Ambient Commons Ambient Commons Attention in the Age of Embodied Information Malcolm McCullough The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2013 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please email special_sales@ mitpress.mit.edu or write to Special Sales Department, The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Franklin Gothic and Garamond by the MIT Press. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McCullough, Malcolm. Ambient commons : attention in the age of embodied information / Malcolm McCullough. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-01880-7 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Architectural design— Philosophy. 2. Information commons. 3. Computer-aided design. 4. Human– computer interaction. I. Title. NA2750M35 2013 720.1’08—dc23 2012030277 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 for Kit Contents Preface ix Acknowledgments xiii Prologue Street Level 1 Part I: Ideas of the Ambient 5 1 Ambient 7 2 Information 25 3 Attention 47 4 Embodiment 69 5 Fixity 91 Part II: Toward an Environmental History of Information 109 6 Tagging the Commons 111 7 Frames and Facades 137 8 Architectural Atmospheres 167 9 Megacity Resources 195 10 Environmental History 225 11 Governing the Ambient 253 12 Peak Distraction 275 Epilogue Silent Commons 285 Notes 295 Name Index 335 Subject Index 339 Preface To sit down with a book, gentle reader, seems less and less what life is like. To be alone with your thoughts was perhaps never the usual human condition. Whether in a traditional tribal society or amid today’s tastes for perpetual messaging, some people don’t share so much as generate their thoughts, even their deepest feel- ings, through constant social connectivity. Solitary reflection may have always been the exception, a chosen path for a few, or for a few chosen hours in a busy life; introspection remains a dif- ficult art. Fortunately, to sit with a book is to enter a dialogue in any case: unlike feeding among so many short, separate messages at once, it is to take up a longer transaction between reader and writer. It is also enjoyable: books exist not only for greater depth or nuance, but also for the sake of language itself. Here the transaction is this: like a highway resurfacing proj- ect, Ambient Commons asks your patience with a temporary inconvenience for the sake of permanent improvement. The project seems justifiable enough: whether you call it “overload” x | Preface or “superabundance,” the flood of mediated information defines this era. This book adds a tiny (albeit dense) drop to that flood. For, as the philosophers explain, often the solution to too much information is still more information, not only for tagging and filtering, but also for making sense. So with hope for improvements in how you cope with superabundance, Ambient Commons invites you to rethink atten- tion itself, especially with respect to your surroundings. You may sometime want to look past preoccupation with devices such as smartphones, and to notice more situated, often inescapable forms of information, but this isn’t just about stopping to smell the roses. At the very least, this book may help you justify greater attention to your surroundings as something better than nostal- gia. There is a practical new sensibility here. It belongs to a cog- nitive revolution. So the next time you mumble, “Be here now!” at someone texting while walking in your way, this book could help you mean more by that. You might also understand that anyone, in any era, may have felt overload. That seems safe to assume. The world has always been overwhelming, all the more so whenever such basic needs as food or safety haven’t been met. If you believe the old truism that you can keep only seven things in mind at once, then perhaps people began sensing overload as soon as there were eight. Yet today surely something has changed. Much more in the sensory field comes from and refers to someplace else. Much more has been engineered deliberately for the workings of atten- tion. The seductions of personalized media seem quite the oppo- site of a numbing, monotonous din. They don’t lead to overload so much as to overconsumption. They aren’t confined to specific Preface | xi sites like the workplace or the literary salon (where ladies and gentlemen of centuries past complained of overload—from the pressure to memorize too much poetry). Perhaps the biggest change is their ubiquity: as you may have noticed, the world is filling with ever more kinds of media, in ever more contexts and formats. Screens large and small appear just about everywhere; physical locations are increasingly tagged and digitally aug- mented; sensors, processors, and memory are not just carried about in pockets and bags, but also built into objects in everyday life. All these augmentations increasingly connect. This isn’t the clanking industrial city that led sociologists to emphasize distrac- tion, nor the media monoculture that led them to situationist critiques of spectacle, nor the all-seeing Orwellian state that many assume to be the inevitable outcome of unchecked media- tion. Today’s embodiments of information have become some- thing far, far more chaotic, often quite culturally fertile, with ever subtler cognitive appeal. The twenty-first-century arts are the arts of interface. But interface is no longer just about sitting at a machine. To describe how this new technology, these new surroundings, and this new outlook for attention have begun to interrelate, this book adopts a single name, “the ambient.” When it comes to making sense of what just happened, a book still works best, at least across any time longer than a moment ago. (There is Twitter for that.) Although slow to pro- duce, a book may still be the best way to trace an enduring path through the ideas of a recent decade or even a recent century. Here in the twilight of print, it helps to remember that. Although a book can’t interconnect ideas nearly so readily as the web, it can penetrate some of them better. As a longer form in a consis- tent voice, a book may improve individual access to a field of xii | Preface ideas from many sources. I wrote this one to find out, and not from a position of expertise so much as one where I could do some digging. I wrote to help others find out for themselves, and for people in different disciplines to find out about one another. Please don’t read this to learn something new about your own field. Read it instead as one writer’s inquiry. The word inquiry should keep coming up. To write is to learn. To write well is to bring others along, even through superabundance. Know that, in the quickly rising flood of data, something just happened for attention to surroundings. Acknowledgments Let me begin by stating how much Ambient Commons reflects my good fortune to work at the University of Michigan, one of the world’s foremost research universities. I especially value its com- binations of expertise in tangible interface, cognition and envi- ronment, social history of technology, and networked urbanism. In all these areas, I am an amateur interloper. My university not only tolerates but often distinctly values my being so. In particu- lar, esteemed colleagues Michael Cohen, Caroline Constant, Paul Edwards, Robert Fishman, Margaret Hedstrom, and John Mar- shall have generously shown me the way. Taubman College, where I teach architecture, has consistently provided encourage- ment for this, a project quite far from its core mission. My work on this book would never have begun without the remarkable exposure provided by so many travels, especially in the boom years 2005–08, in many ways the dawn of embodied information. My thanks go to more individuals and organiza- tions than I can name here. For one, I thank the interaction
Description: