Cancer Vaccine and Therapy A Senior Honors Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation with distinction in Molecular Genetics in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Amber Dawn Coston The Ohio State University June 2006 Project Advisor: Dr. Michael A. Caligiuri, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Medicine and Public Health 1 Background Research has demonstrated a relationship between cancer and the human immune system. Certain cancers have a higher incidence in patients with compromised immune systems. An example occurs in organ transplant patients who are taking immunosuppressive drugs and go on to develop post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). PTLD complicates between 2% and 20% of solid organ transplants performed annually in the United States and is associated with the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) infection in 95% of the cases. Epstein-Barr Virus EBV is the best known and most widely studied herpes virus and was also the first virus implicated in a human cancer. EBV is associated with other cancers, such as Burkitt’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease, and Kaposi’s sarcoma. A unique feature of the virus is that it is present, although dormant, for the lifetime of 90% of immunocompetent adults. EBV infection can arise during childhood and adolescence and occurs as infectious mononucleosis (“mono”) in 50% of these humans. Healthy immune systems create T cells (immune cells in the blood) that are capable of controlling the EBV infection. T cells become specific for EBV by recognizing the peptide from EBV proteins on the surface of an antigen presenting cell (APC) (reference figure 1). Healthy humans are able to activate CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) to recognize and eliminate virus-infected cells. However, humans with compromised immune systems are unable to produce sufficient T cells to control the infection [1]. 2 T cell receptor EBV Peptide Antigen Presenting Cell T cell Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (PTLD) is typically linked to EBV infection and has many features of immune system malignancy. Recently, the incidence of PTLD has been on the rise and it has emerged as a significant complication of solid organ and cell transplantation [2]. It is characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of B cells when post-transplant patients are undergoing immunosuppresion. PTLD presents significant challenges for physicians because it is difficult to predict and has high morbidity and mortality rates. Patients undergoing organ transplants have compromised immune systems due to the immunosuppressive medications they are prescribed in order to avoid organ- rejection. Because of this, these patients have impaired immune function and lack the capabilities to fight off EBV and other typically dormant viruses. Therefore, these patients become more likely than immunocompetent humans to develop PTLD. There are currently a variety of methods that physicians have been using to attempt to treat PTLD. Researchers and clinicians are in need of a treatment method 3 that is able to both treat the tumor and maintain an immunosuppressed state to preserve the organ donation [3, 4, 5]. This has been attempted through the reduction of immunosuppressive medications, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, cell therapy, antiviral therapy, and cytokine therapy. In a recent study, a reduced amount of immunosuppressive drugs was administered in order to reactivate the immune system to attack the EBV-associated tumor [6]. This did, in fact, reduce the tumor in 9 of 11 patients, but led to organ rejection in 5 cases. This study, for the first time, showed an increase in the CD3+CD8+ T cells in patients that went into remission. Another recent study used HLA tetramers complexed with EBV immunodominant peptides and found that a subset of CD3+CD8+ T cells were EBV specific [1]. They also found in a severe combined immune deficient (SCID) mouse model system, as well as in patients, that the expansion of an EBV protein, BZLF1 (RAK) specific CD8+ T cells, correlated with the prevention of PTLD after a combined cytokine treatment. These findings opened a door in the research of human cellular subsets in mediating this protective effect. A vaccine approach to increase the quantity of T cells is a possible treatment method that could be beneficial to many patients. Since PTLD results in mortality in 50- 70% of patients, a vaccine to reduce the frequency of infection could be especially advantageous to organ transplant patients. We hypothesized that a vaccine of BZLF1 protein transduced monocyte-derived antigen presenting cells (dendritic cells) will stimulate the expansion of Epstein- Barr Virus (EBV) BZLF1-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes (CTLs). 4 In order to complete this, we developed two specific aims: Aim 1 – Goal A: Synthesize a BZLF1/GST fusion protein using the Glutathione S- transferase (GST) gene fusion system from prokaryotic cells. Goal B: Synthesize a BZLF1/ V5-His fusion protein from mammalian cells. Aim 2: Determine if monocyte-derived DCs pulsed with BZLF1 fusion proteins stimulate expansion of EBV BZLF1-specific CTLs. Methods Preparation of the Target Protein The preparation and purification of BZLF1, an EBV viral protein, was accomplished using standard protocols provided by Novagen and Invitrogen Corporation for Goals A and B respectively (reference flow sheet 1). For Goal A, EBV BZLF1 cDNA was cloned into a prokaryotic expression vector, pET, obtained from Abgent Inc. For Goal B, a mammalian expression vector, pUB6/V5-His, was prepared by digestion with restriction enzymes (EcoR1 and BamH1) and dephosphorylation with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase. The vector was then gel purified. Next, the insert DNA containing a BZLF1 coding sequence was prepared. This was accomplished by plasmid prep and PCR (in order to amplify the BZLF1 coding sequence). This was followed by a restriction digest with (EcoR1 and BamH1) and gel purification. The DNA insert was then ligated into the pUB6/V5-His vector. 5 For both Goals A and B, each insert/vector pair was transformed into the DH5α strain of E. coli cells. These cells served as an expression host. Finally, the expression of BZLF1 was analyzed. A positive clone was sequenced and the expression of BZLF1 protein was detected by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and a Western blot. The positive clones of generated stable Chinese Hamster Ovarian (CHO) cell lines were expanded in order to generate a large quantity and cell pellets were frozen at -80˚C until purification took place. Purification of the Target Protein For Goal A, the BZLF1 was purified following a standard protocol (GST purification kit from Amersham Bioscience). For goal B, the BZLF1 was purified following standard protocol provided by Invitrogen’s ProBond Purification System. The cell lysate was prepared under native conditions and added to a prepared His affinity column. The lysate was allowed to bind to the resin, then the column was washed, and the protein was eluted. The protein concentration was measured at UV280 and the eluted fractions were stored at 4˚C. Samples of the lysate and wash supernatants were also saved for SDS-PAGE analysis. Functional test of the Purified Target Protein Next, functional testing of the purified BZLF1 protein was conducted (reference flow sheet 2). First, monocyte-derived dendritic cells transduced with BZLF1 protein were generated by culturing hPBMC for 3 days, with cytokine GM-CSF and IFN-α in the presence of EBV BZLF1 protein. BSA (Bovine Serum Proteins) served as a negative 6 control. The presence of the BZLF1 protein in the dendritic cells was determined by immunohistochemistry staining. Next, dendritic cells transduced with BZLF1 were co- cultured with hPBMC from the same donor (autologous). Following the culture, BZLF1- specific T cells were expanded. The activation and cytotoxicity of the generated BZLF1- specific T cells was also determined. The activation of CD8+ T cells was determined by IFN-γ secretion assayed by an IFN-γ-Elispot or by intracellular IFN-γ staining. The cytotoxicity of CD8+ BZLF1-specific T cells was determined by co-cultured CD8+ T cells with a 51Cr-labeled B cell line derived from the same donor. The cytotoxicity of T cells was then calculated based on the percentage of 51Cr released. 7 Preparation and Purification of the Target Protein Flow Sheet 1 (Goal B specifically) Process Detail Prepare pUB6/V5-His Vector 1. Digest with restriction enzyme ↓ and dephosphorylate 2. Gel purify Prepare Insert DNA 1. Plasmid prep and PCR (BZLF-1 coding sequence) 2. Restriction digest 3. Gel purify ↓ 1. Ligate or anneal insert with Clone Insert into pUB6/V5-His Vector pUB6/V5-His vector 2. Transform into non-expression host 3. Identify positive clones; colony ↓ PCR, prepare plasmid DNA, verify reading frame by sequencing, or in vitro transcription/translation Transform into Expression Host (E. coli) 1. Transform DH5α E. coli cells ↓ Analysis of BZLF1 Expression And 1. Detect target protein by SDS- Generate CHO stable cell lines PAGE, Western blot ↓ Scale-up ↓ 1. Scale up culture 2. Prepare extract Purify Target Protein 3. His Affinity column purification 8 Test of the Purified Target Protein Flow Sheet 2 Process Detail Generation of monocyte-derived DCs 1. Culture hPBMC short term (5 transduced with BZLF1 protein days) with GM-CSF in the presence of EBV BZLF1 protein. 2. The presence of BZLF1 protein in DCs will be determined by an ↓ immunohistochemistry staining. 3. Co-culture BZLF1+ DCs with hPBMC from same donor Expansion of BZLF1 specific T cells ↓ 4. The activation of CD8+ T cells can be determined by IFN gamma secretion assayed by a Determination of activation and gamma IFN-Elispot. cytotoxicity of generated BZLF1 specific T cells 5. The cytotoxicity of CD8+ BZLF1 specific T cells will be determined by co-cultured CD8+ T cells with a 51Cr labeled same donor derived B cell line. The cytotoxicity of the T cells will be calculated based on the percentage of 51Cr released. 9 Results The intention of Aim 1-Goal B was to synthesize EBV BZLF1-GST fusion protein in vitro. In order to generate a BZLF1 protein fused with the GST tag, EBV BZLF1 full length cDNA was amplified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and cloned into a vector (pET vector, figure 1). The pET vector was prepared by digestion with restriction enzymes (BamHI and HindIII) and dephosphorylation with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase. The vector was then gel purified. The cloning was successful as evidenced by many more colonies produced from ligation in the presence of the insert compared with the negative control. The positive clones were identified by colony PCR and restriction enzyme digestion. 10
Description: