AN ESSAY ON STRATEGY Also by Robert Neild PRICING AND EMPLOYMENT IN THE TRADE CYCLE THE REFORM AND MEASUREMENT OF BUDGETARY POLICY (with T. S. Ward) HOW TO MAKE UP YOUR MIND ABOUT THE BOMB THE FOUNDATIONS OF DEFENSIVE DEFENCE (edited with Anders Boserup) An Essay on Strategy as it Affects the Achievement of Peace in a Nuclear Setting Robert Neild Professor Emeritus of Economics, Cambridge Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge M MACMILLAN ©Robert Neild 1990 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1990 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 33-4 Alfred Place, London WC1E 7DP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. First published 1990 Published by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LT O Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Neild, R. R. (Robert Ralph), 1924-- An essay on strategy as it affects the achievement of peace in a nuclear setting. 1. Peace, Maintenance, Role of weapons I. Title 327.1'72 ISBN 978-0-333-52987-4 ISBN 978-1-349-20634-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-20634-6 Contents Preface ix Acknowledgments xi 1 Introduction 1 The importance of theory 2 2 The Political Level 5 Political aims and military means 5 Different settings 6 Ends and means in the classical setting 6 Ends and means in a nuclear setting 8 Stability 10 Feedback 11 Terminology 12 Alternative strategies: non-nuclear forces 14 The distinction between offence and defence 15 The choice between offensiveness and defensiveness 16 The interaction of defensive and offensive strategies 18 The implications for balance and force levels 20 Ways to Mutual Defensive Superiority 21 The more-than-two country problem 23 Nuclear weapons on one side 25 The nuclear setting 25 Balance and nuclear weapons 28 Conclusion 28 3 The Nuclear Level 29 The acceptance of stalemate and its implications 30 The pursuit of political advantage 33 Nuclear weapons only 34 Game theory 35 Escalation 36 Raising the risk 38 Escalation dominance 39 Nuclear plus non-nuclear weapons 40 Extended deterrence 42 More than two countries 44 Conclusion 45 v vi Contents 4 The Sub Nuclear Level 46 Origins 46 The trend of technology and firepower 48 The implications of increased accuracy 50 Area weapons 51 Classical laws 52 The requirements of a defensive structure 52 Air forces 57 Navies 59 Evidence from non-aligned countries 60 Evidence from modelling 63 The efficacy of denial and retaliation 63 The transition to defensiveness 65 The one-sided case: conclusion 66 The two-sided case 67 The approach to restructuring 70 The out of area problem 72 5 The Implementation of a Strategy 74 Three methods of implementation 74 The primacy of strategy 77 The objectives of negotiation 78 Obstacles to change 82 Offensive aims 84 6 Interpretation of the Period since 1945 85 Military doctrine 85 Soviet and WTO non-nuclear doctrine 86 United States/NATO non-nuclear doctrine 91 Nuclear doctrine 96 The United States 98 Strengthening deterrence 101 The pursuit of balance 102 The Soviet Union 103 The lesser nuclear powers 105 Disarmament and arms control 106 7 The Present Position and the Policy Alternatives 111 Soviet and WTO policy 111 NATO policies 113 Arms negotiations 114 Contents vii Appendix: Disarmament Negotiations before 1945 118 A Negotiations before 1914 118 The background 118 The naval arms race 122 The disarmament movement 129 The Hague Conferences 130 B Inter-war negotiations 133 The background 133 The approach to disarmament 135 Naval disarmament 136 General disarmament 137 Qualitative disarmament 138 The lessons 142 Notes and References 145 Index 157 To my children Preface I must first acknowledge an unusual debt. It is to Anders Boserup. He and I set out to write this book together about five years ago. After more than a year of often intense work, when we had produced the core of the first few chapters, we decided to give up the collaboration and work separately. We did not disagree over any major point of substance, but gaps remained to be filled, and there was too wide a gulf between our approaches, between his instinct and astonishing capacity to carry the process of logical and methodolo gical dissection always a stage further and my English instinct to halt when I feel I have reached a formulation that is logically adequate to the problem in hand. After an interval of about two years, we both felt that a book setting out this body of ideas was badly needed, and I, with his encouragement, decided to go ahead on my own, making full use of the work we had done together. I had hoped that when he had seen the resulting draft he might feel able to add his name to mine as co-author, but his reservations about my treatment of some points were such that he felt he could not do so, and it was too late to start a new attempt at an agreed text. Anders Boserup contributed many of the most important ideas to the chapters on theory in the first part of the book. My debt to him is immeasurable. He and I are together editing a collection of papers, including some by each of us, which deal more fully with some of the issues raised in this essay. The papers are drawn principally from the Pugwash Workshop on Conventional Defence in Europe. The collection, entitled The Foundations of Defensive Defence, is also published by Macmillan. I have benefitted from many discussions of one of the main topics addressed in this essay - alternative strategies for non-nuclear defence in Europe - with civilian and military experts from East and West whom I have met at the Pugwash Workshop, at seminars in Moscow convened by Professor Andrey Kokoshin and Dr Evgeni Silin, and at seminars in Bavaria organised by Dr Albrecht von Miiller under the auspices of the newly-formed European Centre for International Security. I am indebted to Field Marshal Lord Carver and Dr Oliver Ramsbotham, who read the whole of this essay in draft, and to Professor Norman Stone and Mrs Darrah, who read the Historical ix