Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist Volume III World War I

286 Pages·2019·1.735 MB·English

by  Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Christopher Jon Bjerknes
ADOLF HITLER
BOLSHEVIK
AND
ZIONIST
Volume III
World War I
Copyright © 2019. All Rights Reserved.
Table of Contents
Addendum to Volume 1, Communism 5
1 The Impact of the First World War 13
2 Jacob Schiff and the Messianic Aspirations Which Spawned WW I 19
3 Zionists and Communists Planned, Instigated and Exploited Both
World Wars 63
4 The Quid Pro Quo Deal for the Balfour Declaration 81
5 Zionists Take Palestine, Few Jews Heed the Call 119
6 Ludendorff and the Socialist Agenda for WW I 133
NOTES 199
Addendum to Volume 1, Communism
I.
It should be noted with regard to page 39 of Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and
Zionist, Volume One, Communism; that:
The Schutzstaffel (commonly known as the SS) was co-founded by Emil
Maurice in 1925. Emil Maurice had been Adolf Hitler's private chauffeur.
The SS eventually discovered that Emil Maurice was part Jewish.
Adolf Hitler then had Emil Maurice declared an "honorary Aryan" over
Heinrich Himmler's objections. Himmler was Reichsführer of the
Schutzstaffel.
Hitler's order to Aryanize Emil Maurice violated the rule that all SS officers
had to prove their racial purity with an "Aryan certificate". No one with
Jewish blood was permitted to join or remain in the SS. Members of the SS
were obliged to demonstrate that all of their ancestors were Aryans dating
back to at least the year 1750 AD. (1)
II.
Friedrich Georg detailed the Allies' advance knowledge of Hitler's plans, the
many high-ranking Nazis who worked as spies for the Soviets, and the
treason of the Nazis against the German war effort, in the following works:
Friedrich Georg, Verrat an der Ostfront: Der verlorene Sieg 1941-42,
Grabert, Tübingen, (2012).
Friedrich Georg, Verrat an der Ostfront II: Vergebliche Verteidigung
Europas 1943-45, Grabert, Tübingen, (2012).
Friedrich Georg, Verrat in der Normandie: Eisenhowers deutsche Helfer,
Grabert, Tübingen, (2007).
Bruce Walker published a very informative article proving the fact that the
Nazis were Marxists, "The Nazis Were Marxists", The American Thinker,
(25 November 2007):
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2007/11/the_nazis_were_maxists.
html
III.
Joseph Stalin wanted Adolf Hitler to provoke the Second World War in order
to create the chaotic conditions needed for a Communist world revolution
and the expansion of the Soviet Union across Eastern Europe. Communist
revolution thrives on war, discontent and disruption. The Communists' plan
was to create support among the Western Allies for the Soviet conquest of
Eastern Europe. Hitler would soften up Europe by destroying it and make
Stalin appear to be the savior of the Jews from the Nazis. Stalin then
followed in the footsteps of Hitler's retreat across Eastern Europe to conquer
nation after nation for Communism, as was planned from the beginning. The
Communists committed numerous genocides along the way.
Viktor Suvorov wrote in his book Icebreaker: Who Started the Second World
War?, Hamish Hamilton, London, (1990), English translation by Thomas B.
Beattie,
"Even before the Nazis came to power, the Soviet leaders had given Hitler
the unofficial name of 'Icebreaker for the Revolution'. The name is both apt
and fitting. The communists understood that Europe would be vulnerable
only in the event of war and that the Icebreaker for the Revolution could
make it vulnerable. Unaware of this, Adolf Hitler cleared the way for world
communism by his actions. With his Blitzkrieg wars, Hitler crushed the
Western democracies, scattering and dispersing his forces from Norway to
Libya. This suited Stalin admirably. The Icebreaker committed the greatest
crimes against the world and humanity, and, in doing so, placed in Stalin's
hands the moral right to declare himself the liberator of Europe at any time
he chose--while changing the concentration camps from brown to red.
[***]
Marx and Engels foretold a world war and lengthy international conflicts
which would last 'fifteen, twenty, fifty years'. The prospect did not frighten
them. The authors of The Communist Manifesto did not call on the
proletariat to prevent war; on the contrary, they saw it as desirable. War was
mother to the revolution. The result of a world war, in Engels' words, would
be 'general exhaustion and the creation of conditions for the final victory of
the working class'. (Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Works, Ch. 21, p. 351)
Marx and Engels did not live to see the world war, but a successor in their
cause was found for them in Lenin. From the earliest days of the First World
War, Lenin's party came out in favour of the government of their own
country being defeated, so that the 'imperialist war might be changed into a
civil war'.
Lenin calculated that left-wing parties in other countries would also come
out against the governments of their own countries and the imperialist world
war would be transmuted into a world civil war. This did not happen.
Without abandoning hopes for a world revolution, as early as autumn 1914
Lenin adopted a minimum programme. If world revolution were not to result
from world war, everything possible had to be done to make a revolution
happen in at least one country; it did not matter which one. 'When the
proletariat has conquered that country, it will stand against all the rest of the
world,' fomenting disorders and uprisings in other countries, 'or coming out
against them directly with armed force.' (About the Slogan of the 'United
States of Europe')
For Lenin, as for Marx, world revolution remained the guiding star, and he
did not lose sight of this goal. But according to the minimum programme,
the First World War would only facilitate a revolution in one country. How,
then, would the world revolution take place thereafter? Lenin gave a clear-
cut answer to this question in 1916: as a result of the second imperialist war.
(The Military Programme for the Proletarian Revolution)
Perhaps I am mistaken, but having read much of what Hitler wrote, I have
certainly found no indications that in 1916 Adolf Schickelgruber was
dreaming of the Second World War. But Lenin was. What is more, he was
laying down the need for such a war as the theoretical base for the building
of socialism throughout the world.
Events developed apace. The revolution in Russia occurred the following
year. Lenin hastened there from exile. In the maelstrom of confusion and a
total absence of authority, he and his party, small but militarily organized,
seized power in a coup d'etat. In March 1918, he concluded the Brest-
Litovsk peace agreement with Germany and its allies. At that time
Germany's position was already hopeless. Lenin of course understood this.
The peace he signed therefore freed his hands to strengthen, through civil
conflict, the communist dictatorship inside Russia, and gave Germany
considerable resources and reserves to continue the war in the West, which
was exhausting both Germany and the Western allies."
The present author agrees with Suvorov that Stalin wanted Hitler to start the
Second World War, so that Stalin could then unleash a world revolution and
take Eastern Europe for the Communists. But I go a step further and believe
that Hitler was a willing player in this game. Hitler intended to lose the war
and hand Eastern Europe to Stalin. Hitler was a Bolshevik mole, as was
proven in Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist, Volume I, Communism.
Edvard Benes was the President of Czechoslovakia from 1935 to 1948. His
statements provide us with additional proof that the Second World War was
staged for the purpose of allowing Stalin to seize Eastern Europe for the
Soviet Union. Edvard Benes knew in the mid-1930's that Hitler would
instigate the Second World War, lose it and give Eastern Europe to Stalin.
Benes was a freemason in the Ian Amos Komensky Lodge No. 1, in Prague.
The Second World War did not begin until 1 September 1939.
Stalin hoped to trigger a world-wide Communist revolution when World War
II had sufficiently weakened humanity to the point where such a revolution
could commence and succeed. Hitler dutifully provided Stalin with the
pretext he needed to take of all Eastern Europe by fighting back the Nazis.
Hitler had spread his forces across the region creating an unnecessarily vast
theater of war for Stalin's advances and conquests. Before the war even
started, Evard Benes hoped that Czechoslovakia would share a border with
the expanded Soviet Union, after Hitler provoked the war Benes knew Hitler
would start, then lose.
Igor Lukes and Erik Goldstein wrote in their book The Munich Crisis, 1938:
Prelude to World War II,
"Benes' notes reveal the very core of Soviet strategic thinking at the time.
When Benes expressed his amazement at the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact,
Maiski replied that war would definitely break out 'in two weeks' time'. 'My
overall impression', noted Benes, is that 'the Soviets want war, they prepared
for it conscientiously and they maintain that the war will take place--and that
they have reserved some freedom of action for themselves.' Benes added that
originally he considered this to be an exaggeration. But when he saw the text
of the Nazi-Soviet pact the next day he realized it was even worse than what
Maiski had outlined on 23 August 1939. He realized that Moscow had
slammed the door on any future negotiations with the West. The pact was,
Benes wrote and underlined, 'a rather rough tactic to drive Hitler into war'.
Benes wrote in his summary of the meeting: 'the Soviets are convinced that
the time has come for a final struggle between capitalism, fascism and
nazism and that there will be a world revolution which they will trigger at an
opportune moment when others are exhausted by war'.93 On the eve of
World War II, Benes had no reason to fabricate or misinterpret Maiski's
words. Moreover, his record of the meeting echoes the proclamations of the
VIIth congress of the Comintern of 1935, Litvinov's declaration to Heidrich
in May 1938 in Geneva, and Zhdnov's speech in Prague in August 1938.
Finally, there is an indication that the Kremlin deemed war desirable even
after it had started, in November 1939. A Soviet official told a CPC
delegation in Moscow that the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was justified
because 'if the USSR had concluded a treaty with the Western powers,
Germany would never have unleashed a war from which will develop world
revolution, the revolution we have been preparing for a long time. . . . A
surrounded Germany would never have entered into war.'94 This brief
outline of the long-term Soviet strategy is in harmony with all the other
evidence presented so far: Litvinov's statement to Heidrich in Geneva,
Zhdanov's speech in Prague, Maiski's conversation with Benes, and the
declaration quoted above are characterized by a remarkable degree of
internal consistency. That is what makes the message regarding the
revolutionary potential detected in the crisis of 1938-39 by Stalin credible."
(2)
This provides further proof that Hitler and Stalin were collaborating to start
the Second World War by agreeing to the Nazi-Soviet Pact, so as to
embolden the Germans to invade Poland. Then, after having instigated the
Second World War, Hitler would have an easier time convincing his
Generals to attack the Soviet Union, because there was no longer the
inhibiting risk that England would enter the war, because it already had.
This also demonstrates the thought process which caused the Soviets and
Nazis to put the Fascist Franco in power in Spain. They wanted to surround
France with "Fascists", not openly Communist nations, so that England and
France would fight the "Fascists" of Italy, Germany and possibly Spain, and
so consume Western Europe in a brothers' war leaving it easier pickings for
the Soviets--that is until the United States developed the atomic bomb. This
made it far easier for the Western Allies to declare war on Germany and
become allies of the Soviets and supply the Soviets, than would have been
the case if the Communists had won the Spanish Civil War. Had Soviet-
sponsored Communism succeeded in Spain, France and Britain might have
felt obliged to join forces with Hitler.
Ivan Pfaff wrote,
"However, it was precisely Beneš who, as early as February 1936, indirectly
invited the Soviets to Sovietize Central Europe by declaring to the Prague
Ambassador of the USSR that the Soviets 'must enter not only the Central
European but also the Balkan theater, but Central Europe only if their
interests in this part of Europe are evolving in a clear manner, . . . that they
should not rush into it and patiently wait for a clearer form of the practical
question of the organization of Central Europe'39. [***] [Beneš said,] 'Russia
will have its say in Central Europe. . . Geographical law. . . Hitler helps us to
become Russia's neighbor. After the future disasters, the goal must be that
Russia will be in Užhorod, Presov in Russia. . . The border with Russia as