ebook img

Advisory Council on Drinking Water Quality and Testing Standards: Report and Advice on Ontario Regulation 170/03 Smaller, Private Systems Review and Recommendations PDF

2005·2.6 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Advisory Council on Drinking Water Quality and Testing Standards: Report and Advice on Ontario Regulation 170/03 Smaller, Private Systems Review and Recommendations

5©;j Advisory Councilon Drinking Water Quality and Testing Standards Report and Advice on Ontario Regulation 170/03 Smaller, Private Systems Review and Recommendations Preparedfor the Honourable Leona Dombrowsky Minister ofthe Environment February 8, 2005 Advisory Councilon Drinking WaterQualityandTestingStandards Table ofContents ExecutiveSummary 3 IntroductionandIssues 6 Context 7 Riskin RelationtoSmall Systems 7 Special Challenges Faced bySmall Systems 10 Approach 13 InformationSupportingOurRecommendations 14 SummaryofRelevantConclusionsfromtheVValkerton Inquiry(Part 1) 14 Review ofWalkerton Inquiry Part2 Reportand Recommendations 14 ExamplesofDiseaseOutbreaksin SmallSystems 16 PublicConsultation Summary 16 ReviewofOtherJurisdictions 18 SummaryofKey Points 20 CouncilConclusions 24 A SpecialCase:Non-Municipal Year-RoundResidentialSystems 25 ProposalforManagingSmaller, Private WaterSystems 27 1. RiskAssessmentand Inspection bythe Local Public Health Unit 27 2.TestingandTreatment: SelfAdministered RiskAssessment 27 3. RulesSpecificforEach Sector 27 KeyIssuesAddressedbytheRecommendedModel 32 SummaryofRecommendations 36 Appendix 1: SummaryofConclusions(PartOneWalkerton Inquiry) 39 Appendix2: SummaryofSelectedCaseStudies(Microbial DiseaseOutbreaks) 41 Appendix3: SummaryofKeyConcernsand Recommendationsfrom PublicConsultations 43 Appendix4: Relevant Information ontheNew Zealand Risk-BasedApproach 47 Appendix5: Relevant Information on theOxford County Risk-BasedApproach 51 Appendix6: SummaryofSpecific Issuesand Council Responsesfrom Review 53 References 60 February 8, 2005 Page 2 of60 Advisor}'CouncilonDrinking WaterQualityandTestingStandards Executive Summary InMay2004.TheHonourable LeonaDombrowsky, Ministerofthe Environment,establishedthe AdvisoryCouncil onDrinkingWaterQualityandTestingStandards(Council)andaskedfor recommendationsregardingtheprovince'sdrinkingwaterstandardsandrelatedmeasuresthatmay beneededtoimprovethe safetyandqualityofOntario'sdrinkingwatersupply. OnJune30,2004, MinisterDombrowskyspecificallyaskedtheCounciltoprovideadviceonthe DrinkingWaterSystems Regulation(O. Reg.170/03)("Regulation"forthepurposesofthisreport) withrespecttotheappropriatenessofrequirements forsmallwatersystems,andparticularlyprivate ones, keepinginmindtheprovince'scommitmentto implementall ofCommissionerO'Connor's recommendations. TheSafeDrinking WaterAct.the Regulation,andotherregulationswere developedtoaddressthoserecommendations. TheCouncil,withtheassistanceofaninternal workinggroup,undertookan initial reviewand concludedthatthe Regulation,asitappliestosmallerandprivatesystems, isconsideredtobecostly andcomplex. AlthoughtheMinistryofthe Environment(MOE)istargetinginformationto specific groups,theRegulationisnotwellunderstoodbytheregulatedcommunity. Therefore, theCouncilneededtogainabroaderunderstandingoftherangeofissuesarisingfromthe Regulationas itrelatesto smaller,privatesystems, and itspotential implicationsforaffectedand interestedparties,beforeprovidingrecommendationstotheMinister. TheCouncilalso feltitneeded more informationonthehealthrisksposedby small systems. In itsreview, theCouncil examined the Regulation fromavarietyofperspectives, including: • AreviewoftheWalkerton Reports anddiscussionswith peoplewhoparticipatedinthe developmentofthe PartTworeport. Particularattention was giventoChapter 14, Small DrinkingWaterSystems andthe Recommendations inthis Chapter. • An extensiveConsultationProcesswhereCouncil membersheardfromover 120 presenters in 12 locations. Inaddition, the Council receivedover 100written submissions. The Council heardawiderangeofconcernswiththe Regulationanda numberofsuggestions forimprovement. • TheCouncil collectedinformationonhow otherjurisdictions andcountrieswere endeavoringto enhance andregulatethe safetyofdrinkingwaterprovidedbysmall communal systems andsystems thatprovidewatertothepublic. • TheCouncil alsoheardfrom experts inthe drinkingwaterfieldinadditiontothe expert knowledgeofthe Council's ownmembers. Anumberofactual cases ofdrinkingwater contaminationwere analyzed. Afterthis careful review ofthe current Regulation as itappliesto smaller,private systems, the Council has concludedtheproblemswith the Regulationcannotberemediedthrough specific changestothecurrent Regulation. February8, 2005 Page3 of60 AdvisoryCouncilonDrinking WaterQualityandTestingStandards TheCouncil foundthatthe Regulation seemedtobeeffective forlargersystems serving larger communities andevenforlargerprivate operationsthathadthe scale andrevenuebase and size ofbusinesstomanage the complexitiesofthe Regulation andinstall andoperatetreatment systems. Very small services such asbedandbreakfast operations, churchandcommunity centres, small lodges, camps andcabins, trailerparks, seasonal operationsandawiderange small businessesdidnothavetheresources,knowledgeorskillstobeabletofolloworcomplywith thetypeofregulatory structureas setoutinthe Regulation. TheCouncilbelievesthatthe approach itisrecommendingwill ensurethatsmall systemsarerobustwithrespecttothe provision ofsafedrinkingwater. As suchtheCouncil findsthatan alternativeapproach isneededforthese smallersystems. The basicdrinkingwaterqualitystandardsandlevelofsafetyshouldnotbereduced. However, they canbe betterimplementedthrough anapproachthataddresses thecapacities andabilitiesofthe small serviceownersandoperators Through thedevelopmentofanewregulation,underthe Safe DrinkingWaterAct,the Public Health Unitswouldbe empoweredtoallowthemto administersafe drinkingwaterprograms for these smallersystems. TheCouncil'srecommendedapproach consists ofthe followingkey elements: • A risk-based,site-specific approach for5 ofthe 8 "Categories ofSystem" under Regulation 170/03, which include: LargeMunicipalNon-Residential, Small MunicipalNon-Residential, Non-MunicipalSeasonalResidential, LargeNon- MunicipalNon-Residential, andSmallNon-MunicipalNon-Residential; aswellas anyDesignatedFacilities within these5categories • The remaining3 categories under Regulation 170/03, which include: Large MunicipalResidential, SmallMunicipalResidential, andNon-Municipal Year-Round Residential, areto continueto be regulated underthe current Regulation 170/03 • Risk-based, site-specific approach to be outcome-based, anchored by compliance with the Ontario DrinkingWaterQuality Standards • Transferofresponsibilityto Public Health Unitsto administerthesafedrinking waterprograms forall commercial and institutional systems that servethe public • Extension ofthe provincialgrant program to assist local municipalitiesin providing assistanceto Non-Municipal, Year-Round Residentialsystems Additional recommendations are includedinthisreport, andcanbe foundinthe"Summary of Recommendations" section. February 8, 2005 Page4of60 AdvisoryCouncilonDrinking WaterQuality-andTestingStandards The Council believes that implementation ofitsrecommendationswill helpOntarioensurethat itsdrinkingwatermeets thedual objective ofplacingthe highestpriority onhealth andsafety, while ensuring that implementation is timely, effective andclearlyunderstoodbyall involved. February8, 2005 Page5 of60 AdvisoiyCouncilonDrinking WaterQualityandTestingStandards Introduction and Issues OnJune30,2004,the Ministerofthe EnvironmentaskedtheAdvisory Council onDrinking WaterQualityandTesting Standards(Council)toprovideadviceonthe Drinking-Water SystemsRegulation (O. Reg.170/03)("Regulation"forthepurposes ofthis report)withrespect totheappropriateness ofrequirements forsmallwatersystems, andparticularlyprivateones. ThegovernmentofOntariohas committedtoimplementall ofCommissionerO'Connor's recommendationsandtheSafeDrinking WaterAct,theRegulation, and otherregulationswere developedtoaddressthoserecommendations. However,the Regulation, asitappliestosmallerandprivate systems, is consideredtobe costly, complexandnotwell understoodbytheregulatedcommunity. These factors, andtheresulting inconsistentinterpretations,may leadtoeithernon-compliance orawithdrawal ofservicetothe public. Ineithercase, the qualityofdrinkingwatertoconsumerscouldbecompromised. The MinistryoftheEnvironment(MOE)hasmadeeffortstoexplaintheregulatoryrequirements bytargetinginformationpapers tospecificgroups. However, greaterefforts areneededto directlyreach theregulatedcommunity,which arenotrepresentedby formal associationsthat generallyassistindistributingandsharinginformationandadvice. Aswell,regulated individualsneedapointofcontact in ordertogetconsistentadviceandsupport. Ithasbeendeterminedthatindevelopingthe Regulationtherehasonlybeenalimited assessmentoftherisktopublic health, inregards to smallerandprivatewatersystems. Ithasalsobeendeterminedthattherehasbeen littleresearch intohow otherjurisdictionshave addressedriskforthesetypesofsystems. The PartTwoWalkerton Inquiry reportmade severalrecommendations withrespecttosmall systems. However, theserecommendationsneedtobereassessed,due to inconsistencies in interpretation. The issues identifiedabovehaveguidedtheCouncil in itsassessmentofthismatter. The Council'sadvicepresentedinthisreportfocuseson identifyingsolutionsthataddresstheneed forsafedrinkingwaterandtheprotectionofpublic health within themeansandcapability of waterproviders. This advice includesbothbroaderpolicyrecommendationsonregulatory, administrativeandeconomicapproaches, andspecificsuggestions foramendingaspectsofthe current Regulation. February 8,2005 Page6of60

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.