal decision-makingprocesses/editedbyHeikoHausendorfandAlfonsBora. p. cm.(DiscourseApproachestoPolitics,SocietyandCulture,issn 1569-9463;v.19) Includesbibliographicalreferencesandindexes. 1.Communicationinpolitics.2.Politicalparticipation.3. Citizenship.4.Discourseanalysis.I.Hausendorf,H.(Heiko)II.Bora, Alfons.III.Series. JA85.A63 2006 320.01’4--dc22 2005055893 isbn9027227098(Hb;alk.paper) ©2006–JohnBenjaminsB.V. Nopartofthisbookmaybereproducedinanyform,byprint,photoprint,microfilm,or anyothermeans,withoutwrittenpermissionfromthepublisher. JohnBenjaminsPublishingCo.·P.O.Box36224·1020meAmsterdam·TheNetherlands JohnBenjaminsNorthAmerica·P.O.Box27519·Philadelphiapa19118-0519·usa Contents v Contents Foreword vii Introduction 1 Heiko Hausendorf and Alfons Bora Part I. Communicating Citizenship as Research Subject Communicating citizenship and social positioning:theoretical concepts 23 Alfons Bora and Heiko Hausendorf Licensing plant GMOs – A brief overview over European regulatory conditions for the deliberate release of genetically modified plants 50 Alfons Bora Procedure and participation:A social theoretical assessment of GM licensing procedures in Ireland and the UK 61 Patrick O’Mahony and Siobhan O’Sullivan Part II. Communicating Citizenship as a Methodological Challenge Reconstructing social positioning in discourse:Methodological basics and their implementation from a conversation analysis perspective 85 Heiko Hausendorf and Alfons Bora Critical Discourse Analysis and citizenship 98 Norman Fairclough, Simon Pardoe and Bronislaw Szerszynski A critical comparison of the investigative gaze of three approaches to text analysis 124 Tracey Skillington vi Contents Communicating citizenship in verbal interaction:Principles of a speech act oriented discourse analysis 151 Marina Sbisà Communicative involvement in public discourse: Considerations on an ethnographic inventory and a proposal for the analysis of modes of citizenship 181 Thomas Spranz-Fogasy Part III. Communicating Citizenship in Discourse:Empirical Aspects Opening up the public space: On the framing and re-framing of a discussion meeting about GMO field trials 199 Ingrid Furchner and Peter Münte Personal reference, social categorisation and the communicative achievement of citizenship: Comments on a local public meeting on GMO field trials 223 Zsuzsanna Iványi, András Kertész, Kornélia Marinecz and Nóra Máté Quotations as a vehicle for social positioning 251 Jana Holsanova On doing being personal:Citizen talk as an identity-suspending device in public debates on GMOs 276 Henrike Padmos, Harrie Mazeland and Hedwig te Molder Appendix Data extracts from a local public meeting on GMO field trials 296 Index 000 Contents vii Foreword The contributions collected in this volume have in common a sociolinguistic interest in forms of citizen participation in the context of modern biotechnology. They deal with citizen participation with respect to the various communicative processes in which it is manifested in discourse (‘communicating citizenship’) and try to make clear the theoretical, methodological, and empirical implications that go along with such an approach. In doing so, they draw upon an interdisciplinary European research project called “Paradys” which took up the case of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and its administrative regulation through concrete permitting procedures in order to provide an heuristically fruitful empirical starting point for the analysis of communicated citizenship.1 The contributions comprise most of the talks that were delivered at the first international project conference which was held in order to clarify the theoretical concept of the project, its methodological basics and which should anticipate in an exemplary fashion the kind of findings to be expected.2 It took place at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research (ZiF) at the University of Bielefeld (Germany) in 2000. We would like to express our gratitude to Prof. Dr. Gertrude Lübbe-Wolf as the ZiF’s then acting-director and to Dr. Johannes Roggenhofer as its executive secretary for supporting and organising this workshop. We would also like to thank Prof. Dr. Paul Chilton and Prof. Dr. Ruth Wodak for including this volume into their series Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture (DAPSAC). Alfons Bora and Heiko Hausendorf Bielefeld / Bayreuth, March 2005 Notes 1. Paradys (Participation and the Dynamics of Social Positioning) was funded by the European Commission (Contract No. HPSE-CT–2001-00050). The project consortium included sociological and linguistic research teams from Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK and Germany and was co-ordinated by the editors. 2. In the meantime, the Paradys project has been finished. Readers interested in the details of the empirical findings and results can be referred to the final report which is available on the editors’ university websites (http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/iwt/paradys/English_start.html). viii Contents Introduction 1 Introduction Heiko Hausendorf and Alfons Bora The development of biotechnology is one of the most prominent social areas in which demands for citizen participation have come to be heard in the last decade of the 20th century. The debate on “unpredictable risks”, which is closely connected with biotechnology and the new “life sciences”, has confronted politics and legis- lation with an enormous need for regulation and control. As a result of this, as well as due to the effect of increasing public interest in the topic, new forms of citizen participation have emerged. Their purpose is to improve the transparency of the decision-making processes connected with licensing procedures regarding geneti- cally modified organisms (GMOs) and – to different extents in various European countries – to establish new concepts of citizenship that allow participants, espe- cially the parties locally concerned, to take part in the decision-making process. It is this kind of effort, undertaken to allow and ensure citizens take part in politically and socially contested decision-making processes, that we are inter- ested in. GMOs and other applications of modern biotechnologies are but one example among others (such as environmental policies or serious changes at urban/region/national/transnational levels) where participatory discourse can be expected to emerge – and where it can systematically be studied. Independent from any particular issue, participatory discourse emerges when- ever a political decision-making process in one way or another requires for the ‘public’ to be included. It typically aims at ‘citizenship’ as a mode of including people in the political system that goes beyond the formal mechanisms of representative democracy in favour of ‘good governance’. Participatory discourse comprises a broad variety of communicative events. Amongst them can be mentioned:oral arenas of debating between experts, politicians, and the public, written objec- tions and/or letters from concerned citizens, frequently asked question pages on governmental websites, face-to-face interaction or media communication, formal as well as informal gatherings, singularly occurring local meetings or regularly occurring gatherings of focus groups. The present book takes a first step towards the sociolinguistic exploration of this field of discourse, including the analysis of theoretical, methodological, and empirical aspects. As far as the empirical part of this exploration is concerned, we will restrict ourselves to the study of a single specific local public meeting between citizens, experts and applicants. In response
Description: