ANALOG CIRCUIT DESIGN Analog Circuit Design Fractional-N Synthesizers, Design for Robustness, Line and Bus Drivers Edited by Arthur van Roermund Eindhoven University ofTechnology, The Netherlands Michiel Steyaert KU Leuven, Belgium and Johan H. Huijsing Delft University ofTechnology, The Netherlands KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS NEW YORK,BOSTON, DORDRECHT, LONDON, MOSCOW eBookISBN: 0-306-48707-1 Print ISBN: 1-4020-7559-6 ©2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. Print ©2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht All rights reserved No part of this eBook maybe reproducedor transmitted inanyform or byanymeans,electronic, mechanical, recording, or otherwise, without written consent from the Publisher Created in the United States of America Visit Springer's eBookstore at: http://www.ebooks.kluweronline.com and the Springer Global Website Online at: http://www.springeronline.com Table of Contents Preface vii Part I: Fractional-N Synthesis A. van Roermund 1 Practical Design Aspects in Franctional-N Frequency Synthesis W. Rhee 3 Design and Simulation of Franctional-N Frequency Synthesizers M. Perrott 27 Monolithic CMOS Fractional-N Frequency Synthesizer Design for High Spectral Purity B. De Muer, M. Steyaert 51 A 19mW 2.2GHz Fully Integrated CMOS Sigma Delta Fractional Synthesiser with 35Hz Frequency Step and Quantization Noise Compensation I. Bietti, G. Albasini, E. Temporiti, R. Castello 77 Implementation Aspects of Fractional-N Techniques in Cellular Handsets Y. Le Guillou, D. Brunel 97 Fractional-N Phase Locked Loops and it’s Application in the GSM System G. Märzinger, B. Neurauter 111 Part II: Design for Robustness M. Steyaert 129 ESD for Analogue Circuit Design D. Clarke, A. Righter 131 ESD in Smart Power Processes G. Croce, A. Andreini, L. Cerati, G. Meneghesso, L. Sponton 169 vi RF-ESD Co-Design for High Performance CMOSLNAs P. Leroux, M. Steyaert 207 Improvement of System Robustness through EMC Optimazation B. Deutschmann 227 Robustness in Analog Design M. De Mey 243 Minimizing Undesired Coupling and Interaction in Mixed Signal ICs T.J. Schmerbeck 255 Part III: Line and Bus Drivers J. Huijsing 273 Looking to/for Low Power ADSL Drivers in the DSLAM E. Moons 275 Class-AB Low-Distortion Drivers for ADSL T. Ferianz 291 Class D Self-Oscillating Line Drivers T. Piessens, M. Steyaert 309 Class G/H Line Drivers for xDSL J. Pierdomenico 333 The USB 2.0 Physical Layer: Standard and Implementation G. den Besten 359 Backplane Transceivers K. Tam, W. Ellersick, R. Soenneker 379 PREFACE This book contains the revised and extended tutorials that 18 experts have presented at the workshop on Advances in Analog Circuit Design (AACD) held at 15-17 April 2003, in Graz, Austria. The book comprises three parts, one per topic, each with 6 tutorial contributions. The three topics are: Fractional-N Synthesis; Design for Robustness; Line and Bus Drivers. Each topic is introduced with a foreword by the chairman of the day, respectivelyArthur van Roermund, Michiel Steyaert, and Han Huijsing. Together, they form the permanent program committee of AACD. The local organising committee of the workshop was formed this year by Herbert Grünbacher(workshop chairman) from Carinthia Tech Institute, Villach, Austria; Wolfgang Pribyl from Austriamicrosystems; and Franz Dielacher from Infineon Technologies. This book is number 12 in the series called Analog Circuit Design. The topics discussed in previous issues are: AACD 2002 Spa (Belgium) Structured Mixed-Mode Design Multi-Bit Sigma-Delta Converters Short-Range RF Circuits AACD 2001 Noordwijk (The Netherlands) Scalable Analog Circuits High-Speed D/A Converters RF Power Amplifiers AACD 2000 Munich (Germany) High-Speed A/D Converters Mixed-Signal Design PLLs and Synthesizers AACD 1999 Nice (France) XDSL and Other Communication Systems RF-MOST Models and Behavioural Modelling Integrated Filters and Oscillators viii AACD 1998 Copenhagen (Denmark) 1-Volt Electronics Mixed-Mode Systems LNAs and RF Power Amps for Telecom AACD 1997 Como (Italy) RF A/D Converters Sensor and Actuator Interfaces Low-Noise Oscillators, PLLs and Synthesizers AACD 1996 Lausanne (Swiss) RF CMOS Circuit Design Bandpass SD and Other Converters Translinear Circuits AACD 1995 Villach (Austria) Low Noise/Power/Voltage Mixed-Mode with CAD Tools Voltage, Current and Time References AACD 1994 Eindhoven (The Netherlands) Low Power, Low Voltage Integrated Filters Smart Power AACD 1993 Leuven (Belgium) Mixed-Mode A/D Design Sensor Interfaces Communication Circuits AACD 1992 Scheveningen (The Netherlands) Opamps ADC Analog CAD We hope that also the current book in this series will provide a valuable contribution to our Analog Circuit Design community. Arthur van Roermund PRACTICAL DESIGN ASPECTS IN FRACTIONAL-N FREQUENCY SYNTHESIS Woogeun Rhee IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center Yorktown Heights, NY, USA Abstract The objective of this work is to present practical design consideration of fractional-N frequency synthesis focusing on different aspects from integer-N frequency synthesizer design. In this work, a frac- tional-Nfrequency synthesis technique for high spectral purity is pri- marily considered. The fractional-N synthesizer offers several advantages over integer-N synthesizers and conventional fractional- N synthesizers. However, superior performance of the fractional- N synthesizer can be possibly limited by noise coupling, nonlinearity, and out-of-band phase noise performance. Design efforts and system perspectives both for the modulator and the PLL are needed to overcome those issues. System and circuit design aspects in frac- tional-N synthesizer design have been addressed followed by exper- imental hardware results. 1. Introduction The demand for low-cost high-performance frequency synthesizers is growing as wireless systems are diversified. High data-rate systems such as general packet radio service (GPRS) need agile frequency switching and require lower in-band phase noise to maintain the same integrated phase error with wider loop bandwidth. Standard frequency synthesizers based on a PLL have difficulties in meeting various specifications due to the fundamental trade-off between loop bandwidth and channel spacing. The circuit noise floor of the synthesizer and spurious tones can be suppressed by narrowing the PLL bandwidth, but the narrowband PLL suffers from long settling time. The narrow loop bandwidth also 3 A. van Roermund et al. (eds.), Analog Circuit Design, 3-26. © 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 4 put stringent requirement for the VCO noise performance. Therefore, there is a trade-off to determine the synthesizer performance in terms of the phase noise, the spurious tone, and the settling time as illustrated in Fig. 1. On the other hand, a fractional-N technique provides wide bandwidth with narrow channel spacing and alleviates PLL design constraints for phase noise and reference spur. The inherent problem of the fractional-N frequency synthesizer is that periodic operation of the dual-modulus divider produces spurious tones. Among several spur reduction methods, the modulation method is primarily considered in this work. 2. Fractional-N Frequency Synthesis Fractional-N frequency synthesizers are PLL-based synthesizers which have a frequency resolution finer than phase detectorfrequency. The fractional-N method originally comes from Digiphase technique [1],[2]. Fig. 2 shows the block diagram of the traditional fractional-N frequency synthesizer. Fractional division ratio is obtained by periodically modulating the controlinput of the dual-modulus divider. For example, to achieve an N + 1/4 division ratio or the fractional modulo of 4, an N + 1 division is done after every three N divisions. The carry of the accumulator is the sequence of {...000100010001...}, where the N + 1 division ratio is corresponding to “1”. 5 2.1 Why fractional-N? Since phase detector frequency can be higher than the frequency resolution, the fractional-N synthesizers offer several advantages over integer-N synthesizers. Firstly, the in-band phase noise contribution from the PLL circuits excluding the VCO is less. For example, to achieve –80 dBc/Hz in-band noise at 2-GHz output with the phase detector frequency of 200 kHz, the PLL circuit noise at the phase detector output should be as low as –160 dBc/Hz due to the multiplication factor of 20log(10 000). When the fractional-N method is used with the phase detector frequency of 8 MHz, the phase noise requirement of the PLL circuits becomes only –112 dBc/Hz, which can be easily met even in CMOS. Secondly, the reference spur performance is less sensitive to the leakage current and to the charge pump current mismatch. For example, with a 64-modulo fractional-N technique, the leakage current as high as 10 nA and the 10% mismatch of the charge pump output currents may not degrade reference spur performance significantly while they are critical in the integer-N frequency synthesizers [3]. Thirdly, the fractional-N technique offers agile frequency switching with wide loop bandwidth. Some applications employ narrowband fractional-N synthesizers simply to alleviate the PLL noise contribution. In that case, faster settling time can be achieved by using a dynamic bandwidth method. By dynamic bandwidth we mean that the loop bandwidth is set to be wider than the desired one when the PLL is in the frequency acquisition mode [4],[5]. With high phase detector frequency, the loop bandwidth in the transient mode can be set high with less overshoot problem. The fractional-N technique provides the opportunity of using dynamic bandwidth methods more effectually.
Description: