Table Of Content

DIALOGUE BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATURES IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE VOLUME 1 PROESSOR KENT ROACH Faculty of Law University of Toronto 2004 DEC - 5 2003 FACiilii . Li TC^GrTO DIALOGUE BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATURES IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE VOLUME 1 PROESSOR KENT ROACH Faculty of Law University of Toronto 2004 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from University of Toronto https://archive.org/details/advancedconstitu01roac_2 Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures in Comparative Perspective Volume I 1. Introduction to Dialogue Alexander Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch, 2nd ed (1986), pp. 1, 16-28, 68-71 . 1 Michael Perry, The Constitution in the Courts (1994), pp. 192-204 . 12 Guido Calabresi, “Foreword: Antidiscrimination and Constitutional Accountability" (1991) 105 Harv.L.Rev. 80, pp. 719-747 . 19 Etienne Mureinik, “A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights" (1994) 10 S.A.J.H.R. 31, pp. 31-34. 48 David Dyzenhaus, “Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik's Conception of Legal Culture” (1998) 14 S.A.J.H.R. 11, pp. 31-37. 51 Kent Roach, The Supreme Court on Trial (2001), chs. 12, 13 (Refer to Book) 2. Dialogue in Comparative Perspective Ran Hirschl, “Looking Sideways, Looking Backwards, Looking Forwards: Judicial Review vs. Democracy in Comparative Perspective” (2000) 34 Univ.of Richmond L.R. 415, pp. 434-441 . 55 Mark Tushnet, “Judicial Activism or Restraint in a Section 33 World" (Winter 2003) 53 U.T.L.J. 89. 59 Aharon Barak, “Forward: A Judge on Judging, The Role of a Supreme Court in a Democracy” (2002) 116 Harv.L.Rev. 16, pp. 116-138. 67 Mark Tushnet, “Judicial Review of Legislation” in Cane and Tushnet, The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (2003). 90 Keith Ewing, “Human Rights” in Cane and Tushnet, pp.306-322 . 100 Kent Roach, The Supreme Court on Trial (2001) chs. 2, 4 (Refer to Book) 3. Dialogue in Canada Paul Weiler, “Rights and Judges in a Democracy: A New Canadian Version” (Fall 1984) 18 J. of Law Reform... 110 Hon. Beverly McLachlin, “Charter Myths” (1999) 33 U.B.C.L.R. 23. 132 Peter Hogg and Allison Bushell, “The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures” (1997) 35 O.H.L.J. 75. 140 Christopher Manfredi and James Kelly, “Six Degrees of Dialogue: A Response to Hogg and Bushell” (1999) 37 O.H.L.J. 513. 156 Peter Hogg and Allison Thornton, “Reply to 'Six Degrees of Dialogue’” (1999) 37 O.H.L.J. 529 .. 164 F.L. Morton, “Dialogue or Monologue?” (April 1999) Policy Options.. 169 Kent Roach, The Supreme Court on Trial (2001) chs 1,5 (Refer to Book) 4. Dialogue under the Canadian Charter Kent Roach The Supreme Court on Trial (2001) chs. 10, 14. (Refer to Book) Vriendv. Alberta [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493 . 173 R v. Mills [1999] 3 S.C.R. 668 . 184 Same v. Canada (2002), 218 D.L.R. (4th) 577; 2002 SCC 68. 195 R v. Hall (2002), 217 D.L.R. (4th) 536; 2002 SCC 64 . 205 Halpern v. Canada June 10, 2003 .... 223 Department of Justice Press Release .... 269 Janet Hiebert “From Equality Rights to Same Sex Marriage” Policy Options October 2003 . 272 Christopher Manfredi “Same-Sex Marriage and the Notwithstanding Clause” Policy Options October 2003 ... 279 F.L. Morton “Can Judicial Supremacy Be Stopped?” ibid... 283 5. Dialogue under the American Bill of Rights Kent Roach, The Supreme Court on Triad eh.2 (Refer to Book) Mark Tushnet, “The Flag-Burning Episode: An Essay on the Constitution” (1990) 61 Univ. of Colorado L.Rev. 39 . 288 Charles Tiefer, “The Flag-Burning Controversy of 1989-1990: Congress’ Valid Role in Constitutional Dialogue” (1992) 29 Harv. Journal on Legislation 357 . 296 Dickerson v. United States (2000) 120 S.Ct. 2326 . 318 Carissima Mathen “Constitutional Dialogues in Canada and the United States” (2003) 14N.J.C.L.403.... 334 Cass Sunstein, One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (1999), ch. 2 & conclusion... 367 Kent Roach, “American Constitutional Theory for Canadians (and the Rest of the World)” (2002) 52 U.T.L.J. 503 ..... 381 6. Dialogue in New Zealand and the United Kingdom Paul Rishworth et al. The New Zealand Bill of Rights (2003), pp.l 16-137, 163-167, 81 1-838 ... 391 Text of New Zealand Bill of Rights, ss.1-6, in Rishworth et al, pp.839-840 . 419 Human Rights Act 1998 (UK), ss. 1-8, 10, 14-17, 19. 421 Philip Plowden and Kevin Kerrigan, Advocacy and Human Rights (2002),pp.43-46, 175-193, 197-212, 224-232 .... 428 Poplar Housing v. Donoghue [2002] Q.B. 48 (C.A.) ... 450 R. v. A. (No. 2) [2002] 1 A.C. 45 (H.L.). 453 R. v. Lambert [2002] 2 A.C. 545 (H.L.). 463 R v. Offen [2001] 1 Cr. App. R. 24 (C.A.). 471 In re S (Minors) [2002] 2 A.C. 291 (H.L.). 476 International Transport Roth GmbH v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003| Q.B. 728 (C.A.). . 482 Hooper v Secretary of State for Work anil Pensions | 20021 l J.K.H.R.R. 785 (H.C.J.Q.B.).... 487 The Queen v. London Borough of Enfield [2002] H.L.R. 38 (H.C.J.Q.B.) Bell ExpressVu v. Rex 212 D.L.R. (4th) 1; [20021 2 S.C.R. 559. 497 7. Dialogue in India and South Africa Constitution of India, articles 13 & 32 . 497 S.P. Sathe, Judicial Activism in India (2002). pp. 195-248 . 499 Kent Roach, Constitutional Remedies in Canada (1994), ss. 13.300-13.360 . 527 Constitution of South Africa, articles 36-39, 172 . 530 Ziyad Motala and Cyril Ramaphosa, Constitutional Law (2002), pp. 83-92 . 533 Ease v. South Africa (Minister of Safety and Security) [1997] S.A.J. No. 7 (S.A.C.C.). 543 Hoff nan v. South African Airways [2000] S.A.J. No. 53 (S.A.C.C.). 583 National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v. Minister of Home Affairs [1999] (3) B.C.L.R. 280(C)....... 600 S. v. Manamela [2000] S.A.J. No. 8 (S.A.C.C.). 616 S. v. Ntuli [1995] S.A.J. No. 13 (S.A.C.C.). 644 S. v. Ntuli [1995] S.A.J. No. 6 (S.A.C.C.). 651