ebook img

Additions to the Indo-Australian representatives of Acarnus Gray (Porifera: Demospangiae: Poecilosclerida), with description of a new species PDF

10 Pages·1991·2.6 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Additions to the Indo-Australian representatives of Acarnus Gray (Porifera: Demospangiae: Poecilosclerida), with description of a new species

ADDITIONS TO THE INDO-AUSTRALIAN REPRESENTATIVES OFACARNUS GRAY (PORIFERA: DEMOSPONGIAE: POECILOSCLERIDA), WITH DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES FREERK HIEMSTRA AND JOHN N.A. HOOPER Hiemstra, F. and Hooper, J.N.A. 1991 08 01: Additions to the Indo-Australian repre- sentatives ofAcarnusGray (Porifera:Demospongiae:Poecilosclerida),with description of a new species. Memoirs ofthe Queensland Museum 30(3): 431-442. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. The poorly known species4car/iw.vtenuisfrom southern Australian waters is redescribed and illustrated for the first time. A new species from Sumbawa in Indonesian waters is described,bringingthetotalnumberofspeciesknownforIndo-Australianwaterstoseven, and a key for Indo-Australian species isgiven. 14speciesofAcarnus arenow recognized worldwide, and a briefsynopsis ofthe genus is given. Phylogenetic relationships of the genus proposed by Hooper(1987) are re-evaluatedand five species-groupsare proposed. PoriferOy Demospongiae,Acarnus, /tewspecies,Australia, Indonesia. Freerk Hiemstra, Institute of Taxonomic Zoology (Zoological Museum), University of Amsterdam PO Box 4766 I009-AT Amsterdam, The Netherlands; John N.A. Hooper, Northern Territory Museum ofArts and Sciences, GPO Box 4646, Darwin, Northern Territory0801, Australia; 10February, 1990. BMNH Recent collections undertaken by theSnellius the remaining microscope slides IIexpedition in southern Indonesiadiscovered a (reported by Ayling el ai, 1982) became avail- thinly incrusting, previously undescribed able. In this paper A. tenuis is redescribed and speciesofAcarnus, bringingthe total numberof illustrated for the first time. Its phylogenetic species known for the genus to 14. Given the relationships with other members of the genus close proximity ofthe type locality (Sumbawa) were merelyspeculated upon by Hooper(1987), tthoitshneenworstpheccioeasstmaofyAaulsstorableiaa,paitrtisofpotshseitbrloepitchaalt but these are now re-evaluated. A key is also presented for identification of the seven Indo- Australian sponge fauna, since other species of Acarnus known to occur in Australian waters, Australian Acarnus species, and illustrations recorded by Hooper (1987), have also been comparing these species are presented. found in southern Indonesia (ZMA collections, METHODS van Soest, personal communication; van Soest H 1989). In addition, the Snellius collections in Amsterdam alsocontain specimensofA. souriei Methods of collection, preservation and (Levi, 1952) from Indonesian waters, which ex- preparation ofspecimens forexamination under tends its known distribution further eastwards light microscopy are described elsewhere from Palk Bay, India (Hooper, 1987, fig. 39). (Hooper,1986).Spiculemeasurements,basedon ThroughtheeffortsofMissShirleySlone,type 25 units, are presented as lower range-mean- material of the poorly known A. tenuis Dendy upper range of lengths x widths. Preparation of fromsouthernBAMusNtrHalianwaterswasmadeavail- material for scanning electron microscope ex- ablefromthe collections,andthespecies amination is described by Buizer and van Soest is re-described hereN. AMlVthough ‘syntypes’ ofthe (1977). The following abbreviations are used in aspceocmiepsrehheeldnsiinvteherevisionwoefrteheexgaemniunse(dHodoupreirn,g the text: BMNH, British Museum (Natural His- 1987), no trace ofthe specieswas found on any tory), London; MNHN, Museum National d’- of the incrusting sponge substrates. Acarnus Histoire Naturelle, Paris; NMV, Museum of tenuis was subsequently treated as aspecies in- Victoria, Melbourne; NTM, Northern Territory quirenda, and its characters, as described by Museum, Darwin; ZMA, Zoological Museum Dendy (1896), were declared circumspect until Amsterdam. 434 MEMOIRS OFTHE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM SYSTEMATICS of the Microcionidae (e.g. C. (Axociella) cylindrical C. (Clathria) inancliorata; Hooper, Order POECILOSCLERIDA Topsent in preparation). Family MYXILLIDAETopsent The familyplacemento(Acarnusis lesseasily Acarnus Gray, 1867 decided. Van Soest (1984) transferred the genus from its traditional placement with the Acarnus Gray, 1867:544 [type species and full Microcionidae to the Myxillidae, based on the synonymy given by Hooper, 1987]. possession of ectosomal diactinal spicules (tylotes), which are apomorphic for the family. Diagnosis Hooper (1987:72) summarizes the arguments Ectosomal spicules are tylotes; choanosomal presented by various authors in favour of each spicules are smooth styles, with or without system, and he chose to include the genus with microspined bases, echinatcd by cladotylotes the Myxillidae on the basis that the possession and sometimes by acanthostyles; microscleres ofectosomal tylotesprovidestheonlyconsistent lcayruerivnpecadll,umdawiitnteghiarscoeaccthueerglvoaeredyapwnohdiinttcoshxa(is‘s,otxthhhioecrklnaa'tntsderheauvpseeundal)ly.- ctttrhwwuaeoereafntcahtAmaetiCrl£it?aehrn/eszdrMe(5cHalaoernoeadpretmrdha,iefnfMiyenircepcrrnhoetacpir.iaa)otc.intoieHndroasbweees,thvewaeserrpeee,dnciitbatelhi--es ly the geometry of microscleres. For the Remarks purposesofthe present study the Microcionidae Species are easily recognizable as belonging are considered to be an outlying sister-group of to the order Poecilosclerida in having chelate Myxillidae such as Acarnus. This argument is microscleres,andasmembersofthegenusAcor- developed furtherbelow. nus by their possession of cladotylotes. The recurved apical spinesorclads ofthese spicules show some similarities with some Raspailiidae Acarnus tenuis Dendy, 1896 (e.g. Ectyoplasia, Endectyon) and tetractinal (Figs l,3a,b) spicules of the Tctraclinomorpha, but these are obviouslyanalogousstructures.Evidenceforthe Acarnus tenuis Dendy, 1896:50-51. Hooper, 1987: origin ofcladotylotes is conflicting. On the one 87-90, tables. hand (e.g.A.primigeniussp.nov.) the tetractinal modificationsto cladotylotes \nAcarnusappear to be highly derived forms ofnormal acanthos- MaterialExamined tyle stock. This is illustrated by the series of Lectotype: BMNH 1902.10.18.62(RN974)(micro- spicules described in Figure 2a. Thissituation is scope slide): vicinity of Port Phillip Heads, Mel- thought to be similarto the origin and modifica- bourne, Victoria, 38'’20’S, !44“42*E; date and depth tion of acanthoplagiotrienes (monact, diact, tri- of collection unknown, J.B.Wilson, dredge [NMV act,tetractandpentadforms)in theRaspailiidae G2456now consistsonly ofaspecimenofthe sponge genera Cyamon and Trikentrion (Hooper Plumohalichondria arenacea, upon which A. tenuis 1991b). Conversely, there is also a sequence incrusted, and from which the BMNH microscope demonstrated inA, tenuis(Fig. la,b) which sug- slidepreparationwasmade,butnotraceoftheincrust- gests that larger, smooth-shaft forms of ingsponge was found]. cladotylotes at least may be derived from ec- Paralectotype: BMNH 1902.10.18.375 (RN991) tosomal tylotes. In this regardA. tenuis is atypi- (microscope slide): same locality [NMV G2457 is a cal of other species, and for reasons discussed specimen of Tedania digitata, upon which A. tenuis furtherbelow, it may eventually be moved from incrusted.andfromwhichtheBMNHslidewasmade, Acarnus altogether. but the incrustingspecies is no longerpresent]. Anothercharacterwhichappearstobecharac- Paralectotype: BMNH 1902.10.18.323 (RN1072): teristic for the genusAcarnus is the possession same locality [this BMNH specimen was not ex- of thick toxas with greatly rounded central cur- amined, nor is there any material with Dendy’s RN vature and reflexed tips, resembling a pair of numberpresentintheNM\Lsupposedlyincrustingon “oxhorns” (e.g. Fig.2c), These sorts of spicules Clathriatypica. Aylingetal. (1982) reported thatthe are sharedby most, but notall species(absent in BMNH material consisted only ofamicroscopeslide A. tenuis and apparently absent in A. preparation, but this is unconfirmed, and it is still bicladotylotus), but they are not unique to the possible that the entire specimen is housed in the genus,alsooccurringinsomespeciesofClathria BMNH collection]. NEW SPECIES OFACARNUS 435 FIG. l.Acarnus tenuis. A,, cladotylotes, different growth stages and malformations. B,. ectosomal tylote. C,. choanosomalstyle. 436 MEMOIRS OFTHE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM Description we propose to keep this species in the genus The only extant material seen of this species Acarnus, if for nothing else than convenience, consists of two microscope slide mounts of and with affinities to the otherspecies indicated wholepieces. Nevertheless,theywereenough to by cladotylotes, but the species is readily dif- make the species recognizable, whereas Hooper ferentiated from other members ofthe genus. (1987) had to rely on Dendy’s (1896) brief and uninformative description. The specimens ap- pearas pale yellowish blobs, flattened under the Acarnus primigeniussp.nov. coverglass.Theycontainnovisiblespongin,and (Figs 2, 3d,e,f, 4c) as a consequence, their skeleton is very lax, composedofloosebundlescontainingamixture MaterialExamined oafndcltaydloottyelsotoefseoqruiaelntsaitzeed. pTahraellseklelteottohnemsuaryfabcee Holotype: ZMA Por.7693: Bay of Sangara (Teluk described as confusedly isotropic. The Sengari). Sumbawa, Indonesia. 8“I7'S, IIS^IS’E, m1e7g6a|sicmleXr2espmar)ewohfitchhreaerteypdeosm:itnyalnottesan(d96f-or14t2h-e t1e8nmHodvepet,h,Sn2e1llSiuesptnemebxpeerdi1t9i8o4n,,csoirna,l1r1e4ef/,V/c0ol5l.. H.A. most part lying in bundles consisting of 15-20 spicules, together with cladotylotes of similar size (80-122-152pm x 2pm), which seem to Description occur in all stages ranging from spicules resem- The single specimen occurs as a thin hairy blingtylotes up to clearcladotylotes, and in this crust on the surface ofaSeriatopora sp. (needle species at least they appear to be derived from coral). In life it was bright orange, and in spirit tylotes. Cladotylotesarcalso abundant,general- it has a grey-purplish colour. ly lying in mixed bundles, although not all with The skeleton is composed of a basal plate of the cladome in the same direction. Many spongin with erect plumose spongin fibres aris- cladotylotesaresituatedjustunderthesurfaceof ing in microcionid pattern, and fibres are cored the sponge, piercing through it. Styles are not with styles and echinaled by acanthostyles and frequent(152-184-205pm x 2pm).They do not cladotylotes. Cladotylotes are ofthe same size as occur in bundles, but are separately arranged in acanthostyles(54-62^-67pm x 5(.im atthe base), the skeleton. As noted by Dendy (1922), these and occur in all stages from true acanthostyles spicules are stylote, strongylote, or sometimes through all intermediatestagestotruecladotylotes subtylostylote, and in fact all these formscan be (Figs 2a, 3d,e). Apparently, the transformation found in the preparations. Moreover, they seem from acanthostyles to cladotylotes starts with an to be modifications ofone type, which is essen- increase in spine size at the tip of acanthostyles. tially a style. There are no microscleres. The nextstep appears to be a progressiveblunting Numerous apparently unorganized spherical ofthe pointed apex, resulting in a cladotylote. All cells were also observed dispersed throughout cladotylotes, however, remain tapering from the the choanosome. basetothetiplike regularacanthostyles,andthese are as such readily distinguishable from other Acarnus cladotylotes which have a definitely Distribution Known only from the type locality of Port (tyslwoetlel-iinigk)e obfastahle fporrems.entHoswpeecvieers,,ftrhoemtywlhoitechbatshee Phillip Heads, Victoria. clads sprout, remainsrelatively small. Styles are long (99-JL66-240pm x 4—25-6^m), Remarks somewhat curved, and towards the tip they are Except for the possession ofcladotylotes, this slightly recurved. They possess a distinct base, species would not have been assigned to the which is heavily spined (Fig. 4c). Juvenile styles genus Acarnus, as it differs considerably from seem tobe smooth andthin withaknob-like head. the other species in the genus. In fact Dendy Acanthostyles arc of a single size category only (1922) suggested that a new genus might be (60-66-68pm x 5pm at the base). The head is created forA. tenuis. Heconsidered that the key providedwithspinescurved in thedirectionofthe difference was the absence of chelate tip, whereas the spines on the shaft are curved in microscleres, but this is no longerconsidered of the opposite direction. They appear to have the sufficient importance at the generic level (e.g. same ftinction as the cladotylotes, since both are van Soest,1984). However, other differences echinating. The ectosomal spicules consist of mayvindicate hissuggestion. Forthe timebeing anisotylotes (137-i56-184pm x 2.5pm in size), P^^'»‘Senius. A, cladotylotes and acanthostyle, different growth stages. B, tylote and style. 438 MEMOIRS OFTHE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM FIG.3A-C.Acarnustenuis.A,cladotylotesprotrudingthrough theskinandthe loose formationofroundcells, notseen inotherspeciesofthegenus. B,spiculesofA. tenuisintermingledwith thoseofitssubstrateTedania\ C. bundlesofcladotylotesand lylotes. FIG. 3D-F,Aca/'/Jw.vprimigeniiis. D-E. different growth stagesofthe basal clads. F, microspined base ofthe lylote spicule. which appear smooth-based under the light DrSTRIBLTION microscope,butscanningelectronmiaoscopy(Fig. Known only from the type locality of Sum- 3f) reveals microspines common to all Acarnus bawa, southern Indonesia. species (with the exception ofA. tenuis). Microscleres palmate isochelae (14-17.5- Etymology 21.5pm toxas ofa single type, having charac- For the many piesiomorphic character states. ), teristic “oxhorn”-Iike shape common to the genus (14-3Q-46pm x 1.5-2-4pm in size) Remarks (Fig.2c). This new species is easily differentiated from NEW SPECIES OVACARNUS 439 FIG. 4. Comparison between spicules of Indo-Auslralian Acarnus species. A.B, cladotylote varieties with microspined shaft and basal clads (A,A. souriei), and smooth shaft and swollen base (B,A. lernatus). C—E, variation in microspination of the bases of styles, A. primigenius (C), A. tortilis (D,E). F,G. longer toxas, showing the centrally curved (F,A. innominatus) and the slightly V-shaped types (G,A. thielei). 440 MEMOIRS OFTHE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM otherAcarnus in havingonly small cladotylotes choanosomal styles. Acarnus primigenius dif- incombinationwith acanthostyles. top- fers from most species in having only small senti Dcndy, 1922 also has only small cladotylotes. The acanthostyles distinguish it cladotylotes but lacks acanthostyles. Skeletal fromA. lopsenti Dendy, 1922, together with the structure also differs, being plumose in A. possession ofa microcionid basal and dendroid primigeniusand isotropic/plumo-reticulate inA. choanosomal skeleton, an incrusting habit, topsetui (Hooper, 1987, fig.37). It is speculated larger tylotes, and heavy spines on the heads of that the plumose skeleton may represent an on- styles (Fig. 4c). In having acanthostyles as well togenetic growth stage, occurring in more ma- as cladotylotes echinating skeletal tracts, A. ture specimens, similarto the sequence found in primigenius shows similarities with a group of A. souriei Levi, 1952. species such as A. souriei (Levi, 1952). These specieswere previously referred toAcanthacar- KEY TO THE INDO-AUSTRALIAN nus Levi, 1952, but Hooper (1987) supported SPECIES 0¥ACARNUS their merger intoa singlegenuson the basis that acanthostyles are primitive, and as such could la. Nomicroscleres, spiculebundlesconsistof not be used to define a genus. tylotes andcladotylotesonly . .A. tenuis. Acarnus souriei and other members of the souriei-group (viz. A. bicladotylotus Hoshino, lb. Microsclerespresent 2. 1981,A. /fl£/ovwn(Boury-Esnault, 1973),andA. tener Tanka, 1963) differ from other species in 2a. Acanthostylespresent 3. having cladotylotes oftwo sizes, both ofwhich have spined shafts, a dendriticskeletal architec- 2b. No acanthostyles present, larger ture, in addition to the presence of echinating cladotylotesusually with basal tylote swell- acanthostyles. Within the soMnet-group, how- ing (Fig. 4b) 4. ever, thedifferences are lessclear. TheJapanese speciesA. tener has larger cladotylotes (>80fxm 3a. Only small cladotylotespresent(<100 p.m) long) (whereas those ofA. souriei are <80pm long A.primigenius. long). Similarly, A. bicladotylotus apparently has no large “oxhorn'^-shaped toxas, but it is 3b. Both small (<100pm)and large otherwise poorly differentiated from A. souriei. cladotylotespresent (>100pm),which have These differences require confirmation through a cladome attheirbase (Fig. 4a) A. souriei. re-examination ofthe original Japanese material (which unfortunately has now become virtually 4a. No small cladotylotes A. ternatus. unobtainable for loan, following the untimely death of our colleague Takaharu Hoshino in 4b. Both large and smallcladotylotes ... .5. 1988).Speculatively,however,itseemsunlikely that the two species are distinct, since they are 5a. With spinedcladotylotesonly . .A.tortilis. similar in most of their characteristics and they are only known to occur in restricted and ad- 5b. With both smooth and spined cladotylotes 6. jacent localitiesin Japan. Conversely,A. souriei specimensreportedfrom bothsidesoftheAtlan- 6a. Thickly incrustingsponge,with long toxas tic do seem to differ, and these may prove to be bearingpronounced centralcurvature (Fig. distinct species, in which case the species from 4f) A. innominatus. the American shelf should be referred to A. radovaniby priority. 6b. Elaboratevasiform orflabellategrowth The tortilis-group differs from the souriei- form,course texture, long toxas slightly v- group in lacking acanthostyles, and from the shaped (Fig. 4g) A. thielei. innominatus-group in having only spined varieties of cladotylotes and both smooth and DISCUSSION microspined bases on styles, which are also more-or-less straight. OtherthanA. tortilisTop- Acarnus tenuis Dendy, 1896 differs from all sent, 1892,otherspecies included in the tortilis- otherAcarnusspeciesinlackingmicroscleres,in groupareA. topsenti,A. roxearw.5Boury-Esnault, having a lax skeleton, apparently without spon- 1973, and A. polytylus Pulitzer-Finali, 1983. gin fibres, and in lacking basal spination on Acarnus topsenti is easily differentiated from NEW SPECIES OFACARNUS 441 Other species in this group in having only small Acanthostyles:thepossessionofacanthostyles cladotylotes,whereasothershavebothsmalland is considered tobe plesiomorphic, since there is largevarietiesofthesespicules.TheBrazilian^. atendencytoloseacanthostyles(alsothroughout toxeatus is distinguished in having its larger various groups of Poecilosclerida) and replace category of cladotylotes being very long and them with cladotylotes serving as echinating many-claded;theM^dii^rranc^nA.polytylushas spicules. polytylote examples of ectosomal and Styles: the presence of microspines on the choanosomal spicules,but these may be merely bases of the choanosomal styles is considered malformations of normal ones found in A. tor- here to be plesiomorphic; apomorphy is the oc- tilis, and the two species may prove to be con- currence of smooth styles together with specific. microspinedones,orcompletelyreplacingthem. The innominatus-gronp differs from other Tylotes: the possession of a dermal layer of groups in havinggenerally smooth shafts on the tylotes is the plesiomorphic state for the genus, largervariety ofcladotylotes, which also have a since thecharacterissharedbyall myxillids. No smooth basal tylote swelling. In addition, all apomorphic tendencies of this character were members(viz.A. erithacusdeLaubenfels, 1927, recorded for the genus. A. innominatusQx3.y, 1867,A. thieleihty\, 1958, Skeletal architecture: a reticulate or plumo- andA. ternatus Ridley, 1884) possess more-or- reticulate(dendroid)skeleton isconsideredtobe less abruptly curved styles which have smooth plesiomorphic,andaplumosearchitectureisone bases. Acarnus ternatus (which was not pre- ofseveral possible derived conditions. viously included with this group ofspecies, but Microscleres: toxas do not seem tobeofgreat was placed in a group with A. tenuis; Hooper importance in defining groups; in fact there 1987) has only a single, larger size of seems to be random distribution in the loss of cladotylotes,whereastheotherspecieshavetwo toxa categories (which was also found for the size categoriesofthese spicules;A. innominatus Microcionidae; Hooper, 1991a, and in prepara- hascentrallycurvedlongtoxas(Fig.4f)whereas tion),whereasthemostclosely relatedadvanced btooxtahsAs.litghhitellyeiv-asnhdaAp.eder(iFtihg.ac4ugs).hTavheetlhaetitrerltownog stopxeacsi.esThseeelmosstoofhaivseockheepltaealilspthrroebeabclatyeagodreireisveodf species differ mainly in shape: A. theilei has a feature ofthe genus. flabellate growth form, whereasA. erithacus is Based on this analysis of characters, the four more massive. species-groups proposed by Hooper (1987) are modified as follows: PHYLOGENETICREMARKS GROUP I: A. tenuis - group has derived its cladotylotes from dermal tylotes, and is sup- The genus Clathria of the Microcionidae and posed to have lost the other spined spicules and the genus Megaciella of the Myxillidae are microscleres. Acarnus tenuis is the only repre- chosen as outgroups of AcarnuSy representing sentative ofthis group. GROUP both more-distantly and more-closely related II: A. primigenius - group has a taxa, and criteria for judging the apomorphic dendriticskeletalarchitecture,onecategoryonly state ofcharacters arc listed below. This system oftoxas, and styleswith distinctly spinedbases: essentially follows the findings of van Soest Acarnusprimigenius is the only representative (1984) and Hooper (1987), but the conclusions ofthis group. of those authors are developed further in the GROUPIII;A. souriei-grouphasretainedthe followinganalysis. dendritic skeletal architecture, with echinating Cladotylotes: small acanthostyle*Iike spined acanthostyles, and styles mainly with cladotylotes are plesiomorphic. Since the microspined bases. This group includes A. cladotylotesofA. tenuisseem tohaveadifferent souriei, A. radovani, A. tener and A. origin, these are considered tobe an apomorphy bicladotylotus. GROUP for this taxon, and it is speculated that its IV;A. tortiiis-group hasan isotropic plesiomorphic state must have been the posses- skeleton, both microspined and smooth styles, sionofadermallayeroftylotesonly.InA. tenuis butithaslosttheacanthostyles. Representatives all stages from tylotes to cladotylotes can be are A. tortiiis, A. topsenti, A. polytylus and A. found, both ofwhich have smooth shafts, and it toxeatus. seems unlikely that spicules with spined shafts GROUP V:A. innominatus - group also has a have ever been present. derived isotropic skeleton but has lost the 442 MEMOIRS OFTHE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM microspined styles, whereas larger cladotylotes Beagle,Occ. Pap. N.T. Mus.ArtsSci.3(1):167- show a strong tendency towards a smooth shaft 189. and a smooth basal swelling. This group is rep- 1987. New records of Acanms Gray (Porifera; resented by A. innominatus, A. erithacus, A. Demospongiae:PoeciIosclerida)fromAustralia, thieleiandA. teniatus. with a synopsis of the genus. Mem. Qd Mus. 25:71-105. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1991a. Character stability, systematics and af- finities between Microcionidae (Poecilo- We are indebted to Dr Rob W.M. van Soest sclerida) and Axinellida (Porifera: Demo- (cuUsnsiivoenrss,itaynodfAfomrstcoenrtdianmua)llfyorphriosvaisdsiinsgtanmcaet,erdiiasl- WspooongdisaeH)o.leP,roUcS.A.3rSdmiIntth.soCno.nfConBtiroil.b.SZpooonlg.e(si,n fromallcornersoftheZMAcollection.Wearealso 199p1rebs.s).Revision of the Family Raspailiidae gratefultoMissShirleyM.Stone(British Museum (NaturalHistory))andProf.ClaudeLevi(Museum (Porifera: Demospongiae). with description of Australian species. Invert. Tax. (in press). tNoattiyopneamladt’eHriiasll,oiarnedNattouDrrelHl.e)A.fotrepnrHovoivdein(gUnaicvceers-s HOSHINO,T. 1981.Shallow-WaterDemospongesof sity ofAmsterdam)forcollecting the specimen of WesternJapan,1.,II.J.Sci.HiroshimaUniv.Ser. sthoemnuecwhsepaesciieers.,whichmade analysisofthegenus LAUBBE.,NDFiEvL.S1 (,ZoMol..W)..2D9(E11)9:2477.-2T0h5e,2R9e(d2)S:p2o0n7g-e2s89o.f MontereyPeninsula,California.Ann.Mag. Nat. Hist. (9). 19:258-266. LITERATURE CITED LEVI, C. 1952. Spongiaires de la cote du Senegal. Bull. Inst, fran^aisAfriquenoire. 14:34-59. AYLING,A.L.,STONE,S. AND SMITH,BJ. 1982. 1958, Resullats scienlifiques descampagnes de la Catalogue of types of sponge species from “Calypso”. Fascicule III. V. Campagne 1951- Southern Australia described by ArthurDendy. 1952 en Mer Rouge. 5. Spongiaires de Mer Rep. Nat. Mus. Vicl. 1:87-109. Rouge recueillisparla“Calypso”(1951-1952). BOURY-ESNAULT, N. 1973. Campagnedela“Cal- Ann. Inst. Ocean., Monaco. 34:3-46. ypso” au large des cotes Atlantiques de FAm- PULITZER-FINALI, G. 1983. A collection of erique du sud (1961-1962). 1. 29. Spongiaires. Mediterranean Demospongiae (Porifera) with, Ann. Inst. Ocean., Paris. 49(Suppl.):263-295. in appendix,alistofthe Demospongiaehitherto BUIZER, D.A.G. and SOEST, R.W.M. VAN 1977. recorded from the Mediterranean Sea. Ann. Mycale micracanthoxea nov. spec. (Porifera, Mus. Civ. Storia Natur. Genova. 84:445-621. Poecilosclerida) from the Netherlands. Nether- RIDLEY, S.O. 1884. Spongiida. In: 'Report on the landsJ. Sea Res. ll(3/4):297-304. ZoologicalCollectionsmadeinthe Indo-Pacific DENDY, A. 1896. Catalogue of Non-Calcareous Ocean during the Voyage of H.M.S. “Alert” Sponges collected by J. Bracebridge Wilson, 1881-2. British Museum (Natural History), Esq., M.A., in theneighbourhoodofPortPhillip London, 366-482,582-630. Heads. Part2. Proc. R. Soc. Viet. 2(8):14-51. SOEST, R.W.M. VAN 1984. Marine Sponges from 1922. Report on the Sigmatotelraxonida collected CurasaoandotherCaribbeanLocalities.PartIII. byH.M.S.“Sealark”intheIndianOcean.Trans. Poecilosclerida. Stud. Fauna Curasao other Linn. Soc. London, Zool. In: Reports of the Carib. Is. (199);1-167. Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian 1989.TheIndonesianspongefauna:astatusreport. Ocean in 1905, Volume 7. 18:1-164. NetherlandsJ. SeaRes. 23(2):225-232. GRAY,J.E. 1867. Noteson thearrangementofspon- TANITA, S. 1963. Report on the non-calcareous ges, with descriptionofsome new genera. Proc. sponges in the Museum of the Biological In- Zool. Soc. London 1867:492-558. stitute of the Tohoku University. Part 11. Sci. HOOPER, J.N.A. 1986. Revision of the marine Rep. Tohoku Univ., Ser. 4 (Biol.). 29(2):121- sponge genus Axos Gray (Demospongiae: 129. Axinellida) from northwest Australia. The

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.