Table Of Content

AUTHOR, CASE, AND SUBJECT MATTER INDICES OF THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRIAL ADVOCACY Volume Twenty-Five Indices to Volume 25 AUTHOR INDEX Arthur H. Garrison Rehnquist v. Scalia~The Dickerson and Miranda Cases: A Debate on What Makes a De- cision Constitutional (A) Daniel R. Karon Price Fixing, Market Allocation and Bid Rig- 25:241 ging Conspiracies: How to Counsel Your Clients to Detect Violations and Inform You of Poten- tial Claims (T) Christiana D. Ketcham A Primer on Defending Breast Cancer Litigation 25:451 (T) Thomas A. Mauet The New World of Experts in Federal and State 25:223 Courts (T) Candis A. McGowan The ABC’s of Title VII Class and Age Discrim- ination Collective Actions (T) Meredith Motsinger For Juries, Does Truth Require Facts? (C) 25:135 Bradley C. Nahrstadt A Primer on Defending Breast Cancer Litigation 25:451 (T) Leonard D. Pernoy Post-Judgment Relief in Domestic Relations Cases: Does the Process Ever End? (A) John H. Pierpont For Juries, Does Truth Require Facts? (C) 25:135 Kimberlianne Podlas Blame Judge Judy: The Effects of Syndicated 25:557 Courtrooms on Jurors (A) Richard Pozzuto For Juries, Does Truth Require Facts? (C) 25:135 William H. Rehnquist 2000 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary 25:1 Douglas R. Richmond The Rude Question of Standing in Attorney Dis- 25:17 qualification Disputes (A) Glenn Rohrer For Juries, Does Truth Require Facts? (C) 25:135 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRIAL ADVOCACY [Vol. 25:681 Michael L. Russell Previous Acts of Employment Discrimination: Probative or Prejudicial? (A) J. Alexander Tanford The Ethics of Evidence (A) Indices to Volume 25 CASE INDEX A Dickerson v. United States 25:92 Doctor’s Assocs. v. Casarotto 25:659 Allegheny General Hospital v. Philip Mor- Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee ris, Inc. 25:197 25:495 Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson Dragland v. Dragland 25:84 25:633 E Alternative Financial Solutions, L.L.C. v. Colburn 25:667 Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co. 25:213 American General Finance, Inc. v. Morton Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins 25:145, 25:668 149 Associated General Contractors, Inc. v. Ex parte Learakos 25:664 California State Council of Carpenters Ex parte Stewart 25:663 25:192 Ex parte Thicklin 25:665 B F Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. Baugh First Commercial Trust Co. v. Lorcin En- 25:153 gineering 25:629 Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. Florida v. Segrera 25:82 v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Flower v. Adam 25:164 Co. 25:152 Franco, Adm’x v. Bunyard 25:630 Blue Shield v. McCready 25:192 Bock v. Bock 25:84 G Bram v. United States 25:114 Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Garcia v. Garcia 25:87 Daniel International Corp. 25:46 Gibbons v. Ogden 25:638 Brown v. Dewitt, Inc. 25:664 Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. Buczkowski v. McKay 25:625 25:475 H Cc Hamilton v. Accu-Tek 25:603, 610, 627 Chappell v. Chappell 25:81 Harris v. New York 25:109, 118 City of Cut Bank v. Tom Petrick Construc- Hawkes v. Lewis 25:36 tion, Inc. 25:658 Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection City of Philadelphia v. Beretta 25:199 Corp. 25:194 Colyer v. Smith 25:40 Hurst v. Tony Moore Imports, Inc. Cullum & Boren-McCain Mall, Inc. v. 25:644, 649 Peacock 25:630 I D Illidge v. Goodwin 25:167 Daniels v. State 25:61 Illinois v. Perkins 25:111 Dawson v. City of Bartlesville 25:38 In re Appeal of Infotechnology, Inc. Delahanty v. Hinckley 25:630 25:47, 56 686 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRIAL ADVOCACY [Vol. 25:681 In re Arbitration Between Polemis & NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. Furness, Withy & Co. 25:170, 171 25:639 In re Ockrassa 25:63 Northwest Laborers-Employers Health & In re Turner Brothers Trucking Co. Security Trust Fund v. Philip Morris, 25:654 Inc. 25:205 In re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation 25:35 oO Iron Works Local Union No. 17 v. Philip Morris, Inc. 25:185 O’Connor v. Jones 25:39 Onley v. Onley 25:81 K Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris, Kassis v. Teacher’s Insurance & Annuity Inc. 25:206 Ass’n 25:32 Oregon v. Elstad 25:106, 116 Kelley v. R.G. Industries, Inc. 25:617 Oregon v. Hass 25:109, 118 Kevlik v. Goldstein 25:43 Overseas Tankship U.K. Ltd. v. Miller Steamship Co. (Wagon Mound II) Knight v. Jewett 25:596 25:170, 182 Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co. 25:153 Overseas Tankship U.K. Ltd. v. Mort Dock & Engineering Co. (Wagon L Mound) 25:171, 180 L & L Kempwood Assocs. v. Omega P Builders, Inc. 25:655 Laborers Local 17 Health & Benefit Fund Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. v. Philip Morris, Inc. 25:208 25:170, 174, 612 Love v. Tyson 25:54 Philadelphia v. Fleming Cos. 25:671 Lynch v. Nurdin 25:168 Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. 25:478 M Puglia v. Puglia 25:81 MacPhearson v. Buick Motor Co. 25:609 R Malloy v. Hogan 25:112 Marina Cove CondomiOwnneirs uAsms’ n Rhode Island Laborers’ Health & Welfare v. Isabella Estates 25:657 Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc. 25:203 McCarthy v. Olin Corp. 25:623 Ross v. Ross 25:19 Merrill v. Navegar, Inc. 25:587 Metro North Commuter Railroad Co. v. S Buckley 25:477 Michigan v. Tucker 25:109, 116 Scott v. Shepard 25:167 Miranda v. Arizona 25:91 Selma Medical Center, Inc. v. Fontenot Moning v. Alfono 25:624 25:661 Moran v. Burbine 25:111 Sisters of the Visitation v. Cochran Plas- Moss v. Crosman Corp. 25:608 tering Co. 25:633, 635 Mutual Group U.S. v. Higgins 25:50 Smart v. Sandy Spring National Bank of Maryland 25:219 N Southeast Florida Laborers District Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris New York v. Quarles 25:109, 116, 118 25:187, 623 2002} Indices to Volume 25 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. K.A.W. 25:50 State v. Quattlebaum 25:63 State v. Reddick 25:60 State v. Tippecanoe County Court 25:64 Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris 25:145, 187 Steamfitters Local Union No. 614 Health & Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris , Inc. 25:208 Stites v. Sundstrand Heat Transfer, Inc. 25:478 Swift v. Tyson 25:145, 146 tT Tefco Finance Co. v. Green 25:669 Todesco v. Todesco 25:86 Towne v. Hubbard 25:19 Treadway v. Smith & Wesson 25:608 U United States v. Long 25:495 United States v. Lopez 25:634, 637 United States v. Wilson 25:534 Ww Waskin v. Waskin 25:83 Wasylow v. Glock, Inc. 25:606 Wheat v. United States 25:472 Whiteside v. Scurr 25:495 Wickard v. Filburn 25:639 Withrow v. Williams 25:111 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRIAL ADVOCACY [Vol. 25:681 Indices to Volume 25 SUBJECT MATTER INDEX A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AGE DISCRIMINATION Constitutional Law—Dean v. Riser: A EMPLOYMENT ACT (ADEA) Prevailing Civil Rights Defendant Can Claim Attorey’s Fees fora Voluntary Employment Law—Board of Trustees of the Dismissal with Prejudice 25:383 University of Alabama v. Garrett: Ability of State Employees to Sue Their Employ- Constitutional Law—Ex Parte Griffin: ers for Violations of the Americans With When the United States Constitution Disabilities Act 25:419 Trumps State Hearsay Rules 25:389 ANTITRUST Constitutional Law—Johnson v. Halloran: Can the Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity Price Fixing, Market Allocation and Bid Protect Public Defenders From Malprac- Rigging Conspiracies: How to Counsel tice Suits? 25:395 Your Clients to Detect Violations and Inform You of Potential Claims 25:241 Constitutional Law—Simmons-Harris v. Zelman: Cleveland’s Voucher Program ARBITRATION Found Unconstitutional Under Estab- lishment Clause 25:399 Sisters of the Visitation v. Cochran Plaster- ing Co.: Earnest Federalism or Recon- Prayer and the Ten Commandments in the structive Defiance to the Federal Arbitra- tion Act? 25:633 Courtroom: Were the Actions of Circuit Judge Roy Moore Constitutional? 25:343 ATTORNEY’S FEES Constitutional Law—Dean v. Riser: A Pre- Rehnquist v. Scalia-The Dickerson and vailing Civil Rights DefendCaan nCltai m Miranda Cases: A Debate on What Attorney’s Fees for a Voluntary Dis- Makes a Decision Constitutional 25:91 missal with Prejudice 25:383 CRIMINAL LAW C Criminal Law—/n re Grand Jury Proceed- CIVIL PROCEDURE ings: Are Documents Matters Occurring Before the Grand Jury? 25:405 Civil Procedure—Adler v. Shelton: The Discoverability of Expert’s Draft Opin- Criminal Law and Procedure—United ions 25:371 States v. Bin Laden: The Effects of Criminal Offenses Alone Do Not Give Civil Procedure-The Enforceability of For- Rise to Venue in Alternative Jurisdic- um Selection Clauses Under M/S Bremen tions 25:411 v. Zapata Off-Shore Co. 25:377 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRIAL ADVOCACY [Vol. 25:681 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Previous Acts of Employment Discrimina- tion: Probative or Prejudicial? 25:297 Criminal Law and Procedure—United States The ABC’s of Title VII Class and Age v. Bin Laden: The Effects of Criminal Offenses Alone Do Not Give Rise to Discrimination Collective Actions 25:257 Venue in Alternative Jurisdictions 25:411 Workers’ Compensation Law-—Britt v. Shelby County Health Care Authority: D Injuries Must Meet Two-Prong Test for Compensability Under Alabama Work- DISCRIMINATION ers’ Compensation Act 25:445 ERISA Employment Law—Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co.: Prescription for Equality in Insur- ance Coverage 25:213 The Effect of Pegram v. Herdrich: Truth or Consequences— When Your Doctor Benefits from Denying Treatment Previous Acts of Employment Discrimina- 25:315 tion: Probative or Prejudicial? 25:297 EVIDENCE The ABC’s of Title VII Class and Age Discrimination Collective Actions Constitutional Law—Ex Parte Griffin: 25:257 When the United States Constitution Trumps State Hearsay Rules 25:389 DOMESTIC RELATIONS Evidence—The Dead Man’s Statute: State Post-Judgment Relief in Domestic Relations Legislatures and Courts Conflict 25:217 Cases: Does the Process Ever End? 25:69 The Ethics of Evidence 25:487 E The New World of Experts in Federal and State Courts 25:223 EMPLOYMENT LAW EXPERT TESTIMONY Employment Law—Board of Trustees of the Civil Procedure—Adler v. Shelton: The University of Alabama v. Garrett: Ability Discoverability of Expert’s Draft Opin- of State Employees to Sue Their Employ- ions 25:371 ers for Violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act 25:419 The New World of Experts in Federal and State Courts 25:223 Employment Law—Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co.: Prescription for Equality in Insur- F ance Coverage 25:213 FAMILY LAW Employment Law—Jones v. Conrad: The Treatment of Fibromyalgia for Purposes Post-Judgment Relief in Domestic Rela- of Compensabiinl Woirkteyrs ’ Compen- tions Cases: Does the Process Ever End? sation Cases 25:425 25:69