ebook img

"Americans on the Moon. Great Breakthrough or Space Scam?" PDF

436 Pages·2019·9.686 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview "Americans on the Moon. Great Breakthrough or Space Scam?"

www.manonmoon.ru Unknown Title 40-51 minutes Introduction Death and damnation awaited the loser (Pages from the history of space rivalry) Russia is advancing Ill.1. The �rst satellite of the Earth (USSR, 1957) The �rst astronaut of the Earth (USSR, 1961)        On October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union launched the world's �rst arti�cial Earth satellite and thus opened the space era in the history of mankind (Fig. 1). The Americans took this event hard.         “The �rst Soviet satellite shocked millions of Americans to their foundations, as it for the �rst time questioned their con�dence in the complete superiority of the United States. The technical victory of Soviet scientists led the United States one) to a political defeat, ” recalled one of the editors of the New York Times.        "A country that is leading in space will be judged as the most technologically advanced, with the best education and the best impact of the political and economic system as a whole ," wrote the New York Herald Tribune.       "We unreservedly condemn President Eisenhower for his inability to use the enormous technical capabilities of the country, as a result of which the Soviet Union was able to launch its satellite before the United States," ex-President Truman shouted, glasses flashing. "        "The satellite revealed the psychological vulnerability of our ideas," admitted the then US President D. Eisenhower.       "The dogma of the technical superiority of the United States has collapsed, " wrote the French "Pari-Match" [1].        On April 12, 1961, the historic flight of Yuri Gagarin took place (Fig. 1). In the Soviet Union, a new victory in space caused a huge patriotic upsurge (Fig. 2). Fig. 2. The joy of Russia a)   employees of the Moscow telegraph were among the �rst to learn about Gagarin's flight, b) a demonstration in honor of a new victory in space, c) a boy with a leaflet about Gagarin 1) Quotes from other sources are in small print. Highlights in citations where it is not speci�ed are made by the author of the book. Reference numbers to sources are indicated in square brackets (for example, [1]).        The Americans were very worried about this new blow to their prestige, because they did not hide the fact that they saw themselves as a world leader.  "From the point of view of propaganda, the �rst man in space is worth perhaps more than 100 divisions or a dozen ready to take off at the �rst order of intercontinental missiles ... Representatives of the State Department fear the international consequences of Gagarin's flight," wrote the New York Herald Tribune and Wall Street journal " [1] .        In one of his campaign speeches, Senator DF Kennedy, who soon became President of the United States, said: “The peoples of the world have witnessed that the Soviet Union was the �rst to enter space. Its satellites were the �rst to fly around the moon and around the sun. They concluded that the Soviet Union was going uphill, and we were marking time. I believe that it is time for us to change this opinion " [1] . America's counteroffensive Fig. 3.  John F. Kennedy, President of the United States (1961-1963). On May 25, 1961, he announced that the Americans would be the �rst on the moon. Traditionally, only once a year (usually in January) the President addresses the Congress with a message "On the State of the Country", that is, with a political report and a program of future actions. But on May 25, 1961, shortly after Gagarin's flight, President Kennedy broke this tradition and delivered a second message "On the State of the Country" and announced that the United States would land a man on the moon by the end of the 60s (Fig. 3).        If we want to win the battle that has unfolded around the world between the two systems, if we want to win the battle for the minds of people, then ... we cannot afford to allow the Soviet Union to occupy a leading position in space ” [1] .       A year later, in September 1962, speaking at the Rice University stadium , Kennedy, in particular, said: "We vowed that we would not have to see an enemy conquest flag on the moon, [there will be] a banner of freedom and peace" [2] . As you can see, the terminology is almost military.        The lunar race has begun - a �erce rivalry between the USA and the USSR to be the �rst to send a man to the moon. Both sides attached great importance to achieving victory in this competition “... The rivalry for the moon was a kind of war. “The loser will face death and damnation,” wrote the New York Times at the time. It was a struggle between two systems of power, in which the Americans had to win. By any means [3] ".        The USSR failed to send a man to the Moon, and the USA in 1969-1972 reported six times about the landing of its astronauts on the Moon [4, 5]. Briefs from NASA Moon Missions       To win the lunar race, the Americans carried out a special program called "Apollo". It cost of 20-25 billion dollars (from different sources) and performed under supervision of NASA. ( N ational A eronautics and S pace A dministration - NASA - Authority Aeronautics and Space) . Below, instead of the name "Apollo", the abbreviation "A" is often used. According to NASA, the giant Saturn-5 rocket launched a spacecraft with a total mass of 45 tons and a crew of 3 people into orbit around the Moon (Fig. 4). Then the lunar module ( 1,2 ) with two astronauts separated from the spacecraft and landed on the moon . The command and service module (KSM) with one astronaut on board ( 3,4 ) [6,7,8] remained in orbit . After staying on the Moon, the astronauts in take-off stage 2 returned to the circumlunar orbit, transferred to the KSM and returned to Earth in it. Fig. 4. a) Saturn-5 rocket takes off against the background of the NASA emblem;  b) a diagram of the Apollo spacecraft assembled with a lunar module          According to NASA, A-11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and Baz Aldrin were the �rst to land on the moon (Figure 5). They placed scienti�c instruments (5a) near the lunar module, set up a flag (5b), captured the prints of their shoes in the lunar dust (5c) and left a commemorative pennant (5d).        Fig. 5. Through the pages of the magazine " Life " (August 1969)        In 47 countries of the world, television broadcasts about the �rst landing on the moon (July 1969, A-11, ill. 6a, b). Magazines (Fig. 6 c, d) were published in special issues, including the frequently cited special issues of the American illustrated magazines “ Life ” [7]  and “ A Look ” [8] . Fig. 6. a) an  astronaut descends on the lunar surface, b) South Koreans watch the landing from a large screen, c, d)  special issues of American magazines, August 1969 In the homeland of the �rst conquerors of the moon, a solemn meeting awaited (Fig. 7). Fig. 7. This is how the Apollo 11 crew was welcomed in the USA After the A-11 flight, according to NASA, astronauts landed on the moon �ve more times. Here is a general background on Apollo manned flights [1,4-8] : A-7 . October 11-21.1968. The �rst manned flight of the Apollo spacecraft in near- earth orbit. The rocket "Saturn-1B" was used, subsequent ships were launched into orbit with the rocket "Saturn-5".  A-8 , December 21-27. 1968. First manned flight around the Moon. A-9 , March 3-13.1969. The �rst manned flight in the lunar module in near-earth orbit. A-10 , May 18-26.1969. The �rst manned flight in the lunar module around the Moon. A-11 , July 16-24.1969.  First landing on the moon. Stay on the Moon - 21 hours / of which - 2.5 hours outside the module. 20 kg of lunar soil have been delivered to Earth.  A-12 , November 14-24.1969. Second landing. 31 hours / 7.5 hours, 34 kg of soil. A-13 , April 11-17. 1970. Ship accident. There was no disembarkation. The astronauts returned safely. A-14 , January 31- February 9.1971. Third landing. 33 hours / 9 hours, 42 kg of soil. A-15 , July 26 - August 7.1971. Fourth landing. 67 hours / 10.5 hours, 76.7 kg of soil. A-16 , April 16-27.1972. Fifth landing. 71 hours / 20 hours, 95 kg of soil. A-17 , December 7-19.1972. Sixth landing. 75 hours / 22 hours, 110.4 kg of soil.        According to NASA, the astronauts of the six expeditions took photographs, �lms, and telecasts on the Moon and collected soil samples with a total mass of 378 kg. At the landing sites A-11, A-14 and A-15, they left laser reflectors. In addition, they left a number of electronic devices on the moon, which transmitted information even after the astronauts had departed. Overall, the US triumph was complete.        However, over time, some people began to have doubts about the reliability of these messages. There were contradictions in NASA's "lunar" information. Other questions arose as well. For example, why don't Americans go to the moon anymore? The �rst satellite was followed by thousands, the �rst cosmonaut by hundreds, and the flights to the Moon - nothing! Why is the super-powerful Saturn- 5 rocket not used, which disappeared almost immediately after the Apollo flights? Why are hundreds of kilograms of lunar soil, which the astronauts allegedly brought, have been allegedly stored in NASA's secret storage for almost 40 years, and scientists are given grams? Skeptics and defenders        In the media and on the Internet, a controversy unfolded between skeptics who doubt the authenticity of the conquest of the moon, and defenders who claim - "were!" [9-12] .       Of the many works of skeptics, the book by Yu.I. Mukhina "Anti-Apollo" [10] . Fig. 8. The most representative monographs of skeptics (a) and defenders (b, c) The journalistic direction of "protection" is most fully represented by the book by Y. Golovanov "The Truth About the" Apollo " Program" [1] . As Academician B.E. Chertok writes [11] , "From the authors of the most objective works of the literary- memoir genre, I consider it necessary to single out ... Yaroslav Golovanov - an engineer who has become a professional journalist and writer closest to the circles of the rocket and space community." According to Y. Golovanov, the book was basically written in 1976, following the fresh trail of events, which gives it special value.     The technical direction of the "defense" is best reflected by the review article by V. Yatskin and Yu. Krasilnikov, published several years ago on the Internet, "Did the Americans fly to the moon?" [12]   (as of 29.04.2003, when printing - 92 s). About the rules of discussion of the topic        Let's discuss the rules that are reasonable to follow when discussing information about flights to the moon. The author himself defends his achievements       Dock It is the sole responsibility of the author to prove the credibility of any achievement. Therefore, the statement "the Americans were on the moon" must be defended by the Americans themselves. N o one is obliged to prove that the Americans on the moon were not.           This idea is very lucidly stated in the speech of Academician of the RAS V.E. Zakharov. "There is a difference between the function of a judge and the function of a scientist: the principle of the presumption of innocence works for court cases," while a scientist must be suspicious and distrustful. When receiving a project for examination, a scientist must assume in advance that it contains errors, and approve it only after careful and comprehensive veri�cation. Otherwise, our very existence loses its meaning. "   ( http://www.polit.ru/science/2009/12/22/zakharov_vasilyev_print.html )        This order permeates our entire practical life. Try to tell your friends that you recently set a world barbell record. They will immediately either let you down to the bar, if there is one nearby, or they will ask you to name authoritative witnesses, moreover, not from among your close friends. And you will look strange if you demand: "And you prove that I could not squeeze out such weight!" Unfortunately, we often hear the "defenders" of NASA say: "And you prove that the Americans were not on the moon!" Thus, the accepted order is turned upside down.     No statute of limitations Well, what if the defense went off brilliantly, and over time doubts arose? The rule of "statute of limitations" does not apply in science. For more than 2000 years, scientists, following Ptolemy, believed that the Sun revolved around the Earth. It was only 2000 years later that the accumulated errors in these theoretical predictions, as well as some other facts, prompted Copernicus to “deprive” the Earth of its central place.        In addition to sincere delusions, the history of progress is full of examples of hoaxes that were not immediately exposed. And the Americans have the corresponding "experience" [13-16].   At the beginning of the twentieth century, the world was captured by the race to conquer the poles of the Earth. Especially the North Pole was not "given". And on April 6, 1909, the American R. Peary (Fig. 9) reported that he had reached the North Pole. At the same time, 240 km to the Pole, he sent back Captain R. Bartlett, the only person on the expedition who, apart from Peary himself, was able to determine geographic coordinates. So there was no one quali�ed to con�rm the achievement. Fig. 9. Doubtful "conqueror" of the North Pole - American R. Piri.         And, nevertheless, the American press made a lot of noise about this Peary victory. Her efforts were not in vain: until now, in many publications it is the American R. Peary who is mentioned as the �rst person to reach the North Pole. Nevertheless, careful researchers soon established that Piri actually overwintered in the north of Greenland. Later, the camp in which Piri was hiding was also found. And 70 years later, in the late 80s, when, according to Peary's will, his archives were opened, it was once again con�rmed that he had not reached the Pole.        From these two examples, we see that there is no statute of limitations for renewed doubts about the reliability of a discovery or achievement. Let's follow the example of the boy from the fairy tale of the naked king        Very often in discussions one can hear the following reasoning: “NASA (this and that) did it, but didn’t show it”, “Our people followed everything, but it is kept secret”, “They were on the Moon, but �lms about it were made on Earth ", etc. The author treats such arguments in the same way as the hero of the famous fairy tale by H. Andersen. Seeing His Majesty naked, the boy did not listen to the words about the exceptionally thin fabric of the king's new dress, but said that the king was naked. And he was right. The author of the book invites the reader to follow the same logic with him:      if NASA didn’t show something, then it didn’t do it,      if the mysterious "ours", who allegedly followed everything, have not yet appeared, then it means they have not followed ",      if �lms about astronauts walking on the Moon were �lmed on Earth, then it means that they walked on Earth, and so on.      The author leads the discussion and draws conclusions only on the basis of the available speci�c, published and not anonymous information. Information from letters and oral communications was also taken into account, but with the obligatory indication of the identity of the witness and information con�rming his authority in the issue at stake. Do not shy away from the topic under discussion         Quite often, when discussing the Apollo flights, questions are raised such as what prevented the Russians from flying to the moon, whether space exploration in the USSR was carried out correctly, whether Gagarin flew, etc. Distraction on such topics, no matter how interesting they are, leads away from the answer to the question under discussion: "Were the Americans on the moon?" Therefore, other issues are better discussed in other books.       Having clari�ed the rules of the discussion, let's �nd out what can serve as evidence of the landing of astronauts on the moon? What can serve as evidence of the landing of astronauts on the moon?        Usually defenders give the following list of evidence of the landing of people on the moon: 1) laser reflectors and electronic devices delivered to the moon; 2) recordings of radio communications between astronauts and the Earth; 3) lunar soil delivered by astronauts to Earth; 4) illustrative materials - �lms, television, and photographs from the Moon.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.