ebook img

An Archaeological Investigation of the Whitley Castle Roman Fort and its Setting PDF

138 Pages·2010·18.96 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview An Archaeological Investigation of the Whitley Castle Roman Fort and its Setting

RESEARCH DEPARTMENT REPORT SERIES no. 89-2009 ISSN 1749-8775 WHITLEY CASTLE, TYNEDALE, NORTHuMbERLAND AN ARCHAEOLOgICAL INvESTIgATION Of THE ROMAN fORT AND ITS SETTINg Dave Went and Stewart Ainsworth Research Department Report Series 89- 2009 WHITLEY CASTLE TYNEDALE, NORTHUMBERLAND An archaeological investigation of the Roman fort and its setting Dave Went and Stewart Ainsworth NGR: NY 6949 4868 © English Heritage ISSN 1749-8775 The Research Department Report Series incorporates reports from all the specialist teams within the English Heritage Research Department: Archaeological Science; Archaeological Archives; Historic Interiors Research and Conservation; Archaeological Projects; Aerial Survey and Investigation; Archaeological Survey and Investigation; Architectural Investigation; Imaging, Graphics and Survey, and the Survey of London. It replaces the former Centre for Archaeology Reports Series, the Archaeological Investigation Report Series and the Architectural Investigation Report Series. Many of these are interim reports which make available the results of specialist investigations in advance of full publication. They are not usually subject to external refereeing, and their conclusions may sometimes have to be modified in the light of information not available at the time of the investigation. Where no final project report is available, readers are advised to consult the author before citing these reports in any publication. Opinions expressed in Research Department reports are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of English Heritage. Requests for further hard copies, after the initial print run, can be made by emailing: [email protected] or by writing to: English Heritage, Fort Cumberland, Fort Cumberland Road, Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD Please note that a charge will be made to cover printing and postage. © ENGLISH HERITAGE 89- 2009 © ENGLISH HERITAGE 89- 2009 Frontispiece. Surveying the south-western defences in January 2008. The view is from the south, looking northwards toward the fort's western tower and beyond, to the Tyne Gap and the Borders © ENGLISH HERITAGE 89- 2009 SUMMARY Between November 2007 and July 2008 English Heritage's Archaeological Survey and Investigation team completed a detailed landscape survey of Whitley Castle in Northumberland: a unique, lozenge-shaped Roman fort on a prominent knoll overlooking the South Tyne valley about 3km north of Alston. The fort, perhaps the Epiacum of Ptolemy’s Geography, stands on the Maiden Way about half-way between Magna on Hadrian's Wall and Bravoniacum beyond Stainmore. It is notable for an extensive array of outer defences - four lines of banks and ditches to the north and east, and seven to the south-west - and for an exceptional degree of preservation. Analytical earthwork survey, combined with geophysical survey undertaken by Durham University between January and May 2009, has considerably advanced our understanding of the fort and its surroundings. Whitley Castle, the highest stone-built fort in Britain, was almost certainly positioned to control the production and shipment of lead and silver from the Alston ore-fields. Its curious shape, suited to the limitations and advantages of a natural knoll, enabled, in a slanted fashion, the accommodation of six barracks to the rear of the principia and four to the front, within an area of barely 1.25ha. Extra-mural settlement has been recorded to the west and north of the fort, and a swathe of ground to the south has been tentatively interpreted as a parade ground. Post-Roman activity is evident from the medieval cultivation patterns and minor settlement remains which override the defences, and in traces of two bastle-like houses and an 18th-century farmhouse, Castle Nook Farm, located within the fort itself. By this time the remains of the fort had come to be known as Whitley Castle, having acquired the name from the surrounding Manor of Whitlaw. CONTRIBUTORS The field survey was carried out by Stewart Ainsworth and Dave Went of English Heritage’s Archaeological Survey and Investigation team, with assistance from Trevor Pearson, Head of Technical Survey and Graphics. The archaeological background and historical sources were researched by the principal author, Dave Went. The text was edited by Al Oswald. Earthwork plans and other illustrations were drawn by Philip Sinton (Figures 1-3, 18, 19, 23, 25 and 43) Trevor Pearson (Figure 34) and Dave Went (Figures 21, 26 and 42). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, the authors would like to express their gratitude to John and Elaine Edgar of Castle Nook Farm, for allowing access to their property and for their hospitality throughout the project. We would also like to thank Alastair Robertson, local historian and author, for sharing his knowledge of the site and the locality, and for his permission to reproduce the results of the geophysical surveys undertaken in 2003 and 2006. Thanks are due to Paul Frodsham, Historic Environment Advisor for the North Pennines AONB Partnership, for administering the main geophysical survey contract in 2009, and for other assistance and advice. We are also pleased to acknowledge Natural England’s contribution in support of the 2009 resistivity survey which was arranged by their regional archaeologist, Tom Gledhill, under the terms of a Higher Level Stewardship Scheme. Duncan Hale and the team from Durham University are to be congratulated for the quality of the geophysical surveys cited in this report, which were carried out to suit the authors’ timetable in extremely challenging winter conditions. The authors gratefully acknowledge permission from the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society, acting on behalf of the original authors, to reproduce © ENGLISH HERITAGE 89- 2009 Figures 11 & 24 in this report. Other copyright limitations and relevant permissions are cited alongside the individual images. ARCHIVE LOCATION The site archive and copies of this report have been deposited in the English Heritage archive and library at the National Monuments Record Centre (NMRC), Kemble Drive, Swindon SN2 2GZ (ref NY 64 NE 1). Copies of this report have also been deposited with the Northumberland Historic Environment Record (County Hall, Morpeth, NE61 2EF) and the British Library. DATE OF SURVEY Field survey: November 2007 – July 2008 Geophysical survey: January-May 2009 CONTACT DETAILS Dave Went Tel. 01904 601927. Email: [email protected] Stewart Ainsworth Tel. 01904 601936. Email: [email protected] English Heritage, 37 Tanner Row, York, YO1 6WP © ENGLISH HERITAGE 89- 2009 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY AND CURRENT LAND-USE 5 3. PREVIOUS DISCOVERIES AND RESEARCH 8 4. DESCRIPTION AND INTERPRETATION OF THE FIELD REMAINS 21 4.1 The Roman Fort and its surroundings 21 4.1.1 The principal Roman roads 21 4.1.2 The fort’s defences 24 4.1.3 Interior Structures 36 4.1.4 Extra-mural activity 43 4.2 Post Roman settlement and agriculture 56 4.2.1 Cultivation 56 4.2.2 Bastles, farmsteads and sheepfolds 59 4.2.3 The ‘Old Inclosed lands’ 66 4.2.4 Post-Roman roads and tracks 69 5. DISCUSSION 76 6. CONCLUSION 94 7. SURVEY METHODOLOGY 96 8. REFERENCES 97 APPENDIX 1. ALTARS, STONES AND INSCRIPTIONS 105 APPENDIX 2. CONCORDANCE AND ARCHIVE 117 APPENDIX 3. PERMANENTLY-MARKED SURVEY STATIONS 118 © ENGLISH HERITAGE 89- 2009 © ENGLISH HERITAGE 89- 2009

Description:
Centre for Archaeology Reports Series, the Archaeological Investigation considerably advanced our understanding of the fort and its surroundings. The field survey was carried out by Stewart Ainsworth and Dave Went of . a number of issues to do with its future presentation and management are in
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.