Table Of Content

Historic, Archive Document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. yg : Managing Competing ad States artment of sulture and Unwanted st Service fie Vegetation hwest ion March 1992 Final Environmental Impact Statement Amendment to 1988 Record of Decision DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE NATIONAL, AGRICULTURAL LIBRARY JUN 2 | 1995 CATALOGING PREF Amendment to Record of Decision for USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Final Environmental Impact Statement Managing Competing and Unwanted Vegetation February 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION URES? OUTING) sud ias ohd usts: & CRAVINE «:ehats’ Chevahiucreaciatco. che < a sithale «.S idie-e cishe She wicked. Moxey d sayy 1 Purpose of This Amendment................ PDE AU 1.L ON joie sie wie Biavesvveo oshdsye Sheuese aistand RATIONALE....... ences Guahe was aie ararene oe PUBLIC COMMENT..... tye Bie hus hepesa anus’ Sieisien«e < hses ivaStsec evhspeeveca al ¢ diexSahiar Ceow 5-9 MELLON.sN so srexaA tie xe dvelsl e.c! obsiane @ BPPEAL RIGHTS « divers cheese enero #4 SPelcashe A dstiee «(tesa ahevn\eneks APPENDIX A - IMPLEMENTATION FAITHS YW SISAT * ‘e+e are ** . . a4e4@e ¢ eee * ewe ©4894 @ . ee vaubemmA abct 30 7 . , aad “epee 8% eee ’* * *”* e see teeter auewaert Gek o«eae eetrtreavw wee ss 4 *-* are. el . Cl Ia ** eee teres seve tves ‘ #eeteeneeeta Fel eleneeeee ie#<@*6@ a MOTTA RE = A ee INTRODUCTION Background The Record of Decision (ROD) of December 8, 1988, for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Managing Competing and Unwanted Vegetation includes mitigation measures to reduce the human health risks associated with vegetation treatment methods. Three mitigation measures in the ROD prohibit women from performing certain herbicide applications because potential risks of gender-specific health effects from direct contact exceeded levels identified by the Forest Service as acceptable risks. On March 20, 1991, the U.S. Supreme Court decided International Union v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 111 S.Ct. 1196 (1991). The Supreme Court concluded that an employer is prohibited from discriminating against a woman because of her capacity to become pregnant, unless her reproductive potential prevents her from performing the duties of her job. The Forest Service has determined that the three mitigation measures from the Record of Decision appear to be inconsistent with this Supreme Court ruling. Purpose of This Amendment This amendment to the 1988 ROD removes the gender-specific mitigation measures to comply with the Supreme Court's ruling. This amendment adds nine, new mitigation measures to avert potential risks to human health that could occur because the gender-specific measures are no longer in effect. This amendment changes how the Pacific Northwest Region protects workers from gender-specific health effects, while protecting them from discrimination in employment. No other provisions of the selected alternative for the Regional program, Alternative H, or the ROD are changed. No provisions of the Mediated Agreement are affected by revoking gender-specific worker restrictions. (The "Mediated Agreement" is a legal document signed by parties to the lawsuit under which the Forest Service had been enjoined since 1984 from applying herbicides in the Pacific Northwest Region. Under the agreement, the parties jointly moved the court to dissolve the injunction and dismiss the complaint against the Forest Service with prejudice, and the Forest Service agreed to comply with additional requirements for implementing the ROD.) THE ACTION As indicated in Appendix A, gender-specific worker restrictions will be removed from the mitigation measures for vegetation management projects listed in the ROD, page 19. The mitigation measures being removed are: -- Female workers (either Forest Service employees or contract workers) will not be used as mixers or loaders in atrazine or bromacil applications. Page 2 Female workers (either Forest Service employees or contract workers ) will not be used in backpack spray or hack-and-squirt operations involving the application of 2,4-D, glyphosate, dicamba, tebuthiuron, triclopyr, simazine, or bromacil. Female workers (either Forest Service employees or contract workers) will not be used in dalapon applications. In addition, the footnote on page 19 of the ROD will be removed. The revised footnote, with gender-specific language eliminated, is now mitigation measure #1. As a part of this action, nine new mitigation measures will be added: #1-- Research studies, including both laboratory studies of animals and studies of human populations, demonstrate the potential for gender-specific adverse health effects of glyphosate, dicamba, tebuthiuron, triclopyr, simazine, bromacil, atrazine, 2,4-D, and dalapon. Any employees not wanting exposure to these herbicides will be given alternate work assignments that do not involve direct contact with herbicides. There are many assignments, even in herbicide operations, which do not involve direct contact with herbicides. #2-- The herbicide dalapon will not be used unless its registration is restored by the EPA. #3-- Each worker on herbicide application projects, whether Forest Service employee or contract employee, shall be informed of any known potential human health effects of the specific herbicides to be used prior to starting the project. Each worker will be provided with a copy of the "Methods Information Profile for Herbicides" and the relevant "Herbicide Information Profiles" produced by the Pacific Northwest Region. Prior to beginning the project, each worker shall sign a statement indicating that she or he has reviewed the material, and either agrees to work on the project as assigned, or requests a reassignment. #-- All herbicide application projects shall have available at the work site a permanent or portable eyewash unit and other washing facilities with a supply of uncontaminated water and soap sufficient to wash hands as required and the entire body in the event of accidental contact with herbicides. #5-- All workers should have a complete change of clothes available at the work site in case of accidental exposure to herbicides. A complete set of clean clothes should be worn daily.